Well IMO some people here have no idea and write crap. I am not a know it all its just that I am not an idiot like some people are. I just didnt think you were one of them. Just mind your own business and keep moderating.saint66au wrote:Is it just my imagination, or do you always have to use dripping sarcasm to disagree with someone?plugger66 wrote:So correct on geelong. No good under pressure. Once they are 10 goals up they are gone under pressure. Great comment. If only we could get them 15 goals ahead we would have beaten them.mad saint guy wrote:Positives
Gilbert isn't a crap player, he just isn't a key defender
Kosi can still have a huge impact as a ruckman drifting back
Steven King was a better option than Mark Blake
We won't have to trade/delist any good players to bring in 7-8 kids at the end of the year
Geelong are no good when pressure is applied to them and only kick goals when given space
imho its getting pretty tiresome and you are coming across as a know-it-all
positives
Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators
- mad saint guy
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 7086
- Joined: Tue 26 Jul 2005 9:44pm
- Location: Melbourne
- Has thanked: 52 times
- Been thanked: 367 times
So do you deny that Geelong struggled when we were actually working hard to pressure them, or is it all obviously bulls*** because you think it is?plugger66 wrote:Well IMO some people here have no idea and write crap. I am not a know it all its just that I am not an idiot like some people are. I just didnt think you were one of them. Just mind your own business and keep moderating.
Yes ido deny it.mad saint guy wrote:So do you deny that Geelong struggled when we were actually working hard to pressure them, or is it all obviously bulls*** because you think it is?plugger66 wrote:Well IMO some people here have no idea and write crap. I am not a know it all its just that I am not an idiot like some people are. I just didnt think you were one of them. Just mind your own business and keep moderating.
- mad saint guy
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 7086
- Joined: Tue 26 Jul 2005 9:44pm
- Location: Melbourne
- Has thanked: 52 times
- Been thanked: 367 times
How so? We had 11 scoring shots in the first quarter to their 4. We won the clearances 12 to 3 and their defence could do nothing to stop us when the ball was actually coming into the forward line quickly. They also turned it over on the rebound several times because of their players fumbling under pressure.plugger66 wrote:Yes ido deny it.
Lyon's game plan is very effective when executed to perfection, but unfortunately players aren't robots and they do slow down, making the zoning/flooding/corralling less effective and gaps appear in our defence that Geelong use to move it quickly into their forward line. Whenever they have the ball in space they will have several players presenting for the footy and it is kicked accurately.
If a team fitter than us (most decent teams) implements a similar style to ours in the first quarter then Geelong will struggle.
Well those "idiots who write crap" are just as entitled to their opinion as you are yours....without being belittled with constant sarcasmplugger66 wrote:Well IMO some people here have no idea and write crap. I am not a know it all its just that I am not an idiot like some people are. I just didnt think you were one of them. Just mind your own business and keep moderating.saint66au wrote:Is it just my imagination, or do you always have to use dripping sarcasm to disagree with someone?plugger66 wrote:So correct on geelong. No good under pressure. Once they are 10 goals up they are gone under pressure. Great comment. If only we could get them 15 goals ahead we would have beaten them.mad saint guy wrote:Positives
Gilbert isn't a crap player, he just isn't a key defender
Kosi can still have a huge impact as a ruckman drifting back
Steven King was a better option than Mark Blake
We won't have to trade/delist any good players to bring in 7-8 kids at the end of the year
Geelong are no good when pressure is applied to them and only kick goals when given space
imho its getting pretty tiresome and you are coming across as a know-it-all
This is an Footy fan forum. People are often going to using their hearts instead of their heads when they post. Much as that appears to upset your level-headed unemotional sensibilities, it doesnt make them "idiots" with "no idea" who "write crap".
THE BUBBLE HAS BURST
2011 player sponsor
We are as fit as any team in the AFL. And a game goes for 4 quarters or am I mistaken.mad saint guy wrote:How so? We had 11 scoring shots in the first quarter to their 4. We won the clearances 12 to 3 and their defence could do nothing to stop us when the ball was actually coming into the forward line quickly. They also turned it over on the rebound several times because of their players fumbling under pressure.plugger66 wrote:Yes ido deny it.
Lyon's game plan is very effective when executed to perfection, but unfortunately players aren't robots and they do slow down, making the zoning/flooding/corralling less effective and gaps appear in our defence that Geelong use to move it quickly into their forward line. Whenever they have the ball in space they will have several players presenting for the footy and it is kicked accurately.
If a team fitter than us (most decent teams) implements a similar style to ours in the first quarter then Geelong will struggle.
Do you disagree with the comment that when we did put them under pressure their skills fell down ALOT?plugger66 wrote:We are as fit as any team in the AFL. And a game goes for 4 quarters or am I mistaken.mad saint guy wrote:How so? We had 11 scoring shots in the first quarter to their 4. We won the clearances 12 to 3 and their defence could do nothing to stop us when the ball was actually coming into the forward line quickly. They also turned it over on the rebound several times because of their players fumbling under pressure.plugger66 wrote:Yes ido deny it.
Lyon's game plan is very effective when executed to perfection, but unfortunately players aren't robots and they do slow down, making the zoning/flooding/corralling less effective and gaps appear in our defence that Geelong use to move it quickly into their forward line. Whenever they have the ball in space they will have several players presenting for the footy and it is kicked accurately.
If a team fitter than us (most decent teams) implements a similar style to ours in the first quarter then Geelong will struggle.
Don't worry, plugger66 knows everything and us idiots can go please ourselves
btw how did birss go tonight?
FQF
loyal in the good times and bad
In richo I trust
2013 trade/draft best ever?
Billings - future brownlow medallist Longer - future best ruck
Dunstan - future captain Eli - future cult hero
Acres - future norm smith
loyal in the good times and bad
In richo I trust
2013 trade/draft best ever?
Billings - future brownlow medallist Longer - future best ruck
Dunstan - future captain Eli - future cult hero
Acres - future norm smith
Wouldnt have a clue on Birss as I wasnt there and yes I do disagree there skills fell down because unless I am mistaken the beat us by 42 points and as you said you are right.Solar wrote:Do you disagree with the comment that when we did put them under pressure their skills fell down ALOT?plugger66 wrote:We are as fit as any team in the AFL. And a game goes for 4 quarters or am I mistaken.mad saint guy wrote:How so? We had 11 scoring shots in the first quarter to their 4. We won the clearances 12 to 3 and their defence could do nothing to stop us when the ball was actually coming into the forward line quickly. They also turned it over on the rebound several times because of their players fumbling under pressure.plugger66 wrote:Yes ido deny it.
Lyon's game plan is very effective when executed to perfection, but unfortunately players aren't robots and they do slow down, making the zoning/flooding/corralling less effective and gaps appear in our defence that Geelong use to move it quickly into their forward line. Whenever they have the ball in space they will have several players presenting for the footy and it is kicked accurately.
If a team fitter than us (most decent teams) implements a similar style to ours in the first quarter then Geelong will struggle.
Don't worry, plugger66 knows everything and us idiots can go please ourselves
btw how did birss go tonight?
During the first quarter and a half our pressure was intense and their skills fell down. After that our pressure dropped and they got more space. We have 11 scoring shots and should have been further in front.plugger66 wrote:Wouldnt have a clue on Birss as I wasnt there and yes I do disagree there skills fell down because unless I am mistaken the beat us by 42 points and as you said you are right.Solar wrote:Do you disagree with the comment that when we did put them under pressure their skills fell down ALOT?plugger66 wrote:We are as fit as any team in the AFL. And a game goes for 4 quarters or am I mistaken.mad saint guy wrote:How so? We had 11 scoring shots in the first quarter to their 4. We won the clearances 12 to 3 and their defence could do nothing to stop us when the ball was actually coming into the forward line quickly. They also turned it over on the rebound several times because of their players fumbling under pressure.plugger66 wrote:Yes ido deny it.
Lyon's game plan is very effective when executed to perfection, but unfortunately players aren't robots and they do slow down, making the zoning/flooding/corralling less effective and gaps appear in our defence that Geelong use to move it quickly into their forward line. Whenever they have the ball in space they will have several players presenting for the footy and it is kicked accurately.
If a team fitter than us (most decent teams) implements a similar style to ours in the first quarter then Geelong will struggle.
Don't worry, plugger66 knows everything and us idiots can go please ourselves
btw how did birss go tonight?
First quarter and a half = pressure = geelongs skills fell away
Rest of game = less pressure and more space = geelong pinpointed passes and killed us
I'm confused, unless you can argue otherwise logic dictates that when put under pressure geelongs skills fall down....
HAVE I MISSED SOMETHING?
FQF
loyal in the good times and bad
In richo I trust
2013 trade/draft best ever?
Billings - future brownlow medallist Longer - future best ruck
Dunstan - future captain Eli - future cult hero
Acres - future norm smith
loyal in the good times and bad
In richo I trust
2013 trade/draft best ever?
Billings - future brownlow medallist Longer - future best ruck
Dunstan - future captain Eli - future cult hero
Acres - future norm smith
- mad saint guy
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 7086
- Joined: Tue 26 Jul 2005 9:44pm
- Location: Melbourne
- Has thanked: 52 times
- Been thanked: 367 times
For such a 'know it all' a lot of things sure do fly over your head.plugger66 wrote:So when we were in front in the second quarter when the real pressure was on they were no good. All right you win. Imagine when their skills dont fall down.
Pressure = chasing, tackling, defensive running, 1%ers
In the FIRST quarter, our pressure was good and Geelong's skills were bad.
After the first quarter, our pressure was bad and Geelong's skills were good.
Just read over that a few times and you might get it.
I actually dont know much at all that is why I am only a little bit ahead of you.mad saint guy wrote:For such a 'know it all' a lot of things sure do fly over your head.plugger66 wrote:So when we were in front in the second quarter when the real pressure was on they were no good. All right you win. Imagine when their skills dont fall down.
Pressure = chasing, tackling, defensive running, 1%ers
In the FIRST quarter, our pressure was good and Geelong's skills were bad.
After the first quarter, our pressure was bad and Geelong's skills were good.
Just read over that a few times and you might get it.
ever watched tennis? They have a good way of showing errorsplugger66 wrote:So when we were in front in the second quarter when the real pressure was on they were no good. All right you win. Imagine when their skills dont fall down.
there are unforced errors and forced errors. My arguement is that when we placed tackling and harrasing pressure on them geelong made forced errors. When we stopped putting pressure on they did not commit many unforced errors.
Therefore I argue that when put under physical pressure, geelong make errors. It means we need to work on pressuring them for the full 5 quarters and also make them pay when they do make those errors (see the very gettable goals we missed in the first quarter).
FQF
loyal in the good times and bad
In richo I trust
2013 trade/draft best ever?
Billings - future brownlow medallist Longer - future best ruck
Dunstan - future captain Eli - future cult hero
Acres - future norm smith
loyal in the good times and bad
In richo I trust
2013 trade/draft best ever?
Billings - future brownlow medallist Longer - future best ruck
Dunstan - future captain Eli - future cult hero
Acres - future norm smith
- st_Trav_ofWA
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 8886
- Joined: Wed 13 Sep 2006 7:10pm
- Location: Perth
- Contact:
i dont think geelong we down at all they just have an extra gear they can step up there game to when they need to and we are pretty much stuck in first
"The team that wins in the most positions and makes the least amount of mistakes, usually wins the game." -- Allan Jeans
http://westernsaints.wordpress.com/
http://westernsaints.wordpress.com/