Guess at this weeks ins and outs

This unofficial St Kilda Saints fan forum is for people of all ages to chat Saints Footy and all posts must be respectful.

Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators

Post Reply
plugger66
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 50626
Joined: Mon 26 Feb 2007 8:15pm
Location: oakleigh

Guess at this weeks ins and outs

Post: # 785025Post plugger66 »

Nil change


saintly
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 5412
Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 10:29am
Has thanked: 33 times
Been thanked: 47 times

Post: # 785030Post saintly »

no change


saint66au
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 17003
Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 9:03pm
Contact:

Post: # 785035Post saint66au »

Guess the amount of "OMG why isnt Goose playing" threads started after 6pm tomorrow

My guess...4

Oh..and either no change..or possibly Geary for Eddy, just to have another look at him before finals given that he played a ripper for Sandy last week from all reports

Noone less than 100% will be taken to Sydney...so Kosi and Gardy will be given another week.


Image

THE BUBBLE HAS BURST

2011 player sponsor
older saint
SS Life Member
Posts: 3381
Joined: Wed 12 Sep 2007 5:30pm
Has thanked: 172 times
Been thanked: 519 times

Post: # 785076Post older saint »

No Changes
Expect Lynch to be an emergency.
The unknown is whether Ball met the TRADEMARK and if so perhaps for Eddy?


maverick
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 5023
Joined: Sun 14 Mar 2004 10:42am
Location: Bayside
Has thanked: 9 times
Been thanked: 93 times

Post: # 785094Post maverick »

Out Eddy
In Goose

Not what I would do, but what I think will happen.


suss
Club Player
Posts: 1928
Joined: Sun 22 May 2005 11:42pm
Has thanked: 7 times
Been thanked: 90 times

Post: # 785099Post suss »

Surely Ball did enough to get a recall.

In: Ball
Out: Eddy


User avatar
matrix
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 21475
Joined: Mon 21 May 2007 1:55pm
Has thanked: 4 times
Been thanked: 4 times

Post: # 785101Post matrix »

no change
gards and kozi another week....whats the rush??
bally.....another run in the twos......whats the rush?


User avatar
Bernard Shakey
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 11240
Joined: Sun 18 Mar 2007 11:22pm
Location: Down By The River 1989, 2003, 2009 & 2013
Has thanked: 126 times
Been thanked: 137 times

Post: # 785111Post Bernard Shakey »

suss wrote:Surely Ball did enough to get a recall.

In: Ball
Out: Eddy
No he didn't.

No change.


Old enough to repaint, but young enough to sell
User avatar
meher baba
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 7223
Joined: Mon 14 Aug 2006 6:49am
Location: Tasmania
Has thanked: 1 time
Been thanked: 516 times

Post: # 785112Post meher baba »

Everyone is probably jumping to conclusions about Kosi and Gardi being unavailable. As always, RL was rather cryptic about this in his press conference.

At a guess, I would expect Kosi to play and not Gardi.

The SCG is a small ground which won't really suit Eddy that much: his direct opponent won't need to cover as much ground and therefore Eddy's stamina won't be as valuable.

And, if I were the selectors, I'd be thinking that we know everything there is to know about what Eddy can do, but could still get more out of the experiment of playing Gwilt as a third forward. Also, Gwilt seems to be a touch quicker than Eddy and his size might help in the congested forward line.

I don't/can't believe that Dempster is destined to play lots of games up forward: unlike Robert Walls and some on here I thought he was relatively useless in the forward line (other than kicking one goal from 4? attempts). But then I have always had a bit of a bias against the idea of utility players: I much prefer Blake as a permanent defender, and would love to see BJ given a defined role.

Anyway, on on the above logic I'd expect to see:

IN: Kosi
OUT: Eddy

with Dempster playing at the back of midfield and BJ pushing further forward.

If they decide they want to bring Ball back this week, he comes in for Gwilt and Dempster goes on playing as third forward.

But I interpret Lyon as having said that Ball needed another week or two in the VFL to work on his team play off the ball.


"It is useless to attempt to reason a man out of a thing he was never reasoned into."
- Jonathan Swift
d roit
Club Player
Posts: 140
Joined: Tue 27 May 2008 7:35pm
Location: Melbourne

Post: # 785123Post d roit »

I know he's not quite 100% with the stitching still in his hand, but i think kosi is crucial this week against the swans. Craig Bolton is possibly the only defender who knows how to play against reiwoldt, and on the smallest ground in the afl it will be harder for riewoldt to shake his opponent by constantly running around the ground to tire him.

With Kosi as another option up forward, we aren't so "reiwoldt-central" by having another tall option, who takes another defender away from what is probably going to be a constant double team situation. We only need Kosi to be there, take that defender, and try and bring the ball to ground in a contest so that milne, schneider, mcqualter or just our general frontal pressure can take hold and either kick a goal or force a turnover and maintain possession.

He's not 100%, but he's not 12% either. Stick a glove on him, don't play him on the ground for too long, and if the game is iced just take him off.

Maintaining our structure is crucial...


User avatar
Quixote
SS Life Member
Posts: 2793
Joined: Fri 05 Jan 2007 2:57pm
Location: Look for the windmills

Post: # 785129Post Quixote »

Yeah I think they might take Tommy or Goose as an emergency to Sydney.

Can't see any changes. Can't see Ball, MG or Koz coming back.

Only change possible I reckon would be Geary/Armitage in for a run/try-out, with Eddy missing.


Fortius Quo Fidelius Yo
User avatar
Spinner
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 8502
Joined: Sat 02 Dec 2006 3:40pm
Location: Victoria
Has thanked: 185 times
Been thanked: 133 times

Post: # 785131Post Spinner »

In: Koschitzke, Ball

Out: Dempster, Eddy


OneEyedSainter77
SS Life Member
Posts: 3792
Joined: Tue 02 Aug 2005 10:24pm

Post: # 785134Post OneEyedSainter77 »

I'm on the no change bandwagon.


User avatar
saintluke
Club Player
Posts: 410
Joined: Wed 31 May 2006 4:44pm
Location: Central Coast, Australia

Post: # 785135Post saintluke »

As I live in Sydney I would love to see Kosi and Gardiner back into the side. But realistically I feel 'No Change' will appear on the team sheet tonight.

And there is a good argument for not changing the team that beat the 3rd placed Dogs by close to 50 points.


User avatar
mightysainters
SS Hall of Fame
Posts: 1986
Joined: Tue 16 Mar 2004 2:21pm
Has thanked: 28 times
Been thanked: 52 times

Post: # 785136Post mightysainters »

No way dempster will be dropped spinner. He is in our best 22 I think no change unless kosi is played then gwilt out


User avatar
DWOODROW
Club Player
Posts: 1123
Joined: Tue 10 Feb 2009 4:36pm
Location: TOWNSVILLE
Has thanked: 8 times
Been thanked: 38 times

Post: # 785144Post DWOODROW »

In - Gardiner
Out- wait and see.


saintsrus
SS Hall of Fame
Posts: 2324
Joined: Sat 01 Oct 2005 5:10pm
Location: F.K.A. saintsforlife
Been thanked: 3 times

Post: # 785152Post saintsrus »

In: Koschitzke, Ball

Out: Guilt, Eddy


Even though Gards told us on sat hes playing this week


Before Im 85
plugger66
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 50626
Joined: Mon 26 Feb 2007 8:15pm
Location: oakleigh

Post: # 785153Post plugger66 »

DWOODROW wrote:In - Gardiner
Out- wait and see.
Wait plays for Carlton and is injured. See is where you swim.


User avatar
ace
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 10783
Joined: Sun 16 Dec 2007 3:28pm
Location: St Kilda
Has thanked: 31 times
Been thanked: 830 times

Post: # 785154Post ace »

In: Gardiner (if fit)
Out: McEvoy (if Gardiner fit)

In: Genuine Tall Marking option - 1 Koschitzke, 2 Maguire, 3 McEvoy, 4 Lynch
Out: R Clarke

In: 3 of the following Dempster, Gwilt, Ball, Eddy, R Clarke
Out: 2 of Dempster, Gwilt, Ball, Eddy, R Clarke
:? :? :? :? :? :? :? :? :? :?

Confused huh?

Gardiner if fit to come in place of McEvoy.

Someone must go out to allow another second tall marking option.
It simply did not work last week.
That tall marking option should be Koschitzke, but failing that my choices in order of priority would be Maguire, McEvoy retained, Lynch.

Luke Ball is a chance to come in but only 3 out of the following 5 can fit in the team - Dempster, Gwilt, Ball, Eddy, R Clarke - so 2 miss out.

Still confused, just wait for the selected team.


The more you know, the more you know you don't know.
When I was a young child, I knew that I knew so much about so much.
Now that I am old and know so much more, I know that I know so much about so little, and so little about so much.

If you are not engaging AI actively and aggressively, you are doing it wrong.
You are not going to lose your job to AI.
You are going lose your job to somebody who uses AI.
Your company is not going to go out of business because of AI.
Your company is going to go out of business because another company used AI.
- Jensen Huang, CEO of NVIDIA
User avatar
saintlee
Club Player
Posts: 1331
Joined: Mon 26 Mar 2007 12:57pm
Location: Melbourne

Post: # 785155Post saintlee »

plugger66 wrote:
DWOODROW wrote:In - Gardiner
Out- wait and see.
Wait plays for Carlton and is injured. See is where you swim.
I believe sea is where you swim, see is what your eye's do :wink:


TimPekin'sDirtyGuernsey
Club Player
Posts: 163
Joined: Wed 22 Jul 2009 12:48pm

Post: # 785166Post TimPekin'sDirtyGuernsey »

ace wrote:In: Gardiner (if fit)
Out: McEvoy (if Gardiner fit)

In: Genuine Tall Marking option - 1 Koschitzke, 2 Maguire, 3 McEvoy, 4 Lynch
Out: R Clarke

In: 3 of the following Dempster, Gwilt, Ball, Eddy, R Clarke
Out: 2 of Dempster, Gwilt, Ball, Eddy, R Clarke
:? :? :? :? :? :? :? :? :? :?

Confused huh?

Gardiner if fit to come in place of McEvoy.

Someone must go out to allow another second tall marking option.
It simply did not work last week.
That tall marking option should be Koschitzke, but failing that my choices in order of priority would be Maguire, McEvoy retained, Lynch.

Luke Ball is a chance to come in but only 3 out of the following 5 can fit in the team - Dempster, Gwilt, Ball, Eddy, R Clarke - so 2 miss out.

Still confused, just wait for the selected team.
Why didn't you just say you have no idea. Would have saved a lot of trouble.


User avatar
ace
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 10783
Joined: Sun 16 Dec 2007 3:28pm
Location: St Kilda
Has thanked: 31 times
Been thanked: 830 times

Post: # 785168Post ace »

saintlee wrote:
plugger66 wrote:
DWOODROW wrote:In - Gardiner
Out- wait and see.
Wait plays for Carlton and is injured. See is where you swim.
I believe sea is where you swim, see is what your eye's do :wink:
I thought Gardiner was someone who plants bushes and flowers not someone who kicks footballs. :wink: :wink: :wink:


The more you know, the more you know you don't know.
When I was a young child, I knew that I knew so much about so much.
Now that I am old and know so much more, I know that I know so much about so little, and so little about so much.

If you are not engaging AI actively and aggressively, you are doing it wrong.
You are not going to lose your job to AI.
You are going lose your job to somebody who uses AI.
Your company is not going to go out of business because of AI.
Your company is going to go out of business because another company used AI.
- Jensen Huang, CEO of NVIDIA
User avatar
ace
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 10783
Joined: Sun 16 Dec 2007 3:28pm
Location: St Kilda
Has thanked: 31 times
Been thanked: 830 times

Post: # 785170Post ace »

TimPekin'sDirtyGuernsey wrote:
ace wrote:In: Gardiner (if fit)
Out: McEvoy (if Gardiner fit)

In: Genuine Tall Marking option - 1 Koschitzke, 2 Maguire, 3 McEvoy, 4 Lynch
Out: R Clarke

In: 3 of the following Dempster, Gwilt, Ball, Eddy, R Clarke
Out: 2 of Dempster, Gwilt, Ball, Eddy, R Clarke
:? :? :? :? :? :? :? :? :? :?

Confused huh?

Gardiner if fit to come in place of McEvoy.

Someone must go out to allow another second tall marking option.
It simply did not work last week.
That tall marking option should be Koschitzke, but failing that my choices in order of priority would be Maguire, McEvoy retained, Lynch.

Luke Ball is a chance to come in but only 3 out of the following 5 can fit in the team - Dempster, Gwilt, Ball, Eddy, R Clarke - so 2 miss out.

Still confused, just wait for the selected team.
Why didn't you just say you have no idea. Would have saved a lot of trouble.
IN: Gardiner, Koschitzke, Ball
OUT: McEvoy, R Clarke, Eddy
Does that help. :?


The more you know, the more you know you don't know.
When I was a young child, I knew that I knew so much about so much.
Now that I am old and know so much more, I know that I know so much about so little, and so little about so much.

If you are not engaging AI actively and aggressively, you are doing it wrong.
You are not going to lose your job to AI.
You are going lose your job to somebody who uses AI.
Your company is not going to go out of business because of AI.
Your company is going to go out of business because another company used AI.
- Jensen Huang, CEO of NVIDIA
claystreet
Club Player
Posts: 1166
Joined: Mon 17 Sep 2007 1:52pm
Location: Outer Wing Moorabbin

Post: # 785174Post claystreet »

No change for mine

weekly longshot, Lynch for Gwilt

8-)


saintly
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 5412
Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 10:29am
Has thanked: 33 times
Been thanked: 47 times

Post: # 785176Post saintly »

TimPekin'sDirtyGuernsey wrote:
ace wrote:In: Gardiner (if fit)
Out: McEvoy (if Gardiner fit)

In: Genuine Tall Marking option - 1 Koschitzke, 2 Maguire, 3 McEvoy, 4 Lynch
Out: R Clarke

In: 3 of the following Dempster, Gwilt, Ball, Eddy, R Clarke
Out: 2 of Dempster, Gwilt, Ball, Eddy, R Clarke
:? :? :? :? :? :? :? :? :? :?

Confused huh?

Gardiner if fit to come in place of McEvoy.

Someone must go out to allow another second tall marking option.
It simply did not work last week.
That tall marking option should be Koschitzke, but failing that my choices in order of priority would be Maguire, McEvoy retained, Lynch.

Luke Ball is a chance to come in but only 3 out of the following 5 can fit in the team - Dempster, Gwilt, Ball, Eddy, R Clarke - so 2 miss out.

Still confused, just wait for the selected team.
Why didn't you just say you have no idea. Would have saved a lot of trouble.
:P :P


Post Reply