Under the radar.
Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators
Under the radar.
In all the media discussion about Geelong's stupendous, Nobel Prize winning,
greatest in all history midfield versus our 'quite good' midfield one name is never mentioned. And having just watched the replay of last weeks game may I just say my suspicions have been confirmed and this player is back to his bottom of the pack ball extractor, gut busting run down tackle best. God have mercy, he even kicked a goal.
There's only one Luke Ball.
And this is his kind of game.
greatest in all history midfield versus our 'quite good' midfield one name is never mentioned. And having just watched the replay of last weeks game may I just say my suspicions have been confirmed and this player is back to his bottom of the pack ball extractor, gut busting run down tackle best. God have mercy, he even kicked a goal.
There's only one Luke Ball.
And this is his kind of game.
"He spoke of his stride, his power and his willingness to push himself to exhaustion. All of the things that are on display each weekend in the No 12 jumper" Garry Lyon
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 167
- Joined: Sat 19 Aug 2006 10:47pm
Seeing as Geelong have such a potent midfield, would it be prudent to use Ball as a tagger as well? Would it be too great a loss to sacrifice his in and under efforts? Is he even a good tagger (I kind of just assumed he is). If we can use CJ and Ball to effectively negate 2 of their midfielders (Ablett and Bartell or Selwood) I think we would be well on our way to winning. Maybe we wouldn't get enough clearances then. Its all about striking a balance between trying to stop them from scoring, and scoring ourselves. Can't have too much of one, or too much of the other.
Thoughts?
Thoughts?
roo=god
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 1964
- Joined: Thu 05 Aug 2004 9:29am
- Has thanked: 3 times
- Been thanked: 135 times
- meher baba
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 7223
- Joined: Mon 14 Aug 2006 6:49am
- Location: Tasmania
- Has thanked: 1 time
- Been thanked: 516 times
Against the Tigers, I noticed Luke kicking the ball a bit harder/longer than he generally did in most games before the break.
Indeed, he kicked the ball 14 times against the Tigers, which is a season high for him.
Perhaps he is starting to feel better in himself and his confidence in his kicking is coming back.
In which case, opposing teams will need to watch out!!
Indeed, he kicked the ball 14 times against the Tigers, which is a season high for him.
Perhaps he is starting to feel better in himself and his confidence in his kicking is coming back.
In which case, opposing teams will need to watch out!!
"It is useless to attempt to reason a man out of a thing he was never reasoned into."
- Jonathan Swift
- Jonathan Swift
- perfectionist
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 9053
- Joined: Mon 30 Jul 2007 3:06pm
- Has thanked: 60 times
- Been thanked: 353 times
Yep, noticed that and not unusual.Legendary wrote:....
The minute he came on the ground in the 2nd quarter, we started kicking goals.
Not by me. Our number one ball getter, can handpass either hand and has been running forward of late. As mentioned, he seems to be getting stronger....The most under-rated part of our midfield this year.
- Mr Magic
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 12796
- Joined: Fri 04 May 2007 9:38am
- Has thanked: 802 times
- Been thanked: 432 times
I don't think it's possible to tag all our midfield, just like we can't tag all theirs.Leo.J wrote:He wouldn't be flying under the Cats radar, he's a gun.
He has started kicking the ball longer and more often, which is a real positive...he used to have great skills.
Some of them are just going to be 'head to head' contests.
-
- SS Life Member
- Posts: 3125
- Joined: Sun 27 Mar 2005 8:29pm
- Has thanked: 9 times
- Been thanked: 70 times
We now have a few that could be tagged.Mr Magic wrote:I don't think it's possible to tag all our midfield, just like we can't tag all theirs.Leo.J wrote:He wouldn't be flying under the Cats radar, he's a gun.
He has started kicking the ball longer and more often, which is a real positive...he used to have great skills.
Some of them are just going to be 'head to head' contests.
Dal, BJ, Joey, and Lenny would be the main four possible tags imo.
Bally won't be tagged, so his improving ball use can be a massive bonus for us...he's been playing at 60-70% his full potential for a couple of years now. Now cos he's moving more freely now, he's almost like a new recruit.
Both sides have one tagger so only one from each side will be tagged. The obvious one is Ling to Dal and I am pretty sure CJ will go to Selwood. All the others will go head to head which just slightly favour them but hopefully we just have a better forward line and backline.Leo.J wrote:We now have a few that could be tagged.Mr Magic wrote:I don't think it's possible to tag all our midfield, just like we can't tag all theirs.Leo.J wrote:He wouldn't be flying under the Cats radar, he's a gun.
He has started kicking the ball longer and more often, which is a real positive...he used to have great skills.
Some of them are just going to be 'head to head' contests.
Dal, BJ, Joey, and Lenny would be the main four possible tags imo.
Bally won't be tagged, so his improving ball use can be a massive bonus for us...he's been playing at 60-70% his full potential for a couple of years now. Now cos he's moving more freely now, he's almost like a new recruit.
-
- SS Life Member
- Posts: 3125
- Joined: Sun 27 Mar 2005 8:29pm
- Has thanked: 9 times
- Been thanked: 70 times
Ling will tag Dal, but I woud love to see CJ on Ablett. I beleive he is almost a perfect match for him...That said I reckon CJ will blanket Selwood if given the job.plugger66 wrote:Both sides have one tagger so only one from each side will be tagged. The obvious one is Ling to Dal and I am pretty sure CJ will go to Selwood. All the others will go head to head which just slightly favour them but hopefully we just have a better forward line and backline.Leo.J wrote:We now have a few that could be tagged.Mr Magic wrote:I don't think it's possible to tag all our midfield, just like we can't tag all theirs.Leo.J wrote:He wouldn't be flying under the Cats radar, he's a gun.
He has started kicking the ball longer and more often, which is a real positive...he used to have great skills.
Some of them are just going to be 'head to head' contests.
Dal, BJ, Joey, and Lenny would be the main four possible tags imo.
Bally won't be tagged, so his improving ball use can be a massive bonus for us...he's been playing at 60-70% his full potential for a couple of years now. Now cos he's moving more freely now, he's almost like a new recruit.
I think they will have someone pay some special attention to BJ also.
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 538
- Joined: Mon 01 Sep 2008 10:46pm
Is this Stan Alves in his first three years. No good tagging everyone. Just have to be good enough to win the ball ourselves and beat them around the stopages.carnasaints55 wrote:Seeing as Geelong have such a potent midfield, would it be prudent to use Ball as a tagger as well? Would it be too great a loss to sacrifice his in and under efforts? Is he even a good tagger (I kind of just assumed he is). If we can use CJ and Ball to effectively negate 2 of their midfielders (Ablett and Bartell or Selwood) I think we would be well on our way to winning. Maybe we wouldn't get enough clearances then. Its all about striking a balance between trying to stop them from scoring, and scoring ourselves. Can't have too much of one, or too much of the other.
Thoughts?
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 684
- Joined: Sat 26 Jul 2008 9:44pm
Re: Under the radar.
roxanne wrote:In all the media discussion about Geelong's stupendous, Nobel Prize winning,
greatest in all history midfield versus our 'quite good' midfield one name is never mentioned. And having just watched the replay of last weeks game may I just say my suspicions have been confirmed and this player is back to his bottom of the pack ball extractor, gut busting run down tackle best. God have mercy, he even kicked a goal.
There's only one Luke Ball.
And this is his kind of game.
In all of the discussion on this game - not one mention of #14 have I seen.
Beautiful!
I would be willing to bet signifiant money if Bally is BOG, we will have won.
Fortius Quo Fidelius Yo