saints interest in Brad fisher

This unofficial St Kilda Saints fan forum is for people of all ages to chat Saints Footy and all posts must be respectful.

Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators

User avatar
ace
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 10783
Joined: Sun 16 Dec 2007 3:28pm
Location: St Kilda
Has thanked: 31 times
Been thanked: 830 times

Re: saints interest in Brad fisher

Post: # 817693Post ace »

saintly wrote:from the australian.

sorry no link is up as yet. but in the aritcle it was disccussing a number of players who was wanting to be traded or to stay

and Brad fisher was interested in being traded with 2 clubs looking at him, one being the saints.


remember last year, where lots of players had links to the saints only nathan carroll tried out, and we didn't pick him.

the saints do need a third forward.

and oh, carlton says they that they are prepared to pay part of the cost. unless that bit was about Tuck from richmond wanting to leave.
No they can't have Matt Maguire.
Piss off scum.
Matt is a required player who will make a better 3rd forward next year.
This year was Matt's year back from serious injury.
Next year it wil be the year Matt helps us go back to back.


The more you know, the more you know you don't know.
When I was a young child, I knew that I knew so much about so much.
Now that I am old and know so much more, I know that I know so much about so little, and so little about so much.

If you are not engaging AI actively and aggressively, you are doing it wrong.
You are not going to lose your job to AI.
You are going lose your job to somebody who uses AI.
Your company is not going to go out of business because of AI.
Your company is going to go out of business because another company used AI.
- Jensen Huang, CEO of NVIDIA
SainterK
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 21057
Joined: Thu 14 Aug 2008 9:53pm
Location: Melb

Re: saints interest in Brad fisher

Post: # 817702Post SainterK »

ace wrote:
saintly wrote:from the australian.

sorry no link is up as yet. but in the aritcle it was disccussing a number of players who was wanting to be traded or to stay

and Brad fisher was interested in being traded with 2 clubs looking at him, one being the saints.


remember last year, where lots of players had links to the saints only nathan carroll tried out, and we didn't pick him.

the saints do need a third forward.

and oh, carlton says they that they are prepared to pay part of the cost. unless that bit was about Tuck from richmond wanting to leave.
No they can't have Matt Maguire.
Piss off scum.
Matt is a required player who will make a better 3rd forward next year.
This year was Matt's year back from serious injury.
Next year it wil be the year Matt helps us go back to back.
Agree with what Ace said...

This year is about recovering, and next year is about his return....love you Matt!


Stillwaiting
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 4432
Joined: Sun 25 May 2008 5:39pm

Post: # 817726Post Stillwaiting »

gazrat wrote:
I thought he was supposed to be ok, dont watch much of richmond, usually cos I fall asleep when they are on

hahahahaha

my old mans a lifelong tugger supporter....nowadays , if they win the toss , he stands up , sings the song , falls back down , then goes to sleep happy

when they lose the toss , he turns the telly off
:lol: :lol:


I love this club
reincarnated

Post: # 817816Post reincarnated »

Reincarnated asks the question that why does it take a year for Matt Maguire to come back and play third forward despite playing this year?

Reincarnated asks the question of Matt Maguire being told be specialists to get out there and build strength to his near deformed (toungue and cheek here) legs. Maybe maybe


User avatar
starsign
Club Player
Posts: 1854
Joined: Sat 12 Apr 2008 8:45am
Has thanked: 2 times
Been thanked: 24 times

Post: # 818310Post starsign »

just noticed this thread on Brad Fisher after posting in the general draft thread.......

We definitely need him to give us the trifecta of Fishers:

Fish, Chips and Vinegar!


Post Reply