Ball and Hayes

This unofficial St Kilda Saints fan forum is for people of all ages to chat Saints Footy and all posts must be respectful.

Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators

Post Reply
Batnoe

Ball and Hayes

Post: # 801202Post Batnoe »

We need both of these guys come finals

it showed today with how often we were beaten in the middle and contested posessions....

Armo earnt his spot today, 14 tackles, i would love to see how hard we can look with Ball, Armo, Joey and Hayes in the middle

Hayes is super important, but Ball's tackles and in and under style give us first use. He must come back next week


User avatar
LaUrEnCe
Club Player
Posts: 893
Joined: Sun 05 Jun 2005 9:56pm
Location: Melbourne

Post: # 801208Post LaUrEnCe »

Yes, come back please


User avatar
Beekay
SS Life Member
Posts: 3336
Joined: Mon 22 Nov 2004 1:35pm

Post: # 801216Post Beekay »

With Armo playing a solid game, who would make way ?


User avatar
The Fireman
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 13034
Joined: Mon 08 Mar 2004 11:54pm
Has thanked: 571 times
Been thanked: 1860 times

Post: # 801218Post The Fireman »

I was about to start a thread saying the same thing, we cannot clear the ball after a bounce without Ball and Hayes.
Simple as that.


Batnoe

Post: # 801221Post Batnoe »

Beekay wrote:With Armo playing a solid game, who would make way ?
Dawson, we're only playing Melbourne, keep the ball in the middle

But who would we take out? we lost, there are few players that could make way....

Baker didnt do much, Dawson, Gwilt should all be considered a chance to be dropped

I dont think Milne will be even though he didnt do much, as he was still running


User avatar
Ghost Like
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 6562
Joined: Wed 19 Sep 2007 10:04pm
Has thanked: 5788 times
Been thanked: 1909 times

Post: # 801264Post Ghost Like »

We will not win a final without Hayes & Ball in the middle.

They offer too much, clearances, tackles, leadership, heart, pressure...something sadly lacking in today's match.

BJ is not a midfielder, can be used there sparingly to provide relief or break a tag but he's better off as our 'quarterback' off half back or playing as the 3rd forward with licence to head up on the wings and set up across half back when the run of play is with the opposition.

Zac may have given his spot back to Max (if fit)

Gwilt does not offer enough IMO to own a spot in our 22

Geary would be eyeing a spot & IMO Bakes would not be a touch nervous on today's performance

Armo tackled well but the things Ball has supposedly been dropped for were not evident in Armo's game

Jack Steven should be given another game as with his pace, he takes some pressure off Joey and adds an unknown quantity

King, last quarter aside, would be disappointed in his game and Ben McEvoy could have offered more

Very disappointing today but it confirms to me that Hayes and Ball are our keys...besides Roo of course


User avatar
ThePunter
Club Player
Posts: 742
Joined: Mon 16 Jun 2008 12:43pm
Location: Level 2 Half Forward Flank Lockett End
Contact:

Post: # 801416Post ThePunter »

The last time St Kilda played without both Luke Ball and Lenny Hayes befor today?

Round 13, 2002.


User avatar
SaintWodonga
Club Player
Posts: 1868
Joined: Wed 04 Jul 2007 12:01am
Location: Wodonga
Contact:

Post: # 801436Post SaintWodonga »

Bring them both straight in. And Geary.


Tony Lockett kicks 10 goals

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4v4ZQJHjlvM
devil saint
Club Player
Posts: 310
Joined: Thu 06 Apr 2006 6:38pm
Has thanked: 1 time
Been thanked: 7 times

Post: # 801554Post devil saint »

More than anything we missed their big hearts today. And Max's. Besides Rooey and the three that didn't play and maybe BJ we don't have much ticker.


User avatar
borderbarry
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 6676
Joined: Mon 19 Apr 2004 11:22pm
Location: Wodonga

Post: # 801589Post borderbarry »

The folly of dropping Max is now apparent. Fancy keeping Dawson at Max's expense. Dawson looked like a big kid out there today, with no idea.


User avatar
BaysideSaint
Club Player
Posts: 520
Joined: Thu 20 Aug 2009 7:06pm

Post: # 801594Post BaysideSaint »

Lenny Hayes belonged in the race today, and was when I arrived which made me happy.


User avatar
Dan Warna
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 12846
Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 12:56am
Location: melbourne

Post: # 801872Post Dan Warna »

lenny hayes was missing from the 2006 finals campaign i think.

that was pretty ugly for us after an ordinary melbourne batted us out.


Bewaire krime, da krimson bolt is comeing to yure nayborhood to smach krime

SHUT UP KRIME!
Thinline
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 6043
Joined: Mon 21 May 2007 5:31pm
Location: Currumbin, Quoinslairnd

Post: # 801883Post Thinline »

Batnoe wrote:
Beekay wrote:With Armo playing a solid game, who would make way ?
Dawson, we're only playing Melbourne, keep the ball in the middle

But who would we take out? we lost, there are few players that could make way....

Baker didnt do much, Dawson, Gwilt should all be considered a chance to be dropped

I dont think Milne will be even though he didnt do much, as he was still running
To be honest I'm not sure what aker's role is at the moment. I'd be inclined to replace him with a runner


"The inches we need are everywhere around us. They're in every break in the game. Every minute, every second. On this team we fight for that inch. On this team we tear ourselves and everyone around us to pieces for that inch. We claw with our fingernails for that inch. Because we know when we add up all those inches that's gonna make the f***in' difference between winning and losing! Between living and dying!'
User avatar
philip
Club Player
Posts: 471
Joined: Mon 22 Mar 2004 12:27pm
Location: st kilda (where else!)

Post: # 801896Post philip »

borderbarry wrote:The folly of dropping Max is now apparent. Fancy keeping Dawson at Max's expense. Dawson looked like a big kid out there today, with no idea.
you are closer than you realise in understanding why max was dropped.

not is all as it seems. more was being tried today than people on the forum either understand or are understanding in their analysis.

philip


Just looking forward to us having a real crack each week, and appreciating the younger talent coming through.
Shaggy
Club Player
Posts: 1404
Joined: Fri 26 May 2006 4:29pm
Has thanked: 31 times
Been thanked: 132 times

Post: # 801899Post Shaggy »

borderbarry wrote:The folly of dropping Max is now apparent. Fancy keeping Dawson at Max's expense. Dawson looked like a big kid out there today, with no idea.
This year Lloyd, Richardson, Fev and Buddy have all put Max in the top two backs they have played on. Thats a serious compliment even if the experts :D have never made him AA :shock: .

Zac has been average with Geelong, Essendon and now North. He may well be getting tired because of his frame and maturity. Geary really fell away end of last year. It happens.

Zac has been great for us most of the year. He will be our next Max but I don't think he is there yet.


Legendary
Club Player
Posts: 1900
Joined: Mon 04 Aug 2008 11:35am
Has thanked: 1 time
Been thanked: 56 times

Post: # 801900Post Legendary »

philip wrote:
borderbarry wrote:The folly of dropping Max is now apparent. Fancy keeping Dawson at Max's expense. Dawson looked like a big kid out there today, with no idea.
you are closer than you realise in understanding why max was dropped.

not is all as it seems. more was being tried today than people on the forum either understand or are understanding in their analysis.

philip
Sounds a bit mysterious mate, you have some inside knowledge?

I certainly think that over the last 2 weeks, Dawson has been positioned in the maximum pressure positions, and he hasn't performed his best. Is he being tested a bit more by the coaching staff who only want 1 of him or Max in the side come finals?


User avatar
Mr Magic
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 12726
Joined: Fri 04 May 2007 9:38am
Has thanked: 746 times
Been thanked: 404 times

Post: # 801906Post Mr Magic »

Legendary wrote:
philip wrote:
borderbarry wrote:The folly of dropping Max is now apparent. Fancy keeping Dawson at Max's expense. Dawson looked like a big kid out there today, with no idea.
you are closer than you realise in understanding why max was dropped.

not is all as it seems. more was being tried today than people on the forum either understand or are understanding in their analysis.

philip
Sounds a bit mysterious mate, you have some inside knowledge?

I certainly think that over the last 2 weeks, Dawson has been positioned in the maximum pressure positions, and he hasn't performed his best. Is he being tested a bit more by the coaching staff who only want 1 of him or Max in the side come finals?
That seems plausable.

ALso just think about the following.

Our 2 best 'inside mids all season have been Hayes and Ball. Normally they don't play together on teh fiedl but in rotation.
The selectors would have known that Hayes was going to miss when they selected the team on Thursday.

Why would they not keep Ball in the team knowing that Hayes was going to miss?
Maybe, just maybe, they were 'auditioning' others in that role today?


User avatar
philip
Club Player
Posts: 471
Joined: Mon 22 Mar 2004 12:27pm
Location: st kilda (where else!)

Post: # 801910Post philip »

Legendary wrote:
philip wrote:
borderbarry wrote:The folly of dropping Max is now apparent. Fancy keeping Dawson at Max's expense. Dawson looked like a big kid out there today, with no idea.
you are closer than you realise in understanding why max was dropped.

not is all as it seems. more was being tried today than people on the forum either understand or are understanding in their analysis.

philip
Sounds a bit mysterious mate, you have some inside knowledge?

I certainly think that over the last 2 weeks, Dawson has been positioned in the maximum pressure positions, and he hasn't performed his best. Is he being tested a bit more by the coaching staff who only want 1 of him or Max in the side come finals?
if we were playing bingo, you would have just won, well done!

other than just that, people on the forum need to look back on the last two weeks and ask themselves, did the boys do things differently to normal, did they play a different style even if a nuance. has there been more one on one play as opposed to zone. have players been leaving their own man to cover or been told not to so better assessments of individuals can be made leading up to the finals, ala, Zac.

all teams try to do what we have been, but not all teams have the luxury of knowing their positions are stitched up. geelong is slightly different as their changes have been largely due to bad luck with injury.

philip


Just looking forward to us having a real crack each week, and appreciating the younger talent coming through.
User avatar
QuestionOfAccuracy
Club Player
Posts: 610
Joined: Wed 11 Jul 2007 3:00pm
Contact:

Post: # 801958Post QuestionOfAccuracy »

Definitely need both Bally and Lenny back for the finals.

On todays performance I think Gwilt, Zac, Armo and King will all be considered to be ommitted for next week.

Armo tried hard but I think his decision making and disposal are still off the mark.

Gwilt has had some good games this year but today was quite error-prone. Zac has had two shockers in a row as he has been exposed when having to play one-on-one.

King was beaten especially in the centre square hitouts and offers very little around the ground, although I think they will be reluctant to lose his experience come finals.


User avatar
matrix
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 21475
Joined: Mon 21 May 2007 1:55pm
Has thanked: 4 times
Been thanked: 4 times

Post: # 801968Post matrix »

dont agree with king
didnt have a disposal for a fair while there
but
the taps in the second half actually got us winning clearances.
armo read a couple of beauties over the back
as soon as king look like he was going to get the tap, armo just knew it was going over the back and read the play fantastic
he is a bit slow in other areas
but with a full strength midfield this guys tap work is needed


Teflon
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 23181
Joined: Sat 13 Mar 2004 11:44pm
Has thanked: 732 times
Been thanked: 1771 times

Post: # 802082Post Teflon »

philip wrote:
Legendary wrote:
philip wrote:
borderbarry wrote:The folly of dropping Max is now apparent. Fancy keeping Dawson at Max's expense. Dawson looked like a big kid out there today, with no idea.
you are closer than you realise in understanding why max was dropped.

not is all as it seems. more was being tried today than people on the forum either understand or are understanding in their analysis.

philip
Sounds a bit mysterious mate, you have some inside knowledge?

I certainly think that over the last 2 weeks, Dawson has been positioned in the maximum pressure positions, and he hasn't performed his best. Is he being tested a bit more by the coaching staff who only want 1 of him or Max in the side come finals?
if we were playing bingo, you would have just won, well done!

other than just that, people on the forum need to look back on the last two weeks and ask themselves, did the boys do things differently to normal, did they play a different style even if a nuance. has there been more one on one play as opposed to zone. have players been leaving their own man to cover or been told not to so better assessments of individuals can be made leading up to the finals, ala, Zac.

all teams try to do what we have been, but not all teams have the luxury of knowing their positions are stitched up. geelong is slightly different as their changes have been largely due to bad luck with injury.

philip
Phil you got that on any authority? or you got one of those fortune telling black 8 pool balls?


“Yeah….nah””
User avatar
philip
Club Player
Posts: 471
Joined: Mon 22 Mar 2004 12:27pm
Location: st kilda (where else!)

Post: # 802085Post philip »

i do actually happen to own a lucky 8 ball but rest assured this came from a better authority than that!

philip


Just looking forward to us having a real crack each week, and appreciating the younger talent coming through.
Thinline
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 6043
Joined: Mon 21 May 2007 5:31pm
Location: Currumbin, Quoinslairnd

Post: # 802121Post Thinline »

QuestionOfAccuracy wrote:Definitely need both Bally and Lenny back for the finals.

On todays performance I think Gwilt, Zac, Armo and King will all be considered to be ommitted for next week.

Armo tried hard but I think his decision making and disposal are still off the mark.

Gwilt has had some good games this year but today was quite error-prone. Zac has had two shockers in a row as he has been exposed when having to play one-on-one.

King was beaten especially in the centre square hitouts and offers very little around the ground, although I think they will be reluctant to lose his experience come finals.
Wrong. King's tap work in the second half was a clinic in cleanliness even though it didn't translate to contested ball winning at ground level. But his work rate away from the ruck was really bad.

Ergo...

When contested ball success doesn't seem to stem from ruck taps are we better off with a mobile round the ground trier in McEvoy?

I'm definitely warming to the idea.


"The inches we need are everywhere around us. They're in every break in the game. Every minute, every second. On this team we fight for that inch. On this team we tear ourselves and everyone around us to pieces for that inch. We claw with our fingernails for that inch. Because we know when we add up all those inches that's gonna make the f***in' difference between winning and losing! Between living and dying!'
User avatar
rodgerfox
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 9059
Joined: Wed 10 Mar 2004 9:10am
Has thanked: 425 times
Been thanked: 327 times

Post: # 802129Post rodgerfox »

ThePunter wrote:The last time St Kilda played without both Luke Ball and Lenny Hayes befor today?

Round 13, 2002.
We've played without Lenny, and with a crippled Luke Ball though.

Did Ok (missed top 4 by %) but never really a serious threat without them.

Far better than what we look like now without them however.

Where's the depth when you need it?


spert
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 9016
Joined: Wed 29 Jun 2005 10:39pm
Location: A distant beach
Has thanked: 1 time
Been thanked: 418 times

Post: # 802140Post spert »

We had Ball and Hayes together against Essendon, where our midfield got thrashed. NDS is another who needs to lift his game big-time.


Post Reply