It all depends what was in the actual agreement re this 100k when GT was terminated.Oh When the Saints wrote: But the 100k is his.
If it is true that it was kept back until he fulfilled some 'non disclosure' clause then it is a matter for the courts to determine if he has fulfilled it or not. Clearly he feels he has and just as clearly the previous Board feels he hasn't. The new Board hasn't said publicly one way or the other, but apparently are prepared to give it to him to settle the whole issue. Which btw doesn't mean that either party is correct, only that they are prepared to negotiate a settlement of the issue.