Saintsational Fan Forum - A passionate community of St Kilda Football Club fans discussing news, history, players, trade rumours, results, AFL stats and more.
stinger wrote:in my experience b4e is not a liar......i have called him many other things when this forum was more free for all....he has done likewise to me......but liar is not one of them...if he says he had a meeting with that scottish git...he had a meeting with that scottish git......so be it...but who gives a f*** about the contents ffs.......not me....
Thanks stinger, we may not always agree, but I like you regardless..........u make me laugh sometimes
I still reckon Dean Cox is a better ruckman than Trent Knobel, no matter what you say
What gets me is that this thread should not exist in the first place
You have said nothing except "My meeting with Archie Fraser was interesting" but tell us nothing more
The only thing I and many other posters can take from this is that
IT IS ALL ABOUT YOU
Boasting that you had a meeting with Archie Fraser - I mean - Fair Dinkum to put it frankly WHO GIVES A FLYING F*** - seriously if you are not prepared to dilvulge what went on then why post it - seriously why tell us????
Oh yeah that's right - IT IS ALL ABOUT YOU
You are the Del Griffith of Saintsational as Neil Page said in Planes Trains and Automobiles - "You know when you're telling these little stories? Here's a good idea: have a point. It makes it SO much more interesting for the listener!" or reader in this case
Mods please delete this thread - it is taking up space and has no point except for the naked mole rat picture which is at least interesting to look at
In the begining this thread wads kind of tantlising............now it has evolved into one of the more boring discussions.............moderators , please do us all a favour................lock it!!!!!!............
B4E.....no offence to you ...............I think you make a great contribution by way of both substance and humour............but this one is boring me to to many glasses of Tasmanian Pinot........................!!!!!!!
Devilhead wrote:What gets me is that this thread should not exist in the first place
You have said nothing except "My meeting with Archie Fraser was interesting" but tell us nothing more
The only thing I and many other posters can take from this is that
IT IS ALL ABOUT YOU
Boasting that you had a meeting with Archie Fraser - I mean - Fair Dinkum to put it frankly WHO GIVES A FLYING F*** - seriously if you are not prepared to dilvulge what went on then why post it - seriously why tell us????
Oh yeah that's right - IT IS ALL ABOUT YOU
You are the Del Griffith of Saintsational as Neil Page said in Planes Trains and Automobiles - "You know when you're telling these little stories? Here's a good idea: have a point. It makes it SO much more interesting for the listener!" or reader in this case
Mods please delete this thread - it is taking up space and has no point except for the naked mole rat picture which is at least interesting to look at
Ok d**khead, the reason why I havn't added more, which I thought was obvious, is because Grumpy One made a call on the first page and offered a bet, claiming it was all a complete fabrication and did NOT happen!
I'm still waiting for him to put his money where his mouth is!
Is this any clearer for you and anyone else for that matter!
Devilhead wrote:What gets me is that this thread should not exist in the first place
You have said nothing except "My meeting with Archie Fraser was interesting" but tell us nothing more
The only thing I and many other posters can take from this is that
IT IS ALL ABOUT YOU
Boasting that you had a meeting with Archie Fraser - I mean - Fair Dinkum to put it frankly WHO GIVES A FLYING F*** - seriously if you are not prepared to dilvulge what went on then why post it - seriously why tell us????
Oh yeah that's right - IT IS ALL ABOUT YOU
You are the Del Griffith of Saintsational as Neil Page said in Planes Trains and Automobiles - "You know when you're telling these little stories? Here's a good idea: have a point. It makes it SO much more interesting for the listener!" or reader in this case
Mods please delete this thread - it is taking up space and has no point except for the naked mole rat picture which is at least interesting to look at
Ok d**khead, the reason why I havn't added more, which I thought was obvious, is because Grumpy One made a call on the first page and offered a bet, claiming it was all a complete fabrication and did NOT happen!
I'm still waiting for him to put his money where his mouth is!
Is this any clearer for you and anyone else for that matter!
FAIR DINKUM
Ok let's be realisitc about this.
The only currency worth worrying about, is the obvious one.
Saintsational Currency.
So, here are the terms of my offer....
I think you're full of shiit. So, if you can prove you sipped a cafe latte with the Cane Toad, then I will ban myself for 1 month from Saintsational.
You won't have to hear from me for a month.
Now considering that will most likely include 3 losses, that's some pretty serious currency.
Devilhead wrote:What gets me is that this thread should not exist in the first place
You have said nothing except "My meeting with Archie Fraser was interesting" but tell us nothing more
The only thing I and many other posters can take from this is that
IT IS ALL ABOUT YOU
Boasting that you had a meeting with Archie Fraser - I mean - Fair Dinkum to put it frankly WHO GIVES A FLYING F*** - seriously if you are not prepared to dilvulge what went on then why post it - seriously why tell us????
Oh yeah that's right - IT IS ALL ABOUT YOU
You are the Del Griffith of Saintsational as Neil Page said in Planes Trains and Automobiles - "You know when you're telling these little stories? Here's a good idea: have a point. It makes it SO much more interesting for the listener!" or reader in this case
Mods please delete this thread - it is taking up space and has no point except for the naked mole rat picture which is at least interesting to look at
Ok d**khead, the reason why I havn't added more, which I thought was obvious, is because Grumpy One made a call on the first page and offered a bet, claiming it was all a complete fabrication and did NOT happen!
I'm still waiting for him to put his money where his mouth is!
Is this any clearer for you and anyone else for that matter!
FAIR DINKUM
So, when you first posted, did you intend on telling us, and then someone came along and bet or offered to pay you, and now you are holding out for that?
barks4eva wrote:
Ok d**khead, the reason why I havn't added more, which I thought was obvious, is because Grumpy One made a call on the first page and offered a bet, claiming it was all a complete fabrication and did NOT happen!
I'm still waiting for him to put his money where his mouth is!
Is this any clearer for you and anyone else for that matter!
FAIR DINKUM
be careful mate, I called some poster a tool and got a warning for it...
maybe the word tool is not censored on this site and d**khead is???
I have been called many names myself and I don't believe anyone got a warning for it...
Is tool just as bad as tw@???
It just maybe in the censorship of it, but to me it's a little inconsistent
Don't wait for the light at the end of the tunnel to appear, run down there and light the bloody thing yourself!
rodgerfox wrote:You won't have to hear from me for a month.
Now considering that will most likely include 3 losses, that's some pretty serious currency.
So B4Eva, are you prepared to take this wager?
I know Archie made him the offer to visit, it's just whether B4E took him up...I'd suggest he did.
But RF, you call the shots with pure honesty, so don't ban yourself please. And if we lose three of our first four, your insight would be appreciated whilst others are talking up James Gwilt as our saviour "because he played a good game in 2005".
rodgerfox wrote:You won't have to hear from me for a month.
Now considering that will most likely include 3 losses, that's some pretty serious currency.
So B4Eva, are you prepared to take this wager?
I know Archie made him the offer to visit, it's just whether B4E took him up...I'd suggest he did.
But RF, you call the shots with pure honesty, so don't ban yourself please. And if we lose three of our first four, your insight would be appreciated whilst others are talking up James Gwilt as our saviour "because he played a good game in 2005".
LOL.. if we win 4, the RF will ban himself anyway, cause he'll have nothing to complain about.
The lid is off after Round 2! Enjoy the journey, coz you just don't know where we'll end up. Live for today and seize the moment.
Sainterman wrote:
So, when you first posted, did you intend on telling us, and then someone came along and bet or offered to pay you, and now you are holding out for that?
Are you serious?
I think it is time to lock this thread down...
Yes I always intended to offer more info!
There is a perfectly good explanation as to why I didn't post more information in the OP, which will make perfect sense, once Grumpy One grows some balls and puts his money where his mouth is!
rodgerfox wrote:You won't have to hear from me for a month.
Now considering that will most likely include 3 losses, that's some pretty serious currency.
So B4Eva, are you prepared to take this wager?
I know Archie made him the offer to visit, it's just whether B4E took him up...I'd suggest he did.
But RF, you call the shots with pure honesty, so don't ban yourself please. And if we lose three of our first four, your insight would be appreciated whilst others are talking up James Gwilt as our saviour "because he played a good game in 2005".
LOL.. if we win 4, the RF will ban himself anyway, cause he'll have nothing to complain about.
One of the keys to the best sporting clubs all over the world is the ability to keep picking ways in which to improve.
The only thing more lame than thinking someone may pay up big money on a forum bet, is thinking someone will turn up somewhere for a fight..... I'm only curious to see how tragic this has to get before it's locked.