Another GT "Gem"... I agree 100%!

The Fireman · Mon 21 Sep 2009 12:03pm

Hey Gaz....the silverfish will attack soon if you don't get your butt into gear...

SENsei · Post: # 827038Post **SENsei** » Mon 21 Sep 2009 12:06pm

I do not like what you are advocating, Gaz, but on the other hand I very much like what you are advocating.....

markp · Post: # 827039Post **markp** » Mon 21 Sep 2009 12:07pm

gazrat wrote:ie ....post pictures of bare boobies for example ....and keep doing it until yr banned ....take one for the team u woosies

SENsei · Post: # 827050Post **SENsei** » Mon 21 Sep 2009 12:18pm

You want the truth?

YOU CAN'T HANDLE THE TRUTH!!!

Rossy is the King!!

Milton66 · Post: # 827073Post **Milton66** » Mon 21 Sep 2009 12:35pm

SENsaintsational wrote:Thread should stay active until after Saturday when all arguments about the merits of the former coach v the incumbent can be laid to rest.

And then on the 7th day, we shall rest.......

But surely the argument is settled, now that we won the Prelim?

Oh, yeah.. we were outcoached on Friday.

So is Eade qualified to comment on other coaches?

asiu · Post: # 827094Post **asiu** » Mon 21 Sep 2009 12:49pm

not quite what i was thinkn marko , but i can see and support how u got there ...very good

kenny and i are talking about a visit to tulla this week firery ....u about?

SENsei · Post: # 827108Post **SENsei** » Mon 21 Sep 2009 12:56pm

Milton66 wrote:
SENsaintsational wrote:Thread should stay active until after Saturday when all arguments about the merits of the former coach v the incumbent can be laid to rest.

And then on the 7th day, we shall rest.......
But surely the argument is settled, now that we won the Prelim?

Oh, yeah.. we were outcoached on Friday.

So is Eade qualified to comment on other coaches?

I think the matter is settled. You think the matter is settled. But I fear others are not so sure.

Good to leave the door open for good honest debate.

I'm actually surprised that Eade hasn't been taken to task for his 'non rating' of key forwards.

GT once said that a ruckman needs to do something around not be a lumbering bloke who goes for tap outs only. That got translated into "GT doesn't rate ruckman".

Eade says that he doesn't want a key tall forward for the sake of one. They have to be able to play. Eade "doesn't rate forwards".

I don't think that's too long a bow to draw is it?

.LIAR

st.byron · Post: # 827112Post **st.byron** » Mon 21 Sep 2009 12:58pm

40 pages here we come

The Fireman · Mon 21 Sep 2009 1:12pm

gazrat wrote:
not quite what i was thinkn marko , but i can see and support how u got there ...very good

kenny and i are talking about a visit to tulla this week firery ....u about?

will be at Linton st tomorrow hopefully or will be at home, have to work wed thurs..free fri.

meher baba · Post: # 827159Post **meher baba** » Mon 21 Sep 2009 1:27pm

While we are on the subject of man boobs (or were until recently), does anyone remember this bloke?

I can't recall exactly, but I think he got sacked from his job in the mid-2000s for not caring enough about hitouts to advantage, or something like that.

asiu · Post: # 827167Post **asiu** » Mon 21 Sep 2009 1:33pm

not with a tee shirt on i dont !

get with the program mr baba ...ffs

(firery , if yr going to training tomorrow , can u bring it ? (if u are driving).... we will meet you there )

SENsei · Post: # 827173Post **SENsei** » Mon 21 Sep 2009 1:36pm

Pretty sure Mr Latham was sacked for 'hits' to disadvantage after some heavy nights....

rodgerfox · Post: # 827182Post **rodgerfox** » Mon 21 Sep 2009 1:40pm

SENsaintsational wrote:
I think the matter is settled. You think the matter is settled. But I fear others are not so sure.

What's the 'matter' we're talking about?

Milton66 · Post: # 827276Post **Milton66** » Mon 21 Sep 2009 2:08pm

rodgerfox wrote:
SENsaintsational wrote:
I think the matter is settled. You think the matter is settled. But I fear others are not so sure.

What's the 'matter' we're talking about?

the change in gameplan.

meher baba · Post: # 827319Post **meher baba** » Mon 21 Sep 2009 2:27pm

gazrat wrote:not with a tee shirt on i dont !

get with the program mr baba ...ffs

I couldn't find one of him with the T-shirt off.

Which is probably just as well: I don't think the world is ready yet.

But if you want to see a former politician in the near buff, try these pics of former NSW opposition leader Peter Debenham.

SENsei · Post: # 827382Post **SENsei** » Mon 21 Sep 2009 3:06pm

rodgerfox wrote:
SENsaintsational wrote:
I think the matter is settled. You think the matter is settled. But I fear others are not so sure.

What's the 'matter' we're talking about?

Depends on the day of the week.

I think we should currently debate MB's unhealthy knowledge of our politicians and their 'clothing' habits.

matrix · Post: # 827390Post **matrix** » Mon 21 Sep 2009 3:10pm

dudes
what the hell is with the f****** half naked fellas

bloody hell

markp · Post: # 827408Post **markp** » Mon 21 Sep 2009 3:17pm

matrixcutter wrote:dudes
what the hell is with the f****** half naked fellas

bloody hell

This is the anti-JLH thread... the home of all things wrong.

matrix · Post: # 827411Post **matrix** » Mon 21 Sep 2009 3:18pm

markp wrote:
matrixcutter wrote:dudes
what the hell is with the f****** half naked fellas

bloody hell
This is the anti-JLH thread... the home of all things wrong.

friggin damn straight there
lol

asiu · Post: # 827424Post **asiu** » Mon 21 Sep 2009 3:27pm

the home of all things wrong.

mark started it

not that theres anything wrong with that

matrix · Post: # 827430Post **matrix** » Mon 21 Sep 2009 3:31pm

lol
theres something wrong with looking at Jack with no shirt on...i know that

markp · Post: # 827454Post **markp** » Mon 21 Sep 2009 3:48pm

asiu · Post: # 827502Post **asiu** » Mon 21 Sep 2009 4:07pm

i'm speechless

fair dinkum

{honor thy father and mother (american)}

matrix · Post: # 827504Post **matrix** » Mon 21 Sep 2009 4:08pm

hahahhahahha
friggin gold

joffaboy · Post: # 827508Post **joffaboy** » Mon 21 Sep 2009 4:10pm

markp wrote:

that is just awesome.

Oh

.LIAR