Some questions answered...I think
Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators
- CeilidhSaint
- Club Player
- Posts: 562
- Joined: Mon 18 Sep 2006 11:00pm
- Location: The Ironically Named Victory Room
Some questions answered...I think
Armo has to be regulalrly selcted in the mid-field for this year and forever more - can kick a goal, hard at it,lost his puppy fat and top 10 selection 2006 draft, time to play.
Charlie Chuck wagon Gardiner gives another dimension, can lead up and scrabble on the ground and whilst not the greatest kick (esp. on the run) generally knows where the goals are, clever too. Can be the new Hamill without the perpetual two week injury and concentration sometimes on the man rather than the ball.
King - it's nice to have a genuine tap ruckman who we can rove to as opposed to 2nd guess. Gardi too.
Blake - he did well in the last quarter and righted our ship. Lots can knock him but he gives his all and I like the boy.
Max - no matter what happens in the future, Max has got to be seen as one of the best backmen the Saints have seen. Can play small or tall (Matera anyone?) and needs to be recognised for his great service, and for giving Lloyd the Lurker one of the best touch ups ever.
BJ - give him the ball at HB and the forwards should be sprinting to all parts waiting for him to hit them lace out on the chest. Would love him to play on Cooney sometime. Seems to have replaced Gram in many ways whose game has suffered since BJ's returned, time to reinvent Gram as Dempster is a running quarter back too.
Harvey - never doubt him - nuff said.
Charlie Chuck wagon Gardiner gives another dimension, can lead up and scrabble on the ground and whilst not the greatest kick (esp. on the run) generally knows where the goals are, clever too. Can be the new Hamill without the perpetual two week injury and concentration sometimes on the man rather than the ball.
King - it's nice to have a genuine tap ruckman who we can rove to as opposed to 2nd guess. Gardi too.
Blake - he did well in the last quarter and righted our ship. Lots can knock him but he gives his all and I like the boy.
Max - no matter what happens in the future, Max has got to be seen as one of the best backmen the Saints have seen. Can play small or tall (Matera anyone?) and needs to be recognised for his great service, and for giving Lloyd the Lurker one of the best touch ups ever.
BJ - give him the ball at HB and the forwards should be sprinting to all parts waiting for him to hit them lace out on the chest. Would love him to play on Cooney sometime. Seems to have replaced Gram in many ways whose game has suffered since BJ's returned, time to reinvent Gram as Dempster is a running quarter back too.
Harvey - never doubt him - nuff said.
TB 1 - The Brightest Light on the Darkest Night - we miss you.
Think Globally, Act Sainterly
I have Phil Narkle's helmet
Think Globally, Act Sainterly
I have Phil Narkle's helmet
- Otiman
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 8744
- Joined: Thu 28 Jul 2005 11:09pm
- Location: Elsewhere
- Has thanked: 200 times
- Been thanked: 651 times
Re: Some questions answered...I think
How do people rate him up against Spud?CeilidhSaint wrote:Max - no matter what happens in the future, Max has got to be seen as one of the best backmen the Saints have seen. Can play small or tall (Matera anyone?) and needs to be recognised for his great service, and for giving Lloyd the Lurker one of the best touch ups ever.
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 18647
- Joined: Thu 11 Mar 2004 1:36am
- Has thanked: 1988 times
- Been thanked: 870 times
Re: Some questions answered...I think
as good, maybe betterOtiman wrote:How do people rate him up against Spud?
- Mr Magic
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 12798
- Joined: Fri 04 May 2007 9:38am
- Has thanked: 810 times
- Been thanked: 433 times
Not just 2markinUSA wrote:Well, he certainly is a very good footballer, as was Spud. We've been lucky to have two such talented fullbacks!
We've been lucky to see a 'procession' of great/very good full backs during my time as a supporter (from the early 60's) till now.
Verdun Howell (a Brownlow medallist at full back)
Bob Murray
Cowboy Neale
Barry Lawrence
Trevor Barker
Danny Frawley
Max Hudghton
Luke Penny (if injury hadn't curtailed his carree)
- Mr Magic
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 12798
- Joined: Fri 04 May 2007 9:38am
- Has thanked: 810 times
- Been thanked: 433 times
Yes, my mistake, Jamie was a great servant for our Club that, IMO, was very poorly treated by Stan Alves in the end.saint66au wrote:Dont forget Jamie Shanahan in that list
Poor bugger is only remembered for that one GF game, but played some terrific footy for us at Full Back
IIRC he decided to free up some room in our salary cap to ensure we could keep Joel Smith who decided to jump to Hawthorn anyway. By the time that decision was made, Shanners had been publicly made the 'sole culprit' for our 1997 GF loss.
Joel Smith never left St Kilda we got rid of him on DR's advice, that ended up being wrong.Mr Magic wrote:Yes, my mistake, Jamie was a great servant for our Club that, IMO, was very poorly treated by Stan Alves in the end.saint66au wrote:Dont forget Jamie Shanahan in that list
Poor bugger is only remembered for that one GF game, but played some terrific footy for us at Full Back
IIRC he decided to free up some room in our salary cap to ensure we could keep Joel Smith who decided to jump to Hawthorn anyway. By the time that decision was made, Shanners had been publicly made the 'sole culprit' for our 1997 GF loss.
Qld Saints Supporter Group
- matrix
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 21475
- Joined: Mon 21 May 2007 1:55pm
- Has thanked: 4 times
- Been thanked: 4 times
jesus! we've been spoilt really.Mr Magic wrote: We've been lucky to see a 'procession' of great/very good full backs
Verdun Howell (a Brownlow medallist at full back)
Bob Murray
Cowboy Neale
Barry Lawrence
Trevor Barker
Danny Frawley
Max Hudghton
Luke Penny (if injury hadn't curtailed his carree)
pretty lucky to have seen all those blokes play magic.
i always liked penny too, thought he read the play very well...shame he departed early.
To be fair it was a little of both. Doctors told the club that his broken leg was more serous then most and therefore the club gave him a 1-2 year contract with performance measures (from memory). The hawks gave him a longer one on more money to entice him over, even thought there was a chance he might never play again.Saint Bev wrote:Joel Smith never left St Kilda we got rid of him on DR's advice, that ended up being wrong.Mr Magic wrote:Yes, my mistake, Jamie was a great servant for our Club that, IMO, was very poorly treated by Stan Alves in the end.saint66au wrote:Dont forget Jamie Shanahan in that list
Poor bugger is only remembered for that one GF game, but played some terrific footy for us at Full Back
IIRC he decided to free up some room in our salary cap to ensure we could keep Joel Smith who decided to jump to Hawthorn anyway. By the time that decision was made, Shanners had been publicly made the 'sole culprit' for our 1997 GF loss.
he took the longer term deal, his leg got better and the rest is history.
FQF
loyal in the good times and bad
In richo I trust
2013 trade/draft best ever?
Billings - future brownlow medallist Longer - future best ruck
Dunstan - future captain Eli - future cult hero
Acres - future norm smith
loyal in the good times and bad
In richo I trust
2013 trade/draft best ever?
Billings - future brownlow medallist Longer - future best ruck
Dunstan - future captain Eli - future cult hero
Acres - future norm smith
- Mr Magic
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 12798
- Joined: Fri 04 May 2007 9:38am
- Has thanked: 810 times
- Been thanked: 433 times
Actually I think you'll find we offered him a shorter length contract than what Hawthorn did. We, on medical advice, offered him a 2 year(?) contract whereas Hawthorn offered him a 3 year.Saint Bev wrote:Joel Smith never left St Kilda we got rid of him on DR's advice, that ended up being wrong.Mr Magic wrote:Yes, my mistake, Jamie was a great servant for our Club that, IMO, was very poorly treated by Stan Alves in the end.saint66au wrote:Dont forget Jamie Shanahan in that list
Poor bugger is only remembered for that one GF game, but played some terrific footy for us at Full Back
IIRC he decided to free up some room in our salary cap to ensure we could keep Joel Smith who decided to jump to Hawthorn anyway. By the time that decision was made, Shanners had been publicly made the 'sole culprit' for our 1997 GF loss.
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 126
- Joined: Fri 04 Apr 2008 9:35pm
- Location: Wollongong, NSW
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 10598
- Joined: Tue 14 Jun 2005 7:04pm
- Location: North
- Has thanked: 1011 times
- Been thanked: 1055 times
Re: Some questions answered...I think
Rate Max above Spud. Max has an uncanny ability to get his fist to the ball just as the forward is about to grab it. Ha the leg speed to keep up with the leading forward, is cool under pressure, rarely turns it over and like Spud, the heart and guts of a lion.Otiman wrote:How do people rate him up against Spud?CeilidhSaint wrote:Max - no matter what happens in the future, Max has got to be seen as one of the best backmen the Saints have seen. Can play small or tall (Matera anyone?) and needs to be recognised for his great service, and for giving Lloyd the Lurker one of the best touch ups ever.
Next to Harves the player who has most bled RW&B for his entire career. Absolute champion. 101% STKFC.
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 4655
- Joined: Sun 18 Jun 2006 2:04pm
- Location: Melb
- Has thanked: 5 times
- Been thanked: 23 times
Not taking anything away from Max as he's been a brilliant servant,and probably the most underrated fullback in the game.
However I rate spud higher. Played in an era where he didn't have several players dropping back making it easier for him. Played in an era of great forwards and generally he won on most occasions even when we did cop floggings(which was most weeks). Spud also had a great pair of hands. Had no left side though,and wasn't the greatest kick,much like Max.
Shanahan again,highly underated. Never got beaten,apart from when Jarman started kicking swivel goals from packs,nothing would of stopped that freak performance that day. Luckily for us they showed it wasn't Stkilda's softness that allowed it like everyone said,by doing it the year after against the mighty North side.
Frawley/Shanahan/Hudghton....as underated a trio you'll ever get at fullback. Dare I say it,all better than the shockingly overated 'FB of the century' Silvagni(who's only saving grace was he could go forward every now and then).
However I rate spud higher. Played in an era where he didn't have several players dropping back making it easier for him. Played in an era of great forwards and generally he won on most occasions even when we did cop floggings(which was most weeks). Spud also had a great pair of hands. Had no left side though,and wasn't the greatest kick,much like Max.
Shanahan again,highly underated. Never got beaten,apart from when Jarman started kicking swivel goals from packs,nothing would of stopped that freak performance that day. Luckily for us they showed it wasn't Stkilda's softness that allowed it like everyone said,by doing it the year after against the mighty North side.
Frawley/Shanahan/Hudghton....as underated a trio you'll ever get at fullback. Dare I say it,all better than the shockingly overated 'FB of the century' Silvagni(who's only saving grace was he could go forward every now and then).
- ace
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 10788
- Joined: Sun 16 Dec 2007 3:28pm
- Location: St Kilda
- Has thanked: 31 times
- Been thanked: 836 times
Both spud and Max had/have the closing speed to negate a leading forward.
They get close enough to take a lunging spoiling punch on the ball at the last minute.
The big differences were/are Spud only ever had one shot in his gun but could fight it out with the gorillas.
Spud would be left lying on the ground after his spoil and if his mates did not clear the ball, his effort was in vain.
Max gets up off the turf and continues to compete.
On the other hand Max does not have the physical strength to mix it with a gorilla forward standing in the goal square.
They get close enough to take a lunging spoiling punch on the ball at the last minute.
The big differences were/are Spud only ever had one shot in his gun but could fight it out with the gorillas.
Spud would be left lying on the ground after his spoil and if his mates did not clear the ball, his effort was in vain.
Max gets up off the turf and continues to compete.
On the other hand Max does not have the physical strength to mix it with a gorilla forward standing in the goal square.
- AlpineStars
- Club Player
- Posts: 492
- Joined: Wed 05 Apr 2006 7:44pm
- Location: Aspendale
- Contact:
I think Spud was better, but the way the rules are these days Spud probably would struggle. Max has fantastic closing speed. Did see spud get abbsolutly towelled up one day at moorabbin though by Allan Jakovich (He could play, just a nuff nuff though). Can't remember to many other times he had bags kicked on him?
Wake me up when September ends.
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 1906
- Joined: Fri 19 Mar 2004 5:47pm
- Has thanked: 4 times
- Been thanked: 17 times