FRANKSTON DEAL NOT DONE YET

This unofficial St Kilda Saints fan forum is for people of all ages to chat Saints Footy and all posts must be respectful.

Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators

Post Reply
User avatar
Solar
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 8144
Joined: Wed 10 Mar 2004 12:43pm

Post: # 642578Post Solar »

Bernard Shakey wrote:For the sake of 8 one armed bandits, we are probably going to Tassie.
tool of the week


FQF
loyal in the good times and bad
In richo I trust

2013 trade/draft best ever?
Billings - future brownlow medallist Longer - future best ruck
Dunstan - future captain Eli - future cult hero
Acres - future norm smith
User avatar
GeorgeYoung27
Club Player
Posts: 660
Joined: Mon 19 Apr 2004 2:54pm
Location: on a tight angle at the South Rd end

Post: # 642610Post GeorgeYoung27 »

GeorgeYoung27 wrote:
caseyscorp would love to reply, but he is very busy at the moment.


Indeed I have been a bit busy, but thanks for holding the fort for me.
all I can say is good luck with your current ventures.


casey scorp
Club Player
Posts: 1617
Joined: Sun 25 Sep 2005 1:40am
Location: Hampton/Gold Coast
Been thanked: 7 times

Post: # 645406Post casey scorp »

"Saints-Frankston deal in doubt" says the Frankston Leader on-line news.

http://frankston-leader.whereilive.com. ... -in-doubt/

And Kingston's door is always open says its Mayor.

Come on Archie & Greg - go for it. There's one last opportunity to save the situation.


GrumpyOne

Post: # 645548Post GrumpyOne »

casey scorp wrote:"Saints-Frankston deal in doubt" says the Frankston Leader on-line news.

http://frankston-leader.whereilive.com. ... -in-doubt/

And Kingston's door is always open says its Mayor.

Come on Archie & Greg - go for it. There's one last opportunity to save the situation.
I second that suggestion. It would be best for Kingston and for the Saints to redevelop the site and settle there. For a group of supposedly successful businessmen, it is plainly obvious that due diligence was not performed on any aspect of the Frankston proposal. It was undue haste IMO to stick one up Kingston Council that drove the whole process, and that has bitten us firmly on the bum.

If we have to sack Archie to do it, then it must be done. He has been a good CEO in all other respects, but if he remains a hurdle to negotiations resuming with Kingston, its bye-bye Archie.


SainterK
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 21057
Joined: Thu 14 Aug 2008 9:53pm
Location: Melb

Post: # 646119Post SainterK »

I am new to this whole subject matter, and have been reading through the posts.

Looking around the ground today, it was quite depressing :cry:

Don't get me wrong, I am not turning my nose up at the outdated facilities. It's more that the place is tired and run down, with no-one able to give it the respect it deserves.

Here's hoping that we pursue the option of staying put, and try again!


RBnW
Club Player
Posts: 325
Joined: Tue 16 Oct 2007 7:43pm
Location: Port Melbourne
Contact:

Post: # 646175Post RBnW »

casey scorp wrote:"Saints-Frankston deal in doubt" says the Frankston Leader on-line news.

http://frankston-leader.whereilive.com. ... -in-doubt/

And Kingston's door is always open says its Mayor.

Come on Archie & Greg - go for it. There's one last opportunity to save the situation.
report in the Hsun this morning.... :lol: you had best have that apology ready :oops: :oops:
http://www.news.com.au/heraldsun/sport/ ... 42,00.html
they are saying that the deal has been done and agreed with everyone to build at Frankston on that new site $11m building and in by 2010... :D :D
So can I have that open apology from you you did say you would give all of us........good bye Casey forever :P :P


Our best is yet
to come......
User avatar
Ghost Like
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 6562
Joined: Wed 19 Sep 2007 10:04pm
Has thanked: 5788 times
Been thanked: 1909 times

Post: # 646205Post Ghost Like »

Let's hope they change the name of it from Belvedere Park to The Robert Harvey Reserve.


User avatar
bigmicka
Club Player
Posts: 1278
Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 12:01am

Post: # 646225Post bigmicka »

Melbourne is going to be really loved at Casey after the council decided to give that $1.25 million to Melbourne instead of fixing the Methane problem.

mic


No one ever built a statue for a critic.
saintly
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 5410
Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 10:29am
Has thanked: 33 times
Been thanked: 47 times

Post: # 646559Post saintly »

bigmicka wrote:Melbourne is going to be really loved at Casey after the council decided to give that $1.25 million to Melbourne instead of fixing the Methane problem.

mic
the vote nearly came through to move the the money.

4 to 5 infavour of giving it to a football club instead of fixing the methane problem.

if i was a melbourne supporter, it doesn't sound good!


RBnW
Club Player
Posts: 325
Joined: Tue 16 Oct 2007 7:43pm
Location: Port Melbourne
Contact:

Post: # 646760Post RBnW »

Casey.....Casey....Casey where are you....public apology for all the bull you have put us through for the past year.......
the deal is done at Frankston that you said would never take place.....
Casey.....where are you :?:

We are all waiting..... :oops:


Our best is yet
to come......
GrumpyOne

Post: # 646780Post GrumpyOne »

RBnW wrote:Casey.....Casey....Casey where are you....public apology for all the bull you have put us through for the past year.......
the deal is done at Frankston that you said would never take place.....
Casey.....where are you :?:

We are all waiting..... :oops:
I take it you are referring to Casey Scorps...

No need for an apology IMO. The deal did not go through as presented. We ended up with a compromise backdoor screwing dressed up as the romance of the century.


RBnW
Club Player
Posts: 325
Joined: Tue 16 Oct 2007 7:43pm
Location: Port Melbourne
Contact:

Post: # 646785Post RBnW »

GrumpyOne wrote:
RBnW wrote:Casey.....Casey....Casey where are you....public apology for all the bull you have put us through for the past year.......
the deal is done at Frankston that you said would never take place.....
Casey.....where are you :?:

We are all waiting..... :oops:
I take it you are referring to Casey Scorps...

No need for an apology IMO. The deal did not go through as presented. We ended up with a compromise backdoor screwing dressed up as the romance of the century.
you are hard to keep happy.....but then your name says it all :roll: :roll:


Our best is yet
to come......
GrumpyOne

Post: # 646855Post GrumpyOne »

RBnW wrote:
GrumpyOne wrote:
RBnW wrote:Casey.....Casey....Casey where are you....public apology for all the bull you have put us through for the past year.......
the deal is done at Frankston that you said would never take place.....
Casey.....where are you :?:

We are all waiting..... :oops:
I take it you are referring to Casey Scorps...

No need for an apology IMO. The deal did not go through as presented. We ended up with a compromise backdoor screwing dressed up as the romance of the century.
you are hard to keep happy.....but then your name says it all :roll: :roll:
Touche. :lol: :lol:


casey scorp
Club Player
Posts: 1617
Joined: Sun 25 Sep 2005 1:40am
Location: Hampton/Gold Coast
Been thanked: 7 times

Post: # 646964Post casey scorp »

RBnW wrote:Casey.....Casey....Casey where are you....public apology for all the bull you have put us through for the past year.......
the deal is done at Frankston that you said would never take place.....
Casey.....where are you :?:

We are all waiting..... :oops:
I'm here, and I'm not sure what you're expecting an apology for.

I told you months ago that the Frankston deal would fall over, and now it officially has! Many derided me for bucking the company line, but the ultimate outcome was obvious.

Now we have the Seaford Deal, or Belvedere Park. Don't kid yourself that this is really Frankston, but then again swallow the company line. Some people will believe anything.


Will Belvedere Park work? It certainly doesn't have the same constraints as Frankston, but I'm not sure the proponents can add up. From the media release titled:

SAINTS MOVE TO FRANKSTON CITY CONFIRMED

we have the following:

The $11m plus training and administration facility will include an AFL MCG sized oval, gymnasium, rehabilitation pool, meeting rooms, lecture theatre and an indoor sports hall for basketball, netball and other sports that will be made available to local schools, health providers and sporting associations.

The project will be funded by four parties including the Victorian State Government ($3.45m), Frankston City Council ($3m), AFL ($2.55m) and the St Kilda Football Club ($1.43m, plus all additional costs).


When I went to school that added up to $9 million of other party's contributions, which is exactly as was proposed earlier. The Saints are now to pick up $1.43 million (plus all additional costs).

That is an interesting way of saying $2 million plus (ie $11 million - $9 million).

If you think the Saints have a lazy $2 million plus you're nuts.

And it's a lot more than the $1.25 million proposed to be contributed by the club at Frankston Park when "the deal" was announced in November last year.

And building construction costs have escalated since last year's announcement, and will escalate a lot more before the project is underway, further eroding the value of the total contributions.

I'd be very surprised if the project can be constructed for $11 million (although $11 million plus is rather unlimited, so it can obviously be built for an unlimited figure).

Of course the heading is instructive as well......reference to Frankston City is a poorly attempted smokescreen. Somer people will just swallow anything.

I've just watched The Hollowmen on ABC, and you can just hear the spin doctors "if we say Frankston City, it's consistent with our original announcement because Frankston Park is in Frankston City as well, and it's the same Council so we can just say it's a minor relocation". Please.....I think the supporters should be treated with a bit more respect. But then, some don't really even ask for it.

As for being completed during the 2010 season, it's now a maximum of two years. Without doing a bit of research on the site, I don't know if there are planning requirements that need to be satisfied. I do know that, if a permit is required, you could well get resident opposition given the residential street which must be traversed in order to get to the site. But that may not be a problem. A 12-15 month construction period gives the club about 9 months to get all the design completed, approvals obtained, and tendering undertaken. The gun has just been fired......and the club had better get it's collective skates on.

I've got a feeling that the club and the Council will make this development happen because a failure of another announcement would be fatal. However, we will get a third rate outcome.

The Frankston deal is dead. I'm the one awaiting the apologies.


User avatar
Bernard Shakey
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 11237
Joined: Sun 18 Mar 2007 11:22pm
Location: Down By The River 1989, 2003, 2009 & 2013
Has thanked: 121 times
Been thanked: 137 times

Post: # 646968Post Bernard Shakey »

Shouldn't be any problems with methane, no tips nearby.


Old enough to repaint, but young enough to sell
casey scorp
Club Player
Posts: 1617
Joined: Sun 25 Sep 2005 1:40am
Location: Hampton/Gold Coast
Been thanked: 7 times

Post: # 647003Post casey scorp »

Bernard Shakey wrote:Shouldn't be any problems with methane, no tips nearby.
Hopefully not, but the surface at Belvedere Park is uneven and vegetation struggles to grow.

When you walk the site, it has the feeling of an old....


Teflon
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 23218
Joined: Sat 13 Mar 2004 11:44pm
Has thanked: 735 times
Been thanked: 1778 times

Post: # 647010Post Teflon »

u fought the good fight Casey....lets relax now and enjoy the fresh Frankston air.... :wink:


“Yeah….nah””
User avatar
Bernard Shakey
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 11237
Joined: Sun 18 Mar 2007 11:22pm
Location: Down By The River 1989, 2003, 2009 & 2013
Has thanked: 121 times
Been thanked: 137 times

Post: # 647015Post Bernard Shakey »

casey scorp wrote:
Bernard Shakey wrote:Shouldn't be any problems with methane, no tips nearby.
Hopefully not, but the surface at Belvedere Park is uneven and vegetation struggles to grow.

When you walk the site, it has the feeling of an old....
Which is just what Moorabbin oval was.


Old enough to repaint, but young enough to sell
plugger66
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 50626
Joined: Mon 26 Feb 2007 8:15pm
Location: oakleigh

Post: # 647075Post plugger66 »

casey scorp wrote:
Bernard Shakey wrote:Shouldn't be any problems with methane, no tips nearby.
Hopefully not, but the surface at Belvedere Park is uneven and vegetation struggles to grow.

When you walk the site, it has the feeling of an old....
Are you that obsessed you went and walked on the site. And do you sit there and watch the grass grow. I would suggest you use your life for better things like the Saints winning the prelim and next year both Sandy and Saints being in the finals.


casey scorp
Club Player
Posts: 1617
Joined: Sun 25 Sep 2005 1:40am
Location: Hampton/Gold Coast
Been thanked: 7 times

Post: # 647780Post casey scorp »

plugger66 wrote:Are you that obsessed you went and walked on the site. And do you sit there and watch the grass grow. I would suggest you use your life for better things like the Saints winning the prelim and next year both Sandy and Saints being in the finals.
I find that doing some research puts you in a better position to make comments.

I visited the Frankston Park site after the announcement last November and, blow me down, it was obvious that the proposed development wouldn't work.

I visited the Belvedere Park site as well. My initial observations were that the site was:

* difficult to access (the intersection of Ti-Tree Cres and Seaford Road is left in-left out only)
* accessible only through residential streets
* isolated
* barren
* already occupied by some sports clubs.

It seems like the site is the pits, and hardly worthy of an AFL club's home.

And I'll also put energy into cheering the Saints over the line on Saturday.


User avatar
bobmurray
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 7828
Joined: Mon 03 Oct 2005 11:08pm
Location: In the stand at RSEA Park.
Has thanked: 515 times
Been thanked: 234 times

Post: # 647800Post bobmurray »

casey scorp wrote:
plugger66 wrote:Are you that obsessed you went and walked on the site. And do you sit there and watch the grass grow. I would suggest you use your life for better things like the Saints winning the prelim and next year both Sandy and Saints being in the finals.
I find that doing some research puts you in a better position to make comments.

I visited the Frankston Park site after the announcement last November and, blow me down, it was obvious that the proposed development wouldn't work.

I visited the Belvedere Park site as well. My initial observations were that the site was:

* difficult to access (the intersection of Ti-Tree Cres and Seaford Road is left in-left out only)
* accessible only through residential streets
* isolated
* barren
* already occupied by some sports clubs.

It seems like the site is the pits, and hardly worthy of an AFL club's home.

And I'll also put energy into cheering the Saints over the line on Saturday.
The Saints should have gone to Casey,the project would have started long before the methane started door knocking.....

Based on what's happened so far,who's to say Belvedere's actually going to progress beyond spin....


The list changes for 2025 have begun, always an interesting time for an avid supporter.
plugger66
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 50626
Joined: Mon 26 Feb 2007 8:15pm
Location: oakleigh

Post: # 647848Post plugger66 »

casey scorp wrote:
plugger66 wrote:Are you that obsessed you went and walked on the site. And do you sit there and watch the grass grow. I would suggest you use your life for better things like the Saints winning the prelim and next year both Sandy and Saints being in the finals.
I find that doing some research puts you in a better position to make comments.

I visited the Frankston Park site after the announcement last November and, blow me down, it was obvious that the proposed development wouldn't work.

I visited the Belvedere Park site as well. My initial observations were that the site was:

* difficult to access (the intersection of Ti-Tree Cres and Seaford Road is left in-left out only)
* accessible only through residential streets
* isolated
* barren
* already occupied by some sports clubs.

It seems like the site is the pits, and hardly worthy of an AFL club's home.

And I'll also put energy into cheering the Saints over the line on Saturday.
Sounds very similar to casey but closer to where current players live. Remember it is a training facility not a VFL ground. Good move compared to Casey even though Moorabbin would have been better but wasnt an option.


Pilgram
Club Player
Posts: 819
Joined: Sun 20 Jul 2008 10:25am

Post: # 647850Post Pilgram »

i spoke to brian mase at the dolphins,
and there was a concern that f/ston park was not big enough
(which it truthfully isn't).
so much space at seaford - room to swing a cat.
and sure the land itself is largely old swampland if you do a geological survey,
however they will make it work.
speaking of work,
it has been said that it will start soon.

great stuff from the club!
next to eastlink.
will secure the saints in the top four long term.

great stuff!

casey/cranbourne is putrid.


User avatar
RedWhiteBlack
Club Player
Posts: 234
Joined: Thu 03 Jul 2008 4:27pm
Location: Melbourne

Post: # 647869Post RedWhiteBlack »

Time to change the name of this topic now mods?


Pilgram
Club Player
Posts: 819
Joined: Sun 20 Jul 2008 10:25am

Post: # 647870Post Pilgram »

RedWhiteBlack wrote:Time to change the name of this topic now mods?
or put it in the tip along with all the other cranbourne garbage?

casey scorp has shown himself to be a resounding idiot throughout just quietly.

a stupid thread yet one that has been put to bed i'd suggest.


Post Reply