who are their defenders????

This unofficial St Kilda Saints fan forum is for people of all ages to chat Saints Footy and all posts must be respectful.

Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators

Post Reply
BigMart
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 13622
Joined: Sat 22 Mar 2008 6:06pm
Been thanked: 1 time

who are their defenders????

Post: # 648288Post BigMart »

Who for Nick and Kosi????

Croad obviously will have one of them........who is the other....Murphy???......Birchall???........Campbell Brown???

For their guys we have
Max 191
Sam 192
Blake 191
Gilbert 194
even BJ at 191
to take their turn on Buddy 196 and Roughie 193


steph
Club Player
Posts: 182
Joined: Fri 30 Mar 2007 4:44pm

Re: who are their defenders????

Post: # 648296Post steph »

BigMart wrote:Who for Nick and Kosi????

Croad obviously will have one of them........who is the other....Murphy???......Birchall???........Campbell Brown???

For their guys we have
Max 191
Sam 192
Blake 191
Gilbert 194
even BJ at 191
to take their turn on Buddy 196 and Roughie 193
Brown has been named forward i think, however they may have to resort to him going back if roo and kosi fire. Brownless suggested Murphy on Kos on the Footy Show last night. If this happens, we MUST exploit this match-up as Murphy is nothing more than a very average footballer.

Apart from Hodge, their backline is mediocre.


User avatar
mightysainters
SS Hall of Fame
Posts: 1986
Joined: Tue 16 Mar 2004 2:21pm
Has thanked: 28 times
Been thanked: 52 times

Post: # 648297Post mightysainters »

im smelling a late withdrawal with Gilham on the emergencies... Brown gets away with murder wit hthe chopping of the arms...


molly
Club Player
Posts: 34
Joined: Fri 25 Mar 2005 1:57am

Post: # 648331Post molly »

Birchall 193cm
Murphy 189cm
Brown 177cm
and the surprise one to watch for....
Campbell 199cm

I wouldn't be suprised to see Campbell play on Kosi all day.


Listen to my AFL Podcast (internet Radio show) at http://afl.mollyzine.com
or subscribe in iTunes at:
http://phobos.apple.com/WebObjects/MZSt ... 7&s=143460
ark
Club Player
Posts: 319
Joined: Thu 21 Jul 2005 9:41pm

Post: # 648333Post ark »

Suggest then if Kosi is on try to play through him - Campbell's not much of a defender is he?


molly
Club Player
Posts: 34
Joined: Fri 25 Mar 2005 1:57am

Post: # 648346Post molly »

ark wrote:Suggest then if Kosi is on try to play through him - Campbell's not much of a defender is he?
Nah, he chopped up Barry Hall a couple of years ago when he and the Swans were flying, but hes a dud really!


Listen to my AFL Podcast (internet Radio show) at http://afl.mollyzine.com
or subscribe in iTunes at:
http://phobos.apple.com/WebObjects/MZSt ... 7&s=143460
ark
Club Player
Posts: 319
Joined: Thu 21 Jul 2005 9:41pm

Post: # 648349Post ark »

Ok - admit I might be speaking out of ignrance - hence the ? at the end.


molly
Club Player
Posts: 34
Joined: Fri 25 Mar 2005 1:57am

Post: # 648356Post molly »

ark wrote:Ok - admit I might be speaking out of ignrance - hence the ? at the end.
No worries. He doesn't have a huge body of work in the backline to be fair but when he has done it, he has done a fair job. You would only consider it on the big forwards and resting ruckman (don't think he could match up on Riewoldt or anything like that). The other issue is he is more then handy in the ruck. No Dean Cox but he holds his own.

Good luck for Saturday night and hopefully its a good game.


Listen to my AFL Podcast (internet Radio show) at http://afl.mollyzine.com
or subscribe in iTunes at:
http://phobos.apple.com/WebObjects/MZSt ... 7&s=143460
To the top
SS Life Member
Posts: 3266
Joined: Fri 16 Mar 2007 4:05pm
Been thanked: 390 times

Post: # 648360Post To the top »

Hawthorn do not play with a traditional defence, they roll 8-10 players around the ball at all times.

So no player is ever isolated on an opponent - all they have to do is make a contest then use their numbers to roll the pack forward.

Like Geelong, they only release the ball from the packs when they want, and have someone who has escaped scrutiny - and at other times grab the tacklers arms to ensure the appearance of the ball being held in whilst gaining yards (with the tackler hanging on or being hung onto) rugby league style.

Remember their only victory over us in recent times?

Only Raymond was left for Casey but Hawthorn played this "rolling flood" which actually kept a very under manned St Kilda in the game.

It could be a similarly ugly game tomorrow night.

The player who has had most influence against Hawthorn over the recent past has been Gehrig because his body size loved the way Hawthorn play.

He was quite happy for the rolling flood to come into his territory so he could push and shove and stick his big chest out - except that game we lost we could not get the ball inside 50 to exploit them.


Pilgram
Club Player
Posts: 819
Joined: Sun 20 Jul 2008 10:25am

Post: # 648363Post Pilgram »

To the top wrote:Hawthorn do not play with a traditional defence, they roll 8-10 players around the ball at all times.

So no player is ever isolated on an opponent - all they have to do is make a contest then use their numbers to roll the pack forward.

Like Geelong, they only release the ball from the packs when they want, and have someone who has escaped scrutiny - and at other times grab the tacklers arms to ensure the appearance of the ball being held in whilst gaining yards (with the tackler hanging on or being hung onto) rugby league style.

Remember their only victory over us in recent times?

Only Raymond was left for Casey but Hawthorn played this "rolling flood" which actually kept a very under manned St Kilda in the game.

It could be a similarly ugly game tomorrow night.

The player who has had most influence against Hawthorn over the recent past has been Gehrig because his body size loved the way Hawthorn play.

He was quite happy for the rolling flood to come into his territory so he could push and shove and stick his big chest out - except that game we lost we could not get the ball inside 50 to exploit them.
great summary there


Post Reply