HOW SAINTS WILL EASILY BE 4TH IN 2 weeks time
Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators
HOW SAINTS WILL EASILY BE 4TH IN 2 weeks time
next week - round 17 : GEEL beats hawks; COLL beats ess; SAINTS beat eagles; RICH (in form on a roll)beats lions at TD; ADEL (playing for finals chance) beats syd ( who this week just held out a pathetic BLUES team); PORT beats freeo ;NORTH beats melb; DOGS beat blues =
Geelong 16 1 0 152.63 64
2 W Bulldogs 14 2 1 127.53 58
3 Hawthorn 13 4 0 121.35 52
4 Sydney 10 6 1 120.20 42
5 Collingwood 10 7 0 117.05 40
6 St Kilda 10 7 0 105.27 40
7 Nth Melb 9 7 1 98.54 38
8 Adelaide 9 8 0 105.26 36
9 Bris Lions 9 8 0 105.07 36
10 Richmond 8 8 1 97.46 34
11 Carlton 7 10 0 92.58 28
12 Port Adel 6 11 0 95.24 24
13 Essendon 6 11 0 83.54 24
14 Fremantle 3 14 0 86.29 12
15 Melbourne 2 15 0 65.73 8
16 West Coast 2 15 0 64.30 8
ROUND 18 HAWKS beat woods; SAINTS beat port at TD; DOGS beat swans at Manuka;
all other results won't affect our 4th spot, but assume LIONS beat roos at carrara; ESS beats melb;ADEL beats carlton;GEEL beats richmond;EAGLES beats freeo LADDER =
1 Geelong 17 1 0 151.74 68
2 W Bulldogs 15 2 1 126.61 62
3 Hawthorn 14 4 0 120.57 56
4 St Kilda 11 7 0 105.86 44
5 Sydney 10 7 1 117.88 42
6 Collingwood 10 8 0 115.20 40
7 Adelaide 10 8 0 105.66 40
8 Bris Lions 10 8 0 104.85 40
9 Nth Melb 9 8 1 98.57 38
10 Richmond 8 9 1 95.59 34
11 Carlton 7 11 0 92.39 28
12 Essendon 18 7 11 0 84.85 28
13 Port Adel 18 6 12 0 1721 1817 94.72 24
14 Fremantle 18 3 15 0 1537 1776 86.54 12
15 West Coast 18 3 15 0 1378 2079 66.28 12
16 Melbourne 18 2 16 0 1429 2133 66.99 8
ROUND 19 then important because we play COLL, and SYD plays frreo. If we and SWANS win, then ladder is
1 Geelong 18 1 0 151.31 72
2 W Bulldogs 16 2 1 125.85 66
3 Hawthorn 15 4 0 119.34 60
4 St Kilda 12 7 0 105.62 48
5 Sydney 11 7 1 119.02 46
6 Collingwood 10 9 0 114.18 40
7 Adelaide 10 9 0 104.75 40
8 Bris Lions 10 9 0 104.51 40
9 Nth Melb 9 9 1 98.10 38
10 Richmond 9 9 1 96.27 38
last games v , freeo , crows and dons
It's that easy!!!
Geelong 16 1 0 152.63 64
2 W Bulldogs 14 2 1 127.53 58
3 Hawthorn 13 4 0 121.35 52
4 Sydney 10 6 1 120.20 42
5 Collingwood 10 7 0 117.05 40
6 St Kilda 10 7 0 105.27 40
7 Nth Melb 9 7 1 98.54 38
8 Adelaide 9 8 0 105.26 36
9 Bris Lions 9 8 0 105.07 36
10 Richmond 8 8 1 97.46 34
11 Carlton 7 10 0 92.58 28
12 Port Adel 6 11 0 95.24 24
13 Essendon 6 11 0 83.54 24
14 Fremantle 3 14 0 86.29 12
15 Melbourne 2 15 0 65.73 8
16 West Coast 2 15 0 64.30 8
ROUND 18 HAWKS beat woods; SAINTS beat port at TD; DOGS beat swans at Manuka;
all other results won't affect our 4th spot, but assume LIONS beat roos at carrara; ESS beats melb;ADEL beats carlton;GEEL beats richmond;EAGLES beats freeo LADDER =
1 Geelong 17 1 0 151.74 68
2 W Bulldogs 15 2 1 126.61 62
3 Hawthorn 14 4 0 120.57 56
4 St Kilda 11 7 0 105.86 44
5 Sydney 10 7 1 117.88 42
6 Collingwood 10 8 0 115.20 40
7 Adelaide 10 8 0 105.66 40
8 Bris Lions 10 8 0 104.85 40
9 Nth Melb 9 8 1 98.57 38
10 Richmond 8 9 1 95.59 34
11 Carlton 7 11 0 92.39 28
12 Essendon 18 7 11 0 84.85 28
13 Port Adel 18 6 12 0 1721 1817 94.72 24
14 Fremantle 18 3 15 0 1537 1776 86.54 12
15 West Coast 18 3 15 0 1378 2079 66.28 12
16 Melbourne 18 2 16 0 1429 2133 66.99 8
ROUND 19 then important because we play COLL, and SYD plays frreo. If we and SWANS win, then ladder is
1 Geelong 18 1 0 151.31 72
2 W Bulldogs 16 2 1 125.85 66
3 Hawthorn 15 4 0 119.34 60
4 St Kilda 12 7 0 105.62 48
5 Sydney 11 7 1 119.02 46
6 Collingwood 10 9 0 114.18 40
7 Adelaide 10 9 0 104.75 40
8 Bris Lions 10 9 0 104.51 40
9 Nth Melb 9 9 1 98.10 38
10 Richmond 9 9 1 96.27 38
last games v , freeo , crows and dons
It's that easy!!!
- Saints Premiers 2008
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 4335
- Joined: Thu 27 Oct 2005 11:21pm
- Location: Brisbane
- perfectionist
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 9023
- Joined: Mon 30 Jul 2007 3:06pm
- Has thanked: 60 times
- Been thanked: 347 times
- Saints Premiers 2008
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 4335
- Joined: Thu 27 Oct 2005 11:21pm
- Location: Brisbane
why should we play any of the other home and away matches??? i mean we have only lost 7 matches out of 16 this year...we should go straight to the finalsperfectionist wrote:No point playing the games really - let's just skip to Round 19. Beating WC at Subi is SO easy, and PA - who have they beaten recently?
"It's a work in progress," Lyon said.
Exactly....Saints Premiers 2008 wrote:[
why should we play any of the other home and away matches??? i mean we have only lost 7 matches out of 16 this year...we should go straight to the finals
I may be just a bit pumped up after watching the replay of last night...am I forgiven for my red/white/black tinted glasses?
- perfectionist
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 9023
- Joined: Mon 30 Jul 2007 3:06pm
- Has thanked: 60 times
- Been thanked: 347 times
Quite agree - and in second place!Saints Premiers 2008 wrote:why should we play any of the other home and away matches??? i mean we have only lost 7 matches out of 16 this year...we should go straight to the finalsperfectionist wrote:No point playing the games really - let's just skip to Round 19. Beating WC at Subi is SO easy, and PA - who have they beaten recently?
- Saints Premiers 2008
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 4335
- Joined: Thu 27 Oct 2005 11:21pm
- Location: Brisbane
little ahead of ourselves one thinks...saint08 wrote:Exactly....Saints Premiers 2008 wrote:[
why should we play any of the other home and away matches??? i mean we have only lost 7 matches out of 16 this year...we should go straight to the finals
I may be just a bit pumped up after watching the replay of last night...am I forgiven for my red/white/black tinted glasses?
"It's a work in progress," Lyon said.
- Con Gorozidis
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 23532
- Joined: Thu 19 Jun 2008 4:04pm
- Has thanked: 100 times
- Been thanked: 78 times
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 412
- Joined: Wed 05 May 2004 11:13pm
- Has thanked: 1 time
- Been thanked: 1 time
Geebus ...don't like this post. I'm just happy with the last month and as a Saints person I will treat anything else as a bonus. Remember we never win a Subi and always lose to Port (hint: playing devil's advicate guys) so 3 from 6 at best and we scrape in at 8.
In reality I think that even if we win the last 6 (making it 10 in a row!!!) we could still finish 5th, given the fact that the swans would have to drop 2 games.
If we had been playing like this against the doggies (both times) we would now be seriously be looking at top 4. Oh well!
In reality I think that even if we win the last 6 (making it 10 in a row!!!) we could still finish 5th, given the fact that the swans would have to drop 2 games.
If we had been playing like this against the doggies (both times) we would now be seriously be looking at top 4. Oh well!
- marksnsparks
- Club Player
- Posts: 506
- Joined: Sat 28 Jul 2007 8:09pm
- Location: Mentone
Correction, we beat WCE last year at Subi when they were half decent, and we usually beat Port at the dome. We're just s**thouse at AAMIjackal wrote:Geebus ...don't like this post. I'm just happy with the last month and as a Saints person I will treat anything else as a bonus. Remember we never win a Subi and always lose to Port (hint: playing devil's advicate guys) so 3 from 6 at best and we scrape in at 8.
In reality I think that even if we win the last 6 (making it 10 in a row!!!) we could still finish 5th, given the fact that the swans would have to drop 2 games.
If we had been playing like this against the doggies (both times) we would now be seriously be looking at top 4. Oh well!
- my les foote
- Club Player
- Posts: 1024
- Joined: Tue 12 Dec 2006 6:03pm
- Location: Beside the seaside
- Been thanked: 2 times
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 1617
- Joined: Sun 25 Sep 2005 1:40am
- Location: Hampton/Gold Coast
- Been thanked: 7 times
We've only played PA at Docklands 3 times, and lost twice. Not sure that qualifies as "usually".my les foote wrote:I think we will beat Port but please define "usually"marksnsparks wrote:
Correction, we beat WCE last year at Subi when they were half decent, and we usually beat Port at the dome. We're just s**thouse at AAMI
Funny how they decided they absolutely must not play him until they get psychologocal approval... no psych meeting has happened yet I am sure Plugger, they will find a new story to spin...plugger66 wrote:I would think Hall is certain to play this week.saint08 wrote:Griggsy wrote:be great if that comes off but i won't be putting any money on adelaide atm.
swans - n o Goodes no O'laughlin and perhaps still no Hall , and ijured Tighe = a recipe for an Adelaide win....
I must admit if I followed the swans I would want him to play. Dont see why supporters or the players should be penalised.saint08 wrote:Funny how they decided they absolutely must not play him until they get psychologocal approval... no psych meeting has happened yet I am sure Plugger, they will find a new story to spin...plugger66 wrote:I would think Hall is certain to play this week.saint08 wrote:Griggsy wrote:be great if that comes off but i won't be putting any money on adelaide atm.
swans - n o Goodes no O'laughlin and perhaps still no Hall , and ijured Tighe = a recipe for an Adelaide win....