Our youngsters...
Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 1906
- Joined: Fri 19 Mar 2004 5:47pm
- Has thanked: 4 times
- Been thanked: 17 times
Our youngsters...
To be honest, it doesn't look like any of them have shown anything other than glimpses of potential. It doesn't appear that any of them have the potential to become a STAR. We lack that X factor and enthusiasm that quality young kids provide.
Geary isn't ready for AFL footy yet, him getting ran down by Nick Maxwell of all people in the middle of the ground proved that. The thing is, the bottom 6-8 in our first 22 are looking very ordinary atm.
Geary isn't ready for AFL footy yet, him getting ran down by Nick Maxwell of all people in the middle of the ground proved that. The thing is, the bottom 6-8 in our first 22 are looking very ordinary atm.
The Saints are coming!
- Saints Premiers 2008
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 4335
- Joined: Thu 27 Oct 2005 11:21pm
- Location: Brisbane
- SaintWodonga
- Club Player
- Posts: 1868
- Joined: Wed 04 Jul 2007 12:01am
- Location: Wodonga
- Contact:
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 1906
- Joined: Fri 19 Mar 2004 5:47pm
- Has thanked: 4 times
- Been thanked: 17 times
Spot on. I'm sick of project picks like Howard (in the 2nd round ffs!) We need to go for players who have a good track record in the underage comps, and appear to be ready-made footballers.SaintWodonga wrote:We got to stop going for long term project players in the draft. We need speed & skill that can play in 2009. Anyone watch Rioli today and wonder "what if"?
The Saints are coming!
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 161
- Joined: Sun 10 Aug 2008 1:12am
Let's face it - when our 2000-2 group of players go, (approx. in 5 years time) then we're going to be screwed. We have no even B grade players younger than BJ and with the compromised draft over the next 5 years I don't see where we're going to get any from.
Hird... The unflushable one is now... just a turd...
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 887
- Joined: Thu 17 Apr 2008 2:30am
So WHO is Responsible???
Our youngsters are Fine footballers, BUT compared to other club's youngsters, they are not as good OR as well managed.
Have we had ANY Rising stars in the last 5 years????
THERE'S your problem.... Our recruiting is/was WAY OFF TARGET!!
Whatever we have in place MUST change AND FAST...![Mad :x](./images/smilies/icon_mad.gif)
Our youngsters are Fine footballers, BUT compared to other club's youngsters, they are not as good OR as well managed.
Have we had ANY Rising stars in the last 5 years????
THERE'S your problem.... Our recruiting is/was WAY OFF TARGET!!
Whatever we have in place MUST change AND FAST...
![Mad :x](./images/smilies/icon_mad.gif)
- borderbarry
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 6676
- Joined: Mon 19 Apr 2004 11:22pm
- Location: Wodonga
I read prior to last years draft that the Saints were interested in Rioli. I thought that he was the type of player we were lacking. Then in trade week we got Schneider. I thought, "Oh no, now we will not want Rioli." I was right. Instead we took a big ruck/forward, similar to F.Watts and B.Brooks who we had just delisted. I was not over wrapped in our recruiting, and have not been for several years. Who was the last good player that we have recruited? (Not being a No. 1 or 2 pick).
- QuestionOfAccuracy
- Club Player
- Posts: 610
- Joined: Wed 11 Jul 2007 3:00pm
- Contact:
borderbarry wrote: Who was the last good player that we have recruited? (Not being a No. 1 or 2 pick).
Off the top of my head....Sam Fisher. He was taken at No.55 i believe and that was 4 years or so back
![Shocked :shock:](./images/smilies/icon_eek.gif)
I thought McEvoy was a good pick...you have to give him time because ruckmen always take time to develop. It was an area we had to strengthen and he was the 2nd best ruckman after Kreuzer in the draft.
Armitage hasn't shown any X-factor really...in bursts he's shown he could be a solid player for us but not a midfielder that you can build a midfield arounf (if that makes sense!). Geary still doesn't look up to the AFL speed.
What hasn't helped is that the last couple of drafts havn't had very much depth. Apparently this coming draft is a good one and hopefully the club doesn't trade any picks and uses its picks wisely!
- mad saint guy
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 7076
- Joined: Tue 26 Jul 2005 9:44pm
- Location: Melbourne
- Has thanked: 52 times
- Been thanked: 366 times
And he's 26 years old.ralphysaints35 wrote:sam fisherhe was pick 50 something
I remember thinking the same thing. I was really hoping that we'd pick Rioli at 9 and Dawson Simpson (208cm ruckman who went to Geelong) at 26.I read prior to last years draft that the Saints were interested in Rioli. I thought that he was the type of player we were lacking. Then in trade week we got Schneider. I thought, "Oh no, now we will not want Rioli."
- saintsRrising
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 30091
- Joined: Mon 15 Mar 2004 11:07am
- Location: Melbourne
- Has thanked: 711 times
- Been thanked: 1233 times
Yes but you need to actually find a Sam each and every year together with another good player or two.ralphysaints35 wrote:sam fisherhe was pick 50 something
Not one in every three or so years.
At present we are losing good players faster than we are aquiring new ones.
The AFL's standard is also increasing compounding our problem.
Flying the World in comfort thanks to FF Points....
Yes we need speed, a half forward, a tall defender and a ruckman.
However, if you think that Rioli would have made the difference last night
your kidding yourself. Most of the young players we have will be alright.
It's the senior players that need to get their act together.
There was no leadership last night. Our best two players would not have
being in the best 5 on the ground. When the senior players have an impact
the younger guys always play better.
However, if you think that Rioli would have made the difference last night
your kidding yourself. Most of the young players we have will be alright.
It's the senior players that need to get their act together.
There was no leadership last night. Our best two players would not have
being in the best 5 on the ground. When the senior players have an impact
the younger guys always play better.
-
- SS Life Member
- Posts: 3465
- Joined: Fri 29 Oct 2004 1:01pm
- Has thanked: 91 times
- Been thanked: 162 times
Every year this board wants a small forward with great skills and no engine and a giant ruckman who can't play. Fact is, Dawson Simpson played on the same teams as McEvoy, so it's not like we hadn't seen him. Our recruiters probably saw what everyone else did in Simpson. A giant kid who doesn't use his size to advantage and can't kick or mark well enough to be an AFL-level ruckman. McEvoy, OTOH, was the best mark in the draft, has excellent skills and should be the number 1 ruck at St. Kilda for years. We also needed a ruckman for the future a lot more than a flashy forward pocket. It was the right pick.mad saint guy wrote:I remember thinking the same thing. I was really hoping that we'd pick Rioli at 9 and Dawson Simpson (208cm ruckman who went to Geelong) at 26.
- QuestionOfAccuracy
- Club Player
- Posts: 610
- Joined: Wed 11 Jul 2007 3:00pm
- Contact:
Every year this board wants a small forward with great skills and no engine and a giant ruckman who can't play. We also needed a ruckman for the future a lot more than a flashy forward pocket. It was the right pick.[/quote]
Totally agree. We have much bigger needs than a flashy forward. We need more midfiedlers with speed!. Also need a key defender or two desparately!!!
Totally agree. We have much bigger needs than a flashy forward. We need more midfiedlers with speed!. Also need a key defender or two desparately!!!
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 684
- Joined: Sat 26 Jul 2008 9:44pm
We definately need to add some speed to our list as we get exposed every week.Teams know we lack leg speed so they exploit it to the max. The West Coast game was bordering on embarassing. Everytime they got the ball they just bombed in long to a foot race & we couldnt get anywhere near them hence we lost.