You cannot blame our mids for Kosi's inconsistent and very often poor performances.Thinline wrote:Ease up, mate. You're being a bit touchy for someone who takes apparent delight in slinging it left right and centre. There's no need to attack me personally. Fair dinkum. You rip into Kos with steel capped boots at every opportunity and it's only fair you be asked to account for what I reckon is a pretty blinkered view. Asking you to validate youself is infinitely more mature than taking every chance you can to assassinate a bloke. What does that make you? Three?Bernard Shakey wrote:I've seen every Saints game in Melbourne and 2 interstate this year and also most open training sessions.Thinline wrote:Prove that, Bernard.
In my opinion Kosi plays as he trains and doesn't try.
What a dumb comment by you Thinline. Says to me you are about 12 or 13, because only a kid would come out with a comment like "Prove that".
What I saw, and threfore what you must have seen as well, is a player who kicked 30.21, smashed the occasional pack open, took the occasional great grab, and a lot of the time contested like a big bloke should. Hardly the stuff of someone who, as you so vehemently state, 'never tries'.
The flipside of course is that he also went missing too often, something that was frustrating to us all when we'd prefer him to be more consistent.
Add to that the valid point mentioned by many already that we have a cluster of midfielders, wingers, and back flankers who struggle to hit the side of a barn. In fact the only one who hits forward targets - usually Riewoldt - with anything approaching consistency is 37 and just left the game. I'd love it of Kos had go go gadget arms and hands like platters filled with glue, but fairs fair. For a bloke clearly struggling to play his best, you can hardly say with any authority that he's getting the best delivery. Now perhaps he isn't quick enough to be a KP forward or a lead up player. In that case it's up to Lyon and Barker to create a strategy to leave him one out in space and somehow upskill our delivery men to put the ball in something resembling the right place. Whatever. But the simple fact remains there are very few big men who play an interchangable forward/ruck role who are setting the game alight so we'd be foolish to forcibly remove ours. It'd leave a gaping hole we'd never fill. McEvoy's too young (and if you watched the Kangaroo's game you would have noted he seems to want to mark with his forehead), M Gardiner's gone (apparently), Allen's a puppy, Ferguson doesn't get a sniff, and Van Rheenen's shown very little.
Look, it seems he and Dal will be tossed up as trade bait. If he goes, he goes, so maybe all your dreams will come true.
But I say work with what we have, find a way to make Kos more consistent, fine a way to make his presence on the ground damaging, and get on with it.
Culling him IMO does nothing positive.
In MY view.
The reason the mids don't kick it to him is that he doesn't present.
He may make one attempt at a lead, if it's not kicked to him he gives up.
To be a key forward you require a serious work ethic which I believe he lacks.
To say Lyon and Barker (who probably won't be there next year) need to find a strategy to suit Kosi is laughable. It is a team game and he needs to be part of the team. You will never build a team around him.
At the beginning of the season I felt Kosi was on the right track and his prospects and those of the club looked great for this year.
Maybe the gameplan doesn't suit him (it certainly didn't suit Fraser) but as I said it's a team game. He needs to fit in.
I feel a move would be good for him and the club, but only if the right can be brokered.
If Kosi is traded all my dreams will not come true. That will only happen when for the second time in my life I see the Saints win a premiership.