Our backline coach SOS

This unofficial St Kilda Saints fan forum is for people of all ages to chat Saints Footy and all posts must be respectful.

Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators

Post Reply
User avatar
Mr Magic
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 12782
Joined: Fri 04 May 2007 9:38am
Has thanked: 792 times
Been thanked: 427 times

Our backline coach SOS

Post: # 550011Post Mr Magic »

I had an interesting conversation last night with someone who is at the Club regularly.

We were talking about all things Saints of course and I asked him what the players thought of the assistant coaches?

Without denigrating any of the other assistants, he said that SOS is revered by the backline players.
He has obviously connected with them and they have full trust in what he is trying to teach/show them.

How are our backmen faring as against previous years?
Can anybody note a difference from previous seasons?
Better or worse?


User avatar
rodgerfox
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 9059
Joined: Wed 10 Mar 2004 9:10am
Has thanked: 425 times
Been thanked: 327 times

Post: # 550015Post rodgerfox »

Interesting.

I read an opinion somewhere when we hired that Lyon, that he would fail as a coach.

He would fail because he was brining a Sydney'esque game plan to the club. A game plan which requires absolute effort, commitment and intensity for 4 quarters every weekend, for 22 weeks a year.

Apart from needing a fit list to do this, you needed to really respect your coach.

The opinion of the author was that the game plan was rubbish, and that Roos was an ordinary coach, and that what made the players listen to him was that he was somewhat of a club legend. Some players had played with him, idolised him as player and hung on every word he said.

The thoughts were that Lyon, although delivering the same message, would not be able to get it across, simply because the message was shiit and he didn't have the aura to make players stop and listen to it.


Based on this (whether you give it any creedance or not) it is understandable that players would listen to SoS. He could be selling polished dog turds, and people would buy them.

But then what about Barker? What about Rock?

Overall, does our coaching panel have that immediate respect before even saying a word?


User avatar
Goody
Club Player
Posts: 287
Joined: Wed 10 Mar 2004 2:23pm
Location: Brisbane

Post: # 550026Post Goody »

Ive often wondered why we have Barker as our forward coach.
All I remember of him as a player was he was injured a lot and was not an above average kick for goal.
I know that not all great players become great coaches but I would have thought there was better people out there than Barker to train our forwards.
At the moment our forwards are under achieving and we really havent got a forward where you feel comfortable on a set shot 40m out. I know all players miss but of late I havent felt confident with Roo, Kosi or Milne going for a set shot. The G-Train I do, but his opportunities have been limited.
Our backline I love, its underrated but is more than capable.
Then there is our midfield???


Followed Saints since '71
Sir Robert Harvey was my favorite player
Stewie Lowe and Plugger before that.
Loved watching Rooey and Jack Steven
Now looking forward to the future

Some people make things happen, some people watch things happen, but most just say " What the f#&k happened!".
saint66au
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 17003
Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 9:03pm
Contact:

Post: # 550028Post saint66au »

I actually think our backline has been very cohesive this year.

I especially notice this cohesion during contested ball situations. If we can get our hands on it out of pack, theres a real sense of the players knowing where their teammates will be. A chain of 5-6 quick handpases always finds targets, with a player running to space on or outside 50.

Less effective are our clearances from behinds. I actually think its a big mistake to have Dal kicking out from FB if at least half the time he's just going to chip it to Max or Chipper or Fish in a pocket. As soon as he's done that his tagger is all over him and he's out of the play deep in defence. If we are going to use elite kickers like him and BJ, we have to huddle or provide clear targets for them on or outside 50.

People scream at them to "man up", but when the ball is coming down at 500mph courtesy of lack of forward/midfield pressure it makes it very hard

I know its been said before, but the plethora of behinds we've kicked this year are NOT helping. Kick a goal and the next thing you have is a stop-play contest in the centre, with purportedly one of the leagues best midfields there to contest it. Kick a behind and you hand the opposition control of the footy. With our lack of pressure inside our own 50, we are killing ourselves doing this...and putting more pressure on our backline than there needs to be.


Image

THE BUBBLE HAS BURST

2011 player sponsor
User avatar
Mr Magic
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 12782
Joined: Fri 04 May 2007 9:38am
Has thanked: 792 times
Been thanked: 427 times

Post: # 550030Post Mr Magic »

saint66au wrote: I know its been said before, but the plethora of behinds we've kicked this year are NOT helping. Kick a goal and the next thing you have is a stop-play contest in the centre, with purportedly one of the leagues best midfields there to contest it. Kick a behind and you hand the opposition control of the footy. With our lack of pressure inside our own 50, we are killing ourselves doing this...and putting more pressure on our backline than there needs to be.
Very interesting point.
I hadn't given that issue much thought before.
Although I think of the 3 games I've seen, we seem to have manned up /zoned up pretty well from kick-ins. I don't remember too many times that the opposition have 'run' the ball all the way back to their goals without us touching it? I wasn't at the Bulldogs game so I don't know if it happened then?


User avatar
markinUSA
SS Life Member
Posts: 3149
Joined: Mon 04 Sep 2006 1:19am
Location: Toledo, OH, USA

Post: # 550036Post markinUSA »

This is an interesting thread, thank you for starting it. SOS certainly was a very good footballer. I don't think he was "fullback of the century", but he was certainly very good. I loved watching Plugger tear him a new one when we played the Blues!

On a related point, I was watching the coach's box, and I didn't recognize all the people in there. Is SOS there? I couldn't see him, but (not being at the game) I only ever get to see the brief flashes that come up on the TV. I have seen the girl who is our statistician (being female, she stands out in the group), and Ross of course, but I haven't been able to recognize the others.

Can anyone help?


"Don't give up, never give up" - Robert Harvey.
User avatar
SENsei
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 7128
Joined: Mon 05 Jun 2006 8:25pm

Post: # 550042Post SENsei »

SOS got one of the competition's worst backman in Lewis Roberts-Thomson to play like the best CHB in the comp in their premiership year.

He hasn't got back that form.

Interesting comments on SOS from Mr Magic's source. Have heard similar.


Poster formerly known as SENsaintsational. More wisdom. More knowledge. Less name.
User avatar
saintsRrising
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 30092
Joined: Mon 15 Mar 2004 11:07am
Location: Melbourne
Has thanked: 711 times
Been thanked: 1234 times

Post: # 550051Post saintsRrising »

I think our backline is doing well enough.

Sam Fisher continues to grow as a player. His defensive skills have vastly improved in the time SOS has been there. Whether this is natural growth froma real talent, and/or SOS's influence I do not know.




However I think Grammy needs some real 1 on 1 with SOS on spoiling etc..


Flying the World in comfort thanks to FF Points....
User avatar
saintsRrising
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 30092
Joined: Mon 15 Mar 2004 11:07am
Location: Melbourne
Has thanked: 711 times
Been thanked: 1234 times

Post: # 550052Post saintsRrising »

rodgerfox wrote:Interesting.

I read an opinion somewhere when we hired that Lyon, that he would fail as a coach.

He would fail because he was brining a Sydney'esque game plan to the club. A game plan which requires absolute effort, commitment and intensity for 4 quarters every weekend, for 22 weeks a year.

Apart from needing a fit list to do this, you needed to really respect your coach.

The opinion of the author was that the game plan was rubbish, and that Roos was an ordinary coach, and that what made the players listen to him was that he was somewhat of a club legend. Some players had played with him, idolised him as player and hung on every word he said.

The thoughts were that Lyon, although delivering the same message, would not be able to get it across, simply because the message was shiit and he didn't have the aura to make players stop and listen to it.

I think the OP was asking about our assistants, not Ross.


Flying the World in comfort thanks to FF Points....
User avatar
rodgerfox
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 9059
Joined: Wed 10 Mar 2004 9:10am
Has thanked: 425 times
Been thanked: 327 times

Post: # 550056Post rodgerfox »

saintsRrising wrote:
rodgerfox wrote:Interesting.

I read an opinion somewhere when we hired that Lyon, that he would fail as a coach.

He would fail because he was brining a Sydney'esque game plan to the club. A game plan which requires absolute effort, commitment and intensity for 4 quarters every weekend, for 22 weeks a year.

Apart from needing a fit list to do this, you needed to really respect your coach.

The opinion of the author was that the game plan was rubbish, and that Roos was an ordinary coach, and that what made the players listen to him was that he was somewhat of a club legend. Some players had played with him, idolised him as player and hung on every word he said.

The thoughts were that Lyon, although delivering the same message, would not be able to get it across, simply because the message was shiit and he didn't have the aura to make players stop and listen to it.

I think the OP was asking about our assistants, not Ross.
Sure, I was just using the example of players respecting coaches and assistants based on their reputations and/or playing ability.

I was referring to Barker in particular, but used the Lyon situation as an example.

In SoS' case, he certainly would have had that advantage with our group.


User avatar
meher baba
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 7211
Joined: Mon 14 Aug 2006 6:49am
Location: Tasmania
Has thanked: 1 time
Been thanked: 513 times

Post: # 550064Post meher baba »

I agree that, as far as one can tell from the way he talks in interviews and the way that the backline is playing, SOS seems to be the most successful of our assistant coaches.

I thought the backline stood up wonderfully well last season given our terrible injuries. SOS must surely have made a contribution to this outcome.

It's a bit hard to judge how the other two are going: the midfield and forward line are not playing well, but is that their fault or is it a result of our game plan?


"It is useless to attempt to reason a man out of a thing he was never reasoned into."
- Jonathan Swift
spert
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 9108
Joined: Wed 29 Jun 2005 10:39pm
Location: A distant beach
Has thanked: 1 time
Been thanked: 435 times

Post: # 550067Post spert »

SOS is doing a good job with the backs, but we need another big bodied back down there to compete with gorilla forwards. Max or SFisher are not that kind of player and I don't know if Goose will ever come back to any of his early-career form. Kozi maybe needs a spell deep in the backline. I'm more worried about the woeful forward structure- if we fix that, we will be right up there come finals time.


User avatar
bozza1980
Club Player
Posts: 1688
Joined: Thu 27 Jan 2005 3:42pm
Location: Melbourne
Has thanked: 6 times
Been thanked: 6 times

Post: # 550207Post bozza1980 »

The backline have done really well this year, even late last year they were impressive.

As a lot of people have posted if our forward structure can start to work or a working forward structure is found, things could turn around quickly.


Post Reply