Zac attack

kosifantutti23 · Tue 31 Mar 2009 1:58am

I don't know why the quality is so poor. If someone can do a better job I'll delete it.

sendmehomehappy · Tue 31 Mar 2009 2:14am

Just great to see the big boofhead flattened onto the canvas like that...I think we may have picked up a muscle back man for a song.

Keep it going Zac.

Verdun66 · Post: # 715842Post **Verdun66** » Tue 31 Mar 2009 6:11am

Nice one. And to think we might have got Nathan Carroll. This guy is doing the right things.

markp · Post: # 715847Post **markp** » Tue 31 Mar 2009 7:19am

Good work.... hopefully someone will do the same with the Kosi hanger.

InkerSaint · Post: # 715854Post **InkerSaint** » Tue 31 Mar 2009 8:17am

Nathan Carroll! I forgot all about him!

GREAT observation.

Mr Magic · Post: # 715861Post **Mr Magic** » Tue 31 Mar 2009 8:50am

Interestingky I haven't noticed any questioning of Bacteria Barry's lack of awareness in that shepherd?
Maybe it's only Kosi who suffers from that (raised again last night on 'On the Couch')

True Blue Sainter · Tue 31 Mar 2009 12:00pm

Brilliant video! Great to see, again, and again, and again....

Love seeing Hall cleaned up!! A few more solid performances from Zac could really see him establish himself as a bit of a crowd favourite.

I have a mate who's an avid Hawthorn fan, and attends a lot of Box Hill games also, he was there the day Zac kicked 9 last year. He reckons he has a lot of ability as a forward, as he has a bit of pace on the lead, a fairly accurate left foot and can take a grab. If Max comes back, and we need an option up forward, we could do a lot worse than the Zac Attack.

saintbrat · Post: # 715996Post **saintbrat** » Tue 31 Mar 2009 3:35pm

markp wrote:Good work.... hopefully someone will do the same with the Kosi hanger.

it's up for mark of the week so go to afl.com.au
http://www.afl.com.au/competitions/mark/mark.aspx

Loyal · Post: # 716251Post **Loyal** » Wed 01 Apr 2009 9:41am

what ever happened to spud carroll?

B W and R all over · Wed 01 Apr 2009 12:07pm

I noticed this link under the Zac youtube footage.
This still gets the blood boiling all these years on...

saintbrat · Post: # 716433Post **saintbrat** » Wed 01 Apr 2009 5:23pm

Knowing the football public would be scrutinising his every move, Dawson won his first few contests against Hall and even floored the Swan with a heavy shepherd.

Saints fans were in raptures.

"It was a lucky hit," he said. "I blindsided him a bit and I pride myself on being a physical player.

"When you get the chance to do that it proves a point. I needed to do that early in the game and it was good to get it out of the way."

Starting over
http://www.saints.com.au/season2009/new ... fault.aspx

more articles on Zac in the next few days in the media ( thanks S-M)

stinger · Post: # 716445Post **stinger** » Wed 01 Apr 2009 6:07pm

B W and R all over wrote:I noticed this link under the Zac youtube footage.
This still gets the blood boiling all these years on...

you and me both brother,,,the fact that meathead was allowed to play in the grandfinal was one of the biggest travesties of all times.....

bigcarl · Post: # 716471Post **bigcarl** » Wed 01 Apr 2009 7:45pm

stinger wrote:the fact that meathead was allowed to play in the grandfinal was one of the biggest travesties of all times

a sniping dog. how the afl can justify that decision still get me very angry.

never been slammed in the solar plexus by a trained boxer, but it doesn't look like a lot of fun. would knock the wind out of you for a couple of minutes i reckon.

Griggsy · Post: # 716603Post **Griggsy** » Thu 02 Apr 2009 1:36am

bigcarl wrote:
stinger wrote:the fact that meathead was allowed to play in the grandfinal was one of the biggest travesties of all times
a sniping dog. how the afl can justify that decision still get me very angry.

never been slammed in the solar plexus by a trained boxer, but it doesn't look like a lot of fun. would knock the wind out of you for a couple of minutes i reckon.

amen, I didnt mind Sydney till that day, now i hate them passionatly. How the tribunal justified him being let off when the ball was in the middle who knows.

But no use looking into the past. We messed up, time to focus on this season.

ace · Post: # 716606Post **ace** » Thu 02 Apr 2009 4:41am

[quote="B W and R all over"]I noticed this link under the Zac youtube footage.
This still gets the blood boiling all these years on...

[/quote]

If ever there was doubt as to the corruption of AFL HQ this shows otherwise.

Suspensions are based on the seriousness of a number of elements in the event.
In Hall's case these elements were deliberately undercharged except for one that was seriously overcharged, just enough for a one week suspension.
Sydney then was allowed to challenge just that one element (in play) to reduce the penalty to just under a match suspension.
The under charging of all the other elements were ignored by the tribunal.
They should have made for a certain suspension.