Fev Up for Trade - Nominates Saints

[SainterK]

I have been thinking about it, and I still don't like the idea at all...

We were practically a kick away from a premiership, we have no need for an overpriced, misbehaved, coleman medallist.

Also, he kicks bags on a lesser opponent, but I see no evidence of him peforming against the better full backs in the comp....so how is he better come finals time?

Think of the pressure taken off Roo!

Silly as it sounds, Roo lives on pressure....eats it for breakfast....but that's another story.

Think of the pressure taken off Kosi.

I wasn't talking about Kosi, I was talking about Roo....anything to contribute to the conversation Shakey?

[Milton66]

I have been thinking about it, and I still don't like the idea at all...

We were practically a kick away from a premiership, we have no need for an overpriced, misbehaved, coleman medallist.

Also, he kicks bags on a lesser opponent, but I see no evidence of him peforming against the better full backs in the comp....so how is he better come finals time?

Correction: we WERE within a kick of winning a flag. Past does not = future.

also, on your logic, we should delist milne as he has the same track record as Fev.

Yes, Fev does not kick bags on good full backs because the only avenue they have.

Imagine having to match up on both him and Roo.

Surely, we must have a dud ruckman we couldl give them?

[Bernard Shakey]

I wasn't talking about Kosi, I was talking about Roo....anything to contribute to the conversation Shakey?

So, obviously Fev would make no difference to Kosi, he'd still be mediocre?

[PJ]

Surely, we must have a dud ruckman we couldl give them?

I think there's a couple in GT's shed - give him a call

[SainterK]

I wasn't talking about Kosi, I was talking about Roo....anything to contribute to the conversation Shakey?

So, obviously Fev would make no difference to Kosi, he'd still be mediocre?

I'm not biting

[SainterX]

One thing is for sure.

The cats would not have had 3 defenders on Roo all the time if Fev was at full forward. No team would be that dumb.

[Milton66]

I wasn't talking about Kosi, I was talking about Roo....anything to contribute to the conversation Shakey?

So, obviously Fev would make no difference to Kosi, he'd still be mediocre?

Only if he went to Carlton.

[Batnoe]

I was depressed about the game on the weekend, i am now looking forward to next year, espcecially if we can get someone like Fev, i am sick of people saying we cannot trade away draft picks because they are for the future, in my opinion our window is now and i want a flag and i will do anything and trade anyone to let us win one.

We were so close last week, it may take another year, it may take another 10 to get another chance, i do not want to be thereabouts for the next 10 years. Lets trade to win, and Fev will allow us

Do anything to get him

Maguire+ pick 16 for Fev

Blues could then on trade pick 16 to get a decent forward off someone else or to get Lake from the Dogs. Maguire may be able to be used in their forward line

[SainterK]

I have been thinking about it, and I still don't like the idea at all...

We were practically a kick away from a premiership, we have no need for an overpriced, misbehaved, coleman medallist.

Also, he kicks bags on a lesser opponent, but I see no evidence of him peforming against the better full backs in the comp....so how is he better come finals time?

Correction: we WERE within a kick of winning a flag. Past does not = future.

also, on your logic, we should delist milne as he has the same track record as Fev.

Yes, Fev does not kick bags on good full backs because the only avenue they have.

Imagine having to match up on both him and Roo.

Surely, we must have a dud ruckman we couldl give them?

Past can exceed future, and where have I said that I want to keep Milne?

[Milton66]

Surely, we must have a dud ruckman we couldl give them?

I think there's a couple in GT's shed - give him a call

oh Rixxxxxyyyy... where are you?

[Milton66]

I have been thinking about it, and I still don't like the idea at all...

We were practically a kick away from a premiership, we have no need for an overpriced, misbehaved, coleman medallist.

Also, he kicks bags on a lesser opponent, but I see no evidence of him peforming against the better full backs in the comp....so how is he better come finals time?

Correction: we WERE within a kick of winning a flag. Past does not = future.

also, on your logic, we should delist milne as he has the same track record as Fev.

Yes, Fev does not kick bags on good full backs because the only avenue they have.

Imagine having to match up on both him and Roo.

Surely, we must have a dud ruckman we couldl give them?

Past can exceed future, and where have I said that I want to keep Milne?

1- past cannot exceed future. Impossible. Future can equal past.

2- so you agree that Milne should go?

3- I thought you weren't biting? Woman's perogative??

[saint75]

Surely, we must have a dud ruckman we couldl give them?

I think there's a couple in GT's shed - give him a call

oh Rixxxxxyyyy... where are you?

What about Acland? Damn, we already gave him to them...

[SainterK]

I have been thinking about it, and I still don't like the idea at all...

We were practically a kick away from a premiership, we have no need for an overpriced, misbehaved, coleman medallist.

Also, he kicks bags on a lesser opponent, but I see no evidence of him peforming against the better full backs in the comp....so how is he better come finals time?

Correction: we WERE within a kick of winning a flag. Past does not = future.

also, on your logic, we should delist milne as he has the same track record as Fev.

Yes, Fev does not kick bags on good full backs because the only avenue they have.

Imagine having to match up on both him and Roo.

Surely, we must have a dud ruckman we couldl give them?

Past can exceed future, and where have I said that I want to keep Milne?

1- past cannot exceed future. Impossible. Future can equal past.

2- so you agree that Milne should go?

3- I thought you weren't biting? Woman's perogative??

Option 1 - OK, if that's how you word it

Option 2 - If we can find an alternative?

Option 3 - I tried, I really did....I just can't help it.

[Milton66]

I have been thinking about it, and I still don't like the idea at all...

We were practically a kick away from a premiership, we have no need for an overpriced, misbehaved, coleman medallist.

Also, he kicks bags on a lesser opponent, but I see no evidence of him peforming against the better full backs in the comp....so how is he better come finals time?

Correction: we WERE within a kick of winning a flag. Past does not = future.

also, on your logic, we should delist milne as he has the same track record as Fev.

Yes, Fev does not kick bags on good full backs because the only avenue they have.

Imagine having to match up on both him and Roo.

Surely, we must have a dud ruckman we couldl give them?

Past can exceed future, and where have I said that I want to keep Milne?

1- past cannot exceed future. Impossible. Future can equal past.

2- so you agree that Milne should go?

3- I thought you weren't biting? Woman's perogative??

Option 1 - OK, if that's how you word it

Option 2 - If we can find an alternative?

Option 3 - I tried, I really did....I just can't help it.

**SNAP**

[SainterK]

THE Brendan Fevola camp expects at least four clubs to consider offering the controversial full-forward a new home.

Having initially been disappointed by Carlton's public announcement that the Coleman medallist would definitely be up for trade, Fevola's management have been telling football people that St Kilda, Brisbane Lions, Sydney and Collingwood were prospective bidders.

http://www.heraldsun.com.au/sport/afl/b ... 5781318814

[saintjake]

THE Brendan Fevola camp expects at least four clubs to consider offering the controversial full-forward a new home.

Having initially been disappointed by Carlton's public announcement that the Coleman medallist would definitely be up for trade, Fevola's management have been telling football people that St Kilda, Brisbane Lions, Sydney and Collingwood were prospective bidders.

http://www.heraldsun.com.au/sport/afl/b ... 5781318814

imagine Brisbane's foward line:|
wow.

[SainterK]

And this

The possibility of the Saints dealing with Carlton on Fevola would make for interesting negotiations.

Some football industry talk last night had it that St Kilda would offer Luke Ball and a draft pick for Fevola.

That would free room in St Kilda's salary cap, and give Carlton another in-and-under ball getter (it has already agreed in principle to recruit Brock McLean) to assist Judd.

Ball and Judd went at No. 2 and No. 3 in the 2001 national draft.

http://www.heraldsun.com.au/sport/afl/c ... 5781350070

[SENsei]

THE Brendan Fevola camp expects at least four clubs to consider offering the controversial full-forward a new home.

Having initially been disappointed by Carlton's public announcement that the Coleman medallist would definitely be up for trade, Fevola's management have been telling football people that St Kilda, Brisbane Lions, Sydney and Collingwood were prospective bidders.

http://www.heraldsun.com.au/sport/afl/b ... 5781318814

imagine Brisbane's foward line:|
wow.

Brisbane - swap Fevola for Bradshaw.

Collingwood - you'd think they'd having no player who would fit the bill for a swap. Carlton would want a key forward or back. Maybe they might take Chris Bryan back!!

Sydney - O'Keefe and maybe a younger player like Ed Barlow?

St Kilda - I reckon it would have to be Kosi & Goose. They'd would want Goddard but he won't be going anywhere.

[Milton66]

THE Brendan Fevola camp expects at least four clubs to consider offering the controversial full-forward a new home.

Having initially been disappointed by Carlton's public announcement that the Coleman medallist would definitely be up for trade, Fevola's management have been telling football people that St Kilda, Brisbane Lions, Sydney and Collingwood were prospective bidders.

http://www.heraldsun.com.au/sport/afl/b ... 5781318814

imagine Brisbane's foward line:|
wow.

Brisbane - swap Fevola for Bradshaw.

Collingwood - you'd think they'd having no player who would fit the bill for a swap. Carlton would want a key forward or back. Maybe they might take Chris Bryan back!!

Sydney - O'Keefe and maybe a younger player like Ed Barlow?

St Kilda - I reckon it would have to be Kosi & Goose. They'd would want Goddard but he won't be going anywhere.

Brisbane are looking at Lovett.

[SENsei]

Anyway, my tip is that Fevola will remain with Carlton.

Potentially an unworkable situation.

[saintjake]

Anyway, my tip is that Fevola will remain with Carlton.

Potential an unworkable situation.

very true,
if a deal did come, i can see him in sydney colours.

[Milton66]

Anyway, my tip is that Fevola will remain with Carlton.

Potential an unworkable situation.

very true,
if a deal did come, i can see him in sydney colours.

Roos saying not interested.

If CArlton want him out badly enough, and I reckon Judd will, then they'll cut a deal just to get rid of him. Including copping part of his contract.

[saint75]

Anyway, my tip is that Fevola will remain with Carlton.

Potential an unworkable situation.

very true,
if a deal did come, i can see him in sydney colours.

Roos saying not interested.

If CArlton want him out badly enough, and I reckon Judd will, then they'll cut a deal just to get rid of him. Including copping part of his contract.

Think they had enough headaches with their last full forward......

There is a VERY good chance he is going to be a Saint methinks, it is just what they will want in return......not prepared to give up Ball or Kosi. They can have Goose (sorry Goose!) and our first or second round pick.

[xander]

http://www.heraldsun.com.au/sport/afl/c ... 5781350070

Article suggests we may offer ball and a pick for him.

[saintjake]

Anyway, my tip is that Fevola will remain with Carlton.

Potential an unworkable situation.

very true,
if a deal did come, i can see him in sydney colours.

Roos saying not interested.

If CArlton want him out badly enough, and I reckon Judd will, then they'll cut a deal just to get rid of him. Including copping part of his contract.

Think they had enough headaches with their last full forward......

There is a VERY good chance he is going to be a Saint methinks, it is just what they will want in return......not prepared to give up Ball or Kosi. They can have Goose (sorry Goose!) and our first or second round pick.[/quote
i love goose, but that deal wont work, Fev is a star full foward goose has played 13 games in 3 years.
we would need to give a ball or kosi and a draft pick