1. Riewoldt 2.Koschitzke 3.Didak 4. Livingston

This unofficial St Kilda Saints fan forum is for people of all ages to chat Saints Footy and all posts must be respectful.

Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators

Post Reply
User avatar
cowboy18
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 5795
Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 1:05pm
Location: in my duffle coat
Has thanked: 3 times
Been thanked: 5 times

1. Riewoldt 2.Koschitzke 3.Didak 4. Livingston

Post: # 548975Post cowboy18 »

Think we did well out of the 2000 draft.

Kerr at 18 would have been a good pick in hindsight but I think missing out on the big 4 (1. Riewoldt 2.Koschitzke 3.Didak 4. Livingston) would have sent the forum into meltdown.

We also missed out on Sav Rocca at 30 (could really have had some power forward depth with Gehrig, Rocca, Kosi, Roo etc.)


User avatar
Eastern
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 14357
Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 1:46pm
Location: 3132
Been thanked: 1 time

Post: # 548977Post Eastern »

A lot of the "experts" that year had;

1. Riewoldt

2. Didak

3. Koschitzke

And that could start a whole new debate !!


User avatar
Spinner
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 8502
Joined: Sat 02 Dec 2006 3:40pm
Location: Victoria
Has thanked: 185 times
Been thanked: 133 times

Post: # 548981Post Spinner »

Eastern wrote:A lot of the "experts" that year had;

1. Riewoldt

2. Didak

3. Koschitzke

And that could start a whole new debate !!
Correct.

That first AFL phantom draft had it like that....Way before the draft was kool, and way before the media jumped onto it like it has now days.


User avatar
cowboy18
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 5795
Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 1:05pm
Location: in my duffle coat
Has thanked: 3 times
Been thanked: 5 times

Post: # 548984Post cowboy18 »

Any idea who Rod Butterss wanted?


plugger66
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 50626
Joined: Mon 26 Feb 2007 8:15pm
Location: oakleigh

Re: 1. Riewoldt 2.Koschitzke 3.Didak 4. Livingston

Post: # 548985Post plugger66 »

cowboy18 wrote:Think we did well out of the 2000 draft.

Kerr at 18 would have been a good pick in hindsight but I think missing out on the big 4 (1. Riewoldt 2.Koschitzke 3.Didak 4. Livingston) would have sent the forum into meltdown.

We also missed out on Sav Rocca at 30 (could really have had some power forward depth with Gehrig, Rocca, Kosi, Roo etc.)
This is where we differ. I would have liked Graham Johncock at pick 67 instead we went for Mark Gale. And we missed out on Wayde Skipper when we went for Robert Powell. Finally we could have got not utilised before Daniel Wulf. What were we thinking.

We also went for Brett Voss ahead of Nick Gill who is still playing. What is going on.


User avatar
Spinner
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 8502
Joined: Sat 02 Dec 2006 3:40pm
Location: Victoria
Has thanked: 185 times
Been thanked: 133 times

Post: # 548997Post Spinner »

cowboy18 wrote:Any idea who Rod Butterss wanted?
I reckon Livingston would have been his first choice.

Maybe McDougall for the second pick.


plugger66
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 50626
Joined: Mon 26 Feb 2007 8:15pm
Location: oakleigh

Post: # 548998Post plugger66 »

Spinner wrote:
cowboy18 wrote:Any idea who Rod Butterss wanted?
I reckon Livingston would have been his first choice.

Maybe McDougall for the second pick.
He coached McDougall's Auntie when she was 14 so thats good enough for him.


User avatar
barks4eva
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 10748
Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 12:39pm
Has thanked: 190 times
Been thanked: 92 times

Post: # 548999Post barks4eva »

:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:


Now that is a one classy putdown :wink:


funny stuff cowboy 8-)


DO THE MATHS AND THE SQUARES ARE ALL ROOTED.
saintspremiers
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 25303
Joined: Tue 01 Feb 2005 4:25pm
Location: Trump Tower
Has thanked: 142 times
Been thanked: 284 times

Post: # 549004Post saintspremiers »

cowboy18 wrote:Any idea who Rod Butterss wanted?
he wanted a strapping young lad who called himself "barks4eva", who at the time was playing in the country and had been coached by Grant Thomas.


i am Melbourne Skies - sometimes Blue Skies, Grey Skies, even Partly Cloudy Skies.
User avatar
Saints Premiers 2008
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 4335
Joined: Thu 27 Oct 2005 11:21pm
Location: Brisbane

Post: # 549159Post Saints Premiers 2008 »

saintspremiers wrote:
cowboy18 wrote:Any idea who Rod Butterss wanted?
he wanted a strapping young lad who called himself "barks4eva", who at the time was playing in the country and had been coached by Grant Thomas.
theory has it that b4e is capuano...


"It's a work in progress," Lyon said.
satchmo
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 6656
Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 12:24pm
Location: Hotel Bastardos
Has thanked: 198 times
Been thanked: 166 times
Contact:

Post: # 549165Post satchmo »

cowboy18 wrote:Any idea who Rod Butterss wanted?
Rumour has it he was making a pass.


*Allegedly.

Bring back Lucky Burgers, and nobody gets hurt.

You can't un-fry things.


Last Post
User avatar
bobmurray
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 7932
Joined: Mon 03 Oct 2005 11:08pm
Location: In the stand at RSEA Park.
Has thanked: 547 times
Been thanked: 252 times

Post: # 549474Post bobmurray »

McDougall and Livingston...

Terrible players at AFL level considering where they fell in the draft.....

Unbelievable that these 2 were rated so highly......

:oops:


How many defenders will The Saints pick in the 2024 draft ? :lol:
User avatar
st_Trav_ofWA
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 8886
Joined: Wed 13 Sep 2006 7:10pm
Location: Perth
Contact:

Post: # 549687Post st_Trav_ofWA »

bobmurray wrote:McDougall and Livingston...

Terrible players at AFL level considering where they fell in the draft.....

Unbelievable that these 2 were rated so highly......

:oops:
what about poor freo now theres a team that shoot themself in the foot every draft day !!!
95 pick one - Clive Waterhouse ???!?!?! over looked Primus, Hall Jared Crouch, Simon Prestigiacomo ,Paul Licuria and Daniel Chick :roll: :roll: :roll:

trade peter bell only to retrade him back :roll: ditto on heath black :roll:

trade the number one pick in "super draft" for trent croad who didnt want to wear purple giving up a shot at judd ball hodge ?? only to trade Croad back to where he came from :roll:

then in the next "super draft" trade pick 13 and polak for pick 8 and trade pick 8 and medhurst for tarrant who doesnt want to wear purple and will prob be traded back to a vic club in the next year or so :roll: :roll: :roll:

and now they are the junk yard of unwanted bombers !!!!


"The team that wins in the most positions and makes the least amount of mistakes, usually wins the game." -- Allan Jeans

http://westernsaints.wordpress.com/
congorozides
Club Player
Posts: 1129
Joined: Thu 16 Sep 2004 5:32pm
Has thanked: 18 times
Been thanked: 30 times

Post: # 549785Post congorozides »

bobmurray wrote:McDougall and Livingston...

Terrible players at AFL level considering where they fell in the draft.....

Unbelievable that these 2 were rated so highly......

:oops:
yeah classic. I remember being at the footy last year and some bloke behind me screamed at Fiora "worst number 4 pick ever Fiora".

The bloke had clearly forgotten Luke Livingstone :-)


The Oracale
Club Player
Posts: 36
Joined: Thu 17 Apr 2008 11:21am
Location: Melbourne
Has thanked: 2 times
Been thanked: 2 times

Post: # 550063Post The Oracale »

congorozides wrote:
bobmurray wrote:McDougall and Livingston...

Terrible players at AFL level considering where they fell in the draft.....

Unbelievable that these 2 were rated so highly......

:oops:
yeah classic. I remember being at the footy last year and some bloke behind me screamed at Fiora "worst number 4 pick ever Fiora".

The bloke had clearly forgotten Luke Livingstone :-)
You're right - thats heaps funny, considering Fiora was taken at #3 :roll:

FWIW Luke Livingston was a gun CHF for Kerang/Vic Country his value add was his abillity to not only crash the pack but also to run and chase the ball once it hit the deck (much like Matthew Kreuzer currently does at ground level), to follow it up he had impressive draft camp results and was rated as a top #5 selection on most recruiters pre-draft wish lists.

Sadly, he developed stress fractures in his back which prevented him from playing his natural game and holding him back - and addition to that his confidence was shattered early at Carlton, who through the loss of Silvagni, were threw him to the sharks at FB (a position completly foreign to him).

Luke Livingston was clearly one part unlucky and two parts mis-managed, but hindsight is a wonderfull thing, and most clubs would have picked him up at #4.


Post Reply