Our lowest is highest
Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators
- Enrico_Misso
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 11662
- Joined: Tue 13 Jun 2006 12:11am
- Location: Moorabbin Chapter of The Royal Society of Hagiographers
- Has thanked: 315 times
- Been thanked: 720 times
Our lowest is highest
Everyone raves about our miserly defence and quite rightly so.
But it is time to give our forwards some credit as well.
Our lowest score this year is 80 points.
To put that into context
1) Stk 80
2) Bulldogs 76 against us
3) Geel 65
4) Sydney 63 (65 against us)
5) Carlton 60
6) Ess 57
7) WCE 56
8) Adel 48 against us
9) Haw 45
10) Coll 40 against us
11) Port 36 against us
12) Rich 36 against us
13) Melb 34
14) Brisb 33
15) North 24
16) Freo 13 (28 against us)
That is a powerful measure of how consistent our forward line has been all season.
The fact that 5 of the other teams lowest scores were against us indicates how well the backline has been going.
In fact how consistent the whole team has been.
And our lowest score in 2009 of 80 points is not much below our average score from the last couple of years.
What a remarkable turnaround at both ends of the ground.
But it is time to give our forwards some credit as well.
Our lowest score this year is 80 points.
To put that into context
1) Stk 80
2) Bulldogs 76 against us
3) Geel 65
4) Sydney 63 (65 against us)
5) Carlton 60
6) Ess 57
7) WCE 56
8) Adel 48 against us
9) Haw 45
10) Coll 40 against us
11) Port 36 against us
12) Rich 36 against us
13) Melb 34
14) Brisb 33
15) North 24
16) Freo 13 (28 against us)
That is a powerful measure of how consistent our forward line has been all season.
The fact that 5 of the other teams lowest scores were against us indicates how well the backline has been going.
In fact how consistent the whole team has been.
And our lowest score in 2009 of 80 points is not much below our average score from the last couple of years.
What a remarkable turnaround at both ends of the ground.
Last edited by Enrico_Misso on Mon 20 Jul 2009 12:58am, edited 1 time in total.
The rest of Australia can wander mask-free, socialise, eat out, no curfews, no zoning, no police rings of steel, no illogical inconsistent rules.
They can even WATCH LIVE FOOTY!
They can even WATCH LIVE FOOTY!
How many of the other teams lowest scores have been against us?
Feature article: KFC's "Double Down" burger!
TV Ratings: Hey Hey It's Saturday ratings overview
Do you know what C# is? .NET? Then you need to know this: XSD
TV Ratings: Hey Hey It's Saturday ratings overview
Do you know what C# is? .NET? Then you need to know this: XSD
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 10598
- Joined: Tue 14 Jun 2005 7:04pm
- Location: North
- Has thanked: 1011 times
- Been thanked: 1055 times
-
- SS Life Member
- Posts: 3792
- Joined: Tue 02 Aug 2005 10:24pm
- saint_mite
- SS Hall of Fame
- Posts: 2237
- Joined: Tue 12 Jul 2005 9:10pm
- Location: MoorabbinMWL
Re: Our lowest is highest
and those are all the ones we set, or where close to. we kept freo to 28 points too... that 13 points still boggles me. the crows aren't that good... are they?.. ...Enrico_Misso wrote: 1) Stk 80
2) Bulldogs 76
4) Sydney 63 (+2pts)
8) Adel 48
10) Coll 40
11) Port 36
13) Rich 33 (+3pts)
- Enrico_Misso
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 11662
- Joined: Tue 13 Jun 2006 12:11am
- Location: Moorabbin Chapter of The Royal Society of Hagiographers
- Has thanked: 315 times
- Been thanked: 720 times
Four of those lowest scores were against us
Port = 36
WB = 76
Coll = 40
Adel = 48
Honourable mentions (not the lowest but certainly low) against us
Sydney (65) was lowest till this round
Freo was 28 against us
Rich 36 against us
Port = 36
WB = 76
Coll = 40
Adel = 48
Honourable mentions (not the lowest but certainly low) against us
Sydney (65) was lowest till this round
Freo was 28 against us
Rich 36 against us
The rest of Australia can wander mask-free, socialise, eat out, no curfews, no zoning, no police rings of steel, no illogical inconsistent rules.
They can even WATCH LIVE FOOTY!
They can even WATCH LIVE FOOTY!
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 10598
- Joined: Tue 14 Jun 2005 7:04pm
- Location: North
- Has thanked: 1011 times
- Been thanked: 1055 times
Richmond's 5.6.36 against us in Rd 13 is thier lowest of the year EnricoEnrico_Misso wrote:Four of those lowest scores were against us
Port = 36
WB = 76
Coll = 40
Adel = 48
Honourable mentions (not the lowest but certainly low) against us
Sydney (65) was lowest till this round
Freo was 28 against us
Rich 36 against us
According to the first post, Richmond scored 33 against one team?st.byron wrote:Richmond's 5.6.36 against us in Rd 13 is thier lowest of the year EnricoEnrico_Misso wrote:Four of those lowest scores were against us
Port = 36
WB = 76
Coll = 40
Adel = 48
Honourable mentions (not the lowest but certainly low) against us
Sydney (65) was lowest till this round
Freo was 28 against us
Rich 36 against us
Feature article: KFC's "Double Down" burger!
TV Ratings: Hey Hey It's Saturday ratings overview
Do you know what C# is? .NET? Then you need to know this: XSD
TV Ratings: Hey Hey It's Saturday ratings overview
Do you know what C# is? .NET? Then you need to know this: XSD
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 10598
- Joined: Tue 14 Jun 2005 7:04pm
- Location: North
- Has thanked: 1011 times
- Been thanked: 1055 times
Their lowest score after their 5.6.36 against us has been 8.15.63 against the Doggies in Round 3.battye wrote:
According to the first post, Richmond scored 33 against one team?
Richmond have been consistently in the 80 - 90 point range this year. They've scored between 80 and 99 points in 10 of thier 16 games. But they've only cracked the ton once. Surprising for a team that's only won four games.
Poor finishing skills, they're competitive but just can't seem to get over the line.st.byron wrote:Their lowest score after their 5.6.36 against us has been 8.15.63 against the Doggies in Round 3.battye wrote:
According to the first post, Richmond scored 33 against one team?
Richmond have been consistently in the 80 - 90 point range this year. They've scored between 80 and 99 points in 10 of thier 16 games. But they've only cracked the ton once. Surprising for a team that's only won four games.
- Enrico_Misso
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 11662
- Joined: Tue 13 Jun 2006 12:11am
- Location: Moorabbin Chapter of The Royal Society of Hagiographers
- Has thanked: 315 times
- Been thanked: 720 times
Thanks St.B.st.byron wrote:Richmond's 5.6.36 against us in Rd 13 is thier lowest of the year EnricoEnrico_Misso wrote:Four of those lowest scores were against us
Port = 36
WB = 76
Coll = 40
Adel = 48
Honourable mentions (not the lowest but certainly low) against us
Sydney (65) was lowest till this round
Freo was 28 against us
Rich 36 against us
I misread the score.
I have fixed the original post - also shows which scores were against us.
A pretty telling statistic.
The rest of Australia can wander mask-free, socialise, eat out, no curfews, no zoning, no police rings of steel, no illogical inconsistent rules.
They can even WATCH LIVE FOOTY!
They can even WATCH LIVE FOOTY!
- kosifantutti23
- SS Hall of Fame
- Posts: 2388
- Joined: Fri 26 Sep 2008 12:55am
- Location: Horgen
- InkerSaint
- SS Hall of Fame
- Posts: 2132
- Joined: Wed 07 Jan 2009 3:06pm
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 69
- Joined: Mon 25 May 2009 5:56pm
- Sainter_Dad
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 6325
- Joined: Thu 05 Jun 2008 1:04pm
- Has thanked: 263 times
- Been thanked: 1123 times
I know this is a bitof fun - but seriously - how do you think our forward structure would go against our backs - sorry to say it but I think our backs would win out. If you look at where most of the shots at goal are that our opposition have had - they are mostly around he 50mtr arc - and they have been lucky to convert from there - especially as accurately as some teams have. I dont know that Roo, Schneider and Milne would be as accurate.kosifantutti23 wrote:We're just lucky we haven't played us.
Thank God we have them wearing the tri-band of triumph!
“Youth ages, immaturity is outgrown, ignorance can be educated, and drunkenness sobered, but stupid lasts forever.”
― Aristophanes
If you have a Bee in your Bonnet - I can assist you with that - but it WILL involve some smacking upside the head!
― Aristophanes
If you have a Bee in your Bonnet - I can assist you with that - but it WILL involve some smacking upside the head!
Sainter_Dad wrote:I know this is a bitof fun - but seriously - how do you think our forward structure would go against our backs - sorry to say it but I think our backs would win out. If you look at where most of the shots at goal are that our opposition have had - they are mostly around he 50mtr arc - and they have been lucky to convert from there - especially as accurately as some teams have. I dont know that Roo, Schneider and Milne would be as accurate.kosifantutti23 wrote:We're just lucky we haven't played us.
Thank God we have them wearing the tri-band of triumph!
on roo.....???...no..he would towell them up....
.everybody still loves lenny....and we always will
"Freedom of expression is the cornerstone of a free society,"
However, freedom of expression is not encouraged in certain forums.
"Freedom of expression is the cornerstone of a free society,"
However, freedom of expression is not encouraged in certain forums.
- saint_mite
- SS Hall of Fame
- Posts: 2237
- Joined: Tue 12 Jul 2005 9:10pm
- Location: MoorabbinMWL