Ling - How many weeks?
Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators
- White Winmar
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 5014
- Joined: Tue 02 Jun 2009 10:02pm
Sorry Ace should've read your earlier post a bit more closely. In view of that clean record, the best we can hope for is he gets some carryover points that may earn him a suspension around September, if he stuffs up again. I still stand by my octopus comment. With the greatest of respect, and I know the guy can't help it, but he is a seriously frightening sight when he gets enraged and changes colour!
I started with nothing and I've got most of it left!
Doesnt matter how they compare to each other as the AFL admitted the Gehrig one was wrong by changing the rule that there must be some force. The Hall one would get the same today as it got then as they got rid of the in play and behind play points. Dont get what you are on about with the hits to the stomach thing as it either hurts or doesnt. Both Goose and Suban must have been hurt. Just one final thing every I cannot remember how G got 2 weeks. Did he get 2 which would have been one but he challenged and lost or did he get a straight 2.Mr Magic wrote:How would you rate the 'love tap' in relation to others?plugger66 wrote:Hope he gets something or half the people on here will go for AFL corruption, conspiracy theories or cheating. None of which is true but logic doesnt worry some people. Or the old chestnut, the AFL hate the Saints.Red wrote:It was a love tap. Won't have anything to answer.
Personally I think that it was a little harder than the one Gehrig gave Cloke but not quite as hard as the one Hall gave Goose.
What perplexes me is that Gehrig got 2 weeks for his 'love tap' and Hall got none?
Hence the reason for my original question - how many for Ling?
I know the issue might be clouded because Suban is a 'giant wuss' like Goose for going down after being hit with the 'love tap'.
Afterall, nobody playing AFL should be hurt/inconveniencd by a 'love tap' to the body, should they?
As for your question on what will Ling get well it depends on if he has any points or a good record but I would think it only deserves one week reduced to a reprimand at the most.
- Mr Magic
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 12775
- Joined: Fri 04 May 2007 9:38am
- Has thanked: 785 times
- Been thanked: 425 times
I'm pretty sure Gehrig was given a straight 2.plugger66 wrote:Doesnt matter how they compare to each other as the AFL admitted the Gehrig one was wrong by changing the rule that there must be some force. The Hall one would get the same today as it got then as they got rid of the in play and behind play points. Dont get what you are on about with the hits to the stomach thing as it either hurts or doesnt. Both Goose and Suban must have been hurt. Just one final thing every I cannot remember how G got 2 weeks. Did he get 2 which would have been one but he challenged and lost or did he get a straight 2.Mr Magic wrote:How would you rate the 'love tap' in relation to others?plugger66 wrote:Hope he gets something or half the people on here will go for AFL corruption, conspiracy theories or cheating. None of which is true but logic doesnt worry some people. Or the old chestnut, the AFL hate the Saints.Red wrote:It was a love tap. Won't have anything to answer.
Personally I think that it was a little harder than the one Gehrig gave Cloke but not quite as hard as the one Hall gave Goose.
What perplexes me is that Gehrig got 2 weeks for his 'love tap' and Hall got none?
Hence the reason for my original question - how many for Ling?
I know the issue might be clouded because Suban is a 'giant wuss' like Goose for going down after being hit with the 'love tap'.
Afterall, nobody playing AFL should be hurt/inconveniencd by a 'love tap' to the body, should they?
As for your question on what will Ling get well it depends on if he has any points or a good record but I would think it only deserves one week reduced to a reprimand at the most.
The point I was alluding to re whether Suban or Goose were hurt or not was the characterization of the 'punch' as a 'love tap' and the connotation the use of that term (soft, no power etc) gives.
Why not call it what it was?
A punch that was powerful enough to drop Suban to the ground, where he remained for some time.
- saintbrat
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 44575
- Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 4:11pm
- Location: saints zone
- Has thanked: 6 times
- Been thanked: 188 times
Ling- charged- good record of 5 years.
73 points after deductions.
73 points after deductions.
StReNgTh ThRoUgH LoYaLtY
Rejoicing in hope, patient in tribulation, continuing steadfastly..!!
![Image](http://www.saintsmembership.com.au/theme/afl-stkilda/img/how-i-want-to-be.png)
MEMBERSHIP 2014 31,134 Membership 2015 32,746 MEMBERSHIP 2016 - 38,101
MEMBERSHIP 2017 42,095 , Membership 2018 46,998
MEMBERSHIP 2019 43,106 http://saintsational.net/viewtopic.php? ... 9#p1816890
MEMBERSHIP 2020 48,588 http://saintsational.net/viewtopic.php?f=1&t=100107
Rejoicing in hope, patient in tribulation, continuing steadfastly..!!
![Image](http://www.saintsmembership.com.au/theme/afl-stkilda/img/how-i-want-to-be.png)
MEMBERSHIP 2014 31,134 Membership 2015 32,746 MEMBERSHIP 2016 - 38,101
MEMBERSHIP 2017 42,095 , Membership 2018 46,998
MEMBERSHIP 2019 43,106 http://saintsational.net/viewtopic.php? ... 9#p1816890
MEMBERSHIP 2020 48,588 http://saintsational.net/viewtopic.php?f=1&t=100107
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 738
- Joined: Fri 09 Dec 2005 1:54am
- Location: Vung Tau Vietnam
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 738
- Joined: Fri 09 Dec 2005 1:54am
- Location: Vung Tau Vietnam
- The Fireman
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 13268
- Joined: Mon 08 Mar 2004 11:54pm
- Has thanked: 649 times
- Been thanked: 1918 times
How is that. If Hall was given a week I dont think we get to play instead of the Swans.VietNam_Saint wrote:Ah yes ,, Tummy taps ,,,
BBBBH on Goose ,, initially got a week , should have missed the Granny , but pleaded and played, fair dinkum , can you imagine Hall pleading anything !!
Should have been our GF.
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 6043
- Joined: Mon 21 May 2007 5:31pm
- Location: Currumbin, Quoinslairnd
I know it's all past history and everything but I simply still cannot comprehend how Barry Hall got to play the following week. The best vision EVER of a strike, and still ... Baker vs Freo, no vision, no evidence, same penalty. And dare I say it, King gets six weeks for a bump when he could surely not have foreseen the consequences and Hall gets seven for completely and utterly deliberately smashing in someone's head. I could go on: Gardiner elbow to the head, ahem, glad as I was..., um 1 week?
Nothing new in what I say. I realise that. And like I said, past history. Nor am I suggesting bias because that's just childish.
But it simply beggars belief that supposedly intelligent and apparently capable human beings simply can't get a football judicial system to work how it should.
I mean how hard can it really be?
Nothing new in what I say. I realise that. And like I said, past history. Nor am I suggesting bias because that's just childish.
But it simply beggars belief that supposedly intelligent and apparently capable human beings simply can't get a football judicial system to work how it should.
I mean how hard can it really be?
- matrix
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 21475
- Joined: Mon 21 May 2007 1:55pm
- Has thanked: 4 times
- Been thanked: 4 times
what gets me is the inconsistency
i mean look at the gards and king incident for starters.
one week its boohoo stop ya crying it was a tap
next week its YOU BASTARD cop 3 weeks.
i mean wtf is up with the tribunal
its a bigger joke than the rushed behind ruling and has a grey area bigger than the MCG playing surface.
i mean look at the gards and king incident for starters.
one week its boohoo stop ya crying it was a tap
next week its YOU BASTARD cop 3 weeks.
i mean wtf is up with the tribunal
its a bigger joke than the rushed behind ruling and has a grey area bigger than the MCG playing surface.