You are an idiot, it is quite clear that King ran straight into him. However they should contest the charge because I don think he made high contact and the damage was done whn Power's head hit the groundmordi wrote:..... is it clear that King was the instigator?
I dont think he blindsided him ......
King offered FOUR according to ABC radio just then...
Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators
I'm not sure how the system works but surely we could argue against all three points.
He intentionally bumped him yes, but didn't intentionally injure him, if anything it was reckless.
The bump was medium impact, it seemed to be the ground that did the damage.
Leads to point three, not high contact, head hit ground, not King.
Would any of these actually stand up?
Or would the club need to go down the path of showing that both players instigated contact.
He intentionally bumped him yes, but didn't intentionally injure him, if anything it was reckless.
The bump was medium impact, it seemed to be the ground that did the damage.
Leads to point three, not high contact, head hit ground, not King.
Would any of these actually stand up?
Or would the club need to go down the path of showing that both players instigated contact.
-
The Fireman
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 13325
- Joined: Mon 08 Mar 2004 11:54pm
- Has thanked: 679 times
- Been thanked: 1963 times
-
HarveysDeciple
-
mordi
- Club Player
- Posts: 720
- Joined: Tue 18 May 2004 7:15pm
- Location: out of the back pocket...bound for HBF
- Been thanked: 4 times
Hey Undecided.....I asked two legitimate questions that may have some relevance,
1. Did he instigate? Is it clear that he did? I dont know the vision is hopeless, and until both parties comment not 100% clear.
2. Did he blindside him? If we take the answer to point 1. as Yes, would think it is better that he didn't hit him from behind or in a position where had no idea it was coming ie. blindsided.
Sorry if you think these are not great questions, just thought I would ask.........
Anyways, as I said in another thread, lets not play the man, we are all on the same side in here.
1. Did he instigate? Is it clear that he did? I dont know the vision is hopeless, and until both parties comment not 100% clear.
2. Did he blindside him? If we take the answer to point 1. as Yes, would think it is better that he didn't hit him from behind or in a position where had no idea it was coming ie. blindsided.
Sorry if you think these are not great questions, just thought I would ask.........
Anyways, as I said in another thread, lets not play the man, we are all on the same side in here.
What's the Point of it All?
-
bigcarl
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 18636
- Joined: Thu 11 Mar 2004 1:36am
- Has thanked: 1980 times
- Been thanked: 865 times
-
ace
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 10783
- Joined: Sun 16 Dec 2007 3:28pm
- Location: St Kilda
- Has thanked: 31 times
- Been thanked: 830 times
IT'S OFFICIAL
http://sportal.com.au/afl-news-display/ ... -six-71876And the panel took a dim view of the incident rating it a level five offence - the most serious before a charge is sent directly to the tribunal for determination.
The incident was assessed as intentional conduct, high impact and high contact resulting in a base tally of 550 points or a five-match ban.
But because King has 70.31 points hanging over his head already, his overall tally rose to 620.31 points or a six-match suspension - which is the tally he will risk if he decides to challenge the case at the AFL tribunal on Tuesday night.
However if King accepts the charge his tally will fall to 465.23 points and a four-match suspension.
The more you know, the more you know you don't know.
When I was a young child, I knew that I knew so much about so much.
Now that I am old and know so much more, I know that I know so much about so little, and so little about so much.
If you are not engaging AI actively and aggressively, you are doing it wrong.
You are not going to lose your job to AI.
You are going lose your job to somebody who uses AI.
Your company is not going to go out of business because of AI.
Your company is going to go out of business because another company used AI.
- Jensen Huang, CEO of NVIDIA
When I was a young child, I knew that I knew so much about so much.
Now that I am old and know so much more, I know that I know so much about so little, and so little about so much.
If you are not engaging AI actively and aggressively, you are doing it wrong.
You are not going to lose your job to AI.
You are going lose your job to somebody who uses AI.
Your company is not going to go out of business because of AI.
Your company is going to go out of business because another company used AI.
- Jensen Huang, CEO of NVIDIA
-
HarveysDeciple
-
BAM! (shhhh)
- SS Hall of Fame
- Posts: 2134
- Joined: Thu 24 May 2007 5:23pm
- Location: The little voice inside your head
If we were content to go without King for a while we could be really glib and submit the Hall on Maguire and West on X hits as evidence that it was a legitimate "in play" shepherd 
More Seriously - was thinking it might be worth a week.
More Seriously - was thinking it might be worth a week.
"Everything comes to he who hustles while he waits"
- Henry Ford
- Henry Ford