Father/Son Rule

This unofficial St Kilda Saints fan forum is for people of all ages to chat Saints Footy and all posts must be respectful.

Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators

Post Reply
suss
Club Player
Posts: 1928
Joined: Sun 22 May 2005 11:42pm
Has thanked: 7 times
Been thanked: 90 times

Father/Son Rule

Post: # 547375Post suss »

I remember a few years back after a game in which we soundly beat Geelong Bomber Thompson bleating on about how our early draft picks cost him the game and yet now with a team made of Father/Son superstars he seems rather quiet on the subject.

What a complete farce. They have drafted Blake, Scarlett, G Ablett (let’s forget about N Ablett for the moment) and now Hawkins from a system supposedly designed to create a balanced competition.

Brisbane won 3 premierships in a row with J Brown (yet another Father/Son pick) at CHF and if it wasn’t for Marc Murphy’s decision to stay at home, would have ended up with a first round pick for a fourth round pick.

When the hell is the AFL going to ditch this stupid rule once and for all?? :evil: :evil:


User avatar
meher baba
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 7223
Joined: Mon 14 Aug 2006 6:49am
Location: Tasmania
Has thanked: 1 time
Been thanked: 516 times

Post: # 547377Post meher baba »

Geelong has done extremely well out of it.

I don't agree that the rule should be scrapped: sons should get the opportunity to play for the club where their father starred. But clubs should be required to use their first round picks to get these players.


"It is useless to attempt to reason a man out of a thing he was never reasoned into."
- Jonathan Swift
plugger66
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 50626
Joined: Mon 26 Feb 2007 8:15pm
Location: oakleigh

Post: # 547381Post plugger66 »

The rule is now correct as the true value of the player will be paid.


suss
Club Player
Posts: 1928
Joined: Sun 22 May 2005 11:42pm
Has thanked: 7 times
Been thanked: 90 times

Post: # 547386Post suss »

The rule is now correct as the true value of the player will be paid.
No it won't. If Tom Hawkins was born one year later Geelong would've picked him up with their first round pick at #16 after having just won a flag. Arguably he was a #1-3 pick.


plugger66
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 50626
Joined: Mon 26 Feb 2007 8:15pm
Location: oakleigh

Post: # 547387Post plugger66 »

suss wrote:
The rule is now correct as the true value of the player will be paid.
No it won't. If Tom Hawkins was born one year later Geelong would've picked him up with their first round pick at #16 after having just won a flag. Arguably he was a #1-3 pick.
Well its better than 3rd round and I think it is a good idea. Geelong have lucky we have been unlucky.


User avatar
Armoooo
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 7281
Joined: Sun 26 Nov 2006 2:28pm
Location: The Great South East
Contact:

Post: # 547433Post Armoooo »

plugger66 wrote:The rule is now correct as the true value of the player will be paid.
I am a fan of the new rule, while some teams will still get a bargain I am much happier.


ROBERT HARVEY A.K.A The Great Man, Banger, Harves, Ol' Man River...
384 games, 4 B&F's, 3 EJ Whitten Medals, St.Kilda Captain, 2 Time Brownlow Medalist, 8 Time All Australian, 2nd Highest Brownlow votes poller.... The greatest of ALL TIME!!
maverick
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 5025
Joined: Sun 14 Mar 2004 10:42am
Location: Bayside
Has thanked: 9 times
Been thanked: 93 times

Post: # 547485Post maverick »

Should be 10 year players or 200 gamers only.
Reserved for club legends or champions.
Becomes too many when average players are included as well.


saint66au
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 17003
Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 9:03pm
Contact:

Post: # 547494Post saint66au »

maverick wrote:Should be 10 year players or 200 gamers only.
Reserved for club legends or champions.
Becomes too many when average players are included as well.
Disagree. A kid should be able to follow in his Dads footsteps should he choose whether Dad played 1 game or 300

In this day and age of the Draft treating kids like swap cards, I reckon the Father-Son rule is great. One of the last vestiges of the tribalism that our game grew up on.

Geelong have been lucky genetically, St Kilda not so. Nothing we can do about it and its sour grapes to think otherwise I reckon.


Image

THE BUBBLE HAS BURST

2011 player sponsor
maverick
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 5025
Joined: Sun 14 Mar 2004 10:42am
Location: Bayside
Has thanked: 9 times
Been thanked: 93 times

Post: # 547495Post maverick »

saint66au wrote:
maverick wrote:Should be 10 year players or 200 gamers only.
Reserved for club legends or champions.
Becomes too many when average players are included as well.
Disagree. A kid should be able to follow in his Dads footsteps should he choose whether Dad played 1 game or 300

In this day and age of the Draft treating kids like swap cards, I reckon the Father-Son rule is great. One of the last vestiges of the tribalism that our game grew up on.

Geelong have been lucky genetically, St Kilda not so. Nothing we can do about it and its sour grapes to think otherwise I reckon.
Then why have a draft, its supposed to even things up, by having this it doesn't.

Go back to zones and father son like you describe, or keep the draft and a very restricted father/son.

One or the other.


User avatar
Eastern
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 14357
Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 1:46pm
Location: 3132
Been thanked: 1 time

Post: # 547616Post Eastern »

saint66au wrote:
maverick wrote:Should be 10 year players or 200 gamers only.
Reserved for club legends or champions.
Becomes too many when average players are included as well.
Disagree. A kid should be able to follow in his Dads footsteps should he choose whether Dad played 1 game or 300

In this day and age of the Draft treating kids like swap cards, I reckon the Father-Son rule is great. One of the last vestiges of the tribalism that our game grew up on.

Geelong have been lucky genetically, St Kilda not so. Nothing we can do about it and its sour grapes to think otherwise I reckon.
Wise words indeed, young man. The F/S rule is a good thing. Lets just keep our fingers crossed that the sons of Harvs, Stewie, Frankie, Max etc turn out to be very good footballers !!


User avatar
bozza1980
Club Player
Posts: 1688
Joined: Thu 27 Jan 2005 3:42pm
Location: Melbourne
Has thanked: 6 times
Been thanked: 6 times

Post: # 548009Post bozza1980 »

I like the father son rule.

The new bidding system, helps retain the essence of the rule whilst ensuring clubs pay closer to the odds they should be for these players.


St DAC
SS Hall of Fame
Posts: 2119
Joined: Tue 28 Sep 2004 7:43pm
Location: Gippsland
Has thanked: 3 times
Been thanked: 4 times

Post: # 548092Post St DAC »

Geelong have been fortunate with some of the F/S picks, but not all. David Clarke's boy? Young Woolnough? Both didn't make it, and there's some semblence of obligation on a club to take a good player's offspring, possibly at the risk of passing up a better option in the draft. It cuts both ways.

Mind you if any other club could have picked up GAJ in the draft they would have taken the risk, given the gun-ness of his old man. :D


Post Reply