IMO some of the silly statements made here include:
- He is been rested. 'Resting' is the new black - A fashionable interpretation for everything. Next time someone is sacked from a job, I think we should now refer to the person being 'rested' instead.
- He is injured. Yep, the poor guy has a broken leg, broken arm, no groin and a mentally debilitating disease.
- He will be psychologically disturbed by this and will question his future at the club...
Of course, the most simple and straight forward answer seems to elude many here, as they look for all sorts of conspiracies to explain this event.
How about this instead:
- He is not performing to a level required by the coach, therefore he loses his position in the team, and will need to work on those areas and improve. Being the quality young man that he is, he will focus on what he needs to, improve and be back in the seniors soon enough, better than before.
The club had said as much, but, no, we can't believe what the club says, we know they are lying.
IMO, it is a good move. Just like when Dal and milne were dropped, the results speak for themselves, both players have lifted their games and improved on their weaknesses.
