Hawthorn: Maths is not our strong point.....
Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators
- Grimfang
- Club Player
- Posts: 1431
- Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 9:30am
- Location: Tecoma, Vic.
- Been thanked: 1 time
Hawthorn: Maths is not our strong point.....
http://www.news.com.au/heraldsun/sport/ ... 67,00.html
I knew their membership department had an issue. Didn't know it had spread to the football department.
I knew their membership department had an issue. Didn't know it had spread to the football department.
Do not meddle in the affairs of Dragons; for you are a quick and tasty morsel.
- Enrico_Misso
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 11662
- Joined: Tue 13 Jun 2006 12:11am
- Location: Moorabbin Chapter of The Royal Society of Hagiographers
- Has thanked: 315 times
- Been thanked: 720 times
Would have been an interesting scenario had Hawthorn won.
Presumably now with two days to go they would have had to annul Hawthorns score to that point, reversing the result, re-organising a practise match for Hawthorn, switch the Final venue from Docklands to Fooball Park, re-organise the TV etc.
If nothing else it is a wakeup call to our interchange steward.
Presumably now with two days to go they would have had to annul Hawthorns score to that point, reversing the result, re-organising a practise match for Hawthorn, switch the Final venue from Docklands to Fooball Park, re-organise the TV etc.
If nothing else it is a wakeup call to our interchange steward.
The rest of Australia can wander mask-free, socialise, eat out, no curfews, no zoning, no police rings of steel, no illogical inconsistent rules.
They can even WATCH LIVE FOOTY!
They can even WATCH LIVE FOOTY!
- ausfatcat
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 6535
- Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 4:36pm
- Has thanked: 19 times
- Been thanked: 101 times
Enrico_Misso wrote:Would have been an interesting scenario had Hawthorn won.
Presumably now with two days to go they would have had to annul Hawthorns score to that point, reversing the result, re-organising a practise match for Hawthorn, switch the Final venue from Docklands to Fooball Park, re-organise the TV etc.
If nothing else it is a wakeup call to our interchange steward.
Match referee knew about it so It would've changed the result before now, it's just taken this long to get to the media.
- snoopygirl
- SS Life Member
- Posts: 3589
- Joined: Tue 18 May 2004 11:56am
- Location: Cranbourne East
...no...you have to catch them in the act....line "em up and count them ...at the time.....Enrico_Misso wrote:Would have been an interesting scenario had Hawthorn won.
Presumably now with two days to go they would have had to annul Hawthorns score to that point, reversing the result, re-organising a practise match for Hawthorn, switch the Final venue from Docklands to Fooball Park, re-organise the TV etc.
If nothing else it is a wakeup call to our interchange steward.
.everybody still loves lenny....and we always will
"Freedom of expression is the cornerstone of a free society,"
However, freedom of expression is not encouraged in certain forums.
"Freedom of expression is the cornerstone of a free society,"
However, freedom of expression is not encouraged in certain forums.
- riccardo
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 6952
- Joined: Wed 10 Mar 2004 7:44am
- Location: Jason Gram - Michael Tuck Medalist 2008
Not necessarily, IMHO it would have been Sirengate all over again, with the I/S team again winning out, no doubt.stinger wrote:...no...you have to catch them in the act....line "em up and count them ...at the time.....Enrico_Misso wrote:Would have been an interesting scenario had Hawthorn won.
Presumably now with two days to go they would have had to annul Hawthorns score to that point, reversing the result, re-organising a practise match for Hawthorn, switch the Final venue from Docklands to Fooball Park, re-organise the TV etc.
If nothing else it is a wakeup call to our interchange steward.
Would have been upset if I'd bought a ticket for the game at TD only to not get to use if by virtue of the result being changed. IIRC tix were about $30 in 2004, likley to be more now.
Yes favouring interstate teams again. Sydney, Paul Roos this week?riccardo wrote:Not necessarily, IMHO it would have been Sirengate all over again, with the I/S team again winning out, no doubt.stinger wrote:...no...you have to catch them in the act....line "em up and count them ...at the time.....Enrico_Misso wrote:Would have been an interesting scenario had Hawthorn won.
Presumably now with two days to go they would have had to annul Hawthorns score to that point, reversing the result, re-organising a practise match for Hawthorn, switch the Final venue from Docklands to Fooball Park, re-organise the TV etc.
If nothing else it is a wakeup call to our interchange steward.
Would have been upset if I'd bought a ticket for the game at TD only to not get to use if by virtue of the result being changed. IIRC tix were about $30 in 2004, likley to be more now.
- riccardo
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 6952
- Joined: Wed 10 Mar 2004 7:44am
- Location: Jason Gram - Michael Tuck Medalist 2008
Will clearly only get a slap on the wrist as "nobody heard the comment". Yeah, right.plugger66 wrote:Yes favouring interstate teams again. Sydney, Paul Roos this week?riccardo wrote:Not necessarily, IMHO it would have been Sirengate all over again, with the I/S team again winning out, no doubt.stinger wrote:...no...you have to catch them in the act....line "em up and count them ...at the time.....Enrico_Misso wrote:Would have been an interesting scenario had Hawthorn won.
Presumably now with two days to go they would have had to annul Hawthorns score to that point, reversing the result, re-organising a practise match for Hawthorn, switch the Final venue from Docklands to Fooball Park, re-organise the TV etc.
If nothing else it is a wakeup call to our interchange steward.
Would have been upset if I'd bought a ticket for the game at TD only to not get to use if by virtue of the result being changed. IIRC tix were about $30 in 2004, likley to be more now.
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 1497
- Joined: Wed 24 Mar 2004 11:45am
Plugger66=Pro-AFLplugger66 wrote:Yes favouring interstate teams again. Sydney, Paul Roos this week?riccardo wrote:Not necessarily, IMHO it would have been Sirengate all over again, with the I/S team again winning out, no doubt.stinger wrote:...no...you have to catch them in the act....line "em up and count them ...at the time.....Enrico_Misso wrote:Would have been an interesting scenario had Hawthorn won.
Presumably now with two days to go they would have had to annul Hawthorns score to that point, reversing the result, re-organising a practise match for Hawthorn, switch the Final venue from Docklands to Fooball Park, re-organise the TV etc.
If nothing else it is a wakeup call to our interchange steward.
Would have been upset if I'd bought a ticket for the game at TD only to not get to use if by virtue of the result being changed. IIRC tix were about $30 in 2004, likley to be more now.
Correct because I want the AFL to get better to beat Soccer so that we continue growing otherwise we will be overtaken by that game. At the moment it is growing and yes they make mistakes but as long as we continue getting record crowds and money for TV rights we can continue to pay the players more so they dont go to soccer or even cricket.Sainterman wrote:Plugger66=Pro-AFLplugger66 wrote:Yes favouring interstate teams again. Sydney, Paul Roos this week?riccardo wrote:Not necessarily, IMHO it would have been Sirengate all over again, with the I/S team again winning out, no doubt.stinger wrote:...no...you have to catch them in the act....line "em up and count them ...at the time.....Enrico_Misso wrote:Would have been an interesting scenario had Hawthorn won.
Presumably now with two days to go they would have had to annul Hawthorns score to that point, reversing the result, re-organising a practise match for Hawthorn, switch the Final venue from Docklands to Fooball Park, re-organise the TV etc.
If nothing else it is a wakeup call to our interchange steward.
Would have been upset if I'd bought a ticket for the game at TD only to not get to use if by virtue of the result being changed. IIRC tix were about $30 in 2004, likley to be more now.
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 1497
- Joined: Wed 24 Mar 2004 11:45am
I admire your positivity Plugger66 but it dos become at little tiresome when key issues (social issues and football issue) are mishandled. Consistency is important, and it seems to be lacking all too often.plugger66 wrote:Correct because I want the AFL to get better to beat Soccer so that we continue growing otherwise we will be overtaken by that game. At the moment it is growing and yes they make mistakes but as long as we continue getting record crowds and money for TV rights we can continue to pay the players more so they dont go to soccer or even cricket.Sainterman wrote:Plugger66=Pro-AFLplugger66 wrote:Yes favouring interstate teams again. Sydney, Paul Roos this week?riccardo wrote:Not necessarily, IMHO it would have been Sirengate all over again, with the I/S team again winning out, no doubt.stinger wrote:...no...you have to catch them in the act....line "em up and count them ...at the time.....Enrico_Misso wrote:Would have been an interesting scenario had Hawthorn won.
Presumably now with two days to go they would have had to annul Hawthorns score to that point, reversing the result, re-organising a practise match for Hawthorn, switch the Final venue from Docklands to Fooball Park, re-organise the TV etc.
If nothing else it is a wakeup call to our interchange steward.
Would have been upset if I'd bought a ticket for the game at TD only to not get to use if by virtue of the result being changed. IIRC tix were about $30 in 2004, likley to be more now.
I too want to see AFL thrive, but I don't attribute crowds, gate receipts or TV rights figures to solid management by the AFL. AFL is the peoples game, the people who turn up to see their team, and they want a level playing field. The AFL has a responsbility to commercialise itself and make money, but it also has a responsibility to the people. Footy is more than a business it is part of the social fabric. A level playing field is a must and it doesnt always seem that way. But...perhaps it never was.
Well there will never be a level playing field unless we play every side twice and that cannot happen unless the we go to 12 sides and then everyone would hate the AFL even more and under AD they said they would never force mergers again. Or we play 30 games and the players will not agree to that.
Playing 30 games would stop all thwe winging about sides getting a dream run with the draw and as much as people winge about that the AFl are only trying to do what is requested by clubs.
Playing 30 games would stop all thwe winging about sides getting a dream run with the draw and as much as people winge about that the AFl are only trying to do what is requested by clubs.