Round 13 Teams

meher baba · Post: # 763214Post **meher baba** » Thu 25 Jun 2009 7:07pm

st.byron wrote:
meher baba wrote:
st.byron wrote:No change when the three extra I/C players are pruned off tomorrow.
I find these sorts of posts a bit annoying.

Is this a comment or a statement based on inside info? Please make this clear.

That said, I assume that it is the most likely outcome.
Baba, if I was posting based on inside info, I'd make it clear. Otherwise everything is an opinion. I just get tired of writing IMO in every post. Who else's opinion could it be.

It's only a matter of typing 3 letters. As the old car add used to go:

"Please consider".

ace · Post: # 763216Post **ace** » Thu 25 Jun 2009 7:11pm

Maybe training services forgot to tell team selection that Armitage is unavailable.

"If training services don't tell us that a player is unavailable then we will make that player play" said the chairman of selectors.
"It doesn't hurt me in the slightest." he added.

Dan Warna · Post: # 763217Post **Dan Warna** » Thu 25 Jun 2009 7:15pm

aren't we shooting all players over 23 who haven't won a brownlow yet?

ace · Post: # 763218Post **ace** » Thu 25 Jun 2009 7:18pm

The game is on Sunday.
The team sheet is exactly the same as it was last match.

Correct me if I wrong but I think the club can still make any change it likes to team sheet after training tomorrow including replacing Armitage with someone else.
Hence the real team will only be revealed tomorrow.

VietNam_Saint · Thu 25 Jun 2009 7:23pm

Where's Bloody Goose !!!

Give him a run.

St Fidelius · Thu 25 Jun 2009 7:25pm

VietNam_Saint wrote:Where's Bloody Goose !!!

Give him a run.

For who exactly???

and please don't say that goose can do some ruck duties at the expense of McEvoy...

ace · Post: # 763224Post **ace** » Thu 25 Jun 2009 7:27pm

Cousins in a forward pocket.

Hi Ben, my name is Baker.
What I do is I take white powder like you and mix it with water.
Then I put you in my oven and roast you until you have crispy crust. Then my team mates eat you.

Thinline · Post: # 763225Post **Thinline** » Thu 25 Jun 2009 7:30pm

A white powder/Ben Cousins (I think) joke.

New. Exciting.

3rd generation saint · Thu 25 Jun 2009 8:00pm

It's a good bet there will be no change.
McEvoy should still play, IMO better option for 2nd ruck than Blake.
He also played last week and played well for Sandy, which I thought was a good move by the club, plus he should be able to improve himself against Richmond who have no real establised ruckmen.

plugger66 · Post: # 763255Post **plugger66** » Thu 25 Jun 2009 8:15pm

3rd generation saint wrote:It's a good bet there will be no change.
McEvoy should still play, IMO better option for 2nd ruck than Blake.
He also played last week and played well for Sandy, which I thought was a good move by the club, plus he should be able to improve himself against Richmond who have no real establised ruckmen.

He didnt play last week at all unless he played local footy up near Albury.

VietNam_Saint · Thu 25 Jun 2009 8:19pm

St Fidelius wrote:
VietNam_Saint wrote:Where's Bloody Goose !!!

Give him a run.
For who exactly???

and please don't say that goose can do some ruck duties at the expense of McEvoy...

No , perish the thought. I dunno , give Gwilt or Geary a week off , reckon its worth seeing exactly where Goose is at .

3rd generation saint · Thu 25 Jun 2009 8:22pm

Herald Sun reported that McEvoy had 33 hit-outs, 3 marks and 6 disposals.

plugger66 · Post: # 763268Post **plugger66** » Thu 25 Jun 2009 8:34pm

3rd generation saint wrote:Herald Sun reported that McEvoy had 33 hit-outs, 3 marks and 6 disposals.

I missed that then but he sure looks more like Stanley than McEvoy.

Rickabee · Post: # 763270Post **Rickabee** » Thu 25 Jun 2009 8:40pm

Plugger, maybe it's possible that the H-S got it wrong??

Sounds like clarification may be required?

Legendary · Post: # 763274Post **Legendary** » Thu 25 Jun 2009 8:45pm

My tip would be no change, with Armitage the only possible inclusion for McEvoy if they do make a change.

St Fidelius · Thu 25 Jun 2009 8:47pm

VietNam_Saint wrote:
St Fidelius wrote:
VietNam_Saint wrote:Where's Bloody Goose !!!

Give him a run.
For who exactly???

and please don't say that goose can do some ruck duties at the expense of McEvoy...
No , perish the thought. I dunno , give Gwilt or Geary a week off , reckon its worth seeing exactly where Goose is at .

Gwilt never played last week and dropping Geary for Goose seems like there would be too much height and an imbalance in our side...

Goose has not been selected simply because our tall and key defenders have been playing well...

My only concern is Sam Fisher, and if he has a toe injury that is limiting his performance and if that injury needs a break from the game, that would have been his only in...

But maybe Sam Fisher has recovered from this injury, the team has had a week off and he did little training so far this week, to get him right for match day

thirty-seven!? · Fri 26 Jun 2009 6:29pm

Final Teams:

ST KILDA v RICHMOND
St Kilda
B: Jason Blake, Max Hudghton, Zac Dawson
HB: Steven Baker, Sam Fisher, Brendon Goddard
C: Farren Ray, Luke Ball, Nick Dal Santo
HF: Jason Gram, Nick Riewoldt, Adam Schneider
F: Lenny Hayes, Justin Koschitzke, Stephen Milne
Foll: Michael Gardiner, Clint Jones, Leigh Montagna
I/C: Jarryn Geary, Sam Gilbert, Ben McEvoy, Andrew McQualter
Emg: James Gwilt, David Armitage, Raphael Clarke

No change

Richmond
B: Chris Newman, Jarrod Silvester, Will Thursfield
HB: Dean Polo , Luke McGuane, Richard Tambling
C: Andrew Collins, Shane Tuck, Brett Deledio
HF: Trent Cotchin, Jack Riewoldt, Tom Hislop
F: Tyrone Vickery, Mitch Morton, Ben Cousins
Foll: Angus Graham, Daniel Jackson, Nathan Foley
I/C: Robin Nahas, Kelvin Moore, Alex Rance, Shane Edwards
Emg: Jarrad Oakley-Nicholls, Jake King, Adam Pattison

In: Silvester
Out: Adam Pattison

New: Jarrod Silvester (Coburg)

Quixote · Post: # 763599Post **Quixote** » Fri 26 Jun 2009 6:33pm

Lack of third tall FWD worries me.

Would like to see someone (Gilbert?) go there this week.

LTN16 · Post: # 763618Post **LTN16** » Fri 26 Jun 2009 7:33pm

Quixote wrote:Lack of third tall FWD worries me.

Would like to see someone (Gilbert?) go there this week.

or Goddard ? maybe

Moccha · Post: # 763619Post **Moccha** » Fri 26 Jun 2009 7:38pm

Silvester is that gay dude who sang the 80s hit "Do You Wanna Funk with me"

saint vince · Sat 27 Jun 2009 10:55am

LTN16 wrote:
Quixote wrote:Lack of third tall FWD worries me.

Would like to see someone (Gilbert?) go there this week.
or Goddard ? maybe

Or Dawson. Didn't see the game last week but my old man said he looked like h was going to the right spots last week and could of been used a lot more in the forward fify than he was.

claystreet · Sat 27 Jun 2009 11:01am

I wouldnt mine seeing Dawson get a run in the forward line, has the smarts for it from what i have seen. Then again if the backline needs him so be it.

PJ · Post: # 763800Post PJ » Sat 27 Jun 2009 3:02pm

St Kilda
B: Jason Blake, Max Hudghton, Zac Dawson
HB: Steven Baker, Sam Fisher, Brendon Goddard
C: Farren Ray, Luke Ball, Nick Dal Santo
HF: Jason Gram, Nick Riewoldt, Adam Schneider
F: Lenny Hayes, Justin Koschitzke, Stephen Milne
Foll: Michael Gardiner, Clint Jones, Leigh Montagna
I/C: Jarryn Geary, Sam Gilbert, Ben McEvoy, Andrew McQualter
Emg: James Gwilt, David Armitage, Raphael Clarke

The more I look at this team the better it looks. There's not a player in that team that can't lift when needed, probably only Benny in a development stage, the rest are solid as. Slot in King and this IMO is the team that is going to represent St.Kilda in the finals.

I know - still 10 weeks to go but lookin good.