not an anti RL thread, but rather a question
Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators
-
- SS Life Member
- Posts: 3804
- Joined: Tue 30 May 2006 7:34pm
- Location: the new home of the saints :)
not an anti RL thread, but rather a question
why on earth did Ross crucify Jarryn Geary by leaving him on Aker for so long?
he has played a handful of games, and was getting towled up by a class act, don't you think you could move him a little earlier than the 20 minute mark of the 4th quater when aker had 6 goals to his name.
I think Geary is a good prospect, but this sort of thing will hurt confidence, and not further development imo.
he has played a handful of games, and was getting towled up by a class act, don't you think you could move him a little earlier than the 20 minute mark of the 4th quater when aker had 6 goals to his name.
I think Geary is a good prospect, but this sort of thing will hurt confidence, and not further development imo.
Robert Harvey- Simply the best
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 1208
- Joined: Tue 27 Mar 2007 7:27pm
- Location: Launceston
-
- SS Life Member
- Posts: 3804
- Joined: Tue 30 May 2006 7:34pm
- Location: the new home of the saints :)
agree, but not in this case, also plugger is the best full forward ever, and god humself would struggle to stop him when he was on.LENNY LEADS THE WAY wrote:Plugger once kicked 10 on a young sos at full back 1 day that really killed his carrer didn't it.
Sometimes tough love is the best way
there are points to play for, and we needed to win to get a spot in the 8 so tactically it was stupid.
Robert Harvey- Simply the best
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 10120
- Joined: Fri 16 Feb 2007 3:24pm
- Location: WARBURTON
- Has thanked: 145 times
- Been thanked: 1299 times
- matrix
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 21475
- Joined: Mon 21 May 2007 1:55pm
- Has thanked: 4 times
- Been thanked: 4 times
yeah....especially when the game is there to be won huh, and especially when it was aker who systematically destroyed us....LENNY LEADS THE WAY wrote:Plugger once kicked 10 on a young sos at full back that really killed his carrer didn't it.
Sometimes tough love is the best way
hang on a min.....
is that u Ross?
![Razz :P](./images/smilies/icon_razz.gif)
![Razz :P](./images/smilies/icon_razz.gif)
![Razz :P](./images/smilies/icon_razz.gif)
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 677
- Joined: Sun 14 Mar 2004 8:10pm
-
- SS Life Member
- Posts: 3804
- Joined: Tue 30 May 2006 7:34pm
- Location: the new home of the saints :)
i agree, i really like grammy but he is just rubbish at defending.CURLY wrote:Geary wasnt helped by senior players around him one in particular Gram who is by far the worst defensive player in the league. He now has Jordon McMahon and Ryce Shaw covered for that mantle.
he should play on the wing and wing only
Robert Harvey- Simply the best
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 10120
- Joined: Fri 16 Feb 2007 3:24pm
- Location: WARBURTON
- Has thanked: 145 times
- Been thanked: 1299 times
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 677
- Joined: Sun 14 Mar 2004 8:10pm
-
- SS Hall of Fame
- Posts: 2246
- Joined: Thu 18 Mar 2004 5:14pm
- Location: Level 1 Aisle 37 Row G Telstra Dome
The problem began at the selection table. We have a not match fit Baker who is out #1 choice for small forwards. With Attard out injured as well (#2 small defender) we have absolutely no one else to try. Gram started on him but he lacks accountability (the one thing Ross was bringing to the club). Tried both Fishers both too slow, BJ too slow, Max too slow, Birss too slow, Dempster too slow. Th only player who could remotely go with Aker for speed and had some sort of accountability was Geary but his lack of experienced was going to be found out.
We have very little in the way of Small Defenders with speed. so we need to develop some and Geary appears to be it. Aker was set for a monster game well and truly before the game started.
We have very little in the way of Small Defenders with speed. so we need to develop some and Geary appears to be it. Aker was set for a monster game well and truly before the game started.
Bleeding Red, Black and White for 38 years!
Life Motto - Fortius Quo Fidelius
Raph "Cult Hero" Clarke Fan Club.
Life Motto - Fortius Quo Fidelius
Raph "Cult Hero" Clarke Fan Club.
-
- SS Life Member
- Posts: 3804
- Joined: Tue 30 May 2006 7:34pm
- Location: the new home of the saints :)
the same explosive pace that Geary had in his attempt to negate Aker?luckysaint wrote:Both are good negators however they both don't have the explosive pace to go with him, anyone else?fonz_#15 wrote:max?luckysaint wrote:Who else would you have put on him?
L.fisher?
i refuse to criticise the young bloke as it isn't his fault but i am sure that maxy's smarts would have made up for his lack of speed.
Robert Harvey- Simply the best
- meher baba
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 7196
- Joined: Mon 14 Aug 2006 6:49am
- Location: Tasmania
- Has thanked: 1 time
- Been thanked: 502 times
All this discussion of who should/shouldn't have been on Aker is irrelevant IMO.
We didn't lose this game down the back: we lost it in the midfield and up front.
They only scored 106 points against us at the Dome FFS!! And eleven of those points were gifted to them by the umps.
It's our attack that is utterly up the creek in 2008, not our defending.
Used properly, Gram is an attacking player from the back half of the field: like Aussie Jones (and talk about a player who didn't take the slightest interest in playing accountable football).
The whole point about playing a Jason Gram or an Aussie Jones on anyone - Aker if you insist - is for them to run off him and set up attacking opportunities on the rebound.
We are all getting sucked into the Ross Lyon mental universe in which there are effectively 18 taggers on the ground.
Personally, I wouldn't have put Gram on Aker, but if a coach chooses to do this, he would expect Aker to kick a few but for Grammy to set up more opportunities down the other end. And, indeed, we looked better when Gram was on Aker than when Dempster and Geary played on him.
It's no good picking on individual match ups or player performances when the entire team set up and match day strategy are all totally out of whack.
Players like Gram, Kosi, Raph, Gwilt, Geary, Schneider, BJ, Riewoldt, Fish, Milne, Fiora and even Dempster would contribute a hell of a lot more under a better coach than Lyon.
We didn't lose this game down the back: we lost it in the midfield and up front.
They only scored 106 points against us at the Dome FFS!! And eleven of those points were gifted to them by the umps.
It's our attack that is utterly up the creek in 2008, not our defending.
Used properly, Gram is an attacking player from the back half of the field: like Aussie Jones (and talk about a player who didn't take the slightest interest in playing accountable football).
The whole point about playing a Jason Gram or an Aussie Jones on anyone - Aker if you insist - is for them to run off him and set up attacking opportunities on the rebound.
We are all getting sucked into the Ross Lyon mental universe in which there are effectively 18 taggers on the ground.
Personally, I wouldn't have put Gram on Aker, but if a coach chooses to do this, he would expect Aker to kick a few but for Grammy to set up more opportunities down the other end. And, indeed, we looked better when Gram was on Aker than when Dempster and Geary played on him.
It's no good picking on individual match ups or player performances when the entire team set up and match day strategy are all totally out of whack.
Players like Gram, Kosi, Raph, Gwilt, Geary, Schneider, BJ, Riewoldt, Fish, Milne, Fiora and even Dempster would contribute a hell of a lot more under a better coach than Lyon.
"It is useless to attempt to reason a man out of a thing he was never reasoned into."
- Jonathan Swift
- Jonathan Swift
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 4241
- Joined: Fri 15 Sep 2006 10:35am
- Location: earth
- Has thanked: 1 time
- Been thanked: 1390 times
Our forward set up is just terrible. Without doubt the worst in the league. I'm not talking about talent, I'm talking about how they position themselves when our player win possession at half back and the wing. If you look at our players when they get the ball on the wing, take a few steps and look up, you will see that our key forwards are at least 70 metres away. The guy on the wing then has to stop, and cut inside. By this time, the opposition has pushed back. Our forwards then either all push out wide or all congregate at about 25 metres out from goal. Either way, we make it very easy for the opposition to rebound.
I'd love to see the stats on marks taken by St Kilda players between 45 and 60 metres out from goal. I bet it's the worst in the league. Our half forward zone is a ghost town, with the occasional tumbleweed rolling through.
This, and our slow midfield are our biggest problems. One of them we can't fix immediately, but one of them we can. Unfortunatley, we have a stubborn coach whose mind moves like treacle.
I'd love to see the stats on marks taken by St Kilda players between 45 and 60 metres out from goal. I bet it's the worst in the league. Our half forward zone is a ghost town, with the occasional tumbleweed rolling through.
This, and our slow midfield are our biggest problems. One of them we can't fix immediately, but one of them we can. Unfortunatley, we have a stubborn coach whose mind moves like treacle.
At last someone who can see the wood for the trees.Red wrote:Geary went to Aker after Gram started to get toweled up.
I think it was good to see how he would handle the situation. I have no
problems with it because on yesterdays form he would have killed anyone.
Bloody hell we can be over-critical sometimes us Saints fans. Do you see North fans bleating that whoever the hell was supposed to be on Ablett cost them the game Fri night? I reckon they just accepted that in that sort of mood Ablett is unstoppable.
Part of the reason Aka had a day out was the silver service he got from upfield when our forward line fell apart and the Doggies rebounded with ease. If we'd applied some forward pressure or had some forward structure the ball would have spent more time in our Fwd 50 AND we'd have put some more scoreboard pressure on them.
RL only put Geary on him after the game was shot. I for one was happy to have him learn the caper and he certainly did no worse than the others before him. Sam Fisher actually played on Aka for the last 10 mins or so.
Move Dempster onto him? Robbing Peter to play Paul..Cooney would have then torn us apart
![Image](http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v131/littlemiter/66sig.jpg)
THE BUBBLE HAS BURST
2011 player sponsor
- Spinner
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 8502
- Joined: Sat 02 Dec 2006 3:40pm
- Location: Victoria
- Has thanked: 185 times
- Been thanked: 133 times
Re: not an anti RL thread, but rather a question
I agree....fonz_#15 wrote:why on earth did Ross crucify Jarryn Geary by leaving him on Aker for so long?
he has played a handful of games, and was getting towled up by a class act, don't you think you could move him a little earlier than the 20 minute mark of the 4th quater when aker had 6 goals to his name.
I think Geary is a good prospect, but this sort of thing will hurt confidence, and not further development imo.
Why would you let him get destroyed on Aker, (which was the result of lack of help from the rest of the team) and then just decide to put him forward when the game was well and truly lost.
I seriously believe that the Saints had conceded defeat well before the start of the fourth quarter.
-
- SS Life Member
- Posts: 3303
- Joined: Tue 23 May 2006 6:14pm
- Location: East Oakleigh
- Has thanked: 1 time
- Been thanked: 40 times
Dont worry guys , apparently RL actually knows something about coaching. Thats what his defenders will claim. Why not let a young player with less than 10 games get torn a new one? Great coaching right there?
He would have really learnt nothing in the great scheme of things, but his confidence will take a hit. He will recover, but the point is....
Dont worry, RL knows what he is doing![Rolling Eyes :roll:](./images/smilies/icon_rolleyes.gif)
He would have really learnt nothing in the great scheme of things, but his confidence will take a hit. He will recover, but the point is....
Dont worry, RL knows what he is doing
![Rolling Eyes :roll:](./images/smilies/icon_rolleyes.gif)
- Saints Premiers 2008
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 4335
- Joined: Thu 27 Oct 2005 11:21pm
- Location: Brisbane
you dont thoughiwantmeseats wrote:Dont worry guys , apparently RL actually knows something about coaching. Thats what his defenders will claim. Why not let a young player with less than 10 games get torn a new one? Great coaching right there?
He would have really learnt nothing in the great scheme of things, but his confidence will take a hit. He will recover, but the point is....
Dont worry, RL knows what he is doing
"It's a work in progress," Lyon said.
- matrix
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 21475
- Joined: Mon 21 May 2007 1:55pm
- Has thanked: 4 times
- Been thanked: 4 times
Saints Premiers 2008 wrote:you dont thoughiwantmeseats wrote:Dont worry guys , apparently RL actually knows something about coaching. Thats what his defenders will claim. Why not let a young player with less than 10 games get torn a new one? Great coaching right there?
He would have really learnt nothing in the great scheme of things, but his confidence will take a hit. He will recover, but the point is....
Dont worry, RL knows what he is doing
![Rolling Eyes :roll:](./images/smilies/icon_rolleyes.gif)
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 1129
- Joined: Thu 16 Sep 2004 5:32pm
- Has thanked: 18 times
- Been thanked: 30 times
leigh fisher is barely a footballer. i mean what is the point of that guy? hes not tall. hes not fast. hes just a battler. gives us nothing. oxygen theif.luckysaint wrote:Both are good negators however they both don't have the explosive pace to go with him, anyone else?fonz_#15 wrote:max?luckysaint wrote:Who else would you have put on him?
L.fisher?
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 23208
- Joined: Sat 13 Mar 2004 11:44pm
- Has thanked: 735 times
- Been thanked: 1776 times
Exactly what Lyon said at the presser...we just dont cover small forwards well.....guess what we are seeing more of in the game (apart from freak Franklin) - small forward lines....scary.redwhite&blackblood wrote:
We have very little in the way of Small Defenders with speed. so we need to develop some and Geary appears to be it.
“Yeah….nah””
first
Gram on aker
second
Goddard on aker
third
Gram on aker
fourth
Gram on aker
5th
Geary
6th
Geary
Geary was also on Akermanis for nearly the whole of the 3rd quarter without Aker really having an impact but was kicked a few times against him with great delivery to him in the last.
I thought one of the more shining lights was Geary.
Gram on aker
second
Goddard on aker
third
Gram on aker
fourth
Gram on aker
5th
Geary
6th
Geary
Geary was also on Akermanis for nearly the whole of the 3rd quarter without Aker really having an impact but was kicked a few times against him with great delivery to him in the last.
I thought one of the more shining lights was Geary.
Goddard.