plugger66 wrote:
Didnt bother posting the second part where I said he was no better than Welsh.
And what relevance does Welsh or performance have to do with whether Lynch is a key forward or not? I never said he was a good one, I simply said he was one.
Lynch was probably the difference between WC in 2005 vs 2006 FWIW.
I know you probably determine how and where footballers play based on stats but I prefer to actually watch games of football.
Micheal Rix might struggle to win hit outs but that doesn't mean he's not a ruckman. He's not a very good ruckman but he's still a ruckman.
What is it then. You state that you are yet to see a premiership team that lacks key marking forwards. I point out Welsh has a better record than Lynch so you resort to selective posting because I proved that either statement is wrong or the Bulldogs do have a key marking forward.
Do I need to point out that the Bulldogs haven't won anything yet?
You've proved didly.
Welsh is like all the Bulldog's forwards, he's a versatile forward. Can play flanks as well as key positions. You don't structure a forward line around players like him and his return this year demonstrates that the Bulldogs don't.
Which one is it or are you still asleep. Wake up Jeff.
I ask again, why do you always need to be a dick?
Arguing for the sake of it?