Change this week require potential impact player

This unofficial St Kilda Saints fan forum is for people of all ages to chat Saints Footy and all posts must be respectful.

Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators

Post Reply
older saint
SS Life Member
Posts: 3335
Joined: Wed 12 Sep 2007 5:30pm
Has thanked: 167 times
Been thanked: 511 times

Change this week require potential impact player

Post: # 640793Post older saint »

If any changes are made this week the player we bring in really needs to have the potential to have an impact , ala Gwilt in Adelaide in a one off performace.

Fiora & Birrs will be solid players but not win us the game . M Gardiner is Ruck only never was or will be a FF.

I think C Gardiner out and in Fergusson, played as a half forward. He has a very good mark and COULD kick 3-4 goals in a game which could be the difference in the end, the X factor.
Yes it is a risk but finals see odd players step up.

Apart from that based on Ball not Ok and Blake ok probably keep the same line up as it had worked for the past few weeks.

Thoughts?


User avatar
borderbarry
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 6676
Joined: Mon 19 Apr 2004 11:22pm
Location: Wodonga

Post: # 640830Post borderbarry »

I thought that Armitage should be the first one considered. He has been in good form in the VFL, better than Birss even. Although you are quite right that Ferguson may be the additional forward we are so badly lacking. Other than him I would try Rafe, but he is probably required down back.


User avatar
meher baba
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 7150
Joined: Mon 14 Aug 2006 6:49am
Location: Tasmania
Has thanked: 1 time
Been thanked: 488 times

Post: # 640911Post meher baba »

:roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll:

I'm really such a schmuck. I keep opening up threads expecting to see some interesting and serious discussion, and I find myself reading, for the umpteenth time, inane posts suggesting that the likes of Ferguson, Gardi, Armitage or Allen should be brought into our team for the rest of the finals because they are supposedly going to make a big impact: or, in the case of the last two, because we ought to "give our young players some finals experience".

All four of these guys have played AFL during the season. All four have IMO, looked like they are a significant way below the required standard (Gardi's skills don't, but he moved around the field at glacial speed, suggesting - as he has now confirmed - that his injuries have prevented him from returning to anything remotely near his one time best game).

I would be the first to acknowledge that C Gardiner, McQualter, Eddy and to a less extent Gwilt, Raph and X all have their shortcomings as finals players. None of them would make the Geelong team, and I doubt that they would make any of the other final 8 teams (nor would Kosi on current form, Jones, Blake and perhaps a number of others).

But replacing any of these guys, if they are not injured, with any of Gardi, Ferguson, Allen and Armitage would be a massive risk given that they have shown next to nothing - repeat, next to nothing - at AFL level this season. Selecting any of them again this season would be a "psychic" decision based on a combination of hope and instinct. If Lyon's instincts tell him that any of these guys could deliver on Saturday night (or in subsequent matches, if we get to play any), then fair enough. But the idea that they are "going well" in the VFL has got much to do with it. Geary has been going well in the odd game lately, but Lyon seems to be finished with him for the season.

I really doubt that any poster on this forum would have any idea of what Lyon's instincts are telling him right now about any of these players. And I suspect that his knowledge and logic would be telling him to steer well clear of these four players. Still, Armo and Allen appear to be hovering around the edges, so he might know something that we all don't. But I'm sure it's got nothing to do with any idea that these guys should be given finals experience. And I doubt (and fervently hope) that Lyon would be considering Gardi or Ferguson at this point in time.

On the other hand, I am sure that he is considering Birss and Fiora, both of whom have shown some form at AFL level this season.

To conclude, my message is that - if you are looking for any additional impact in our performance on Saturday - I would think that, like me, you would be looking to see this coming from the players who ran around last weekend: particularly the likes of Schneider, Harves, Kosi, Dal and Joey (all of whom I think will need to contribute a lot more if we are going to knock over the Pies).


"It is useless to attempt to reason a man out of a thing he was never reasoned into."
- Jonathan Swift
User avatar
saint patrick
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 4338
Joined: Sun 14 Mar 2004 5:20pm
Location: mt.martha

Post: # 640916Post saint patrick »

Birss must play and should never have been dropped...personally would like to see Armo come backin as a grunt player to counter the Swanns,Burns etc

Outs should be Eddy and Macqualter IMO.


Never take a backward step even to gain momentum.....

'It's OK to have the capabilities and abilities, but you've got to get it done." Terry Daniher 05

"We have beauty in our captain and we have a true leader in our coach. Our time will come"
Thinline.Post 09 Grand final.
remboy
SS Hall of Fame
Posts: 2130
Joined: Fri 22 Jul 2005 9:27am
Location: Rockville
Has thanked: 566 times
Been thanked: 177 times

Post: # 640917Post remboy »

You want an impact player? Let's pick Rix and tell him to knock out Thomas, Medhurst, Davis and Cloke. Wouldn't matter if he got suspended for life.


henno
Club Player
Posts: 306
Joined: Sun 15 Jun 2008 6:23pm

Re: Change this week require potential impact player

Post: # 640950Post henno »

older saint wrote:If any changes are made this week the player we bring in really needs to have the potential to have an impact , ala Gwilt in Adelaide in a one off performace.

Fiora & Birrs will be solid players but not win us the game . M Gardiner is Ruck only never was or will be a FF.

I think C Gardiner out and in Fergusson, played as a half forward. He has a very good mark and COULD kick 3-4 goals in a game which could be the difference in the end, the X factor.
Yes it is a risk but finals see odd players step up.

Apart from that based on Ball not Ok and Blake ok probably keep the same line up as it had worked for the past few weeks.

Thoughts?
yes ferguson might play alright, but let's not get too ahead of ourselves

his kicking for goal was atrocious agains melbourne, the worst team in the comp.

as memory recalls i think he kicked 3 or 4 behinds and one didnt make the distance. and also 0 goals.


User avatar
Winmar7Fan
Club Player
Posts: 756
Joined: Thu 08 May 2008 5:31pm
Location: Gold Coast

Post: # 641008Post Winmar7Fan »

meher baba wrote::roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll:

I'm really such a schmuck. I keep opening up threads expecting to see some interesting and serious discussion, and I find myself reading, for the umpteenth time, inane posts suggesting that the likes of Ferguson, Gardi, Armitage or Allen should be brought into our team for the rest of the finals because they are supposedly going to make a big impact: or, in the case of the last two, because we ought to "give our young players some finals experience".

All four of these guys have played AFL during the season. All four have IMO, looked like they are a significant way below the required standard (Gardi's skills don't, but he moved around the field at glacial speed, suggesting - as he has now confirmed - that his injuries have prevented him from returning to anything remotely near his one time best game).

I would be the first to acknowledge that C Gardiner, McQualter, Eddy and to a less extent Gwilt, Raph and X all have their shortcomings as finals players. None of them would make the Geelong team, and I doubt that they would make any of the other final 8 teams (nor would Kosi on current form, Jones, Blake and perhaps a number of others).

But replacing any of these guys, if they are not injured, with any of Gardi, Ferguson, Allen and Armitage would be a massive risk given that they have shown next to nothing - repeat, next to nothing - at AFL level this season. Selecting any of them again this season would be a "psychic" decision based on a combination of hope and instinct. If Lyon's instincts tell him that any of these guys could deliver on Saturday night (or in subsequent matches, if we get to play any), then fair enough. But the idea that they are "going well" in the VFL has got much to do with it. Geary has been going well in the odd game lately, but Lyon seems to be finished with him for the season.

I really doubt that any poster on this forum would have any idea of what Lyon's instincts are telling him right now about any of these players. And I suspect that his knowledge and logic would be telling him to steer well clear of these four players. Still, Armo and Allen appear to be hovering around the edges, so he might know something that we all don't. But I'm sure it's got nothing to do with any idea that these guys should be given finals experience. And I doubt (and fervently hope) that Lyon would be considering Gardi or Ferguson at this point in time.

On the other hand, I am sure that he is considering Birss and Fiora, both of whom have shown some form at AFL level this season.

To conclude, my message is that - if you are looking for any additional impact in our performance on Saturday - I would think that, like me, you would be looking to see this coming from the players who ran around last weekend: particularly the likes of Schneider, Harves, Kosi, Dal and Joey (all of whom I think will need to contribute a lot more if we are going to knock over the Pies).
Couldn't have said it all better myself all these guys and I'd even throw Gwilt in there not to just a "lesser extent" wouldn't even be there if we were a top team like the others.

IMO they're all VFL players that supporters embrace because we have no-one else.


linz
Club Player
Posts: 1209
Joined: Wed 27 Jul 2005 8:11pm
Has thanked: 1 time
Been thanked: 4 times
Contact:

Post: # 641037Post linz »

Winmar7Fan wrote:
meher baba wrote::roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll:

I'm really such a schmuck. I keep opening up threads expecting to see some interesting and serious discussion, and I find myself reading, for the umpteenth time, inane posts suggesting that the likes of Ferguson, Gardi, Armitage or Allen should be brought into our team for the rest of the finals because they are supposedly going to make a big impact: or, in the case of the last two, because we ought to "give our young players some finals experience".

All four of these guys have played AFL during the season. All four have IMO, looked like they are a significant way below the required standard (Gardi's skills don't, but he moved around the field at glacial speed, suggesting - as he has now confirmed - that his injuries have prevented him from returning to anything remotely near his one time best game).

I would be the first to acknowledge that C Gardiner, McQualter, Eddy and to a less extent Gwilt, Raph and X all have their shortcomings as finals players. None of them would make the Geelong team, and I doubt that they would make any of the other final 8 teams (nor would Kosi on current form, Jones, Blake and perhaps a number of others).

But replacing any of these guys, if they are not injured, with any of Gardi, Ferguson, Allen and Armitage would be a massive risk given that they have shown next to nothing - repeat, next to nothing - at AFL level this season. Selecting any of them again this season would be a "psychic" decision based on a combination of hope and instinct. If Lyon's instincts tell him that any of these guys could deliver on Saturday night (or in subsequent matches, if we get to play any), then fair enough. But the idea that they are "going well" in the VFL has got much to do with it. Geary has been going well in the odd game lately, but Lyon seems to be finished with him for the season.

I really doubt that any poster on this forum would have any idea of what Lyon's instincts are telling him right now about any of these players. And I suspect that his knowledge and logic would be telling him to steer well clear of these four players. Still, Armo and Allen appear to be hovering around the edges, so he might know something that we all don't. But I'm sure it's got nothing to do with any idea that these guys should be given finals experience. And I doubt (and fervently hope) that Lyon would be considering Gardi or Ferguson at this point in time.

On the other hand, I am sure that he is considering Birss and Fiora, both of whom have shown some form at AFL level this season.

To conclude, my message is that - if you are looking for any additional impact in our performance on Saturday - I would think that, like me, you would be looking to see this coming from the players who ran around last weekend: particularly the likes of Schneider, Harves, Kosi, Dal and Joey (all of whom I think will need to contribute a lot more if we are going to knock over the Pies).
Couldn't have said it all better myself all these guys and I'd even throw Gwilt in there not to just a "lesser extent" wouldn't even be there if we were a top team like the others.

IMO they're all VFL players that supporters embrace because we have no-one else.
Yep.In my opinion: Our list isn't good enough. Having said that, we now have to NOW make it unpredictable to the opposition. IN: Gardiner OUT: King
IN: Armitage OUT: Mini IN: Birrs OUT: Raph IN: Ball (hopefully) Out X.


I once spent a year in Adelaide, I think it was on a Sunday.
User avatar
matrix
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 21475
Joined: Mon 21 May 2007 1:55pm
Has thanked: 4 times
Been thanked: 4 times

Post: # 641131Post matrix »

out: King???

u 4 real :?:


User avatar
quidnunc
Club Player
Posts: 243
Joined: Thu 11 Mar 2004 11:29am
Location: Merimbula
Been thanked: 1 time

Post: # 641138Post quidnunc »

At the risk of sounding uninteresting I would think that the team that played Geelong were not able to ignite a spark (under finals pressure) to get them going and were snuffed out.

I'm also not sure going in with the same side and hoping that will change is the best philosophy either?

My thoughts are that Armitage should play - does kick goals and tackles well. (I can't be bothered quoting stats but for those inclined check the comparisons between Eddy and McQualter for these attributes).

Ferguson also should not summarily be dismissed as an option. One game to show his value as a forward showed promise and would have been in the side the following week except for illness. I think of the game he played against Melbourne and compare it to what Charlie Gardiner is giving us. More chance of a spark from Ferguson me thinks.

Finally, Michael Gardiner - played an absolute shocker against the Eagles but also had a lot on this forum happy with his form early on. (Form last week in Scorps was apparently good). I think he has to come in to consideration as he could continue the pressure on Josh Fraser who would not like two hard bodied experienced ruckman against him all game. That pressure may alleviate a perceived on ball advantage for the pies.

That's my thoughts - don't like them? Too late you've read them!


Was there on the outer wing as a youngster flying the flag in '66 - still loyal, still passionate!
saint66au
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 17003
Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 9:03pm
Contact:

Post: # 641142Post saint66au »

Our 3rd forward options have not worked all year and its somewhat optimistic to expect that they will magically explode in a cut-throat final.

Charlie G is living proof of all this tosh about "the emergencies at Geelong would all walk into St Kildas starting 22"..well IIRC Charlie was an emergency in their GF team last year. King PLAYED in the premiership side and yet has been solid rather than spectacular with us this year. SAid it all last Sunday that he was rated so highly by Gellong that his opponent spent most of his day double-teaming Roo

Ferguson..well he got lucky. 3rd forward v Melbourne. Yes played well but shanked all his set shots under zero pressure. My 80-something Dad could have played 3rd forward that day and snagged a few.

Allen. Hmm...2 unspectacular games this year and hes gonna be the magic answer in a final?

Look, lets face it. For us to win on Saturday Roo and/or Milney are gonna have to kick a bag. Our "3rd" forward option goals are far more likely to come from a spread of Gram/BJ/Schneider than any more traditional targets.

Kosi? God I love the bloke but he'd be the first to admit he's sadly out of form atm. Let him gallop around in the ruck like he did against Essendon, fill some holes and provide some chop-outs. If he kicks a goal or two its a huge bonus


Image

THE BUBBLE HAS BURST

2011 player sponsor
User avatar
widereceiver
Club Player
Posts: 701
Joined: Tue 12 Apr 2005 6:26pm
Location: near Linton St.

Post: # 641156Post widereceiver »

I think X was brought in as an impact player. NO IMPACT. Hasn't played enough footy so it's back to the old drawing board.

Birss unlucky.


"Winning's not everything, it's the ONLY thing!" Vince Lombardi.
Sam Gilbert #1 booster - always on the attack!!!
Win more for Winmar
saint1974
Club Player
Posts: 425
Joined: Mon 01 Sep 2008 4:31pm
Location: Melbourne
Has thanked: 2 times
Been thanked: 8 times

Post: # 641163Post saint1974 »

x.clarke and c.gardiner out.

In birss and armitage(someone tough and strong not afraid of the hard ball get who can put a storng tackle on)


Red
Club Player
Posts: 427
Joined: Thu 17 May 2007 1:46pm
Been thanked: 4 times

Post: # 641190Post Red »

Armitage has been a dead set dog in the seniors this year.

The boy can play but he doesn't run hard enough in the 1's and he doesn't

have to in the 2's because head and shoulders better than most others on

the field. He needs to push himself to make an impact.

X will be better for the run.


Post Reply