No you are right. This is the first thread ever started that was stupid. By the way how many shares has your family got in the players and how much do you spend on memberships?St Fidelius wrote:Go for it!plugger66 wrote:Who the hell are you, the fun police or a bandwidth monitor. Maybe I should write posts about how many player shares I have bought or what memberships my family has and how much I spend on the Saints.St Fidelius wrote:Just why did you started this "waste of bandwidth" thread in the first caseplugger66 wrote:That is just stupid. This thread is for quality posts only.Thinline wrote:Time to make some tough decisions. Get rid of that Riewoldt hack. Lucky to be there. Hayes is past it. He should go. And Montagna's an outside ball gatherer who needs a stint in the magoos to harden the F*** up. There - I said what everyone's thinking.![]()
Could you not comment about it in the other threads that have suggested dropping players![]()
Surely having a discussion about posters suggestions on dropping players should be in that thread, instead of starting a bullsh1t thread
at least I don't start stupid threads
We need to make a few changes this week
Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators
- St Fidelius
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 10492
- Joined: Sun 01 Aug 2004 10:30am
plugger66 wrote:No you are right. This is the first thread ever started that was stupid. By the way how many shares has your family got in the players and how much do you spend on memberships?St Fidelius wrote:Go for it!plugger66 wrote:Who the hell are you, the fun police or a bandwidth monitor. Maybe I should write posts about how many player shares I have bought or what memberships my family has and how much I spend on the Saints.St Fidelius wrote:Just why did you started this "waste of bandwidth" thread in the first caseplugger66 wrote:That is just stupid. This thread is for quality posts only.Thinline wrote:Time to make some tough decisions. Get rid of that Riewoldt hack. Lucky to be there. Hayes is past it. He should go. And Montagna's an outside ball gatherer who needs a stint in the magoos to harden the F*** up. There - I said what everyone's thinking.![]()
Could you not comment about it in the other threads that have suggested dropping players![]()
Surely having a discussion about posters suggestions on dropping players should be in that thread, instead of starting a bullsh1t thread
at least I don't start stupid threads
![Rolling Eyes :roll:](./images/smilies/icon_rolleyes.gif)
Try at least to get over yourself
![Idea :idea:](./images/smilies/icon_idea.gif)
Don't wait for the light at the end of the tunnel to appear, run down there and light the bloody thing yourself!
- Armoooo
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 7281
- Joined: Sun 26 Nov 2006 2:28pm
- Location: The Great South East
- Contact:
Good grief, you love stirring the pot don't you mate
FWIW I think it should be Gardiner out, Eljay in...
![Laughing :lol:](./images/smilies/icon_lol.gif)
![Laughing :lol:](./images/smilies/icon_lol.gif)
FWIW I think it should be Gardiner out, Eljay in...
ROBERT HARVEY A.K.A The Great Man, Banger, Harves, Ol' Man River...
384 games, 4 B&F's, 3 EJ Whitten Medals, St.Kilda Captain, 2 Time Brownlow Medalist, 8 Time All Australian, 2nd Highest Brownlow votes poller.... The greatest of ALL TIME!!
384 games, 4 B&F's, 3 EJ Whitten Medals, St.Kilda Captain, 2 Time Brownlow Medalist, 8 Time All Australian, 2nd Highest Brownlow votes poller.... The greatest of ALL TIME!!
- ace
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 10734
- Joined: Sun 16 Dec 2007 3:28pm
- Location: St Kilda
- Has thanked: 30 times
- Been thanked: 819 times
Re: We need to make a few changes this week
Speak for yourself Plugger66 but not for other posters.......plugger66 wrote:Our form has been poor
Thoughts?
The more you know, the more you know you don't know.
When I was a young child, I knew that I knew so much about so much.
Now that I am old and know so much more, I know that I know so much about so little, and so little about so much.
If you are not engaging AI actively and aggressively, you are doing it wrong.
You are not going to lose your job to AI.
You are going lose your job to somebody who uses AI.
Your company is not going to go out of business because of AI.
Your company is going to go out of business because another company used AI.
- Jensen Huang, CEO of NVIDIA
When I was a young child, I knew that I knew so much about so much.
Now that I am old and know so much more, I know that I know so much about so little, and so little about so much.
If you are not engaging AI actively and aggressively, you are doing it wrong.
You are not going to lose your job to AI.
You are going lose your job to somebody who uses AI.
Your company is not going to go out of business because of AI.
Your company is going to go out of business because another company used AI.
- Jensen Huang, CEO of NVIDIA
- saintsRrising
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 30089
- Joined: Mon 15 Mar 2004 11:07am
- Location: Melbourne
- Has thanked: 711 times
- Been thanked: 1233 times
Re: We need to make a few changes this week
Yes.plugger66 wrote:
Thoughts?
Out : Sarcasm.
Sarcasm started out ok but with overwork his efforts have become predictable and thin.
Time for a spell think.
Occasiobal Wit might be worth promoting.... or even Dry Humour...but best of all would be Frank Discussion.
Flying the World in comfort thanks to FF Points....
- Spinner
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 8502
- Joined: Sat 02 Dec 2006 3:40pm
- Location: Victoria
- Has thanked: 185 times
- Been thanked: 133 times
Re: We need to make a few changes this week
Nice work!saintsRrising wrote:Yes.plugger66 wrote:
Thoughts?
Out : Sarcasm.
Sarcasm started out ok but with overwork his efforts have become predictable and thin.
Time for a spell think.
Occasiobal Wit might be worth promoting.... or even Dry Humour...but best of all would be Frank Discussion.
P66 - I continue to lol at your threads, and even more at some of your responses to criticism!
![Very Happy :D](./images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif)
![Cool 8-)](./images/smilies/icon_cool.gif)
Re: We need to make a few changes this week
I love critisim but i love changes to a winning side even more. I dont need a spell but people who want to drop everyone in sight do.Spinner wrote:Nice work!saintsRrising wrote:Yes.plugger66 wrote:
Thoughts?
Out : Sarcasm.
Sarcasm started out ok but with overwork his efforts have become predictable and thin.
Time for a spell think.
Occasiobal Wit might be worth promoting.... or even Dry Humour...but best of all would be Frank Discussion.
P66 - I continue to lol at your threads, and even more at some of your responses to criticism!![]()
- MCG-Unit
- SS Life Member
- Posts: 3147
- Joined: Thu 11 Mar 2004 4:04pm
- Location: Land of the Giants
- Has thanked: 527 times
- Been thanked: 20 times
And that applies to a lot more than plugger66 - have a look at some of the inane threads, and massive post countsbobmurray wrote:The only thing some people care about is the total quantity of posts associated with their username........
![]()
![]()
![Shocked :shock:](./images/smilies/icon_eek.gif)
By the way, it's obvious plugger was just taking the p!ss
![Neutral :|](./images/smilies/icon_neutral.gif)
Stand your ground ![Shocked :shock:](./images/smilies/icon_eek.gif)
![Shocked :shock:](./images/smilies/icon_eek.gif)
we need to make changes this week
A Very good question most of the year we kept the same side last game we dropped Gwilt and Raph Geary has had a weeks break to refresh i will give an extra chance i can see him matching up on Selwood against Geelong.Who do we bring into the side Gwilt, Steven,goose or our no. 83 draft pick Begley so he can play on Cousins.
trevor barker
Good thread.
I agree wuth P66. At least 4 to 5 changes are definately required. Their form last weekend was shocking - the whole team went missing.
12-0 is really pathetic and to not keep the % over 200 is shameful.
I'd drop Blake, Zac, Luke Ball, Schneids, Milne and mabye Kosi and bring in Armo (broken collar bone never stopped anyone from going in and under) Dempster (one game back from an ACL should be more than enough), Heyne, Lynch, and Allen (even though he is still injured).
We should beat the Tigers by at least twenty goals with that team and if we dont i will demand that Lyon is sacked.
I agree wuth P66. At least 4 to 5 changes are definately required. Their form last weekend was shocking - the whole team went missing.
12-0 is really pathetic and to not keep the % over 200 is shameful.
I'd drop Blake, Zac, Luke Ball, Schneids, Milne and mabye Kosi and bring in Armo (broken collar bone never stopped anyone from going in and under) Dempster (one game back from an ACL should be more than enough), Heyne, Lynch, and Allen (even though he is still injured).
We should beat the Tigers by at least twenty goals with that team and if we dont i will demand that Lyon is sacked.
Lance or James??
There comes a point in every man's life when he has to say, "Enough is enough." For me, that time is now. I have been dealing with claims that I cheated and had an unfair advantage in <redacted>. Over the past three years, I have been subjected to a <redacted>investigation followed by <redacted> witch hunt. The toll this has taken on my family, and my work for <redacted>and on me leads me to where I am today – finished with this nonsense. (Oops just got a spontaneous errection <unredacted>)
There comes a point in every man's life when he has to say, "Enough is enough." For me, that time is now. I have been dealing with claims that I cheated and had an unfair advantage in <redacted>. Over the past three years, I have been subjected to a <redacted>investigation followed by <redacted> witch hunt. The toll this has taken on my family, and my work for <redacted>and on me leads me to where I am today – finished with this nonsense. (Oops just got a spontaneous errection <unredacted>)
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 9069
- Joined: Wed 29 Jun 2005 10:39pm
- Location: A distant beach
- Has thanked: 1 time
- Been thanked: 426 times
Crazy talk - never mess with a winning formula. Keep the side unchanged unless injuries force otherwise, and let the teams who are struggling, experiment with their lineups. No player in a team with 12 consecutive wins, needs a rest. Any players who want a senior berth are going to have to stay injury-free and put in a lot of BOGs at Sandy, just having steady form at Sandy won't get you a gig in the seniors.
- cowboy18
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 5795
- Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 1:05pm
- Location: in my duffle coat
- Has thanked: 3 times
- Been thanked: 5 times
Rubbish. It's not the players. They've been pleasing.joffaboy wrote:Good thread.
I agree wuth P66. At least 4 to 5 changes are definately required. Their form last weekend was shocking - the whole team went missing.
12-0 is really pathetic and to not keep the % over 200 is shameful.
I'd drop Blake, Zac, Luke Ball, Schneids, Milne and mabye Kosi and bring in Armo (broken collar bone never stopped anyone from going in and under) Dempster (one game back from an ACL should be more than enough), Heyne, Lynch, and Allen (even though he is still injured).
We should beat the Tigers by at least twenty goals with that team and if we dont i will demand that Lyon is sacked.
Lyon should have a couple of weeks at Sandy to get his coaching form back, he's been pretty average of late.
- Devilhead
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 8376
- Joined: Mon 08 Mar 2004 11:56pm
- Has thanked: 137 times
- Been thanked: 1169 times
Rubbish it's not the coach it's us - the supporters - lately our posting has been less than desirable - we should all be dropped 2 grades back to TalkingCarltoncowboy18 wrote:
Rubbish. It's not the players. They've been pleasing.
Lyon should have a couple of weeks at Sandy to get his coaching form back, he's been pretty average of late.
The Devil makes work for idle hands!!!
-
- SS Life Member
- Posts: 3152
- Joined: Tue 02 Jun 2009 2:44am
- Location: Next to what's next to me.
- Has thanked: 71 times
- Been thanked: 35 times
Re: We need to make a few changes this week
I take it you're strongly opposed to Mick Malthouse "dropping" three guys this week (on top of an injury omission), to "keep the pressure on the playing group", despite their having won 4 in a row? Or Geelong dropping 2 blokes last week, despite having won 11 straight?plugger66 wrote: I love critisim but i love changes to a winning side even more. I dont need a spell but people who want to drop everyone in sight do.
Are you going to write something sarcastic about Mick and Bomber? Or make comments about how they don't know what they're doing (with 1000 or so AFL games experience between them.)? Or do you just take aim at easy targets, when they suggest something pretty much identical?
Not everyone has the same approach as you and it doesn't make you any better than them, unless of course you're better than Mick Malthouse and Bomber Thompson, which you're clearly not.
YOU GET WHAT YOU SETTLE FOR.
Re: We need to make a few changes this week
I am not going to criticise either coach but you obviously are criticising our coach because he isnt making a change.AnythingsPossibleSaints wrote:I take it you're strongly opposed to Mick Malthouse "dropping" three guys this week (on top of an injury omission), to "keep the pressure on the playing group", despite their having won 4 in a row? Or Geelong dropping 2 blokes last week, despite having won 11 straight?plugger66 wrote: I love critisim but i love changes to a winning side even more. I dont need a spell but people who want to drop everyone in sight do.
Are you going to write something sarcastic about Mick and Bomber? Or make comments about how they don't know what they're doing (with 1000 or so AFL games experience between them.)? Or do you just take aim at easy targets, when they suggest something pretty much identical?
Not everyone has the same approach as you and it doesn't make you any better than them, unless of course you're better than Mick Malthouse and Bomber Thompson, which you're clearly not.
- St Fidelius
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 10492
- Joined: Sun 01 Aug 2004 10:30am
Re: We need to make a few changes this week
What a silly thing to say to suggest that a poster on here is better than the two coaches you have mentioned....AnythingsPossibleSaints wrote:I take it you're strongly opposed to Mick Malthouse "dropping" three guys this week (on top of an injury omission), to "keep the pressure on the playing group", despite their having won 4 in a row? Or Geelong dropping 2 blokes last week, despite having won 11 straight?plugger66 wrote: I love critisim but i love changes to a winning side even more. I dont need a spell but people who want to drop everyone in sight do.
Are you going to write something sarcastic about Mick and Bomber? Or make comments about how they don't know what they're doing (with 1000 or so AFL games experience between them.)? Or do you just take aim at easy targets, when they suggest something pretty much identical?
Not everyone has the same approach as you and it doesn't make you any better than them, unless of course you're better than Mick Malthouse and Bomber Thompson, which you're clearly not.
Sidebottom has been average at best in his first year
Wood has been very ordinary and that is a complement
Clarke see above (just 7 disposals and 1 mark last week)..
Both Djerrkura and Wojcinski have been ordinary this season
Also the fact that Harry Taylor was fit to play at CHB suggest at least one player would be dropped
Yes they all deserved to be dropped...
Just who in you opinion should be dropped for an ordinary performance this season (and not just one bad game)???
Don't wait for the light at the end of the tunnel to appear, run down there and light the bloody thing yourself!