Alwyn Davey's holding the ball non-call
Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators
Alwyn Davey's holding the ball non-call
Did anybody else see that? He was streaming through the middle, went to kick the ball and Armo laid a great tackle on him forcing him to kick the ground instead of the ball. The umpire was no more than 5-10m away and still didn't call it. It was honestly the definition of improper disposal and yet the umpire doesn't call it! In the end it ended up being very costly because they ended up kicking a goal from it and had all the momentum in the world. Honestly if the umpires can't see that, then what the hell can they see?
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 25303
- Joined: Tue 01 Feb 2005 4:25pm
- Location: Trump Tower
- Has thanked: 142 times
- Been thanked: 284 times
The blind mongrels made plenty of mistakes last night, especially maggot number 15 - he really stood out as a problem child.
Overall, they seemed equally bad for both sides, but considering we won comfortably they tend to get let off the hook a bit.....
Overall, they seemed equally bad for both sides, but considering we won comfortably they tend to get let off the hook a bit.....
i am Melbourne Skies - sometimes Blue Skies, Grey Skies, even Partly Cloudy Skies.
Hit his foot.
Lance or James??
There comes a point in every man's life when he has to say, "Enough is enough." For me, that time is now. I have been dealing with claims that I cheated and had an unfair advantage in <redacted>. Over the past three years, I have been subjected to a <redacted>investigation followed by <redacted> witch hunt. The toll this has taken on my family, and my work for <redacted>and on me leads me to where I am today – finished with this nonsense. (Oops just got a spontaneous errection <unredacted>)
There comes a point in every man's life when he has to say, "Enough is enough." For me, that time is now. I have been dealing with claims that I cheated and had an unfair advantage in <redacted>. Over the past three years, I have been subjected to a <redacted>investigation followed by <redacted> witch hunt. The toll this has taken on my family, and my work for <redacted>and on me leads me to where I am today – finished with this nonsense. (Oops just got a spontaneous errection <unredacted>)
- Mr Magic
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 12798
- Joined: Fri 04 May 2007 9:38am
- Has thanked: 810 times
- Been thanked: 433 times
Sorry to sidetrack this thread, but did anybody else think the umpires used different interpretations on 2 rules last night?
Holding the ball
Hands in the back/Chopping the arms.
It seemed to me that htye hardly paid any frees for both of those type of infractions compared to what we have seen in the first 4 rounds.
Maybe the players just miraculously got better at not offending over the week?
Holding the ball
Hands in the back/Chopping the arms.
It seemed to me that htye hardly paid any frees for both of those type of infractions compared to what we have seen in the first 4 rounds.
Maybe the players just miraculously got better at not offending over the week?
- mad saint guy
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 7086
- Joined: Tue 26 Jul 2005 9:44pm
- Location: Melbourne
- Has thanked: 52 times
- Been thanked: 367 times
- my les foote
- Club Player
- Posts: 1024
- Joined: Tue 12 Dec 2006 6:03pm
- Location: Beside the seaside
- Been thanked: 2 times
I saw that and I'm sure my neighbours heard me go off my nut at that. It was absoloutley ridiculous call.mad saint guy wrote:Strangest decision was when Goddard tackled McPhee, McPhee drops the ball and play on is called. Montagna gathers the ball, is tackled by Lloyd, Montagna drops the ball and is pinged. Identical scenarios within about 5 seconds of each other and they only call one of them.
- my les foote
- Club Player
- Posts: 1024
- Joined: Tue 12 Dec 2006 6:03pm
- Location: Beside the seaside
- Been thanked: 2 times
I feel like I'm channeling Plugger66 in this thread.mad saint guy wrote:Strangest decision was when Goddard tackled McPhee, McPhee drops the ball and play on is called. Montagna gathers the ball, is tackled by Lloyd, Montagna drops the ball and is pinged. Identical scenarios within about 5 seconds of each other and they only call one of them.
I couldn't see that one either. McPhee had the ball twice before Lloyd's free. He handballed both times although the first time he grabbed hold of Armitage's jumper to stop him from tackling. A few seconds later he had it again and handballed as soon as he was tackled by Sam Fisher.
The Lloyd free was there, as was the one payed against him a few minutes later.
Win it for HIM!
- Mr Magic
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 12798
- Joined: Fri 04 May 2007 9:38am
- Has thanked: 810 times
- Been thanked: 433 times
my les foote wrote:mad saint guy wrote:Strangest decision was when Goddard tackled McPhee, McPhee drops the ball and play on is called. Montagna gathers the ball, is tackled by Lloyd, Montagna drops the ball and is pinged. Identical scenarios within about 5 seconds of each other and they only call one of them.
although the first time he grabbed hold of Armitage's jumper to stop him from tackling. quote]
Did Armitage have teh ball when McPhee grabbed his jumper? No he didn't - clear case of 'holding the man' against McPhee!
-
- SS Life Member
- Posts: 3303
- Joined: Tue 23 May 2006 6:14pm
- Location: East Oakleigh
- Has thanked: 1 time
- Been thanked: 40 times
Yes absolutely, and I for one am very glad. Nothing more frustrating than the automatic ping when the ball is under a pack, it was getting totally ridiculous!!! Just each situation on its merists. Well done umps.Mr Magic wrote:Sorry to sidetrack this thread, but did anybody else think the umpires used different interpretations on 2 rules last night?
Holding the ball
Hands in the back/Chopping the arms.
It seemed to me that htye hardly paid any frees for both of those type of infractions compared to what we have seen in the first 4 rounds.
Maybe the players just miraculously got better at not offending over the week?