Kosi reported
Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators
- cowboy18
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 5795
- Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 1:05pm
- Location: in my duffle coat
- Has thanked: 3 times
- Been thanked: 5 times
And has the worst awareness in the AFL according to many pundits?saintDal wrote:How could he have known when was he facing the other way?perfectionist wrote:It will be touch and go. I think he knew the Wakelin did not have the ball and decided to exact so revenge for an incident that occurred just prior. The umpire knew that too, which is why he was reported. However, the MRP can only look at the isolated incident. The benefit of the doubt may go his way.
Can we use that in his defence?
![Wink :wink:](./images/smilies/icon_wink.gif)
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 278
- Joined: Thu 16 Sep 2004 9:30pm
- Location: In saint heaven
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 11337
- Joined: Thu 11 Mar 2004 12:57am
- Location: South of Heaven
- Has thanked: 1329 times
- Been thanked: 453 times
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 278
- Joined: Thu 16 Sep 2004 9:30pm
- Location: In saint heaven
Ball in the area...would be gobsmacked 1 if he goes up 2 if a half decent defence couldn't get him off.Watch the replay the ball there while Kosi tackles then unsighted.No Case to answer for sure!StSteven wrote:Ask Milburn 3 weeks ago.Baldock Rules wrote:What for,, a heavy tackle and follow through.Since when do you get rubbed out for that.Sam23 wrote:He'll be put out for a week i'd say.
Carry over points hurt
Will be thrown out or reprimand at worst.
There are freaks and freaks and Baldock was both of those.
- Enrico_Misso
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 11662
- Joined: Tue 13 Jun 2006 12:11am
- Location: Moorabbin Chapter of The Royal Society of Hagiographers
- Has thanked: 315 times
- Been thanked: 720 times
Certainly deserved a free.
Didn't deserve a report.
But the tribunal is so bloody inconsistent who knows what will happen.
But I think it is better that he is going straight to the tribunal rather than go through the even less consistent Match Review Panel.
Didn't deserve a report.
But the tribunal is so bloody inconsistent who knows what will happen.
But I think it is better that he is going straight to the tribunal rather than go through the even less consistent Match Review Panel.
The rest of Australia can wander mask-free, socialise, eat out, no curfews, no zoning, no police rings of steel, no illogical inconsistent rules.
They can even WATCH LIVE FOOTY!
They can even WATCH LIVE FOOTY!
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 359
- Joined: Mon 30 Oct 2006 5:04pm
- Location: Melbourne
- Has thanked: 2 times
- Been thanked: 11 times
MRP will review it and throw it out, won't even go to the tribunal. Difference with milburn was he had him wrapped up and he wasn't close to having the ball. Kosi's was a sling rather than driving him into the ground. Free kick, nothing else.
If at first you don't succeed, sky diving is not for you.
- Enrico_Misso
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 11662
- Joined: Tue 13 Jun 2006 12:11am
- Location: Moorabbin Chapter of The Royal Society of Hagiographers
- Has thanked: 315 times
- Been thanked: 720 times
But the umpire reported him.The_Merchant wrote:MRP will review it and throw it out, won't even go to the tribunal. Difference with milburn was he had him wrapped up and he wasn't close to having the ball. Kosi's was a sling rather than driving him into the ground. Free kick, nothing else.
So doesn't that mean it will go straight to the Tribunal ?
Or has that Anderson idiot changed the rules again ?
The rest of Australia can wander mask-free, socialise, eat out, no curfews, no zoning, no police rings of steel, no illogical inconsistent rules.
They can even WATCH LIVE FOOTY!
They can even WATCH LIVE FOOTY!
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 359
- Joined: Mon 30 Oct 2006 5:04pm
- Location: Melbourne
- Has thanked: 2 times
- Been thanked: 11 times
The difference there is that Milburn was aware that the ball had come out.StSteven wrote:Ask Milburn 3 weeks ago.Baldock Rules wrote:What for,, a heavy tackle and follow through.Since when do you get rubbed out for that.Sam23 wrote:He'll be put out for a week i'd say.
Carry over points hurt
Will be thrown out or reprimand at worst.
- desertsaint
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 10423
- Joined: Sun 27 Apr 2008 2:02pm
- Location: out there
- Has thanked: 187 times
- Been thanked: 705 times
spot on - should've been paid the frees himself and understandably lost it a bit - just hope it doesn't cost him a week - would be very harsh but who knows? - the only constant with the tribunal is inconsistency!Moccha wrote:I reckon he wanted to hurt Wakelin and was seriously pissed off with the 2 frees paid against him. I'm not so confident of Kossie getting off, played a good game though.
"The starting point of all achievement is desire. "
No they are the same as they have been for 3 years.Enrico_Misso wrote:But the umpire reported him.The_Merchant wrote:MRP will review it and throw it out, won't even go to the tribunal. Difference with milburn was he had him wrapped up and he wasn't close to having the ball. Kosi's was a sling rather than driving him into the ground. Free kick, nothing else.
So doesn't that mean it will go straight to the Tribunal ?
Or has that Anderson idiot changed the rules again ?
- Mr Magic
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 12775
- Joined: Fri 04 May 2007 9:38am
- Has thanked: 784 times
- Been thanked: 425 times
Plugger is correct.plugger66 wrote:No they are the same as they have been for 3 years.Enrico_Misso wrote:But the umpire reported him.The_Merchant wrote:MRP will review it and throw it out, won't even go to the tribunal. Difference with milburn was he had him wrapped up and he wasn't close to having the ball. Kosi's was a sling rather than driving him into the ground. Free kick, nothing else.
So doesn't that mean it will go straight to the Tribunal ?
Or has that Anderson idiot changed the rules again ?
The MRP review all incidents from the game, including any reports. They determine what the charge and penalty should be. In some cases they refer the insident directly to the Tribunal without offering a penalty.
- Tassie Saint
- Club Player
- Posts: 625
- Joined: Sun 03 Oct 2004 5:58pm
- Location: In the wilds of Tassie - Where boys become men, and cousins become wives
- St Fidelius
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 10492
- Joined: Sun 01 Aug 2004 10:30am
I can't see how he could be reprimanded if he has carry over points...Baldock Rules wrote:What for,, a heavy tackle and follow through.Since when do you get rubbed out for that.Sam23 wrote:He'll be put out for a week i'd say.
Carry over points hurt
Will be thrown out or reprimand at worst.
either guilty or innocent ...
Don't wait for the light at the end of the tunnel to appear, run down there and light the bloody thing yourself!
-
- SS Hall of Fame
- Posts: 2015
- Joined: Wed 10 Aug 2005 8:01pm
- Has thanked: 67 times
- Been thanked: 19 times
- St Fidelius
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 10492
- Joined: Sun 01 Aug 2004 10:30am
- St Fidelius
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 10492
- Joined: Sun 01 Aug 2004 10:30am