Grant Thomas' Legal Action !!
Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators
- Eastern
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 14357
- Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 1:46pm
- Location: 3132
- Been thanked: 1 time
Grant Thomas' Legal Action !!
I heard on Saturday Night that the case GT had against the club had been settled/withdrawn prior to going to court.
I cannot vouch for the credibility of my source, but thats what I was told !!
I cannot vouch for the credibility of my source, but thats what I was told !!
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 7282
- Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 9:31am
- Has thanked: 11 times
- Been thanked: 142 times
Re: Grant Thomas' Legal Action !!
Could be big difference between possible settlement or being withdrawn..??Eastern wrote:I heard on Saturday Night that the case GT had against the club had been settled/withdrawn prior to going to court.
I cannot vouch for the credibility of my source, but thats what I was told !!
which??
saint4life
- Selhurst Saint
- Club Player
- Posts: 1762
- Joined: Thu 19 Aug 2004 9:09am
- Location: I do like to be beside the seaside
- Been thanked: 35 times
I believe our auditors made us "provide" for a possible payout to GT in the financial statements for the YE 31/10. I can't recall what the figure was though. $280K?markp wrote:Surely any financial settlement would have to be listed in the end of year report?
"...If there has been one recurring theme through this whole shocking mess, it has been the misguided, inflated egos and their ill-judged determination to cling to long-standing old boy friendships. The bad advice that has guided the selfish and culpable James Hird has not only punctuated this saga but symbolised it..."
- Mr Magic
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 12754
- Joined: Fri 04 May 2007 9:38am
- Has thanked: 764 times
- Been thanked: 423 times
They announced a 'provision' in the 2007 accounts which means that if they have settled/paid out for any less than the provision they will actually show a 'profit' on the transaction in teh 2008 accounts.
Some might call it 'creative' accounting by teh new Board, others might call it 'prudent' accounting.
What cannot be disputed is that the 'provision' decreased the profit from 2007 accoiunts.
Some might call it 'creative' accounting by teh new Board, others might call it 'prudent' accounting.
What cannot be disputed is that the 'provision' decreased the profit from 2007 accoiunts.
- barks4eva
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 10748
- Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 12:39pm
- Has thanked: 190 times
- Been thanked: 92 times
Re: Grant Thomas' Legal Action !!
Eastern wrote:I heard on Saturday Night that the case GT had against the club had been settled/withdrawn prior to going to court.
I cannot vouch for the credibility of my source, but thats what I was told !!
Your source on this matter is highly credible, but I just told you what I was told and I cannot vouch for the credibility of my source who told me what he was told, but could not vouch for the credibility of his source who was told by his source whom he could not vouch credibility for.
I hope it hasn't been settled, I was looking forward to my day in court
![Laughing :lol:](./images/smilies/icon_lol.gif)
DO THE MATHS AND THE SQUARES ARE ALL ROOTED.
Re: Grant Thomas' Legal Action !!
You are one tough man.barks4eva wrote:Eastern wrote:I heard on Saturday Night that the case GT had against the club had been settled/withdrawn prior to going to court.
I cannot vouch for the credibility of my source, but thats what I was told !!
Your source on this matter is highly credible, but I just told you what I was told and I cannot vouch for the credibility of my source who told me what he was told, but could not vouch for the credibility of his source who was told by his source whom he could not vouch credibility for.
I hope it hasn't been settled, I was looking forward to my day in court
- Saints43
- Club Player
- Posts: 1826
- Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 1:01pm
- Location: L2 A38
- Has thanked: 100 times
- Been thanked: 11 times
Re: Grant Thomas' Legal Action !!
Because it's the only environment that you would be able to exist in with him.barks4eva wrote:I hope it hasn't been settled, I was looking forward to my day in court
He has sorted you out in every interaction.
You want to have a listen back to your second call to SEN. It's not good listening for you.
- Eastern
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 14357
- Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 1:46pm
- Location: 3132
- Been thanked: 1 time
Re: Grant Thomas' Legal Action !!
Differing opinions can only serve to make the world a better placebarks4eva wrote:Eastern wrote:I heard on Saturday Night that the case GT had against the club had been settled/withdrawn prior to going to court.
I cannot vouch for the credibility of my source, but thats what I was told !!
Your source on this matter is highly credible![]()
![]()
,
![Rolling Eyes :roll:](./images/smilies/icon_rolleyes.gif)
![Wink :wink:](./images/smilies/icon_wink.gif)
- barks4eva
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 10748
- Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 12:39pm
- Has thanked: 190 times
- Been thanked: 92 times
Re: Grant Thomas' Legal Action !!
Your one of the biggest GT doll worshipping flogs on here, what happened was GT blatantly lied which he has a habit of doing, and the more questions that Hudson and Brereton followed up with the more backtracking Thomas did and the more uncomfortable he got, it was laughable.Saints43 wrote:Because it's the only environment that you would be able to exist in with him.barks4eva wrote:I hope it hasn't been settled, I was looking forward to my day in court
He has sorted you out in every interaction.
You want to have a listen back to your second call to SEN. It's not good listening for you.
Your so dumbed down I don't expect you to get it as you wouldn't get the drum even if ya had a brass band up ya, FAIR DINKUM
DO THE MATHS AND THE SQUARES ARE ALL ROOTED.
Grant Thomas' legal action
Hey Barks!!!
We'll be looking out for you on Nine news outside the courtroom
(PLEASE dont be offended its only a leg-pull
)
![Laughing :lol:](./images/smilies/icon_lol.gif)
![Laughing :lol:](./images/smilies/icon_lol.gif)
![Laughing :lol:](./images/smilies/icon_lol.gif)
![Laughing :lol:](./images/smilies/icon_lol.gif)
![Laughing :lol:](./images/smilies/icon_lol.gif)
![Laughing :lol:](./images/smilies/icon_lol.gif)
![Laughing :lol:](./images/smilies/icon_lol.gif)
![Laughing :lol:](./images/smilies/icon_lol.gif)
![Laughing :lol:](./images/smilies/icon_lol.gif)
![Laughing :lol:](./images/smilies/icon_lol.gif)
![Laughing :lol:](./images/smilies/icon_lol.gif)
We'll be looking out for you on Nine news outside the courtroom
![Wink :wink:](./images/smilies/icon_wink.gif)
(PLEASE dont be offended its only a leg-pull
![Wink :wink:](./images/smilies/icon_wink.gif)
- Eastern
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 14357
- Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 1:46pm
- Location: 3132
- Been thanked: 1 time
Re: Grant Thomas' Legal Action !!
Hey Mods !!barks4eva wrote:
Your one of the biggest GT doll worshipping flogs on here,
Your so dumbed down I don't expect you to get it as you wouldn't get the drum even if ya had a brass band up ya, FAIR DINKUM
Is b4e entitled to any holiday pay if/when he is banned for this
![Question :?:](./images/smilies/icon_question.gif)
![Rolling Eyes :roll:](./images/smilies/icon_rolleyes.gif)
![Wink :wink:](./images/smilies/icon_wink.gif)
- The Fireman
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 13245
- Joined: Mon 08 Mar 2004 11:54pm
- Has thanked: 644 times
- Been thanked: 1908 times
- markp
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 15549
- Joined: Mon 26 Mar 2007 4:22pm
- Has thanked: 62 times
- Been thanked: 81 times
I do remember that, just hope that if this story is true there is a way to work out what the final figure was.... it's our money (or it was).Selhurst Saint wrote:I believe our auditors made us "provide" for a possible payout to GT in the financial statements for the YE 31/10. I can't recall what the figure was though. $280K?markp wrote:Surely any financial settlement would have to be listed in the end of year report?
I would love to compare what Barks nobody has ever done for the St.Kilda FC compared to GT. Get ya hand off it ya 'stalker.'
That injunction stopping you stalking Nicole Kidaman doesnt mean you had to fing a new victim of your 'obsessive homeoerotic' tendencies.
That injunction stopping you stalking Nicole Kidaman doesnt mean you had to fing a new victim of your 'obsessive homeoerotic' tendencies.
My behaviour is considered acceptable in some far off remote exotic countries...
I am pretty sure B4E didn't take $2.5 million out of the coffers of the STKFC like on Grant Thomas.St.Kenny wrote:I would love to compare what Barks nobody has ever done for the St.Kilda FC compared to GT. Get ya hand off it ya 'stalker.'
That injunction stopping you stalking Nicole Kidaman doesnt mean you had to fing a new victim of your 'obsessive homeoerotic' tendencies.
Then came back for more
![Rolling Eyes :roll:](./images/smilies/icon_rolleyes.gif)
Thomas caught put ying on SEN again today. Claimed that he never commented on St.Kilda and then Mark Doran came out with the fact that Doran fronted Thomas with evidence he had been pottig the Saints and now Thomas wont go on his show or even talk to Doran
![Rolling Eyes :roll:](./images/smilies/icon_rolleyes.gif)
![Rolling Eyes :roll:](./images/smilies/icon_rolleyes.gif)
Doran knows what the STKFC has on Thomas.
![Cool 8-)](./images/smilies/icon_cool.gif)
![Cool 8-)](./images/smilies/icon_cool.gif)
Lance or James??
There comes a point in every man's life when he has to say, "Enough is enough." For me, that time is now. I have been dealing with claims that I cheated and had an unfair advantage in <redacted>. Over the past three years, I have been subjected to a <redacted>investigation followed by <redacted> witch hunt. The toll this has taken on my family, and my work for <redacted>and on me leads me to where I am today – finished with this nonsense. (Oops just got a spontaneous errection <unredacted>)
There comes a point in every man's life when he has to say, "Enough is enough." For me, that time is now. I have been dealing with claims that I cheated and had an unfair advantage in <redacted>. Over the past three years, I have been subjected to a <redacted>investigation followed by <redacted> witch hunt. The toll this has taken on my family, and my work for <redacted>and on me leads me to where I am today – finished with this nonsense. (Oops just got a spontaneous errection <unredacted>)
- Mr Magic
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 12754
- Joined: Fri 04 May 2007 9:38am
- Has thanked: 764 times
- Been thanked: 423 times
That's what he said last year on that infamous 'RB day'. At the time Doran stated he had been told by a source at teh Club what the issue was and he had invited GT to come on teh Show and answer the allegations. He then said that GT had chosen not to come on his show and instead go on 'The Run Home' with Ox and Francis.joffaboy wrote:I am pretty sure B4E didn't take $2.5 million out of the coffers of the STKFC like on Grant Thomas.St.Kenny wrote:I would love to compare what Barks nobody has ever done for the St.Kilda FC compared to GT. Get ya hand off it ya 'stalker.'
That injunction stopping you stalking Nicole Kidaman doesnt mean you had to fing a new victim of your 'obsessive homeoerotic' tendencies.
Then came back for more![]()
Thomas caught put ying on SEN again today. Claimed that he never commented on St.Kilda and then Mark Doran came out with the fact that Doran fronted Thomas with evidence he had been pottig the Saints and now Thomas wont go on his show or even talk to Doran![]()
![]()
Doran knows what the STKFC has on Thomas.![]()
I don't believe that GT has been on Doran's show since then?
Well said. Go GT! All of this proves how much the media and (sadly) a lot of the supporters had it in for GT from day one. I think he deserves his salary from 2007 (that he was contracted for and that actually Stan Alves/Tim Watson etc received). I would be horrified if anyone of my friends or family treated any coach of this football club the way GT has been treated.St.Kenny wrote:I would love to compare what Barks nobody has ever done for the St.Kilda FC compared to GT. Get ya hand off it ya 'stalker.'
That injunction stopping you stalking Nicole Kidaman doesnt mean you had to fing a new victim of your 'obsessive homeoerotic' tendencies.
P.S. I hope Butterrss/Walls/Wilson/ and the digbats who say "Time to get behind the club as one" when they NEVER DID when GT was there get there come uppance-sooner rather than later. Doran= AFL MAFIA MEDIA APOLOGISTS
"Thanks korters. If Richmond kick more goals they'll win"-R.Scumbag (nee Walls)
The All Spin Zone-Saintsational.com
The All Spin Zone-Saintsational.com
- Mr Magic
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 12754
- Joined: Fri 04 May 2007 9:38am
- Has thanked: 764 times
- Been thanked: 423 times
Well why don't you just send him a cheque for his 2007 salary then?mischa wrote:Well said. Go GT! All of this proves how much the media and (sadly) a lot of the supporters had it in for GT from day one. I think he deserves his salary from 2007 (that he was contracted for and that actually Stan Alves/Tim Watson etc received). I would be horrified if anyone of my friends or family treated any coach of this football club the way GT has been treated.St.Kenny wrote:I would love to compare what Barks nobody has ever done for the St.Kilda FC compared to GT. Get ya hand off it ya 'stalker.'
That injunction stopping you stalking Nicole Kidaman doesnt mean you had to fing a new victim of your 'obsessive homeoerotic' tendencies.
P.S. I hope Butterrss/Walls/Wilson/ and the digbats who say "Time to get behind the club as one" when they NEVER DID when GT was there get there come uppance-sooner rather than later. Doran= AFL MAFIA MEDIA APOLOGISTS
Well Barks has certainly achieved what he set out to do. Mischa quoting St Kenny - 'a meeting of the minds'.
You know Mischa, not even GT's staunchest supporters on here think the CLub should pay him his $500,000 salary for 2007, whether he was wrongly sacked or not.
One thing I will give you though - your posts are ceratinly consistent.