Cj and the finals
Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators
- meher baba
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 7220
- Joined: Mon 14 Aug 2006 6:49am
- Location: Tasmania
- Has thanked: 1 time
- Been thanked: 516 times
Cj and the finals
Hi y'all
I notice the topic of CJ, and whether or not he should be in our team for the finals, bobbing up in a number of threads lately. So I thought that it mightn't be a bad idea to start a CJ-specific thread in which we can really thrash the matter out.
Personally, I find CJ to be a very appealling sort of a player: he gives 120 per cent, he's aggressive, he wants to win, he can tackle.
However, while I acknowledge that he doesn't produce as many clear turnovers as he used to do, I still think his disposal by foot is basically UTS. He can be relied upon to hit someone totally in the clear with a slow, looping pass about 4 out of 5 occasions.
He has virtually no sense of how strategically to mount or direct an attack fromt the back half of the ground. At best, he can get the ball to someone else who can do this. At worst, he can clog up the attack by going sideways or backwards to a player he feels confident he can hit, which can result in the play going to the wrong side of the field and clogging everything up: which often results in a turnover which might not appear to be CJ's fault, but for which he was effectively the instigator.
Watching Raph, with his undoubted tendency to make the occasional howler, and being able to compare him to CJ, I could see how Raph's delivery forward was infinitely more effective: he actually has the skill to send the ball by foot at more than a snail's pace to precisely where he wants to put it. Players like Dal, BJ, Chips and Gwilt are streets ahead of Raph, let alone CJ.
Now, I've only managed to get to a couple of games live this year, at which CJ's clogging effect on attacks from the back half was bleeding obvious to me. But I have even been able to detect it on TV in some games: especially on Sunday (perhaps because he got so many disposals).
I'm surprised at all the CJ love on here - "I'm warming to CJ, etc." - shown by posters who often also complain about our poor disposal skills by foot and hand. Gram and Joey are unreliable enough with their disposal: can we really afford to have 3 such players operating in the back half of the field against the likes of the Cats or the Dogs?
Anyway, I appreciate that others see this very differently to me, so I'm hoping for an interesting discussion.
I notice the topic of CJ, and whether or not he should be in our team for the finals, bobbing up in a number of threads lately. So I thought that it mightn't be a bad idea to start a CJ-specific thread in which we can really thrash the matter out.
Personally, I find CJ to be a very appealling sort of a player: he gives 120 per cent, he's aggressive, he wants to win, he can tackle.
However, while I acknowledge that he doesn't produce as many clear turnovers as he used to do, I still think his disposal by foot is basically UTS. He can be relied upon to hit someone totally in the clear with a slow, looping pass about 4 out of 5 occasions.
He has virtually no sense of how strategically to mount or direct an attack fromt the back half of the ground. At best, he can get the ball to someone else who can do this. At worst, he can clog up the attack by going sideways or backwards to a player he feels confident he can hit, which can result in the play going to the wrong side of the field and clogging everything up: which often results in a turnover which might not appear to be CJ's fault, but for which he was effectively the instigator.
Watching Raph, with his undoubted tendency to make the occasional howler, and being able to compare him to CJ, I could see how Raph's delivery forward was infinitely more effective: he actually has the skill to send the ball by foot at more than a snail's pace to precisely where he wants to put it. Players like Dal, BJ, Chips and Gwilt are streets ahead of Raph, let alone CJ.
Now, I've only managed to get to a couple of games live this year, at which CJ's clogging effect on attacks from the back half was bleeding obvious to me. But I have even been able to detect it on TV in some games: especially on Sunday (perhaps because he got so many disposals).
I'm surprised at all the CJ love on here - "I'm warming to CJ, etc." - shown by posters who often also complain about our poor disposal skills by foot and hand. Gram and Joey are unreliable enough with their disposal: can we really afford to have 3 such players operating in the back half of the field against the likes of the Cats or the Dogs?
Anyway, I appreciate that others see this very differently to me, so I'm hoping for an interesting discussion.
"It is useless to attempt to reason a man out of a thing he was never reasoned into."
- Jonathan Swift
- Jonathan Swift
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 18635
- Joined: Thu 11 Mar 2004 1:36am
- Has thanked: 1979 times
- Been thanked: 865 times
Re: Cj and the finals
my memory of the game is that cj was one of the few keeping us in it when the chips were down early on. he didn't lessen intensity all day either.
his ugly kicking style doesn't win many friends among the football purists, but i think he compensates for it by being very good in other key areas.
he's quick, aggressive and can lay a tackle. gets a lot of it and, most of the time, uses it to our advantage. you can never fault his effort.
imo he's in our best 22.
his ugly kicking style doesn't win many friends among the football purists, but i think he compensates for it by being very good in other key areas.
he's quick, aggressive and can lay a tackle. gets a lot of it and, most of the time, uses it to our advantage. you can never fault his effort.
imo he's in our best 22.
Its hard not to value and admire his application, he goes at it 100 miles an hour..
However,
For mine, he is not good enough and should be out... I have seen all vic games this year, and he is far worse live IMO than on tv...
I think he was our worst player on the weekend, (or 2nd, ahead of charlie), due to his shocking decision making and very average disposal..
Sure, his 'efficiency' is not that low looking at stats, but the amount of time he sold his teammates, particularly Joey, into trouble was ridiculous..
X is a certain starter ahead of him, as is mini.... I think Eddy is ahead of him also..
However,
For mine, he is not good enough and should be out... I have seen all vic games this year, and he is far worse live IMO than on tv...
I think he was our worst player on the weekend, (or 2nd, ahead of charlie), due to his shocking decision making and very average disposal..
Sure, his 'efficiency' is not that low looking at stats, but the amount of time he sold his teammates, particularly Joey, into trouble was ridiculous..
X is a certain starter ahead of him, as is mini.... I think Eddy is ahead of him also..
-
- SS Life Member
- Posts: 2508
- Joined: Tue 14 Jun 2005 9:11pm
- Location: Behind the goal, South Road end
- Has thanked: 32 times
- Been thanked: 38 times
Just a couple of comments.
His disposal of the ball although still poor has improved 3000% compared with what is was like when he first came into the team. Back then he was quick but offered nothing else. He made you wonder how a player who could neither kick nor handpass could become an AFL player. Now we are wondering whether he's good enough to play in the finals. So things have shifted a bit.
His capacity to run at speed, lay tackles, keep keeping on etc are exactly what more than half the team are lacking when we have one of those bad days. On occasion he could almost have been named among our best 6 simply because he persists, but maybe that's more a reflection of his team mates than of CJ.
The key question is not whether he's good enough but rather whether he's in our best 22. With Bally and X fit, then maybe not. But on recent performances he's marginally better value than Fizz for example. I'd put him in our best 24.
His disposal of the ball although still poor has improved 3000% compared with what is was like when he first came into the team. Back then he was quick but offered nothing else. He made you wonder how a player who could neither kick nor handpass could become an AFL player. Now we are wondering whether he's good enough to play in the finals. So things have shifted a bit.
His capacity to run at speed, lay tackles, keep keeping on etc are exactly what more than half the team are lacking when we have one of those bad days. On occasion he could almost have been named among our best 6 simply because he persists, but maybe that's more a reflection of his team mates than of CJ.
The key question is not whether he's good enough but rather whether he's in our best 22. With Bally and X fit, then maybe not. But on recent performances he's marginally better value than Fizz for example. I'd put him in our best 24.
Last edited by Superboot on Tue 26 Aug 2008 2:16pm, edited 1 time in total.
agree with best 24.... would put him way ahead of Fiora... buts thats a discussion for another thread....Superboot wrote:Just a couple of comments.
His disposal of the ball although still poor has improved 3000% compared with what is was like when he first came into the team. Back then he was quick but offered nothing else. He made you wonder how a player who could neither kick nor handpass could become an AFL player. Now we are wondering whether he's good enough to play in the finals. So things have shifted a bit.
His capacity to run at speed, lay tackles, keep keeping on etc was exactly what more than half the team are lacking when we have one of those bad days. On occasion he could almost have been named among our best 6 simply because he persists, but maybe that's more a reflection of his team mates than of CJ.
The key question is not whether he's good enough but rather whether he's in our best 22. With Bally and X fit, then maybe not. But on recent performances he's marginally better value than Fizz for example. I'd put him in our best 24.
The negatives are his footskills and some of his decision making.
The positives are he is pretty good by hand, provides lots of run, does all
the 1%ers and he has a strong body which will be important come finals
time.
The other thing is he is probably one of the more consistent players in the
side. He doesn't have a lot of ups and downs. In fact I don't think there has
being a week that he hasn't improved. You can't ask much more than that.
The positives are he is pretty good by hand, provides lots of run, does all
the 1%ers and he has a strong body which will be important come finals
time.
The other thing is he is probably one of the more consistent players in the
side. He doesn't have a lot of ups and downs. In fact I don't think there has
being a week that he hasn't improved. You can't ask much more than that.
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 18635
- Joined: Thu 11 Mar 2004 1:36am
- Has thanked: 1979 times
- Been thanked: 865 times
- The Saintsational Man
- Club Player
- Posts: 1475
- Joined: Mon 09 Jul 2007 12:04pm
- Otiman
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 8717
- Joined: Thu 28 Jul 2005 11:09pm
- Location: Elsewhere
- Has thanked: 197 times
- Been thanked: 646 times
He is an asset and a liability in one.
I believe the asset is extremely important in finals footy, and his liability is slightly diminished, due to the scrappy nature of most finals.
In games like today, where skill by foot is key in maintaining posession and frustrating the opposition, he is shown up. However in wet weather games, and games which are a bit of a slug fest, with sloppy skills on each side, then he comes into play and is in our top 10.
I believe the asset is extremely important in finals footy, and his liability is slightly diminished, due to the scrappy nature of most finals.
In games like today, where skill by foot is key in maintaining posession and frustrating the opposition, he is shown up. However in wet weather games, and games which are a bit of a slug fest, with sloppy skills on each side, then he comes into play and is in our top 10.
rodgerfox wrote:Good opponents let guys like CJ get the pill.bigcarl wrote:the other thing is that the guy is a ball magnet.
on sunday only montagna, goddard and gram had more disposals.
the guys i'd like to tip from the team are the ones who can't get the ball.
yeah they have been letting the likes of harvey get it for 21 seasons.
Not being facetious but there is or was a prevailing belief that Harvey didn't hurt you when he had the pill.
now the above is patently wrong but with a player like cj or Andrew Thompson it is certainly true. cj actually attempted to kick the ball with his right foot on the weekend with unexpectedly good results (he shanked it and it rolled out over the boundary).
Really, who would the opposition rather have the pill cj or bj???
Lance or James??
There comes a point in every man's life when he has to say, "Enough is enough." For me, that time is now. I have been dealing with claims that I cheated and had an unfair advantage in <redacted>. Over the past three years, I have been subjected to a <redacted>investigation followed by <redacted> witch hunt. The toll this has taken on my family, and my work for <redacted>and on me leads me to where I am today – finished with this nonsense. (Oops just got a spontaneous errection <unredacted>)
There comes a point in every man's life when he has to say, "Enough is enough." For me, that time is now. I have been dealing with claims that I cheated and had an unfair advantage in <redacted>. Over the past three years, I have been subjected to a <redacted>investigation followed by <redacted> witch hunt. The toll this has taken on my family, and my work for <redacted>and on me leads me to where I am today – finished with this nonsense. (Oops just got a spontaneous errection <unredacted>)
- n1ck
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 9871
- Joined: Sun 08 Aug 2004 2:28am
- Location: Clarinda
- Has thanked: 78 times
- Been thanked: 91 times
The thing I like about CJ is that he is aware of his limitations.
The improvement in his disposal has been enormous, but I also put it down to him not trying to thread the ball through the eye of a needle anymore.
He's well aware of his deficiencies, and so, unlike Dal or Ball, will ont hit a target 50m away, but he will hit a target 25 or 30m away, and if there isnt an option like that, he'l either run the ball himself, or handball to an option with better footskills to hit someone else.
Players with his running, chasing and tackling abilities are needed come September.
The improvement in his disposal has been enormous, but I also put it down to him not trying to thread the ball through the eye of a needle anymore.
He's well aware of his deficiencies, and so, unlike Dal or Ball, will ont hit a target 50m away, but he will hit a target 25 or 30m away, and if there isnt an option like that, he'l either run the ball himself, or handball to an option with better footskills to hit someone else.
Players with his running, chasing and tackling abilities are needed come September.
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 161
- Joined: Sun 10 Aug 2008 1:12am
- BAM! (shhhh)
- SS Hall of Fame
- Posts: 2134
- Joined: Thu 24 May 2007 5:23pm
- Location: The little voice inside your head
Interesting choice of players to compare in the OP. Raph Clarke vs Clinton Jones. Based on the last couple of games, I definately think there's room in the finals team for both, for near opposite reasons.
CJ is a forward pressure machine. He chases all day long, tackles like a maniac, and is a good handball running player (which is where his better efficiency numbers are coming from this year, an underrated skill that as a team we're not overpossessed of). The problem is his kicking.
With Raph, his kicking is excellent. When he's been coming in off the wing or through the middle from centre the last couple of games, the kick inside 50 is a real strength. He sees a spot and that's where the ball lands, his accuracy is fantastic. His tackling isn't bad, and he's got more size, and he can run and all, but his handballs tend to be of the "hospital" variety.
They add very different strengths to the team. I'd like to see both in the finals. I'd like Raph to be the guy that CJ handballs to at the end of a run, rather than the other way around.
CJ is a forward pressure machine. He chases all day long, tackles like a maniac, and is a good handball running player (which is where his better efficiency numbers are coming from this year, an underrated skill that as a team we're not overpossessed of). The problem is his kicking.
With Raph, his kicking is excellent. When he's been coming in off the wing or through the middle from centre the last couple of games, the kick inside 50 is a real strength. He sees a spot and that's where the ball lands, his accuracy is fantastic. His tackling isn't bad, and he's got more size, and he can run and all, but his handballs tend to be of the "hospital" variety.
They add very different strengths to the team. I'd like to see both in the finals. I'd like Raph to be the guy that CJ handballs to at the end of a run, rather than the other way around.
"Everything comes to he who hustles while he waits"
- Henry Ford
- Henry Ford
- WayneJudson42
- SS Life Member
- Posts: 3380
- Joined: Mon 07 Jul 2008 9:53pm
- Location: I'm a victim of circumstance
Disposal, and tackling aside, one thing I do notice is that due to his running, he can provide an option around the packs to release the ball to him. seems to run to almost every contest.
Is also fit and match hardened.
Is also fit and match hardened.
The lid is off after Round 2! Enjoy the journey, coz you just don't know where we'll end up. Live for today and seize the moment.
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 18635
- Joined: Thu 11 Mar 2004 1:36am
- Has thanked: 1979 times
- Been thanked: 865 times
they can't all be no. 1 draft picks. there's probably no-one in the competition who uses it better than bj.joffaboy wrote:Really, who would the opposition rather have the pill cj or bj???
bj's the thoroughbred whereas cj is the unfashionable hack who makes up for his deficiencies with a huge heart and sheer effort.
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 18635
- Joined: Thu 11 Mar 2004 1:36am
- Has thanked: 1979 times
- Been thanked: 865 times
- rodgerfox
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 9059
- Joined: Wed 10 Mar 2004 9:10am
- Has thanked: 425 times
- Been thanked: 327 times
That is very naive.bob__71 wrote:Another great insight there Rodger...good players who let their oponent get the ball....yet again showing how much football you have ever played or how much you know about the game. flog
Opposition want Max, CJ and Blake to get the ball (obviously if we have to get posession at all).
They will leave these guys free and double team BJ, Gram, Sam Fisher etc.
When Max, Blake, CJ etc. are getting the ball across half back, it's no coincidence that as a team, we look slow, inefficient and can't score.
As soon as our coaching department respond and create ways for our good players to get their hands on it - we look better immediately.
It's hardly an insight. It's basic footy knowledge and common sense.
It's also why teams bust their arse to ensure their good kickers are getting loose ball. It's why Geelong work so hard to protect Ablett. It's why we used to work so hard to get the nut in Aussie Jones' hands.
It's often why you find the very good kicks take the kick ins from FB and go short - then end up getting it back themselves. It frees them up and allows to them to get their hands on it.
- mad saint guy
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 7077
- Joined: Tue 26 Jul 2005 9:44pm
- Location: Melbourne
- Has thanked: 52 times
- Been thanked: 366 times
If you actually watch what is going on during games then you'll see that he is absolutely right. CJ usually plays 15-20m off his opponent which results in many easy possessions for both of them.bob__71 wrote:Another great insight there Rodger...good players who let their oponent get the ball....yet again showing how much football you have ever played or how much you know about the game. flog
What costs us is when Jones is sitting off his opponent when they are rebonding from defence, allowing his opponent to get the footy in the clear and run it forwards. This scenario is where CJ's infamous pressure and chasing comes from. Personally I'd rather that Jones simply stay close to his opponent while we're defending and not let them get the ball uncontested, but most on here seem to love his 40m chases down the wing, since 1 in every 20 results in an exciting run-down.
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 161
- Joined: Sun 10 Aug 2008 1:12am
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 1521
- Joined: Sun 14 Mar 2004 8:38pm
- Been thanked: 25 times
The biggest issue I have with CJ is his decision-making & disposal (specifically by hand).
Yes, he has qualities, and his foot skills are getting a little better.
But we are moving into finals and mistakes get magnified and punished more severely.
Too often his decision/execution effort is poor:
- He will be slow and indecisive as to which target to hit by hand/foot (not by a lot, but its there)
- He will poorly execute the action (handball/kick) which causes a turnover, a tackle or a breakdown in the forward movement
- He will choose the wrong target, again which causes a turnover, a tackle or a breakdown in the forward movement
Amongst the skill of ball movement & decision making of the likes of Dal, Lenny, Harvey, Monty, Ball, Gram, Goddard & Milne (even mini), he stands out like 'dogs balls'.....he is the weakest link in this midfield chain.
IF X. Clarke can get fit and come in this week, he should ultimately take Jones' place. We need to try to WIN a FLAG, not just make up the numbers…we need improvement in every facet of the game we can muster. X has his pace, but heaps more skill and better decision-making…
If X can't get up to full fitness and rythym of the game in time, then CJ might hold his position.
Yes, he has qualities, and his foot skills are getting a little better.
But we are moving into finals and mistakes get magnified and punished more severely.
Too often his decision/execution effort is poor:
- He will be slow and indecisive as to which target to hit by hand/foot (not by a lot, but its there)
- He will poorly execute the action (handball/kick) which causes a turnover, a tackle or a breakdown in the forward movement
- He will choose the wrong target, again which causes a turnover, a tackle or a breakdown in the forward movement
Amongst the skill of ball movement & decision making of the likes of Dal, Lenny, Harvey, Monty, Ball, Gram, Goddard & Milne (even mini), he stands out like 'dogs balls'.....he is the weakest link in this midfield chain.
IF X. Clarke can get fit and come in this week, he should ultimately take Jones' place. We need to try to WIN a FLAG, not just make up the numbers…we need improvement in every facet of the game we can muster. X has his pace, but heaps more skill and better decision-making…
If X can't get up to full fitness and rythym of the game in time, then CJ might hold his position.
- st_Trav_ofWA
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 8886
- Joined: Wed 13 Sep 2006 7:10pm
- Location: Perth
- Contact:
here i though good opponents didnt let the other team get the ball .....rodgerfox wrote:Good opponents let guys like CJ get the pill.bigcarl wrote:the other thing is that the guy is a ball magnet.
on sunday only montagna, goddard and gram had more disposals.
the guys i'd like to tip from the team are the ones who can't get the ball.
"The team that wins in the most positions and makes the least amount of mistakes, usually wins the game." -- Allan Jeans
http://westernsaints.wordpress.com/
http://westernsaints.wordpress.com/