if max is out who comes in

JABBER · Post: # 765318Post **JABBER** » Mon 29 Jun 2009 8:50pm

Goose Dempster or even Gwilt or Armitage

Has geelong got tall forwards who can hurt us I put Dawson On Hawkins
Dont know about Mooney maybe goose Dempster or Gwilt do kick the ball very good and Armo might be needed in the midfield

claystreet · Post: # 765319Post **claystreet** » Mon 29 Jun 2009 8:51pm

I reckon they will give Gwilt a run if Max is out but i think Max will play

perfectionist · Mon 29 Jun 2009 8:57pm

James Gwilt

borderbarry · Mon 29 Jun 2009 9:13pm

Armo must be close

FullMonty · Post: # 765381Post **FullMonty** » Mon 29 Jun 2009 10:28pm

Bring on the Goose!

saint patrick · Mon 29 Jun 2009 10:35pm

Jack Steven has apparently been impressive at Sandy recently...would add some pace and extend the midfield..armo a chance as well.

bigcarl · Post: # 765388Post **bigcarl** » Mon 29 Jun 2009 10:35pm

gwilt, armitage or maybe lynch to debut.

Bernard Shakey · Mon 29 Jun 2009 10:38pm

Armo and Steven are no chance.

For mine it has to be Gwilt.

We were playing better with Jimmy than the 3 games Max has played.

plugger66 · Post: # 765404Post **plugger66** » Mon 29 Jun 2009 10:51pm

Bernard Shakey wrote:Armo and Steven are no chance.

For mine it has to be Gwilt.

We were playing better with Jimmy than the 3 games Max has played.

I would think Armo is a huge chance.

Solar · Post: # 765409Post **Solar** » Mon 29 Jun 2009 11:03pm

bigcarl wrote:gwilt, armitage or maybe lynch to debut.

what he said

saintjake · Post: # 765412Post **saintjake** » Mon 29 Jun 2009 11:05pm

Bernard Shakey wrote:Armo and Steven are no chance.

For mine it has to be Gwilt.

We were playing better with Jimmy than the 3 games Max has played.

because gwilt and max were playing in the same position

goose for hawkins.
hawkins isnt on fire,
same build as goose.

Solar · Post: # 765424Post **Solar** » Mon 29 Jun 2009 11:22pm

saintjake wrote:
Bernard Shakey wrote:Armo and Steven are no chance.

For mine it has to be Gwilt.

We were playing better with Jimmy than the 3 games Max has played.
because gwilt and max were playing in the same position
goose for hawkins.
hawkins isnt on fire,
same build as goose.

good point, it's not like we have too many tall defensive backman

SaintWodonga · Mon 29 Jun 2009 11:45pm

Goose...

makemytime · Mon 29 Jun 2009 11:50pm

it has to be a defender or jimmy boy, no doubt about it

SainterK · Post: # 765476Post **SainterK** » Tue 30 Jun 2009 12:35am

Bring back Gwilt....

xander · Post: # 765478Post **xander** » Tue 30 Jun 2009 12:38am

bring back back the goose as a late change 90 minutes before the game

avid · Post: # 765489Post **avid** » Tue 30 Jun 2009 1:28am

I really really really hope it's Goose.

saint75 · Post: # 765502Post **saint75** » Tue 30 Jun 2009 1:53am

I think that Maxies foot would have to be broken or about to fall off before he would miss this game.

If by chance he does miss, Goose in. Hawkins is slow and a lumbering giant. Goose is more than his match. If not Goose, then definitely Gwilt.

bendigo bob · Tue 30 Jun 2009 12:12pm

Gwilt Dempster Goose in that order. If max is out then we already have their forwards covered so Gwilt would provide a 3rd tall forward option to help negate Scarlett Taylor and Harley. If not Gwilt then Dempster as another midfield/half back rotation run with player. 3rd option would be Goose but unfortunately I cant see it happening as we are too top heavy down back if Goose comes in. The 4th option would be out of Raph Armo or Steven.

Thinline · Post: # 765583Post **Thinline** » Tue 30 Jun 2009 12:17pm

xander wrote:bring back back the goose as a late change 90 minutes before the game

Why?

So we can go out full of false bravado on the back of Goose's miraculous recovery and Bomber can flick a quick small up forward to kick four goals before we've even warmed up?

spert · Post: # 765587Post **spert** » Tue 30 Jun 2009 12:21pm

Bring in a strong body against the country bumkins -so Gwilt (who I still think we miss in the forward line) or take a risk with Goose.

TassieJones · Tue 30 Jun 2009 12:44pm

for balance (our backline was top heavy) it'd be Armo

like for like it'd be Goose.

I'd prefer Maguire but would be happy with either option.

AnythingsPossibleSaints · Tue 30 Jun 2009 12:56pm

If Max misses, it will probably be either Goose (this could be the opening they've needed to get him in, and I hope they take it) or Dempster (who could be our best match-up on Chapman, if he plays forward, or S Johnson). I could definitely see them bringing him in to play on one of them, especially if Max misses. The next option is probably Jimmy G.
I don't see them bringing in Armo or Jack Steven until we need to replace someone in the midfield, which we hopefully won't need to do.

Sunday Red · Post: # 765609Post **Sunday Red** » Tue 30 Jun 2009 1:24pm

Dempster IMO.

Goose will be exposed for lack of pace.

AnythingsPossibleSaints · Tue 30 Jun 2009 2:17pm

Sunday Red wrote:Dempster IMO.

Goose will be exposed for lack of pace.

Not by Mooney, or Hawkins, I don't think. Neither of them are exactly Usain Bolt. Bringing Goose in would also give us that little extra excitement boost (especially our fans), given how happy so many would be to see him back (and the fact it would be his 100th game). It's not why I'd bring him in, but it would be a bonus that could make a small positive difference.