The Weekend DISASTER has started !!
Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators
- Eastern
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 14357
- Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 1:46pm
- Location: 3132
- Been thanked: 1 time
The Weekend DISASTER has started !!
Umpires this week
St KILDA v Port Adelaide
Vosso, HEAD, Keating
!!
St KILDA v Port Adelaide
Vosso, HEAD, Keating
!!
should never ever ever umpire a game that includes st kilda EVER again....
disgrace
disgrace
FQF
loyal in the good times and bad
In richo I trust
2013 trade/draft best ever?
Billings - future brownlow medallist Longer - future best ruck
Dunstan - future captain Eli - future cult hero
Acres - future norm smith
loyal in the good times and bad
In richo I trust
2013 trade/draft best ever?
Billings - future brownlow medallist Longer - future best ruck
Dunstan - future captain Eli - future cult hero
Acres - future norm smith
good pointdegruch wrote:Aw...what are you guys worried about? I've read the 'Whinging Supporters' thread and am now thoroughly convinced there has never been any umpiring bias against St Kilda from these guys, or any other umpire, ever!
Lets call the coach and have him get us ready to bend over.......
FQF
loyal in the good times and bad
In richo I trust
2013 trade/draft best ever?
Billings - future brownlow medallist Longer - future best ruck
Dunstan - future captain Eli - future cult hero
Acres - future norm smith
loyal in the good times and bad
In richo I trust
2013 trade/draft best ever?
Billings - future brownlow medallist Longer - future best ruck
Dunstan - future captain Eli - future cult hero
Acres - future norm smith
- The Saintsational Man
- Club Player
- Posts: 1475
- Joined: Mon 09 Jul 2007 12:04pm
- BAM! (shhhh)
- SS Hall of Fame
- Posts: 2134
- Joined: Thu 24 May 2007 5:23pm
- Location: The little voice inside your head
- Bernard Shakey
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 11240
- Joined: Sun 18 Mar 2007 11:22pm
- Location: Down By The River 1989, 2003, 2009 & 2013
- Has thanked: 126 times
- Been thanked: 137 times
-
- SS Hall of Fame
- Posts: 2034
- Joined: Wed 03 May 2006 11:18pm
- Been thanked: 1 time
This is absolutely not tin foil hats.
Matthew Head is a corrupt umpire. This is known by all.
He handed the game in 2005 to Freo on a plate with ridiculous decisions throughout the game.
After the game the trustworthy Tony Jones overheard Matthew Head commenting on his delight at "getting back at Stkilda".
Matthew Head is a corrupt umpire. This is known by all.
He handed the game in 2005 to Freo on a plate with ridiculous decisions throughout the game.
After the game the trustworthy Tony Jones overheard Matthew Head commenting on his delight at "getting back at Stkilda".
degruch wrote:Aw...what are you guys worried about? I've read the 'Whinging Supporters' thread and am now thoroughly convinced there has never been any umpiring bias against St Kilda from these guys, or any other umpire, ever!
.everybody still loves lenny....and we always will
"Freedom of expression is the cornerstone of a free society,"
However, freedom of expression is not encouraged in certain forums.
"Freedom of expression is the cornerstone of a free society,"
However, freedom of expression is not encouraged in certain forums.
JeffDunne wrote:Maybe we should approach K-Y for a sponsorship with the club?
The club could then include a tube in the membership pack for 'real supporters' like plugger66.
post of the month....... .....
.everybody still loves lenny....and we always will
"Freedom of expression is the cornerstone of a free society,"
However, freedom of expression is not encouraged in certain forums.
"Freedom of expression is the cornerstone of a free society,"
However, freedom of expression is not encouraged in certain forums.
Now that is the post of the month.brown-coat wrote:This is absolutely not tin foil hats.
Matthew Head is a corrupt umpire. This is known by all.
He handed the game in 2005 to Freo on a plate with ridiculous decisions throughout the game.
After the game the trustworthy Tony Jones overheard Matthew Head commenting on his delight at "getting back at Stkilda".
- degruch
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 8948
- Joined: Mon 19 May 2008 4:29pm
- Location: Croydonia
- Has thanked: 146 times
- Been thanked: 237 times
If only it was just the one game mate...but it's been seasons and seasons worth of silly buggers...pretty well since Ross Oakley announced he wanted us out of the league. It's a shame we wasted the only season the AFL wanted us to win...'97, when we were Victoria's 'Great White Hope' against the marauding interstaters. But, just like last week...whenever we want 'em to produce the big win we all know the Saints deserve, they come out flailing and make us feel the opposite. Sigh.brown-coat wrote:This is absolutely not tin foil hats.
Matthew Head is a corrupt umpire. This is known by all.
He handed the game in 2005 to Freo on a plate with ridiculous decisions throughout the game.
After the game the trustworthy Tony Jones overheard Matthew Head commenting on his delight at "getting back at Stkilda".
Anyway, I won't succumb to depression...we got some scores to settle this weekend, so the maggots can pay all the dodgey frees they like, report the entire side on unseen evidence whilst we are assaulted by opposition players, it won't stop the Sainters from coming home with chocco's chockies this weekend!
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 330
- Joined: Thu 11 Mar 2004 8:27pm
- Location: WA
- Has thanked: 3 times
- Been thanked: 9 times
- Mr Magic
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 12792
- Joined: Fri 04 May 2007 9:38am
- Has thanked: 802 times
- Been thanked: 428 times
Well it's been nearly 3 years since Tony Jones publicly aired repeatedly what he alleges Head said to him.wasoncestkil58 wrote:Are you sure you can trust anything that Tony Jones says? Like alot of other commentators he just likes to make a statement to cause a stir.
In that time he
hasn't resiled from his statements
hasn't retracted his statements
hasn't apologised for his statements.
BUT more importantly,
neither the Umpire concerned, the Umpires in general nor the AFL have instituted any legal proceedings over it. Nor have they demanded any sort of retraction from Jones or Ch 9.
These are the same people who threatened all sorts of retribution on James Hird over his remarks about McLaren.
What should we 'read' into this set of circumstances?