Under the trial rules, if a team has a 17th interchange, it loses a player for the rest of that quarter and the other side gets a free kick from the goal square.
Huh........
See Micky Milkshakes comments.
New interchange rule
Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators
-
saintspremiers
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 25303
- Joined: Tue 01 Feb 2005 4:25pm
- Location: Trump Tower
- Has thanked: 142 times
- Been thanked: 284 times
I'm in favour of a cap on interchange - I hardly think a cap of 16 per quarter is too onerous.
BUT....
It seems the AFL railroaded this change without consulting the coaches or even the rule committee!
Fair Dinkum, why can't the AFL at least do some consulting of important stake holders?
Are they worried there might be a counter argument?
BUT....
It seems the AFL railroaded this change without consulting the coaches or even the rule committee!
Fair Dinkum, why can't the AFL at least do some consulting of important stake holders?
Are they worried there might be a counter argument?
i am Melbourne Skies - sometimes Blue Skies, Grey Skies, even Partly Cloudy Skies.