Kingy incident

This unofficial St Kilda Saints fan forum is for people of all ages to chat Saints Footy and all posts must be respectful.

Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators

plugger66
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 50626
Joined: Mon 26 Feb 2007 8:15pm
Location: oakleigh

Post: # 752798Post plugger66 »

Mr Magic wrote:
st.byron wrote:
TriColourDisciple wrote:I found it hard to pick up on the telly to.
However, from what I could see, I think he might be Okay.

* Did you hear the jeers every time Kingy went near the ball after that?
Yeh it was inconclusive on the replay. It didn't look as though there was a swing of an arm or a fist. Was contact from Kingy's body, from his arm /hand or did they trip over each other?
The commentators (and I use the term advisedly) on Fox Sports kept saying there was nothing wrong done by King other than it was well off the play.

Given that the MRP decided last year West on X that there is nothing wrong with taking out/blocking/shepherding a player well off the play, then he shouldn't have a case to answer.

Did Power run at King or did King run into Power?
That doesnt mean he gets odd because West didnt go. That was plainly wrong. If it was off the ball he will go.


User avatar
Dis Believer
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 5083
Joined: Sun 28 Mar 2004 1:42pm
Location: The terraces at Moorabbin, in the pouring rain.......
Has thanked: 252 times
Been thanked: 270 times

Post: # 752808Post Dis Believer »

WE don't have to prove anything - it's up to others to prove he did something wrong. If there is noe evidence of anything untoward then there is no case. Whether or not someone is knocked out means nothing, what counts is evidence and proof of wrong-doing.


The heavy metal artist formerly known as True Believer!
IF you look around the room and can't identify who the sucker is, then it's probably you!
felixleo
Club Player
Posts: 390
Joined: Mon 28 Apr 2008 11:32pm
Location: highett

Post: # 752901Post felixleo »

As long as we don't go with the Bakes defence against Farmer we should be right. Maybe the 'wookie defense' from southpark could be the go.


Are you gonna be the one?
User avatar
Pwoit
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 4068
Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 1:08am
Location: Thailand and Laos

Post: # 752947Post Pwoit »

Theres no video evidence so naturallly will get 7 weeks.


User avatar
Enrico_Misso
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 11662
Joined: Tue 13 Jun 2006 12:11am
Location: Moorabbin Chapter of The Royal Society of Hagiographers
Has thanked: 315 times
Been thanked: 720 times

Post: # 752954Post Enrico_Misso »

The replay is only a long shot, but he seems to have his elbow down.

Maybe for insurance he should change his name to Barry Hall?


The rest of Australia can wander mask-free, socialise, eat out, no curfews, no zoning, no police rings of steel, no illogical inconsistent rules. 
They can even WATCH LIVE FOOTY!
User avatar
ace
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 10715
Joined: Sun 16 Dec 2007 3:28pm
Location: St Kilda
Has thanked: 30 times
Been thanked: 814 times

Post: # 752958Post ace »

Pwoit wrote:Theres no video evidence so naturallly will get 7 weeks.
Whatever he does he should not tell the truth.
It was against Demetriou's precious Kangaroos, so will be more than 7 weeks.

Innocuous contact (0 points), Demetriou upset (25 points) = 25 activation points = 10 weeks.
:roll: :roll: :roll:


The more you know, the more you know you don't know.
When I was a young child, I knew that I knew so much about so much.
Now that I am old and know so much more, I know that I know so much about so little, and so little about so much.

If you are not engaging AI actively and aggressively, you are doing it wrong.
You are not going to lose your job to AI.
You are going lose your job to somebody who uses AI.
Your company is not going to go out of business because of AI.
Your company is going to go out of business because another company used AI.
- Jensen Huang, CEO of NVIDIA
happy feet
Club Player
Posts: 1833
Joined: Wed 27 Feb 2008 7:27pm
Has thanked: 226 times
Been thanked: 347 times

behind the play tactics

Post: # 753015Post happy feet »

Saw plenty of scragging holding tactics by the Roos today that was let go by the umpires. Another head high hit on Ball, Dal and Montagna held off the ball in the first quater, Kosi shepherded out from marking contests. Why should King be worried? Probably 2 weeks.


User avatar
Bernard Shakey
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 11229
Joined: Sun 18 Mar 2007 11:22pm
Location: Down By The River 1989, 2003, 2009 & 2013
Has thanked: 117 times
Been thanked: 136 times

Post: # 753048Post Bernard Shakey »

He will get at least a week, unless he has carryover points (I think he got a reprimand earlier this year).

It was miles off the ball and the Brion he cleaned up could not reasonably expect to be cleaned up. Was intentional, but initial contact was not high.

I noticed that King had an egg on the side of his head after the game. Could have been a head clash.

He will still go.


Old enough to repaint, but young enough to sell
User avatar
Solar
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 8144
Joined: Wed 10 Mar 2004 12:43pm

Post: # 753067Post Solar »

things they need to focus on if it does go up and we fight it (if he gets more then a week IMO)

- kings size vs power. Big ruckman's body contact will always hurt a thin outside receiver

- king seemed to only see him at the last second

- power was looking the other way as he ran into king

at worst we will see him back for the tigers game IMO


FQF
loyal in the good times and bad
In richo I trust

2013 trade/draft best ever?
Billings - future brownlow medallist Longer - future best ruck
Dunstan - future captain Eli - future cult hero
Acres - future norm smith
KATETHESAINT
Club Player
Posts: 56
Joined: Tue 02 Nov 2004 10:20am

Kingy Incident

Post: # 753120Post KATETHESAINT »

Im sorry but that kind of action is just undisciplined and I would expect better from Kingie. We cannot afford for our players to be suspended...Gardiner you should know better as well. Go ahead have a go at me but i think they should be more in control.


Sobraz
SS Life Member
Posts: 3399
Joined: Thu 29 Mar 2007 1:06pm
Has thanked: 2 times

Post: # 753131Post Sobraz »

no big deal whatever comes of it... Gardi will return, and is clearly our no.1 ruck, and the game time BigMac will get it will be invaluable... I would love to see Gardi and BigMac to be our ruck stocks come finals time...

King is not a big loss IMO... nothing to stress over be it a week or 3...


Teflon
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 23181
Joined: Sat 13 Mar 2004 11:44pm
Has thanked: 732 times
Been thanked: 1771 times

Post: # 753148Post Teflon »

youd want King in against Cats I reckon...big body.


“Yeah….nah””
maverick
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 5013
Joined: Sun 14 Mar 2004 10:42am
Location: Bayside
Has thanked: 9 times
Been thanked: 91 times

Post: # 753150Post maverick »

Was not THAT far off the ball, 25 metres at most, we had the ball, he was running towards our player, very similar to many incidents not cited over the last couple of years....


Should not go IMO.


saintly_safes
Club Player
Posts: 684
Joined: Sat 26 Jul 2008 9:44pm

Post: # 753157Post saintly_safes »

Think hes in trouble .Dont know much about his previous record but im thinking min 2 maybe 4 :cry:


plugger66
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 50626
Joined: Mon 26 Feb 2007 8:15pm
Location: oakleigh

Post: # 753163Post plugger66 »

ace wrote:
Pwoit wrote:Theres no video evidence so naturallly will get 7 weeks.
Whatever he does he should not tell the truth.
It was against Demetriou's precious Kangaroos, so will be more than 7 weeks.

Innocuous contact (0 points), Demetriou upset (25 points) = 25 activation points = 10 weeks.
:roll: :roll: :roll:
Do you have any idea. As I said previously what should the AFL do to make the best competition even better.


User avatar
kosifantutti23
SS Hall of Fame
Posts: 2388
Joined: Fri 26 Sep 2008 12:55am
Location: Horgen

Post: # 753164Post kosifantutti23 »

It was a bump to a player who could not reasonably expect contact. One week. Any thoughts of 4 are ridiculous.


Furtius Quo Rdelious
User avatar
Gabba
SS Hall of Fame
Posts: 2105
Joined: Tue 13 Sep 2005 6:47pm
Been thanked: 2 times

Post: # 753171Post Gabba »

felixleo wrote:As long as we don't go with the Bakes defence against Farmer we should be right. Maybe the 'wookie defense' from southpark could be the go.
Was thinking the Chewbacca defence myself.


saintly_safes
Club Player
Posts: 684
Joined: Sat 26 Jul 2008 9:44pm

Post: # 753187Post saintly_safes »

kosifantutti23 wrote:It was a bump to a player who could not reasonably expect contact. One week. Any thoughts of 4 are ridiculous.
This is St.Kilda & the player involved didnt take any further part in the contest. Im not the match reveiw panel but dont be too surpised by the outcome .Im not saying that I think he deserves 4 weeks but you can never under estimate the "all mighty"


User avatar
goodie
Club Player
Posts: 1289
Joined: Sun 31 Dec 2006 6:41pm

Post: # 753202Post goodie »

Points in favour:
Contact was not that hard, just the landing
West v. Clarke is favourable precendant
Footage shows exactly what happened
Was a rough and tumble game

Points against:
Power suffered concussion
Power caught offguard
Ruckman vs. smaller bloke, not a good look
Even Hall's lawyers would struggle to call that 'in play'

Did I miss any? Can't remember where King's eyes were

And all the North fans calling King names should look at how their big brave blokes were trying to rough up Montagna all game.


Image
User avatar
TassieJones
Club Player
Posts: 276
Joined: Mon 19 May 2008 9:17pm
Location: The NCR

Post: # 753210Post TassieJones »

only problem with it was it was off the ball, not high at all from what I can see.

I'd give him 1 week, but I reckon he'll cop 3


User avatar
saint75
SS Hall of Fame
Posts: 2101
Joined: Sun 28 Sep 2008 2:05pm
Location: Melbourne

Post: # 753234Post saint75 »

TassieJones wrote:only problem with it was it was off the ball, not high at all from what I can see.

I'd give him 1 week, but I reckon he'll cop 3
You have got to be kidding? 4 weeks for a legit bump? If he gets 4 for that then the AFL really do have it in for us and it is not just a paranoid delusion by St Kilda Supporters!

The contact did not cause him the concussion, his head hitting the ground did. Mind you, it must be a problem with Petrie's peripheral vision. Wasn't that the reason that Giansiracusa got away with what he did to Kosi that had Kosi out of the game for WEEKS!!!

To be honest, I would be more uncomfortable and concerned if I was Raph (which I believe is OK, but will depend on the mood of the tribunal) than I would be if I was Kingy!


User avatar
Griggsy
SS Life Member
Posts: 2524
Joined: Mon 21 Jul 2008 1:41am
Location: WA

Post: # 753237Post Griggsy »

think the comentator said it was a legit bump, just the player wasnt expecting it. So if it was just that it would be nothing. However, the injury resulting skews it into 1-2 weeks. The concussion alone will give it a suspension.


AnythingsPossibleSaints
SS Life Member
Posts: 3152
Joined: Tue 02 Jun 2009 2:44am
Location: Next to what's next to me.
Has thanked: 71 times
Been thanked: 35 times

Post: # 753253Post AnythingsPossibleSaints »

This is the problem with the whole system. It's a guess as to what's "acceptable" or not. He could get anything from nothing, to weeks. It's like a lottery.
I'm not that fussed if he goes though, as Gardi has clearly been better this year and I reckon Big Mac has had almost as much impact in his two games (as Kingy does). King hardly touches it around the ground. Big Mac looks good.


YOU GET WHAT YOU SETTLE FOR.
User avatar
ace
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 10715
Joined: Sun 16 Dec 2007 3:28pm
Location: St Kilda
Has thanked: 30 times
Been thanked: 814 times

Post: # 753264Post ace »

Legendary wrote:There is no system of precedent in the AFL.

Specifically, they are NOT ALLOWED to look at previous decisions. Nor can these be used as evidence.



I don't understand why they just don't introduce a system of precedent into the AFL tribunal.

It's kept us going in civil society for thousands of years.
It is because the AFL does not want to be fair and just.
The AFL wants to manipulate the results by advantaging one team over another.
They achieve that by changing the rules from week to week - have you noticed the drop off in frees for St Kilda from good tackles - and by removing players through suspensions.
AFL is an abbreviation for corruption.

CAPISCE!


The more you know, the more you know you don't know.
When I was a young child, I knew that I knew so much about so much.
Now that I am old and know so much more, I know that I know so much about so little, and so little about so much.

If you are not engaging AI actively and aggressively, you are doing it wrong.
You are not going to lose your job to AI.
You are going lose your job to somebody who uses AI.
Your company is not going to go out of business because of AI.
Your company is going to go out of business because another company used AI.
- Jensen Huang, CEO of NVIDIA
User avatar
samoht
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 5779
Joined: Sun 14 Mar 2004 10:45am
Location: https://www.amazon.com.au/Fugitive-Sold ... B00EO1GCNK
Has thanked: 592 times
Been thanked: 437 times
Contact:

Post: # 753332Post samoht »

this is the way I see it ..

Players run to cover loose opposition players or fill empty spaces even when the ball is 50 metres or more away, which is just part of what should always be considered general play .. and the ball was only 20 metres away in this instance.

1. Kings and Powers intentions were to do either of the above things, i.e. engage in normal general play and not to target each other.

2. Being fully absorbed in what they each were doing they happened to cross each others paths and surprised each other - King saw him in the last fraction of a second and fended him off in a normal, expected reflex action to prevent a body clash, with absolutely no intention.

3. It should be dismissed... but will it be ?


Post Reply