Stanley V Nic Nat

This unofficial St Kilda Saints fan forum is for people of all ages to chat Saints Footy and all posts must be respectful.

Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators

Post Reply
User avatar
#1GILL
SS Hall of Fame
Posts: 2310
Joined: Sun 28 Sep 2008 1:15pm
Location: Berwick

Stanley V Nic Nat

Post: # 836105Post #1GILL »

Have been having a debate since the GF sprint about which of these giants is fastest.

By my timing(Fairly unreliable) Rhys ran sub 11 seconds on the weekend.
Does anybody know how fast Nick runs 100m? I looked at the stats from last years draft camp, and they only had 20m sprint times and Repeat spinrts.


undecided
Club Player
Posts: 504
Joined: Wed 08 Oct 2008 7:50pm
Contact:

Post: # 836144Post undecided »

Stanley beat him in the heats and nic nat didn't make the final


User avatar
snoopygirl
SS Life Member
Posts: 3589
Joined: Tue 18 May 2004 11:56am
Location: Cranbourne East

Post: # 836146Post snoopygirl »

To be fair to nic nat, he did do his hammy in the heats.


Image
User avatar
mick13
Club Player
Posts: 1672
Joined: Sun 25 Nov 2007 5:51pm

Post: # 836148Post mick13 »

In the big scheme of things, 100 metres doesnt matter much. How often is a ruckman gonna run 100 metres?

20m sprint times are more important.

Of course, if he's just as fast over 20 metres, it's even better.

*imagines Stanley tapping ball to self on half back flank before running 60 metres taking 4 bounces and hitting Roo on the tit 20 out in front*

Oh shi-, brb.


undecided
Club Player
Posts: 504
Joined: Wed 08 Oct 2008 7:50pm
Contact:

Post: # 836149Post undecided »

snoopygirl wrote:To be fair to nic nat, he did do his hammy in the heats.
did he? I was wondering how he ran second and still didn't make the final. But still, Rhys had him covered easily. He seems to have a much better running style


undecided
Club Player
Posts: 504
Joined: Wed 08 Oct 2008 7:50pm
Contact:

Post: # 836150Post undecided »

mick13 wrote:In the big scheme of things, 100 metres doesnt matter much. How often is a ruckman gonna run 100 metres?

20m sprint times are more important.

Of course, if he's just as fast over 20 metres, it's even better.

*imagines Stanley tapping ball to self on half back flank before running 60 metres taking 4 bounces and hitting Roo on the tit 20 out in front*

Oh shi-, brb.
i think he could do that, as long as he can bounce the ball properly


User avatar
mick13
Club Player
Posts: 1672
Joined: Sun 25 Nov 2007 5:51pm

Post: # 836152Post mick13 »

undecided wrote:
mick13 wrote:In the big scheme of things, 100 metres doesnt matter much. How often is a ruckman gonna run 100 metres?

20m sprint times are more important.

Of course, if he's just as fast over 20 metres, it's even better.

*imagines Stanley tapping ball to self on half back flank before running 60 metres taking 4 bounces and hitting Roo on the tit 20 out in front*

Oh shi-, brb.
i think he could do that, as long as he can bounce the ball properly
True, by the time the ball comes back to where he bounced it from he'd be 20 metres ahead of it...

This is gonna be a problem me thinks. *thinking emoticon*


Post Reply