A very good post.Saints Premiers 2008 wrote:i usually follow the gospel according to judson however i disagreesaintsRrising wrote:Some don't.WayneJudson42 wrote:
Forget if GT's rejects are better than RL's... look at what GT gave up for them compared to RL. Get it?
ie MB says not to "count" getting King because we got him so cheap
Yet Brooks swapped for two low picks including a first rounder is held up as wise....
why should we wait 5 years approx to then judge rl based on a previous coach???
different list different strengths good and bad points other players have developed or 'come on' others have tapered away due to injury or simply poor form
why should we compare it all to what gt did???
do we compare it to gt because we went to consecutive prelim's without being able to play accountable football???
probably
The irony is just fantastic. The obsession with Thomas is unbelievable.
The obsession from those who are still trying to discredit him is bizarre. Why would Lyon's performance be any different by comparing him to GT?
Does that make Lyon a better coach if after 5 years he has a better record than Thomas?
Does it make him worse if he doesn't?
And aboev all that - what does that matter to the club?
How does that help at all?
Lyon's judged on what we dish up each week, and how many flags we win.
Nothing more, nothing less.