snap....saint66au wrote:Ahh...who actually cares ??
WJ was suspended not permanently banned..his suspension is lifted so if he wants to come back under a new username for whatever reason and choose not to disclose it..then does anyone really care?
![Wink :wink:](./images/smilies/icon_wink.gif)
![Laughing :lol:](./images/smilies/icon_lol.gif)
Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators
snap....saint66au wrote:Ahh...who actually cares ??
WJ was suspended not permanently banned..his suspension is lifted so if he wants to come back under a new username for whatever reason and choose not to disclose it..then does anyone really care?
GrumpyOne wrote:
I harbour grudges, and you have a short memory.
Enough said. We are nine-zip. Not time to start eating our own.
Why thank you Sting.stinger wrote:GrumpyOne wrote:
I harbour grudges, and you have a short memory.
Enough said. We are nine-zip. Not time to start eating our own.
never have truer words ever been typed in the history of this forum.......well....not by this poster anyway.....![]()
![]()
![]()
Well you obviously care enough to keep stalking me.stinger wrote:snap....saint66au wrote:Ahh...who actually cares ??
WJ was suspended not permanently banned..his suspension is lifted so if he wants to come back under a new username for whatever reason and choose not to disclose it..then does anyone really care?![]()
Speak to the mods milton, you may be able to transfer you previous post count to ur new username....I have seem others do it in the past, Oh When The Saints i think it was.Milton66 wrote:Well you obviously care enough to keep stalking me.stinger wrote:snap....saint66au wrote:Ahh...who actually cares ??
WJ was suspended not permanently banned..his suspension is lifted so if he wants to come back under a new username for whatever reason and choose not to disclose it..then does anyone really care?![]()
Thanks, but it's not the real issue. Post count doesn't bother me. People abusing you via other people's posts do. Hopefully the mods will do the needy.Spinner wrote:Speak to the mods milton, you may be able to transfer you previous post count to ur new username....I have seem others do it in the past, Oh When The Saints i think it was.Milton66 wrote:Well you obviously care enough to keep stalking me.stinger wrote:snap....saint66au wrote:Ahh...who actually cares ??
WJ was suspended not permanently banned..his suspension is lifted so if he wants to come back under a new username for whatever reason and choose not to disclose it..then does anyone really care?![]()
Back on topic I assume you are one of the main reasons RF is no longer posting because of your belligerence.Milton66 wrote:Shaggy wrote:On what basis wouldl you say that. We're getting off topic a bit, but it's a bit of fun.Milton66 wrote:None of the above. But I have a healthy respect for most businesses/professions you obviously don'tShaggy wrote:So which one are you Shaggy? Lawyer, car salesman or Pollie?Milton66 wrote:If you really don't like Australia's laws, politics and cars than go overseas .... unless of course you are the type thats loves to bitch against main stream but takes the benefits they bring to the marketstinger wrote:Champagne comedy, coming from Mr Cleanskin himselfaussierules0k wrote:
i agree with you.....the world is a far nastier place these days...and the internet ten times worse......![]()
![]()
Oh deary deary me.
And then you call me a troll? On what basis are you harassing me.
Please feel free to ignomre me n the future.
I may be a troll, but the difference betwween you and me is that lawyers are tax dodging trolls who get paid to troll the pond scum and defend them, even if they are guilty, just so you can make a quid.
Right up there with used car salesmen and politicians. Absolute pillars of modern society.
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
.
Given that hardly anybody knows anyone here in real life and what they do, or what they're like, there's a fair few assumptions being stated as fact.
Then again what else can you go by other than what people post on here?
For the record, I have a healthy respect for all politicians of all persuasion, given what they sacrafice personally for their work. Even the left wing Ruddies of the world.
I have lawyers in my family. I also have a ton of respect for business owners who put their nuts on the line to achieve a better future.
Now stop baiting me
WTF?as SaintRising does with Saintbrat when he gets a chance. The bitchiness is ridiculous.
gardiner was always going to come good once he had a fitness base and confidencefelixleo wrote:How about having a Saintsational "Hall of Infamy" with the top ten suspended contributors in order. As to SP2008's comments on page one Dawson just seems to be improving each game and looks to have his spot locked in at the moment and SP was not the only one to think Gardi was worth the punt. Finally to so say its 'nice being correct' after the fact is (as Bruce would say) delicious when it blows up in your face the week after.
I know you have a go at RF. You really don't like his writing style. Regardless you don't spam against him ... its a healthy but heated debate.Mr Magic wrote:WTF?as SaintRising does with Saintbrat when he gets a chance. The bitchiness is ridiculous.
I must have missed all those occasions?
You sure about that?
I think you've got the names mixed up.
rodgerfox never misses an opportunity to have a go at SRr.
I generally have a go at rodgerfox when I think he's posting nonsense or trolling, but I've never seen SRr, or anybody else for that matter (other than a ludicrous comment from SaintNat once) have a go at Bratty.
Hate to agree with you SP2008Saints Premiers 2008 wrote:glad you are the other one who thinks it was a great decision (at the time) to pick him up and to keep him (at the time of it) - not just another one of these bandwagoner's who attempt to state that they thought it was a great idea to begin to come across as a typical saintsationalist know it all
why would i waste my time?Iceman234 wrote:Hate to agree with you SP2008Saints Premiers 2008 wrote:glad you are the other one who thinks it was a great decision (at the time) to pick him up and to keep him (at the time of it) - not just another one of these bandwagoner's who attempt to state that they thought it was a great idea to begin to come across as a typical saintsationalist know it allbut I - while vehemently opposed to Cousins, was always a big fan of MG coming to us, and was more than happy to give him the second chance - look back at any of my posts then and you will see I was the third person who wanted him.
I've never noticed but I will look out for it.Shaggy wrote:I know you have a go at RF. You really don't like his writing style. Regardless you don't spam against him ... its a healthy but heated debate.Mr Magic wrote:WTF?as SaintRising does with Saintbrat when he gets a chance. The bitchiness is ridiculous.
I must have missed all those occasions?
You sure about that?
I think you've got the names mixed up.
rodgerfox never misses an opportunity to have a go at SRr.
I generally have a go at rodgerfox when I think he's posting nonsense or trolling, but I've never seen SRr, or anybody else for that matter (other than a ludicrous comment from SaintNat once) have a go at Bratty.
Brat doesn't deserve anyone to ever have a go at her. I do not know who she is. But I bet you she really doesn't like SRr.
When she makes a mistake SRr does picks it up. I hope you watch from now on.
Do you honestly think that Fox would go away because of what I post? You are deluded my friend. That's a bold assumption. He's copped worse from what I've seen, and does himself no favours either.Shaggy wrote:Milton66 wrote:Back on topic I assume you are one of the main reasons RF is no longer posting because of your belligerence.Shaggy wrote:On what basis wouldl you say that. We're getting off topic a bit, but it's a bit of fun.Milton66 wrote:None of the above. But I have a healthy respect for most businesses/professions you obviously don'tShaggy wrote:So which one are you Shaggy? Lawyer, car salesman or Pollie?Milton66 wrote:If you really don't like Australia's laws, politics and cars than go overseas .... unless of course you are the type thats loves to bitch against main stream but takes the benefits they bring to the marketstinger wrote:Champagne comedy, coming from Mr Cleanskin himselfaussierules0k wrote:
i agree with you.....the world is a far nastier place these days...and the internet ten times worse......![]()
![]()
Oh deary deary me.
And then you call me a troll? On what basis are you harassing me.
Please feel free to ignomre me n the future.
I may be a troll, but the difference betwween you and me is that lawyers are tax dodging trolls who get paid to troll the pond scum and defend them, even if they are guilty, just so you can make a quid.
Right up there with used car salesmen and politicians. Absolute pillars of modern society.
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
.
Given that hardly anybody knows anyone here in real life and what they do, or what they're like, there's a fair few assumptions being stated as fact.
Then again what else can you go by other than what people post on here?
For the record, I have a healthy respect for all politicians of all persuasion, given what they sacrafice personally for their work. Even the left wing Ruddies of the world.
I have lawyers in my family. I also have a ton of respect for business owners who put their nuts on the line to achieve a better future.
Now stop baiting me
I concede you are bright, post a lot, and can be sneaky (the false ID was great).
Regardless there are some of us who are unhappy that you and others have pushed RF out.
Whilst you may think its great RF has gone there are others who value his opinion above yours.
As for your current campaign against Stinger ... he adds to SS. He continually posts interesting articles here and on the general forum and has done the past 3 years I have been on.
What do you do apart from post a lot and fight?
You downgrade Stinger as SaintRising does with Saintbrat when he gets a chance. The bitchiness is ridiculous.
There are many who liked to read RF despite not being big number posters.
You obviously don't like to be proven wrong and therefore its war to prove otherwise.
Good on you (without respect).
Well - because you stated felixleo was theSaints Premiers 2008 wrote:why would i waste my time?Iceman234 wrote:Hate to agree with you SP2008Saints Premiers 2008 wrote:glad you are the other one who thinks it was a great decision (at the time) to pick him up and to keep him (at the time of it) - not just another one of these bandwagoner's who attempt to state that they thought it was a great idea to begin to come across as a typical saintsationalist know it allbut I - while vehemently opposed to Cousins, was always a big fan of MG coming to us, and was more than happy to give him the second chance - look back at any of my posts then and you will see I was the third person who wanted him.
as for cousins, who knows
So no-one else, apart from you and felixleo (and no disrespect to felixleo, and no ties to you), never thought MG was worth it...other one who thinks it was a great decision (at the time) to pick him up and to keep him (at the time of it)
thank you and i know i was the only one to pick gardinerIceman234 wrote:Well - because you stated felixleo was theSaints Premiers 2008 wrote:why would i waste my time?Iceman234 wrote:Hate to agree with you SP2008Saints Premiers 2008 wrote:glad you are the other one who thinks it was a great decision (at the time) to pick him up and to keep him (at the time of it) - not just another one of these bandwagoner's who attempt to state that they thought it was a great idea to begin to come across as a typical saintsationalist know it allbut I - while vehemently opposed to Cousins, was always a big fan of MG coming to us, and was more than happy to give him the second chance - look back at any of my posts then and you will see I was the third person who wanted him.
as for cousins, who knowsSo no-one else, apart from you and felixleo (and no disrespect to felixleo, and no ties to you), never thought MG was worth it...other one who thinks it was a great decision (at the time) to pick him up and to keep him (at the time of it)
LOL you freaking legend, you were the only one to pick him as a future gun at STKFC and good on you.![]()
![]()
Pity you didn't pick Zac...
RF is no longer here. From my readings I think you are primarily responsible. Congratulations.Milton66 wrote:Shaggy wrote:Do you honestly think that Fox would go away because of what I post? You are deluded my friend. That's a bold assumption. He's copped worse from what I've seen, and does himself no favours either.Milton66 wrote:Back on topic I assume you are one of the main reasons RF is no longer posting because of your belligerence.Shaggy wrote:On what basis wouldl you say that. We're getting off topic a bit, but it's a bit of fun.Milton66 wrote:None of the above. But I have a healthy respect for most businesses/professions you obviously don'tShaggy wrote:So which one are you Shaggy? Lawyer, car salesman or Pollie?Milton66 wrote:If you really don't like Australia's laws, politics and cars than go overseas .... unless of course you are the type thats loves to bitch against main stream but takes the benefits they bring to the marketstinger wrote:Champagne comedy, coming from Mr Cleanskin himselfaussierules0k wrote:
i agree with you.....the world is a far nastier place these days...and the internet ten times worse......![]()
![]()
Oh deary deary me.
And then you call me a troll? On what basis are you harassing me.
Please feel free to ignomre me n the future.
I may be a troll, but the difference betwween you and me is that lawyers are tax dodging trolls who get paid to troll the pond scum and defend them, even if they are guilty, just so you can make a quid.
Right up there with used car salesmen and politicians. Absolute pillars of modern society.
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
.
Given that hardly anybody knows anyone here in real life and what they do, or what they're like, there's a fair few assumptions being stated as fact.
Then again what else can you go by other than what people post on here?
For the record, I have a healthy respect for all politicians of all persuasion, given what they sacrafice personally for their work. Even the left wing Ruddies of the world.
I have lawyers in my family. I also have a ton of respect for business owners who put their nuts on the line to achieve a better future.
Now stop baiting me
I concede you are bright, post a lot, and can be sneaky (the false ID was great).
Regardless there are some of us who are unhappy that you and others have pushed RF out.
Whilst you may think its great RF has gone there are others who value his opinion above yours.
As for your current campaign against Stinger ... he adds to SS. He continually posts interesting articles here and on the general forum and has done the past 3 years I have been on.
What do you do apart from post a lot and fight?
You downgrade Stinger as SaintRising does with Saintbrat when he gets a chance. The bitchiness is ridiculous.
There are many who liked to read RF despite not being big number posters.
You obviously don't like to be proven wrong and therefore its war to prove otherwise.
Good on you (without respect).
My downgrading of Stinger has to do with the constant swearing and belittling of others. And that's my business.
Funny, Stinger has been here 3 years and posted 16000+ times yet you ridicule me for posting a lot and fighting? Too funny.
Yep he adds a lot of cowardly insults and belittling of others behind his keyboard. WOW, what a hero.
I'll talk footy until the cows come home, and like your hero Stinger, I reserve my right to an opinion as it is a public forum. Everyone's fair game here.
If someone has a go at me, like you're doing, for no apparent reason, then I'll retaliate.
At least my views on footy are based on logic and an understanding of the game... IF you no like, you no read. Simple.
Funny how people like P66 who call it straight and thereby expose people for their silly conspiracy theories also gets attacked.
Perhaps we should all come on here and trot out the usual negative diatribe to keep people like you happy?
I don't take shots at you, so don't start another argument.
Now go and get yourself a Scooby snack.
Well if you're such a fan how come you don't have his 2007 run on top?Saints Premiers 2008 wrote:thank you and i know i was the only one to pick gardinerIceman234 wrote:blahSaints Premiers 2008 wrote:blahIceman234 wrote:blahSaints Premiers 2008 wrote:blah
Pity you didn't pick Zac...
Mate, why you want to keep ressurecting a dud thread is beyond me. Couldn't give 2 hoots if you disrespect me or not.Shaggy wrote:Milton66 wrote:RF is no longer here. From my readings I think you are primarily responsible. Congratulations.Shaggy wrote:Do you honestly think that Fox would go away because of what I post? You are deluded my friend. That's a bold assumption. He's copped worse from what I've seen, and does himself no favours either.Milton66 wrote:Back on topic I assume you are one of the main reasons RF is no longer posting because of your belligerence.Shaggy wrote:On what basis wouldl you say that. We're getting off topic a bit, but it's a bit of fun.Milton66 wrote:None of the above. But I have a healthy respect for most businesses/professions you obviously don'tShaggy wrote:So which one are you Shaggy? Lawyer, car salesman or Pollie?Milton66 wrote:If you really don't like Australia's laws, politics and cars than go overseas .... unless of course you are the type thats loves to bitch against main stream but takes the benefits they bring to the marketstinger wrote:Champagne comedy, coming from Mr Cleanskin himselfaussierules0k wrote:
i agree with you.....the world is a far nastier place these days...and the internet ten times worse......![]()
![]()
Oh deary deary me.
And then you call me a troll? On what basis are you harassing me.
Please feel free to ignomre me n the future.
I may be a troll, but the difference betwween you and me is that lawyers are tax dodging trolls who get paid to troll the pond scum and defend them, even if they are guilty, just so you can make a quid.
Right up there with used car salesmen and politicians. Absolute pillars of modern society.
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
.
Given that hardly anybody knows anyone here in real life and what they do, or what they're like, there's a fair few assumptions being stated as fact.
Then again what else can you go by other than what people post on here?
For the record, I have a healthy respect for all politicians of all persuasion, given what they sacrafice personally for their work. Even the left wing Ruddies of the world.
I have lawyers in my family. I also have a ton of respect for business owners who put their nuts on the line to achieve a better future.
Now stop baiting me
I concede you are bright, post a lot, and can be sneaky (the false ID was great).
Regardless there are some of us who are unhappy that you and others have pushed RF out.
Whilst you may think its great RF has gone there are others who value his opinion above yours.
As for your current campaign against Stinger ... he adds to SS. He continually posts interesting articles here and on the general forum and has done the past 3 years I have been on.
What do you do apart from post a lot and fight?
You downgrade Stinger as SaintRising does with Saintbrat when he gets a chance. The bitchiness is ridiculous.
There are many who liked to read RF despite not being big number posters.
You obviously don't like to be proven wrong and therefore its war to prove otherwise.
Good on you (without respect).
My downgrading of Stinger has to do with the constant swearing and belittling of others. And that's my business.
Funny, Stinger has been here 3 years and posted 16000+ times yet you ridicule me for posting a lot and fighting? Too funny.
Yep he adds a lot of cowardly insults and belittling of others behind his keyboard. WOW, what a hero.
I'll talk footy until the cows come home, and like your hero Stinger, I reserve my right to an opinion as it is a public forum. Everyone's fair game here.
If someone has a go at me, like you're doing, for no apparent reason, then I'll retaliate.
At least my views on footy are based on logic and an understanding of the game... IF you no like, you no read. Simple.
Funny how people like P66 who call it straight and thereby expose people for their silly conspiracy theories also gets attacked.
Perhaps we should all come on here and trot out the usual negative diatribe to keep people like you happy?
I don't take shots at you, so don't start another argument.
Now go and get yourself a Scooby snack.
Whilst you see RF as purely being negative I think he is a realist which doesn't mean he doesn't hope for the best.
After GT was sacked RF wrote a piece which basically predicted the 3 year restructuring and maturity of the core players which has taken place. He was howled down because forumites wanted the premiership now.
He has also written a lot of bollocks as well in the meantime.
But generally he has been right.
If you don't like it fine but his understanding of the game is quite outstanding IMO.
Regardless you have won. You have scared him off. You are smart, aggresive and obviously have time on your hands.
But I will say I seriously disrepect you as a result.
mediocrity has been replaced with smugness, expectation and fear that a club built on loosing could actually do something...Milton66 wrote:Are you refering to the "medocrity embracing" few?Saints Premiers 2008 wrote:god no, leave it going
its all about a select few that actually have a differing opinion on things![]()
That's an "in" joke btw.
too bad the differing opinions are based on nothing more than what you see on TV.Saints Premiers 2008 wrote:god no, leave it going
its all about a select few that actually have a differing opinion on things