not the best call i've ever heardTimeToShineFellas wrote:In other breaking news Carpet Call are expected to become the West Coast Eagles' new sponsors.Eastern wrote:SGIO will be reviewing their sponsorship of WCE early next week when their execs return from a Road Safety Conference in Melbourne !!
A Carpet call spokesman said West Coast and the company were an ideal match as both are pretty good at sweeping things under the rug hoping that no-one notices.......
WC to lose draft picks???
Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators
- Life Long Saint
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 5511
- Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 12:54pm
- Has thanked: 62 times
- Been thanked: 480 times
- Contact:
...because you've been penalised! Your punishment is loss of draft picks.Riewoldting wrote:Why wouldn't you receive the picks?Life Long Saint wrote:No...you would never receive those draft picks to trade them away.
IMO, If the AFL decides to punish the Eagles this draft then they could only take away those picks allocated to the Eagles. Picks 3 & 20 are exempt as the are the result of the Judd trade.
When the AFL punished Carlton, they took away their first & second round picks. It was on the eve of the draft and that was for repeated salary cap breaches.
WCE have a rogue player. The punishment should be heavy fines and the player in question should be delisted. Personally, I'd be stunned if the Eagles don't do this themselves today. Benny has had too many chances now.
- riccardo
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 6952
- Joined: Wed 10 Mar 2004 7:44am
- Location: Jason Gram - Michael Tuck Medalist 2008
The AFL made it quite clear to West Coast the last time this happened that they faced very harsh penalties, including losing draft picks and even premiership points if anything like this happened again.Saints Premiers 2006 wrote:i disagree with them taking draft picks off
why should they be denied access to something they traded for involving a player that wanted to leave etc
premiership points might be something to look into
but not draft picks - that should be for instances like carlton's
The club by failing to adequately monitor a player they are fully aware is at risk of this behaviour is negligent, they knew the risks and should be punished.
![Image](http://img153.imageshack.us/img153/1114/jgramsigye6.png)
![Image](http://www.animenewsnetwork.com/bbs/phpBB2/images/avatars/84500472546cabf191ae67.gif)
- borderbarry
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 6676
- Joined: Mon 19 Apr 2004 11:22pm
- Location: Wodonga
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 1351
- Joined: Sat 06 Oct 2007 2:42pm
- Has thanked: 240 times
- Been thanked: 382 times
When the AFL called the WC board over to melb to talk about BC it was a part of him coming back to play, that WC took full responsibility that BC wouldn't stuff up again! They were warned that inc fines lose of draft picks and/or premiership points. They let greed of another flag get in the way of BC personal problems OBVIOUSLY he wasn't ready. They knew the consequences, they rolled the dice ...and lost. Time to pay...
- Mr Magic
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 12754
- Joined: Fri 04 May 2007 9:38am
- Has thanked: 764 times
- Been thanked: 423 times
I know it's heresy and I'll risk being 'tarred and feathered' or 'burned at the stake'
but
Patrick Smith this morning on SEN called for the WCE to lose their first 2 picks in this year's draft (including pick 3 from Carlton for Judd)
and
anybody selected by the WCE with later picks to be given the option of not going to the Eagles.
The basis of his call for this action was the fact that teh WCE met with the AFL and were not only warned of the consequences for any further transgressions but agreed (signed up?) to the penalties.
I realizr it is only Patrick and you cannot take anything he says/writes seriously, but I thought it was interesting.
but
Patrick Smith this morning on SEN called for the WCE to lose their first 2 picks in this year's draft (including pick 3 from Carlton for Judd)
and
anybody selected by the WCE with later picks to be given the option of not going to the Eagles.
The basis of his call for this action was the fact that teh WCE met with the AFL and were not only warned of the consequences for any further transgressions but agreed (signed up?) to the penalties.
I realizr it is only Patrick and you cannot take anything he says/writes seriously, but I thought it was interesting.
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 10598
- Joined: Tue 14 Jun 2005 7:04pm
- Location: North
- Has thanked: 1011 times
- Been thanked: 1055 times
stkfc1 wrote:When the AFL called the WC board over to melb to talk about BC it was a part of him coming back to play, that WC took full responsibility that BC wouldn't stuff up again! They were warned that inc fines lose of draft picks and/or premiership points. They let greed of another flag get in the way of BC personal problems OBVIOUSLY he wasn't ready. They knew the consequences, they rolled the dice ...and lost. Time to pay...
Agree with this. They've taken the chance and it's backfired. They should pay the cost.
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 25303
- Joined: Tue 01 Feb 2005 4:25pm
- Location: Trump Tower
- Has thanked: 142 times
- Been thanked: 284 times
st.byron wrote:stkfc1 wrote:When the AFL called the WC board over to melb to talk about BC it was a part of him coming back to play, that WC took full responsibility that BC wouldn't stuff up again! They were warned that inc fines lose of draft picks and/or premiership points. They let greed of another flag get in the way of BC personal problems OBVIOUSLY he wasn't ready. They knew the consequences, they rolled the dice ...and lost. Time to pay...
Agree with this. They've taken the chance and it's backfired. They should pay the cost.[/quote
exactly.
And the AFL sanctioned it.
If the AFL don't force the WCE to give up draft picks, Demetriou should stand down.
Howard already thinks Demetriou is a soft c*ck re the AFL drug policy.
Demetriou just burys his ugly head in the sand and pretends whatever drug policy you had wouldn't have picked up Cousins.
+saintspremiers wrote:st.byron wrote:stkfc1 wrote:When the AFL called the WC board over to melb to talk about BC it was a part of him coming back to play, that WC took full responsibility that BC wouldn't stuff up again! They were warned that inc fines lose of draft picks and/or premiership points. They let greed of another flag get in the way of BC personal problems OBVIOUSLY he wasn't ready. They knew the consequences, they rolled the dice ...and lost. Time to pay...
Agree with this. They've taken the chance and it's backfired. They should pay the cost.[/quote
exactly.
And the AFL sanctioned it.
If the AFL don't force the WCE to give up draft picks, Demetriou should stand down.
Howard already thinks Demetriou is a soft c*ck re the AFL drug policy.
Demetriou just burys his ugly head in the sand and pretends whatever drug policy you had wouldn't have picked up Cousins.
Well he is right in one way. The government dont want us to increase testing they just want one less strike so it wouldnt have changed anything.
- bobmurray
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 7781
- Joined: Mon 03 Oct 2005 11:08pm
- Location: In the stand at RSEA Park.
- Has thanked: 497 times
- Been thanked: 226 times
Its the off season,it's Ben Cousins person not Ben Cousins football player thats transgressed,its got fook all to do with the Eagles in this instance..
His career is done and dusted,his earning capacity is next to nothing,i think he's punished enough.......
He's probably heading towards a pine box quicker than his parents ever
dreamed of.....
Idiot..
![Rolling Eyes :roll:](./images/smilies/icon_rolleyes.gif)
His career is done and dusted,his earning capacity is next to nothing,i think he's punished enough.......
He's probably heading towards a pine box quicker than his parents ever
dreamed of.....
Idiot..
![Rolling Eyes :roll:](./images/smilies/icon_rolleyes.gif)
Six debutants for the Saints so far in Season 2024. ![Very Happy :D](./images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif)
![Very Happy :D](./images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif)
- Brian Collis
- Club Player
- Posts: 1353
- Joined: Thu 06 May 2004 2:47pm
- Location: Light her up babe
What should they have done - hired a chaperone?riccardo wrote:The AFL made it quite clear to West Coast the last time this happened that they faced very harsh penalties, including losing draft picks and even premiership points if anything like this happened again.Saints Premiers 2006 wrote:i disagree with them taking draft picks off
why should they be denied access to something they traded for involving a player that wanted to leave etc
premiership points might be something to look into
but not draft picks - that should be for instances like carlton's
The club by failing to adequately monitor a player they are fully aware is at risk of this behaviour is negligent, they knew the risks and should be punished.
How can the club control his behaviour?
They set the guidelines, he's flouted them and they sacked him. They acted appropriately and so should not be punished.
Pretty simple hey!
Like Howard's any sort of expert? Anyhow he's be safely retired in a few weeks.saintspremiers wrote: If the AFL don't force the WCE to give up draft picks, Demetriou should stand down.
Howard already thinks Demetriou is a soft c*ck re the AFL drug policy.
Demetriou just burys his ugly head in the sand and pretends whatever drug policy you had wouldn't have picked up Cousins.
Perhaps you should have paid attention when a whole raft of D&A services (medical authorities and charities like Turning Point) applauded the AFL's policy a few weeks back.
Guess they wouldn't have as much clue as internet nuffies and John Howard though eh? They only work with substance abusers day in and day out.
Hird... The unflushable one is now... just a turd...
- borderbarry
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 6676
- Joined: Mon 19 Apr 2004 11:22pm
- Location: Wodonga
- Unforgiven
- SS Life Member
- Posts: 3258
- Joined: Wed 23 Feb 2005 9:48pm
- Location: Full Forward
- meher baba
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 7196
- Joined: Mon 14 Aug 2006 6:49am
- Location: Tasmania
- Has thanked: 1 time
- Been thanked: 503 times
Taking draft picks off the Eagles will be an appropriate punishment because..................????
I simply don't get it. How were they supposed to have stopped what happened on Tuesday? Anyway, as it won't be going to court for quite some time now, how can the AFL take any action until the case is completed?
And, if it is deemed to be appropriate to punish the Eagles, why take draft picks? I can't see how it is in any way an appropriate punishment, and its impact would be random and unpredictable (after all, there is no way of knowing whether or not the players who would have been drafted with the picks would have been any good or not).
A far better idea would be, for example, to withhold the TV rights money due to the Eagles for one year and give it to drug rehab services or some such.
I simply don't get it. How were they supposed to have stopped what happened on Tuesday? Anyway, as it won't be going to court for quite some time now, how can the AFL take any action until the case is completed?
And, if it is deemed to be appropriate to punish the Eagles, why take draft picks? I can't see how it is in any way an appropriate punishment, and its impact would be random and unpredictable (after all, there is no way of knowing whether or not the players who would have been drafted with the picks would have been any good or not).
A far better idea would be, for example, to withhold the TV rights money due to the Eagles for one year and give it to drug rehab services or some such.
"It is useless to attempt to reason a man out of a thing he was never reasoned into."
- Jonathan Swift
- Jonathan Swift