Saintsational Fan Forum - A passionate community of St Kilda Football Club fans discussing news, history, players, trade rumours, results, AFL stats and more.
st_Trav_ofWA wrote:i understand these guys are carlton Trolls but have they posted porn ? no have they personally attacked anyone ? no have they posted sensitive information ? no ... so what have they done to be banned ? besides having a differant point of veiw to the majority on here ?
the only issue i could see is Silvio_Foschini avatar size .
Erm...they've done all those things you've mentioned above.
really where ? they have said nothing worse then what we have said back .
so we ban them cause they are not st kilda fans then what comes next we ban ppl cause they dont think RL should bee sacked ... then we ban ppl who dont love Fiora ... then we turn this place into a OMG OMG DAL is soo Hot forum ?
"The team that wins in the most positions and makes the least amount of mistakes, usually wins the game." -- Allan Jeans
st_Trav_ofWA wrote:i understand these guys are carlton Trolls but have they posted porn ? no have they personally attacked anyone ? no have they posted sensitive information ? no ... so what have they done to be banned ? besides having a differant point of veiw to the majority on here ?
the only issue i could see is Silvio_Foschini avatar size .
Erm...they've done all those things you've mentioned above.
really where ? they have said nothing worse then what we have said back .
so we ban them cause they are not st kilda fans then what comes next we ban ppl cause they dont think RL should bee sacked ... then we ban ppl who dont love Fiora ... then we turn this place into a OMG OMG DAL is soo Hot forum ?
'Chris Judd' (or was it Chris Judd) was blocked for putting porn up the other week...'Get a 2nd Verse' for posting personal abuse a couple days ago...that's just the last few weeks. I don't mind an arguement, the problem is that 99% of these tools have go no argument, not facts and no life. The only thing we should be encouraging them to do is drink battery acid.
st_Trav_ofWA wrote:thats one of our own providing that fine comment if we are big enuff to give them crap about being spinless cheats surely we are big enuff totake some back , after all do we want this place to be like the collingwood forum that allows only possitive speak about pro Magpie subjects ?
But what do they bring to the table? not much, the cheating scum have little to offer in reply so they just spew rubbish on here. Do we need that? It is a Saints forum after all, I nice place to come with out being trolled by mindless Carlton supporters, Trav, try that on a Carlton board and see how long you last.
st_Trav_ofWA wrote:i understand these guys are carlton Trolls but have they posted porn ? no have they personally attacked anyone ? no have they posted sensitive information ? no ... so what have they done to be banned ? besides having a differant point of veiw to the majority on here ?
the only issue i could see is Silvio_Foschini avatar size .
Erm...they've done all those things you've mentioned above.
really where ? they have said nothing worse then what we have said back .
so we ban them cause they are not st kilda fans then what comes next we ban ppl cause they dont think RL should bee sacked ... then we ban ppl who dont love Fiora ... then we turn this place into a OMG OMG DAL is soo Hot forum ?
'Chris Judd' (or was it Chris Judd) was blocked for putting porn up the other week...'Get a 2nd Verse' for posting personal abuse a couple days ago...that's just the last few weeks. I don't mind an arguement, the problem is that 99% of these tools have go no argument, not facts and no life. The only thing we should be encouraging them to do is drink battery acid.
i was talking about this thread specifically i agree that knobhead Chris Judd should of been banned but the carlton fools on this thread have been harmless and i dont think they need to be banned
"The team that wins in the most positions and makes the least amount of mistakes, usually wins the game." -- Allan Jeans
st_Trav_ofWA wrote:i understand these guys are carlton Trolls but have they posted porn ? no have they personally attacked anyone ? no have they posted sensitive information ? no ... so what have they done to be banned ? besides having a differant point of veiw to the majority on here ?
the only issue i could see is Silvio_Foschini avatar size .
Erm...they've done all those things you've mentioned above.
really where ? they have said nothing worse then what we have said back .
so we ban them cause they are not st kilda fans then what comes next we ban ppl cause they dont think RL should bee sacked ... then we ban ppl who dont love Fiora ... then we turn this place into a OMG OMG DAL is soo Hot forum ?
'Chris Judd' (or was it Chris Judd) was blocked for putting porn up the other week...'Get a 2nd Verse' for posting personal abuse a couple days ago...that's just the last few weeks. I don't mind an arguement, the problem is that 99% of these tools have go no argument, not facts and no life. The only thing we should be encouraging them to do is drink battery acid.
i was talking about this thread specifically i agree that knobhead Chris Judd should of been banned but the carlton fools on this thread have been harmless and i dont think they need to be banned
Mods cut the personal abuse out of this thread a couple days back.
st_Trav_ofWA wrote:thats one of our own providing that fine comment if we are big enuff to give them crap about being spinless cheats surely we are big enuff totake some back , after all do we want this place to be like the collingwood forum that allows only possitive speak about pro Magpie subjects ?
But what do they bring to the table? not much, the cheating scum have little to offer in reply so they just spew rubbish on here. Do we need that? It is a Saints forum after all, I nice place to come with out being trolled by mindless Carlton supporters, Trav, try that on a Carlton board and see how long you last.
what do they bring to the table .. somthing differant besides the same old stuff on here of late i would rather dispute my team being better then thier team then have a 10 page flog-a-log of why RL is crap and GT was god and how GW is a mentalmidget and Robert Walls is the root of all evil behind it
"The team that wins in the most positions and makes the least amount of mistakes, usually wins the game." -- Allan Jeans
JeffDunne wrote:You're sick of reading about St Kilda on a St Kilda forum?
no im sick or reading the same s*** but worded differantly in 8 diffeant threads im sick of somwhat decent discussions dissintergrating into the eternal pro GT anti GT slug fests , im sick of the same complaints about our team re hashed over and over and over again , im sick of ppl acting like we are 0-11 having the stkilda faitfull sticking up for their club is more appealing then reading them stick the boot in to our own
"The team that wins in the most positions and makes the least amount of mistakes, usually wins the game." -- Allan Jeans
st_Trav_ofWA wrote:i understand these guys are carlton Trolls but have they posted porn ? no have they personally attacked anyone ? no have they posted sensitive information ? no ... so what have they done to be banned ? besides having a differant point of veiw to the majority on here ?
the only issue i could see is Silvio_Foschini avatar size .
Erm...they've done all those things you've mentioned above.
really where ? they have said nothing worse then what we have said back .
so we ban them cause they are not st kilda fans then what comes next we ban ppl cause they dont think RL should bee sacked ... then we ban ppl who dont love Fiora ... then we turn this place into a OMG OMG DAL is soo Hot forum ?
'Chris Judd' (or was it Chris Judd) was blocked for putting porn up the other week...'Get a 2nd Verse' for posting personal abuse a couple days ago...that's just the last few weeks. I don't mind an arguement, the problem is that 99% of these tools have go no argument, not facts and no life. The only thing we should be encouraging them to do is drink battery acid.
i was talking about this thread specifically i agree that knobhead Chris Judd should of been banned but the carlton fools on this thread have been harmless and i dont think they need to be banned
Mods cut the personal abuse out of this thread a couple days back.
my bad i didnt know that from whats on there now it seems fine but if its been cleaned up then .......
"The team that wins in the most positions and makes the least amount of mistakes, usually wins the game." -- Allan Jeans
The Fireman wrote: Successful and dishonest doesn't sit well alongside each other, from now on everyone will question any success Carlton had or will get.
As i said your club is now tainted heavily , from cheating, tanking and criminal presidents it's just too hard to shake.
As for the fans on here getting angry , I'm sure they wouldn't like oppo supporters trolling over on Carlton forums would they? Especially when you consider the ones trolling here are supporters of the most dishonest club in the history of the game.
why do you keep saying the same stuff over and over.
is it stkilda only on saintsational (serious question)...
The Fireman wrote: Successful and dishonest doesn't sit well alongside each other, from now on everyone will question any success Carlton had or will get.
As i said your club is now tainted heavily , from cheating, tanking and criminal presidents it's just too hard to shake.
As for the fans on here getting angry , I'm sure they wouldn't like oppo supporters trolling over on Carlton forums would they? Especially when you consider the ones trolling here are supporters of the most dishonest club in the history of the game.
why do you keep saying the same stuff over and over.
is it stkilda only on saintsational (serious question)...
i haven't done anything to be banned have i?
Till it sinks in I guess. I was responding to your "successful" quote and was simply explaining why I think it had no place in respect to a dishonest organization, that's fair enough isn't it?
and no you've done nothing to be banned for as far as I can see.
Has it sunk in, do you agree with me?
Last edited by The Fireman on Fri 13 Jun 2008 8:06pm, edited 2 times in total.
The Fireman wrote:Till it sinks in I guess. I was responding to your "successful" quote and was simply explaining why I think it had no place in respect to a dishonest organization, that's fair enough isn't it?
and no you've done nothing to be banned for as far as I can see.
Has it sunk in, do you agree with me?
The Fireman wrote:Till it sinks in I guess. I was responding to your "successful" quote and was simply explaining why I think it had no place in respect to a dishonest organization, that's fair enough isn't it?
and no you've done nothing to be banned for as far as I can see.
Has it sunk in, do you agree with me?
The Fireman wrote:Till it sinks in I guess. I was responding to your "successful" quote and was simply explaining why I think it had no place in respect to a dishonest organization, that's fair enough isn't it?
and no you've done nothing to be banned for as far as I can see.
Has it sunk in, do you agree with me?
