Why wasn't Riewoldt dropped?

perfectionist · Thu 19 Jun 2008 10:14pm

If Nick Dal Santo, why not Nick Riewoldt or Lenny Hayes or Luke Ball or Sam Fisher or...?

I can only hope it is a ruse, if not, someone is an arse, or has decided to make up the shortfall in the Frankston relocation costs in one big bet.

devil saint · Thu 19 Jun 2008 10:15pm

Because the other four, even though they make mistakes, give 100% every week. Simple answer!

bethb7 · Post: # 590292Post **bethb7** » Thu 19 Jun 2008 10:16pm

I don't think Dal-Santo should have been dropped, but none of the players you just mentioned should even be considered to be dropped.

perfectionist · Fri 20 Jun 2008 10:07am

It appears that humour is lost on the young.

saintspremiers · Fri 20 Jun 2008 11:40am

Roo is playing injured.

His goal kicking is beyond a joke from set shots, and he should IMO be rested and even sent up north with Steph to get away for a few weeks and get himself right to play the footy he is capable of.

bergsone · Post: # 590632Post **bergsone** » Fri 20 Jun 2008 11:42am

OP may be their turn next week

Saint Mik · Post: # 590634Post **Saint Mik** » Fri 20 Jun 2008 11:43am

saintspremiers wrote:Roo is playing injured.

His goal kicking is beyond a joke from set shots, and he should IMO be rested and even sent up north with Steph to get away for a few weeks and get himself right to play the footy he is capable of.

I can see the headlines ROO HEADS NORTH TO THE GOLD COAST

Dan Warna · Post: # 590640Post **Dan Warna** » Fri 20 Jun 2008 11:48am

No doubt barker after helping Riewoldt with his kicking will now work to fix his contested marking as well.