Saintsational Fan Forum - A passionate community of St Kilda Football Club fans discussing news, history, players, trade rumours, results, AFL stats and more.
apparently he remembers the iffy advantage call in the last (we had a few iffy advantage calls too) yet he forgets about the 2 goals the umps GAVE to Geelong in the first
Guys a flog trying to flog papers bet the the filth are all over the back page by tuesday and would not surprise me if they have a banner or an inset photo on tomorrows back page.
Yeah. Just like in a GF when one team wins by a goal - means nothing! The reality is, even a H&A game can mean plenty - just ask a certain team that lost a Round 21 clash and a top 2 possie and then (possibly) the flag!
Sheehan is a garbage football journo. Writes at third-grade level and seems to see a different game from everyone else. "Geelong were a trifle unlucky." Bulldust.
What a grudging, anti-StKilda piece that is.
No need to respond Plugger66. It'll be as predictable as ever.
Already lost count of the different media reports that harp on about the play on call, and mention ottens and johnson - yet to read of the free kick disparity, and king, dempster, and max in the wings!
Even read in SEN that ling 'clearly' beat dal and mooney beat zac?
Fine - i'm happy if we remain underdogs - but how about a balanced report!
"The starting point of all achievement is desire. "
desertsaint wrote:Already lost count of the different media reports that harp on about the play on call, and mention ottens and johnson - yet to read of the free kick disparity, and king, dempster, and max in the wings!
Even read in SEN that ling 'clearly' beat dal and mooney beat zac?
Fine - i'm happy if we remain underdogs - but how about a balanced report!
I guess the media are firmly in the Geelong camp then. When the game concluded I was wondering whether from now on the Saints would be hyped up to the extent that the Cats have been recently... we are no longer "equal #1", we are four points clear now.
desertsaint wrote:Already lost count of the different media reports that harp on about the play on call, and mention ottens and johnson - yet to read of the free kick disparity, and king, dempster, and max in the wings!
Even read in SEN that ling 'clearly' beat dal and mooney beat zac?
Fine - i'm happy if we remain underdogs - but how about a balanced report!
I guess the media are firmly in the Geelong camp then. When the game concluded I was wondering whether from now on the Saints would be hyped up to the extent that the Cats have been recently... we are no longer "equal #1", we are four points clear now.
As I said elsewhere, it seems some don't want to let go of the geelong "era" of dominance.
Typical weapy namby pamby crap you'd (sadly) expect from the AFL's top writer...I thought he was jumping back on our bandwagon a couple months back, but now he's siding with the schoolyard bully! Watch him claim he'd identified us as potential Grand Finalists post season if (when) we take out the premiership.
desertsaint wrote:Already lost count of the different media reports that harp on about the play on call, and mention ottens and johnson - yet to read of the free kick disparity, and king, dempster, and max in the wings!
Even read in SEN that ling 'clearly' beat dal and mooney beat zac?
Fine - i'm happy if we remain underdogs - but how about a balanced report!
I guess the media are firmly in the Geelong camp then. When the game concluded I was wondering whether from now on the Saints would be hyped up to the extent that the Cats have been recently... we are no longer "equal #1", we are four points clear now.
As I said elsewhere, it seems some don't want to let go of the geelong "era" of dominance.
I think it is absolutely FAN FREAKIN' TASTIC! Pressure and expectation is still on Geelong and we don't rate as a flag prospect. I just want the team to go about their jobs and keep winning. Just keep level heads and go about their business. No need to worry about opinions or speculation by people that are insignificant and who's opinion does not count.