![Laughing :lol:](./images/smilies/icon_lol.gif)
cats whinge about umpiring
Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators
- St. Luke
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 5268
- Joined: Wed 17 Mar 2004 12:34pm
- Location: Hiding at Telstra Dome!
....AND the first two goals Geelong scored were from soft free's IMO. We should have won by 18 points in the end. Surely that would have stopped them from whinging....you'd think ![Laughing :lol:](./images/smilies/icon_lol.gif)
![Laughing :lol:](./images/smilies/icon_lol.gif)
When they created LENNY HAYES (in the shadow of Harvs) they forgot to break the mold (again)- hence the Supremely Incredible Jack Steven!!
Why are we worried about what Scarlett thinks about the umpiring
Difference between Geelong and the Saints....
Geelong will continue to make excuses, and Thompson will calm his spoilt boys and tell them they were brave and fantastic. Ross will ensure we remain humble after the win, address our weaknesses and own our mistakes.
![Shocked :shock:](./images/smilies/icon_eek.gif)
Difference between Geelong and the Saints....
Geelong will continue to make excuses, and Thompson will calm his spoilt boys and tell them they were brave and fantastic. Ross will ensure we remain humble after the win, address our weaknesses and own our mistakes.
Thomson didn't make excuses. In fact refused to use Johnson as an excuse and said he wasn't interested in complaining about umpiring.
Scarlett is a low life with little character who was badly beaten by Kosi yesterday.
Scarlett is a low life with little character who was badly beaten by Kosi yesterday.
Lance or James??
There comes a point in every man's life when he has to say, "Enough is enough." For me, that time is now. I have been dealing with claims that I cheated and had an unfair advantage in <redacted>. Over the past three years, I have been subjected to a <redacted>investigation followed by <redacted> witch hunt. The toll this has taken on my family, and my work for <redacted>and on me leads me to where I am today – finished with this nonsense. (Oops just got a spontaneous errection <unredacted>)
There comes a point in every man's life when he has to say, "Enough is enough." For me, that time is now. I have been dealing with claims that I cheated and had an unfair advantage in <redacted>. Over the past three years, I have been subjected to a <redacted>investigation followed by <redacted> witch hunt. The toll this has taken on my family, and my work for <redacted>and on me leads me to where I am today – finished with this nonsense. (Oops just got a spontaneous errection <unredacted>)
- samoht
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 5817
- Joined: Sun 14 Mar 2004 10:45am
- Location: https://www.amazon.com.au/Fugitive-Sold ... B00EO1GCNK
- Has thanked: 598 times
- Been thanked: 447 times
- Contact:
Those stats say it all -Beno88 wrote:FREE KICKS INSIDE 50
GEELONG : 5
ST.KILDA : 0
50 METRE PENALTIES
GEELONG : 3
ST.KILDA : 0
SCORES FROM FREES OR 50 MTR PENALTIES
GEELONG : 7
ST.KILDA : 0
We looked like a 4-6 goal better team and we obviously were, but those
lop sided umpiring decisions and 50 metre penalties in crucial spots of the ground obviously cost us.
Lucky we were good enough to overcome Geelong's extra player - the thumpire.
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 684
- Joined: Sat 26 Jul 2008 9:44pm
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 10598
- Joined: Tue 14 Jun 2005 7:04pm
- Location: North
- Has thanked: 1011 times
- Been thanked: 1055 times
Pretty funny that a thread that's supposed to be about the Cats whinging about the umpiring turns into us whinging about the umpiring. And we won. Build a bridge and get over it.
IMO everyone could use a dose of Bomber Thompson's attitude.
"I'm not that interested," he said. "They probably missed a lot of free kicks and players don't have perfect games, coaches don't and neither do umpires. I don't think as a club we're that worried about complaining about the umpires."
IMO everyone could use a dose of Bomber Thompson's attitude.
"I'm not that interested," he said. "They probably missed a lot of free kicks and players don't have perfect games, coaches don't and neither do umpires. I don't think as a club we're that worried about complaining about the umpires."
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 18579
- Joined: Thu 11 Mar 2004 1:36am
- Has thanked: 1904 times
- Been thanked: 841 times
i reckon it's okay to whinge when you win. when you lose it comes across as sour grapes and reflects badly.st.byron wrote:Pretty funny that a thread that's supposed to be about the Cats whinging about the umpiring turns into us whinging about the umpiring. And we won. Build a bridge and get over it.
IMO everyone could use a dose of Bomber Thompson's attitude.
scarlett's big mouth has got him in trouble again
![Wink :wink:](./images/smilies/icon_wink.gif)
- AlpineStars
- Club Player
- Posts: 492
- Joined: Wed 05 Apr 2006 7:44pm
- Location: Aspendale
- Contact:
- barks4eva
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 10748
- Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 12:39pm
- Has thanked: 190 times
- Been thanked: 92 times
Something needs to be done about this, they just throw it out all the time, must have been at the very least 8 times where they distributed the ball with a blatant throw with the umpires in awful position as usual to view, what is nothing less than a rugby pass.fingers wrote:What was the "crow throw" ?Grimfang wrote:Remember in the 90's there was all the talk of the "Crow Throw"?
After watching Geelong continually get away with the same yesterday (Selwood especially); Mrs. Grimfang named it the "Pussy Pass" (in honour of the late Molly Sugden).
Geelong have been getting away with this for ages, I don't think any other team in the AFL do this, they continually throw the ball out as if playing rugby and nothing gets done about it.
It's a fair dinkum disgrace.
AND how the **** can you have a game as huge as that and have Vozzo and Chamberlain umpiring it to begin with.
If they are considered two of the best umpires going around then the umpiring department is truly ******!
Absolute cabbages!
DO THE MATHS AND THE SQUARES ARE ALL ROOTED.
Did anyone else see the in the back call against Scarlett on Kosi, Scarlett clearly punches Kosi in the kidneys. He shouldn't complain about the umpires he's lucky they didnt report him on the spot.AlpineStars wrote:The Ablett 50m was disgraceful and got Geelong going, they were headed for a goaless 1st Quarter and that decision changed the momentum of the game.
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 18579
- Joined: Thu 11 Mar 2004 1:36am
- Has thanked: 1904 times
- Been thanked: 841 times
- Saint 58
- Club Player
- Posts: 749
- Joined: Thu 02 Nov 2006 11:10am
- Location: Anywhere the Saints are playing in Melbourne
- Has thanked: 216 times
- Been thanked: 96 times
Hi Guys,
Haven't posted for ages but always have a read .....
Scarlett SHUT THE F*** UP ASSHOLE. You don't like getting beaten do you, you P****. Kosi ripped you a new one mate, that why you punched him in the side cos you were frustrated.
Man I hope we play you in the GF and kick your ass, then you will be "Geelong, the greatest underachievers of all"
Haven't posted for ages but always have a read .....
Scarlett SHUT THE F*** UP ASSHOLE. You don't like getting beaten do you, you P****. Kosi ripped you a new one mate, that why you punched him in the side cos you were frustrated.
Man I hope we play you in the GF and kick your ass, then you will be "Geelong, the greatest underachievers of all"
What you do for others will define your life.
[Football isn't everything ... it's the ONLY thing]
[Football isn't everything ... it's the ONLY thing]
- barks4eva
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 10748
- Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 12:39pm
- Has thanked: 190 times
- Been thanked: 92 times
Kossie was clearly held in a marking as contest, as obvious as it gets and no free kick was paid,Ice Wolf wrote:Did anyone else see the in the back call against Scarlett on Kosi, Scarlett clearly punches Kosi in the kidneys. He shouldn't complain about the umpires he's lucky they didnt report him on the spot.AlpineStars wrote:The Ablett 50m was disgraceful and got Geelong going, they were headed for a goaless 1st Quarter and that decision changed the momentum of the game.
if I remember correctly this incident that Scarlett is bringing up happened just after this,
Kossie should have received a free kick if the cabbages were doing their job properly and that other instance would not have even occurred.
DO THE MATHS AND THE SQUARES ARE ALL ROOTED.
-
- SS Life Member
- Posts: 3152
- Joined: Tue 02 Jun 2009 2:44am
- Location: Next to what's next to me.
- Has thanked: 71 times
- Been thanked: 35 times
Here here. I was directly behind Ablett and Jones and Ablett clearly took 2 or 3 quick steps to his left (off his line). If the ump was doing his job right he'd have called play on and they would quite likely have been down at least 5 zip at quarter time. Instead he paid 50 and got them going. They were getting "charity call" after "charity call" at that point, like they felt sorry for them and were trying to even it up. They were successful.AlpineStars wrote:The Ablett 50m was disgraceful and got Geelong going, they were headed for a goaless 1st Quarter and that decision changed the momentum of the game.
YOU GET WHAT YOU SETTLE FOR.
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 10598
- Joined: Tue 14 Jun 2005 7:04pm
- Location: North
- Has thanked: 1011 times
- Been thanked: 1055 times
yes Ablett did step off his line. But CJ put his hand on his arm first. Watch the replay. Tiggy touchwood? Yes. 50/50? Yes.AnythingsPossibleSaints wrote: Here here. I was directly behind Ablett and Jones and Ablett clearly took 2 or 3 quick steps to his left (off his line). If the ump was doing his job right he'd have called play on and they would quite likely have been down at least 5 zip at quarter time. Instead he paid 50 and got them going. They were getting "charity call" after "charity call" at that point, like they felt sorry for them and were trying to even it up. They were successful.
Resultant penalty way beyond the value of the infringement? Yes.
Was the infringement technically there? Yes.
FFS, you guys cherry pick specific decisions out as though they exist in isolation and we didn't get the benefit of some dodgy ones.
The play on to advantage for them in the last. Sam Fisher lucky not to be pinged for HTB inside the last two minutes inside their forward 50. Like Bomber Thompson said, they miss a few and give some that are 50/ 50. Most of you rabbiting on about the umpires just want something to complain about and are just as one eyed as the Cats fans this thread was supposed to be about.
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 10598
- Joined: Tue 14 Jun 2005 7:04pm
- Location: North
- Has thanked: 1011 times
- Been thanked: 1055 times
Shakes head. Sighs. Remembers to remind self that many forumites have had one eye removed.degruch wrote:No, it's just there were so many of them to choose from. Face it, we would have won by 6 goals if it weren't some fortunate umpiring.st.byron wrote:FFS, you guys cherry pick specific decisions out as though they exist in isolation...
Yup good points especially by Thompson. To pick out that one advantage call and complain about it is really absolutely stupid. Basically the Cats coach is calling Scarlett and idiot which I wholeheartedly agree withst.byron wrote:FFS, you guys cherry pick specific decisions out as though they exist in isolation and we didn't get the benefit of some dodgy ones.
The play on to advantage for them in the last. Sam Fisher lucky not to be pinged for HTB inside the last two minutes inside their forward 50. Like Bomber Thompson said, they miss a few and give some that are 50/ 50. Most of you rabbiting on about the umpires just want something to complain about and are just as one eyed as the Cats fans this thread was supposed to be about.
![Very Happy :D](./images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif)
![Very Happy :D](./images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif)
Lance or James??
There comes a point in every man's life when he has to say, "Enough is enough." For me, that time is now. I have been dealing with claims that I cheated and had an unfair advantage in <redacted>. Over the past three years, I have been subjected to a <redacted>investigation followed by <redacted> witch hunt. The toll this has taken on my family, and my work for <redacted>and on me leads me to where I am today – finished with this nonsense. (Oops just got a spontaneous errection <unredacted>)
There comes a point in every man's life when he has to say, "Enough is enough." For me, that time is now. I have been dealing with claims that I cheated and had an unfair advantage in <redacted>. Over the past three years, I have been subjected to a <redacted>investigation followed by <redacted> witch hunt. The toll this has taken on my family, and my work for <redacted>and on me leads me to where I am today – finished with this nonsense. (Oops just got a spontaneous errection <unredacted>)
- degruch
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 8948
- Joined: Mon 19 May 2008 4:29pm
- Location: Croydonia
- Has thanked: 146 times
- Been thanked: 237 times
Better than being totally blind.st.byron wrote:Shakes head. Sighs. Remembers to remind self that many forumites have had one eye removed.degruch wrote:No, it's just there were so many of them to choose from. Face it, we would have won by 6 goals if it weren't some fortunate umpiring.st.byron wrote:FFS, you guys cherry pick specific decisions out as though they exist in isolation...
![Laughing :lol:](./images/smilies/icon_lol.gif)
12 to 5 their way at half time...and we had the pill most of the time......quarter time i reckoned it was saints 5 goals maggots 2 goals......matrixcutter wrote:there was one in the first quarter where milney got a free for in the back
he was 60 out
ump calls play on (after the allotted time frame of milney looking for a pass)
and the cat player leiterally 2 or 3 meters behind him tackles him and its called holding the ball.....
now arent they usually telling players to get away??
u cant just sit there waiting and then pounce.....i thought it was a 'u have to be at least 5 meters away'.
bigred is right...i thought the umps killed us too
.everybody still loves lenny....and we always will
"Freedom of expression is the cornerstone of a free society,"
However, freedom of expression is not encouraged in certain forums.
"Freedom of expression is the cornerstone of a free society,"
However, freedom of expression is not encouraged in certain forums.
-
- SS Life Member
- Posts: 3152
- Joined: Tue 02 Jun 2009 2:44am
- Location: Next to what's next to me.
- Has thanked: 71 times
- Been thanked: 35 times
CJ didn't put his hand on his arm first, he did that AFTER Ablett stepped well off his line TO THE LEFT. I'm not talking about when he then ran off to the right. I've already seen the replay, but I didn't need to, because, as I said, I was directly in line with/behind them (with them between me and the goals) so I had a PERFECT view of it (as did those around us, who said the same thing). Much better than the camera angle on the TV, which didn't show it from a good angle. He took about 2-3 little steps to the left (off his line) and would have run off (left), had CJ not impeded him. It was a mistake (would have called play on- if he'd been paying attention) from the ump and got them on the board.st.byron wrote:yes Ablett did step off his line. But CJ put his hand on his arm first. Watch the replay. Tiggy touchwood? Yes. 50/50? Yes.AnythingsPossibleSaints wrote: Here here. I was directly behind Ablett and Jones and Ablett clearly took 2 or 3 quick steps to his left (off his line). If the ump was doing his job right he'd have called play on and they would quite likely have been down at least 5 zip at quarter time. Instead he paid 50 and got them going. They were getting "charity call" after "charity call" at that point, like they felt sorry for them and were trying to even it up. They were successful.
Resultant penalty way beyond the value of the infringement? Yes.
Was the infringement technically there? Yes.
FFS, you guys cherry pick specific decisions out as though they exist in isolation and we didn't get the benefit of some dodgy ones.
The play on to advantage for them in the last. Sam Fisher lucky not to be pinged for HTB inside the last two minutes inside their forward 50. Like Bomber Thompson said, they miss a few and give some that are 50/ 50. Most of you rabbiting on about the umpires just want something to complain about and are just as one eyed as the Cats fans this thread was supposed to be about.
And you can support a team without being "one eyed". The "advantage" call in the last two mins looked to be a SHOCKER and I'm sure they missed some more of Geelong's free's, but they got a much better go of it than us, as evidenced by the FACTS. Frees: 23 to 15, 50m penalties: 3 to NONE, goals from frees: 2 to NONE, etc.
The only reason so many are making mention of this, is that so many in the media and on forums are saying Geelong were "robbed" and other complete bulls*** like that. So we feel the need to "right a wrong", if that's OK with you.
YOU GET WHAT YOU SETTLE FOR.
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 10598
- Joined: Tue 14 Jun 2005 7:04pm
- Location: North
- Has thanked: 1011 times
- Been thanked: 1055 times
AnythingsPossibleSaints wrote:[
CJ didn't put his hand on his arm first, he did that AFTER Ablett stepped well off his line TO THE LEFT. I'm not talking about when he then ran off to the right. I've already seen the replay, but I didn't need to, because, as I said, I was directly in line with/behind them (with them between me and the goals) so I had a PERFECT view of it (as did those around us, who said the same thing). Much better than the camera angle on the TV, which didn't show it from a good angle. He took about 2-3 little steps to the left (off his line) and would have run off (left), had CJ not impeded him. It was a mistake (would have called play on- if he'd been paying attention) from the ump and got them on the board.
And you can support a team without being "one eyed". The "advantage" call in the last two mins looked to be a SHOCKER and I'm sure they missed some more of Geelong's free's, but they got a much better go of it than us, as evidenced by the FACTS. Frees: 23 to 15, 50m penalties: 3 to NONE, goals from frees: 2 to NONE, etc.
The only reason so many are making mention of this, is that so many in the media and on forums are saying Geelong were "robbed" and other complete bulls*** like that. So we feel the need to "right a wrong", if that's OK with you.
You think Ablett moved off his line before CJ touched him. I think it happened at the same time
You think you're righting a wrong. I think you're just being one eyed.
We disagree. Simple.
There were obviously quite a few contentious decisions during the match. Not helped by slo-mo replays and infinate camera angles and the luxury to have 10 or 20 seconds to make a decision.
My impression was that the Umps missed some, got some, and in some cases paid them the wrong way, but overall they were not biased.
It was fair enough on the day.
My impression was that the Umps missed some, got some, and in some cases paid them the wrong way, but overall they were not biased.
It was fair enough on the day.