I'll admit I may have been wrong.......
Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators
I'll admit I may have been wrong.......
I was quite openly was angry and concerned on this forum when the club decided not to go ahead and draft cousins to the club. After a thumping at the hands of Geelong and Hawthorn in the finals, I just couldn't see our the list making enough significant improvement to match these 2 teams. I never thought Cousins would be the answer or that he would win us a premiership. However, I felt that he could add a significant boost to our midfield with the retirement of Harvey.
Whilst I still believe that Cousins would make an 'interesting' addition to our midfield and would still be an asset, my apology is for underestimating our list. Whilst I have always known we have a large number of exceptionally talented players, they just never seemed to get it together and last year they seemed to be a iittle 'disinterested' for a large portion of the games they played in the first half of the year.
I have never had a problem with Ross and his coaching as I liked the direction he was moving the team in. My problem was that the team were resisting and were reluctant to follow him in this new direction. What a difference a pre season makes! The last 7 weeks confirms my opinion that Grant Thomas was kept in the job 2 years past his use by date. He was fantastic for those first few years and was what we needed to pull the club back together, but he hit his peak and should never have been offered the second contract. Do you agree or disagree? Would be interested in your thoughts.
Whilst I still believe that Cousins would make an 'interesting' addition to our midfield and would still be an asset, my apology is for underestimating our list. Whilst I have always known we have a large number of exceptionally talented players, they just never seemed to get it together and last year they seemed to be a iittle 'disinterested' for a large portion of the games they played in the first half of the year.
I have never had a problem with Ross and his coaching as I liked the direction he was moving the team in. My problem was that the team were resisting and were reluctant to follow him in this new direction. What a difference a pre season makes! The last 7 weeks confirms my opinion that Grant Thomas was kept in the job 2 years past his use by date. He was fantastic for those first few years and was what we needed to pull the club back together, but he hit his peak and should never have been offered the second contract. Do you agree or disagree? Would be interested in your thoughts.
Nevermind, we all sometimes have preconceived idea's and make incorrect judgements at times.
I would love to say that I have always been a RL fan, but the truth is I have been non commital and sat on the fence with this one. I kind of wish I had been willing to put out my support for him earlier....
My point, hindsight is a wonderful thing....but how great that we can all learn and bounce of one another on this forum.
I would love to say that I have always been a RL fan, but the truth is I have been non commital and sat on the fence with this one. I kind of wish I had been willing to put out my support for him earlier....
My point, hindsight is a wonderful thing....but how great that we can all learn and bounce of one another on this forum.
It has taken me a long time to warm to Ross too. But as you say, hindsight is a wonderful thing and had I known where he might take us I think I would have been a fan much sooner.ohwhenthesaints! wrote:Nevermind, we all sometimes have preconceived idea's and make incorrect judgements at times.
I would love to say that I have always been a RL fan, but the truth is I have been non commital and sat on the fence with this one. I kind of wish I had been willing to put out my support for him earlier....
My point, hindsight is a wonderful thing....but how great that we can all learn and bounce of one another on this forum.
- widereceiver
- Club Player
- Posts: 701
- Joined: Tue 12 Apr 2005 6:26pm
- Location: near Linton St.
- bigred
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 11463
- Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 7:39am
- Has thanked: 25 times
- Been thanked: 609 times
I will admit that I am surprised.
I dont really think I was wrong though.
A few things I was wrong about:
Farren Ray. I'll admit I called him a "Poor Man's Fiora". So, so so wrong.
Zach Dawson. I called him a "Poor Man's Tim Elliot"
He has bee great.
Greg Westaway. He is getting wraps from people who know what they are talking about.
I thought we would be "there abouts" again. Playing finals etc...
I most certainly did not think that we would come out and start playing this absolutely brilliant style of football. Seriously, this is THE best style, effort, intent, and application I have seen from this club in my lifetime. And I absolutely love watching them play it.
I dont really think I was wrong though.
A few things I was wrong about:
Farren Ray. I'll admit I called him a "Poor Man's Fiora". So, so so wrong.
Zach Dawson. I called him a "Poor Man's Tim Elliot"
![Razz :P](./images/smilies/icon_razz.gif)
Greg Westaway. He is getting wraps from people who know what they are talking about.
I thought we would be "there abouts" again. Playing finals etc...
I most certainly did not think that we would come out and start playing this absolutely brilliant style of football. Seriously, this is THE best style, effort, intent, and application I have seen from this club in my lifetime. And I absolutely love watching them play it.
"Now the ball is loose, it gives St. Kilda a rough chance. Black. Good handpass. Voss. Schwarze now, the defender, can run and from a long way".....
-
- SS Life Member
- Posts: 2508
- Joined: Tue 14 Jun 2005 9:11pm
- Location: Behind the goal, South Road end
- Has thanked: 32 times
- Been thanked: 38 times
Excellent point.bungiton wrote:In actual fact, Ross Lyon deserves credit here, instead of drafting cousins, he challenged our midfield to be cousins.
I think they've all surpassed his objective.
The improvement in Joey in particular is extraordinary, and Dal is getting close to his potential. But it has to be said that the likes of Ray, Geary, Jones, and Mini are pulling so much weight it's allowing the elite midfielders to become very high impact players.
This is such a great post.
I was also underwhelmed by picking up Farren Ray - thought he was a
front running dud. I am so humbled but how wrong I was. Go Hoo-Ray!
Thought Clinton Jones had one season in him - not because of effort but because he couldn't kick for nuts. Wrong. Wrong.
I really liked Grant Thomas, thought he did a great job agains the odds (massive injuries, interstate finals) and still do.
But I did like Lyon best from the coaches on offer and was glad when we picked him - so got that right at least.
I was also underwhelmed by picking up Farren Ray - thought he was a
front running dud. I am so humbled but how wrong I was. Go Hoo-Ray!
Thought Clinton Jones had one season in him - not because of effort but because he couldn't kick for nuts. Wrong. Wrong.
I really liked Grant Thomas, thought he did a great job agains the odds (massive injuries, interstate finals) and still do.
But I did like Lyon best from the coaches on offer and was glad when we picked him - so got that right at least.
"He spoke of his stride, his power and his willingness to push himself to exhaustion. All of the things that are on display each weekend in the No 12 jumper" Garry Lyon
- Selhurst Saint
- Club Player
- Posts: 1762
- Joined: Thu 19 Aug 2004 9:09am
- Location: I do like to be beside the seaside
- Been thanked: 35 times
As my cousin text me during the game last night.........."We have never been as good as we are right now".
Kudos to Ross, his support team, and the players execution.
Kudos to Ross, his support team, and the players execution.
"...If there has been one recurring theme through this whole shocking mess, it has been the misguided, inflated egos and their ill-judged determination to cling to long-standing old boy friendships. The bad advice that has guided the selfish and culpable James Hird has not only punctuated this saga but symbolised it..."
- Winmar7Fan
- Club Player
- Posts: 756
- Joined: Thu 08 May 2008 5:31pm
- Location: Gold Coast
Definitely agree. Except I'm not convinced yet we made the right choice with Cousins. He's playing well enough with the game time he's had in a bottom team of garbage to suggest in this team playing at the skill level we are he could be carving up.
Who knows different circumstances with our fitness management he may not have even tore his hammy either.
Who knows different circumstances with our fitness management he may not have even tore his hammy either.
He may have broken a leg. We made the right decision for one reason alone. We have won every game and you cannot do better than that.Winmar7Fan wrote:I'm not convinced yet we made the right choice with Cousins. He's playing well enough with the game time he's had in a bottom team of garbage to suggest in this team playing at the skill level we are he could be carving up.
Who knows different circumstances with our fitness management he may not have even tore his hammy either.
- Winmar7Fan
- Club Player
- Posts: 756
- Joined: Thu 08 May 2008 5:31pm
- Location: Gold Coast
Exactly what I thought . You can always do better and we still may need to to win the flag we're not there yet.bergholt wrote:that argument makes no sense.plugger66 wrote:He may have broken a leg. We made the right decision for one reason alone. We have won every game and you cannot do better than that.
As happy as I am now I wouldn't knock back any opportunity to be even stronger.
- evertonfc
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 7261
- Joined: Mon 08 Mar 2004 9:11pm
- Location: 'Quietly Confident' County
- Has thanked: 115 times
- Been thanked: 267 times
- Contact:
I don't think drafting or the non-drafting of Cousins would have affected our fortunes one iota.
Why? Because the building blocks for this season go way, way deeper than pre-season draft day. It's naive to think that we've gone on a 7-0 run on the strength of that decision.
It might have provided a temporary spur, just as playing in someone's 200th game might do. But I sincerely doubt it would have had any long-lasting ramifications. If anything, he would have been another midfielder to add to our collection. Who knows, perhaps he'd be pushing up daisies in the reserves right now?
At the time, I was all for Cousins and have absolutely no regrets about that. I don't think one skerrick of Richmond's poor form is due to him.
I shudder to think that players could be so mentally weak that they would fluctuate their fortunes based on one player.
I would have looked at Cousins like Leigh Matthews looked at Martin Pyke - basically viewed as damaged goods by others, but capable of doing a job for us on the cheap. And let's not forget, if Cousins was a part of this 7-0 team, I don't think anyone would be complaining.
In the wash up, look, if it's been the catalyst for our upturn in form, then you seriously have to wonder how long it will last for. However, in saying that, I didn't predict the steps that our midfield would take. Nobody could have. Not even Ross Lyon, which is probably why we were in the running for Cousins for as long as we have been.
Would I take him right now, if I had the option? Sure. I'd have him in the twos - along with Max, Matt, Armitage, L Fisher, Raph and everyone else who hasn't been able to crack our 22 right now.
He'd be a nice addition, rather than an essential part. That's a testament to the improvement by our playing list.
Why? Because the building blocks for this season go way, way deeper than pre-season draft day. It's naive to think that we've gone on a 7-0 run on the strength of that decision.
It might have provided a temporary spur, just as playing in someone's 200th game might do. But I sincerely doubt it would have had any long-lasting ramifications. If anything, he would have been another midfielder to add to our collection. Who knows, perhaps he'd be pushing up daisies in the reserves right now?
At the time, I was all for Cousins and have absolutely no regrets about that. I don't think one skerrick of Richmond's poor form is due to him.
I shudder to think that players could be so mentally weak that they would fluctuate their fortunes based on one player.
I would have looked at Cousins like Leigh Matthews looked at Martin Pyke - basically viewed as damaged goods by others, but capable of doing a job for us on the cheap. And let's not forget, if Cousins was a part of this 7-0 team, I don't think anyone would be complaining.
In the wash up, look, if it's been the catalyst for our upturn in form, then you seriously have to wonder how long it will last for. However, in saying that, I didn't predict the steps that our midfield would take. Nobody could have. Not even Ross Lyon, which is probably why we were in the running for Cousins for as long as we have been.
Would I take him right now, if I had the option? Sure. I'd have him in the twos - along with Max, Matt, Armitage, L Fisher, Raph and everyone else who hasn't been able to crack our 22 right now.
He'd be a nice addition, rather than an essential part. That's a testament to the improvement by our playing list.
Clueless and mediocre petty tyrant.
![Image](http://www.freeimagehosting.net/uploads/684651e21d.jpg)
![Image](http://www.freeimagehosting.net/uploads/684651e21d.jpg)
- Winmar7Fan
- Club Player
- Posts: 756
- Joined: Thu 08 May 2008 5:31pm
- Location: Gold Coast
I don't want to start an eruption of the Cousins thing because we are doing well enough that it doesn't matter but somehow I don't think he'd be in the twos.evertonfc wrote:I don't think drafting or the non-drafting of Cousins would have affected our fortunes one iota.
Why? Because the building blocks for this season go way, way deeper than pre-season draft day. It's naive to think that we went from ninth spot going into to R21 last year to 7-0 on the strength of that decision.
It might have provided a temporary spur, just as playing in someone's 200th game might do. But I sincerely doubt it would have had any long-lasting ramifications. If anything, he would have been another midfielder to add to our collection. Who knows, perhaps he'd be pushing up daisies in the 2s right now?
At the time, I was all for Cousins and have absolutely no regrets about that. I don't think one skerrick of Richmond's poor form is due to him.
I shudder to think that players could be so mentally weak that they would fluctuate their fortunes based on one player.
I would have looked at Cousins like Leigh Matthews looked at Martin Pyke - basically viewed as damaged goods by others, but good his job with us. And let's not forget, if Cousins was a part of this 7-0 team, I don't think anyone would be complaining.
In the wash up, look, if it's been the catalyst for our upturn in form, then you seriously have to wonder how long it will last for. However, in saying that, I didn't predict the steps that our midfield would take. Nobody could have. Not even Ross Lyon, which is probably why we were in the running for as long as we have been.
Would I take him right now, if I had the option? Sure. I'd have him in the twos - along with Max, Matt, Armitage, L Fisher, Raph and everyone else who hasn't been able to crack our 22 right now.
Our bellies might be nice and full with contentment at the moment but I'm under no dissolution about how far away we are. Things could easily do a 180 turn around. By round 16 we could have eight top players out while a player like Cousins could be fit running around averaging 25 disposals.
- evertonfc
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 7261
- Joined: Mon 08 Mar 2004 9:11pm
- Location: 'Quietly Confident' County
- Has thanked: 115 times
- Been thanked: 267 times
- Contact:
In all honesty, it's just an example that we could live without him even if we had him.Winmar7Fan wrote:I don't want to start an eruption of the Cousins thing because we are doing well enough that it doesn't matter but somehow I don't think he'd be in the twos.
Our bellies might be nice and full with contentment at the moment but I'm under no disolusion about how far away we are. By round 16 we could have eight top players out while a player like Cousins could be fit running around averaging 25 disposals.
However, I suspect he'd be in the 1s, and putting his head over the ball every much as Luke Ball, running every bit as hard as Lenny Hayes and trying to prove himself as much as Ray, Dal Santo and Geary...
(Remember, our medical staff - thank you Dave Misson - would have him on track
![Wink ;)](./images/smilies/icon_wink.gif)
I guess for me the bonus in having him would not be that we'd be playing better for certain now, but remember, the season is a long one. What happens - god forbid - if Lenny re-did he knee? Or Dal broke his leg? BC would have made a great September back-up.
However, he's not here, and thank christ we're playing well, or this joint would have gone into meltdown
![Cool 8-)](./images/smilies/icon_cool.gif)
Clueless and mediocre petty tyrant.
![Image](http://www.freeimagehosting.net/uploads/684651e21d.jpg)
![Image](http://www.freeimagehosting.net/uploads/684651e21d.jpg)
In all honesty if he had come to us and done his Hammy round one, the club would have been burnt down. You don't win premierships by adding good 31 year olds. You play kids, look at the form of Jones, Mini Gwilt and young Geary. Which of these kids would be loitering in the two's instead of gining valuable, confidence, composure and experience in the first 22?
![Image](http://i96.photobucket.com/albums/l179/bungiton/harvey.png)
I'm sorry, you've gone through all the trouble to find out what this actually says and it really is quite insignificant.
- bigred
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 11463
- Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 7:39am
- Has thanked: 25 times
- Been thanked: 609 times
Who gives a flog about Ben Cousins?
Last I saw he was struggling to make it on the park for a side that has won a single game this year.
I am glad we did not take him. Obviously we dont need a thirty one year old past champion to come into this side.
Sure it may have been tempting.
Pffft....Why is this even an issue now?
Seriously, let him run out his career with a second rate club....for the money.
Let our guys focus on winning a flag ffs.
Last I saw he was struggling to make it on the park for a side that has won a single game this year.
I am glad we did not take him. Obviously we dont need a thirty one year old past champion to come into this side.
Sure it may have been tempting.
Pffft....Why is this even an issue now?
Seriously, let him run out his career with a second rate club....for the money.
Let our guys focus on winning a flag ffs.
"Now the ball is loose, it gives St. Kilda a rough chance. Black. Good handpass. Voss. Schwarze now, the defender, can run and from a long way".....
I think the incredible amount of media hype that surrounded the recruitment of Ben Cousins would have derailed us....at least in the beginning. CAn you remember what it was like?
Too much attention on the Saints, an overhyped first round game..just like Richmond suffered. He's a great player and would have contributed but I think the coach was right - the mid field is better off striving to play like him than they would have been having him there.
Too much attention on the Saints, an overhyped first round game..just like Richmond suffered. He's a great player and would have contributed but I think the coach was right - the mid field is better off striving to play like him than they would have been having him there.
"He spoke of his stride, his power and his willingness to push himself to exhaustion. All of the things that are on display each weekend in the No 12 jumper" Garry Lyon
- Winmar7Fan
- Club Player
- Posts: 756
- Joined: Thu 08 May 2008 5:31pm
- Location: Gold Coast
I'm sure any team of good talented young kids would have no harm done to them to have a 31 year old Brownlow Medalist that's won 4 Best and Fairests and Captained a Club that was arguably the best in the comp for leadership and confidence.bungiton wrote:In all honesty if he had come to us and done his Hammy round one, the club would have been burnt down. You don't win premierships by adding good 31 year olds. You play kids, look at the form of Jones, Mini Gwilt and young Geary. Which of these kids would be loitering in the two's instead of gining valuable, confidence, composure and experience in the first 22?
A player like him can contribute a lot more than just his own stats on the ground and if we want to say he's not worth it let's take a look at his old partner in crime Michael Gardiner.
Anyway it doesn't matter now and we'll never know I'm just saying I think a bit different to a lot of cocky people on here who wouldn't even be interested in giving Superman a guernsey because of the way we're traveling at the moment.
- bigred
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 11463
- Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 7:39am
- Has thanked: 25 times
- Been thanked: 609 times
I reckon he could hold down a forward flank....'m just saying I think a bit different to a lot of cocky people on here who wouldn't even be interested in giving Superman a guernsey because of the way we're traveling at the moment
"Now the ball is loose, it gives St. Kilda a rough chance. Black. Good handpass. Voss. Schwarze now, the defender, can run and from a long way".....
- ace
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 10734
- Joined: Sun 16 Dec 2007 3:28pm
- Location: St Kilda
- Has thanked: 30 times
- Been thanked: 819 times
[quote="Winmar7Fan"]
A player like him can contribute a lot more than just his own stats on the ground and if we want to say he's not worth it let's take a look at his old partner in crime Michael Gardiner.[/quote]
Gardiner never convicted, not even prosecuted.
Simply a good guy with bad friends.
A player like him can contribute a lot more than just his own stats on the ground and if we want to say he's not worth it let's take a look at his old partner in crime Michael Gardiner.[/quote]
Gardiner never convicted, not even prosecuted.
Simply a good guy with bad friends.
The more you know, the more you know you don't know.
When I was a young child, I knew that I knew so much about so much.
Now that I am old and know so much more, I know that I know so much about so little, and so little about so much.
If you are not engaging AI actively and aggressively, you are doing it wrong.
You are not going to lose your job to AI.
You are going lose your job to somebody who uses AI.
Your company is not going to go out of business because of AI.
Your company is going to go out of business because another company used AI.
- Jensen Huang, CEO of NVIDIA
When I was a young child, I knew that I knew so much about so much.
Now that I am old and know so much more, I know that I know so much about so little, and so little about so much.
If you are not engaging AI actively and aggressively, you are doing it wrong.
You are not going to lose your job to AI.
You are going lose your job to somebody who uses AI.
Your company is not going to go out of business because of AI.
Your company is going to go out of business because another company used AI.
- Jensen Huang, CEO of NVIDIA
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 1166
- Joined: Mon 17 Sep 2007 1:52pm
- Location: Outer Wing Moorabbin
+1saint75 wrote:One thing I can say is that I have always been a huge fan of Ross Lyon. He was such a breath of fresh air after Grant Thomas. Whilst I supported Thomas when he was our coach (as any loyal saint would), I was never a fan of Thomas and the way he went about things and was glad to see him go.