This is GOLD!!! - Hitler rants about the 2009 AA selections
Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators
- The Saintsational Man
- Club Player
- Posts: 1475
- Joined: Mon 09 Jul 2007 12:04pm
- saintsRrising
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 30094
- Joined: Mon 15 Mar 2004 11:07am
- Location: Melbourne
- Has thanked: 711 times
- Been thanked: 1234 times
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 18635
- Joined: Thu 11 Mar 2004 1:36am
- Has thanked: 1979 times
- Been thanked: 865 times
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 6090
- Joined: Fri 11 Mar 2005 9:18pm
#1GILL wrote:Am i the only one who thinks Lecras should NOT of made the side?
I cannot beleive the hype over this. I dont think Davis should of made it but the rest of the forwards were correct imo. Porps should of been the other inclusion
Like it has been said 58 goals for a small foward in a sh1t team, whilst Porps has an open AAMI 50 to work with. Great season by both, but it's a solo award and Le Cras was a beaken in a weak team, but Porps was just a star in a team of them.
Great vid by the way
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 1136
- Joined: Tue 02 Nov 2004 10:58am
- Location: in the outer
It does not matter which team they play in. Why do you think the majority of players were picked from good sides. Most of the players selected would not be as good without the solid team around them. Porps had a better season than Lecras imo so he should of been selected(imo).esaint66 wrote:#1GILL wrote:Am i the only one who thinks Lecras should NOT of made the side?
I cannot beleive the hype over this. I dont think Davis should of made it but the rest of the forwards were correct imo. Porps should of been the other inclusion
Like it has been said 58 goals for a small foward in a sh1t team, whilst Porps has an open AAMI 50 to work with. Great season by both, but it's a solo award and Le Cras was a beaken in a weak team, but Porps was just a star in a team of them.
Great vid by the way
Davis being selected is laughable though
#1GILL wrote:It does not matter which team they play in. Why do you think the majority of players were picked from good sides. Most of the players selected would not be as good without the solid team around them. Porps had a better season than Lecras imo so he should of been selected(imo).esaint66 wrote:#1GILL wrote:Am i the only one who thinks Lecras should NOT of made the side?
I cannot beleive the hype over this. I dont think Davis should of made it but the rest of the forwards were correct imo. Porps should of been the other inclusion
Like it has been said 58 goals for a small foward in a sh1t team, whilst Porps has an open AAMI 50 to work with. Great season by both, but it's a solo award and Le Cras was a beaken in a weak team, but Porps was just a star in a team of them.
Great vid by the way
Davis being selected is laughable though
your right it doesn't matter what team your selected from and Davis was a terrible selection, but the fact that Le Cras being a lead up forward for a team that's kicking accuracy into the 50 is as bad as West Coast and he still managed to kick 58 goals. He must be doing something right. Porplyzia is the same, but his delivery from the midfield is more direct and much much smoother. It comes down to the individual and if one small forward kicks 50 odd for the season from S**T delivery whilst the other kicks 50 something with decent delivery ... There isn't much between them, but one had a better season than the other.
Best. Rant. Ever.
It's always good to get some affirmation of my belief that nick Maxwell is specatacularly overrated. When collingwood made him captain I figured they'd just run out of talent. but when he was selected AA, I was sure I must be missing something.
It's always good to get some affirmation of my belief that nick Maxwell is specatacularly overrated. When collingwood made him captain I figured they'd just run out of talent. but when he was selected AA, I was sure I must be missing something.
Blindly delusional optimist. Fan of the Blake.
"If anyone disagrees with anything I say, I am quite prepared not only to retract it, but also to deny under oath that I ever said itâ€
"If anyone disagrees with anything I say, I am quite prepared not only to retract it, but also to deny under oath that I ever said itâ€
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 10598
- Joined: Tue 14 Jun 2005 7:04pm
- Location: North
- Has thanked: 1011 times
- Been thanked: 1055 times
- flyingwhale18
- Club Player
- Posts: 97
- Joined: Thu 09 Jul 2009 3:10am
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 23243
- Joined: Sat 13 Mar 2004 11:44pm
- Has thanked: 741 times
- Been thanked: 1798 times