to both players now i will say it SLOWLY HOW TH FK DID HE KNOW TO TEL THEEEEM TO CHAT WITH THE SAINTS
![Rolling Eyes :roll:](./images/smilies/icon_rolleyes.gif)
![Rolling Eyes :roll:](./images/smilies/icon_rolleyes.gif)
![Rolling Eyes :roll:](./images/smilies/icon_rolleyes.gif)
![Rolling Eyes :roll:](./images/smilies/icon_rolleyes.gif)
![Rolling Eyes :roll:](./images/smilies/icon_rolleyes.gif)
![Rolling Eyes :roll:](./images/smilies/icon_rolleyes.gif)
![Rolling Eyes :roll:](./images/smilies/icon_rolleyes.gif)
![Rolling Eyes :roll:](./images/smilies/icon_rolleyes.gif)
Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators
C Gardiner aint a ruckmans left nutplugger66 wrote:Because the Saints wanted a ruckman. Is it that hard to understand.claystreet wrote:Neil Balme has said that they were told to go have a chat with the Saints
to both players now i will say it SLOWLY HOW TH FK DID HE KNOW TO TEL THEEEEM TO CHAT WITH THE SAINTS
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
I was talking about King. Gardiner is an extra that was going to be delisted. RL must see something in him.claystreet wrote:C Gardiner aint a ruckmans left nutplugger66 wrote:Because the Saints wanted a ruckman. Is it that hard to understand.claystreet wrote:Neil Balme has said that they were told to go have a chat with the Saints
to both players now i will say it SLOWLY HOW TH FK DID HE KNOW TO TEL THEEEEM TO CHAT WITH THE SAINTS
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Your all over the shop mate with speculation and no substance to your comments with that its beer oclock have a nice dayplugger66 wrote:I was talking about King. Gardiner is an extra that was going to be delisted. RL must see something in him.claystreet wrote:C Gardiner aint a ruckmans left nutplugger66 wrote:Because the Saints wanted a ruckman. Is it that hard to understand.claystreet wrote:Neil Balme has said that they were told to go have a chat with the Saints
to both players now i will say it SLOWLY HOW TH FK DID HE KNOW TO TEL THEEEEM TO CHAT WITH THE SAINTS
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Methinks Kenny must have accidently locked himself in his car during negotiations, (Or Ross Lyon locked kenny in there and hid the keys!) Whoever did it did well but if they were real good at negotiating they would have had Jimmy Bartell and Gary Abblett thrown in for pick 90 !!!!!killa_gram wrote:Supporters from other clubs seem to think we have done very well with our trading. Just interested to know about our feelings for Sheldon now. Do we love or hate him?
They have to use their LAST pick for father son NOT pick 90. IF they decide to pass on pick say...60....and then try and re enter to use pick 90 they cant do this.....but your a lawyer you knew this right????stinger wrote:plugger66 wrote:Only if they use their pick before that which I doubt. How can you see with those eyes rolling. ffs ffs ffsstinger wrote:plugger66 wrote: So why did they do the trade for a pick they will not use if they we not going to be delisted?
...because they can use pick 90 for their father/son selection.......ffs....![]()
![]()
they can use their last pick for their father son selection......pick 90......what are you smoking ffs.....
...talk about arguing with the mentally challenged......![]()
however any picks you receive in a trade need to be used dont they?Teflon wrote:They have to use their LAST pick for father son NOT pick 90. IF they decide to pass on pick say...60....and then try and re enter to use pick 90 they cant do this.....but your a lawyer you knew this right????stinger wrote:plugger66 wrote:Only if they use their pick before that which I doubt. How can you see with those eyes rolling. ffs ffs ffsstinger wrote:plugger66 wrote: So why did they do the trade for a pick they will not use if they we not going to be delisted?
...because they can use pick 90 for their father/son selection.......ffs....![]()
![]()
they can use their last pick for their father son selection......pick 90......what are you smoking ffs.....
...talk about arguing with the mentally challenged......![]()
plugger66 wrote:claystreet wrote:Dont care either way about KS havent bagged him
was surprised to see him back at the club though
dont believe hes had much to do with the draft
Peake and Lyon have done the work IMHO
Peakr would have nothing to do with it. Two people only would do it and they are KS and RL. Well done both of them.
I think you are right 4, Kenny may be the next delisting.4theluvoftheclub wrote:plugger66 wrote:claystreet wrote:Dont care either way about KS havent bagged him
was surprised to see him back at the club though
dont believe hes had much to do with the draft
Peake and Lyon have done the work IMHO
Peakr would have nothing to do with it. Two people only would do it and they are KS and RL. Well done both of them.
Sorry clay street, but you're misinformed, .
The 4 real players were Lyon, Peake (ex 2 IC recruiter at cats), Archie Fraser , and Tony Elshaug...Sheldon had very little role,
nice guy , but out of his depth
Behind Play wrote:4theluvoftheclub wrote:plugger66 wrote: The 4 real players were Lyon, Peake (ex 2 IC recruiter at cats), Archie Fraser , and Tony Elshaug...Sheldon had very little role,
nice guy , but out of his depth
I think you are right 4, Kenny may be the next delisting.
i don't normally try to set idiots straight...but the draft rules have been changed this year ..and you don"t have to use a traded pick..Teflon wrote:They have to use their LAST pick for father son NOT pick 90. IF they decide to pass on pick say...60....and then try and re enter to use pick 90 they cant do this.....but your a lawyer you knew this right????stinger wrote:plugger66 wrote:Only if they use their pick before that which I doubt. How can you see with those eyes rolling. ffs ffs ffsstinger wrote:plugger66 wrote: So why did they do the trade for a pick they will not use if they we not going to be delisted?
...because they can use pick 90 for their father/son selection.......ffs....![]()
![]()
they can use their last pick for their father son selection......pick 90......what are you smoking ffs.....
...talk about arguing with the mentally challenged......![]()
not any more...SaintBot wrote:
however any picks you receive in a trade need to be used dont they?
so in the end pick 90 will be their f/s unless they keep going till pick 97...
Sorry but you are wrong. The only real players in this draft were RL and KS. Happy for you to prove me wrong but that would be impossible. Peake had nothing to do with the Geelong trade as both players were going to be delisted because of salary cap pressure.4theluvoftheclub wrote:plugger66 wrote:claystreet wrote:Dont care either way about KS havent bagged him
was surprised to see him back at the club though
dont believe hes had much to do with the draft
Peake and Lyon have done the work IMHO
Peakr would have nothing to do with it. Two people only would do it and they are KS and RL. Well done both of them.
Sorry plugger 66 , but you're misinformed on this occassion, .
The 4 real players were Lyon, Peake (ex 2 IC recruiter at cats), Archie Fraser , and Tony Elshaug...Sheldon had very little role,
nice guy , but out of his depth
where is your proof...i know who i would prefer to believe...and it ain't you.....plugger66 wrote:Sorry but you are wrong. The only real players in this draft were RL and KS. Happy for you to prove me wrong but that would be impossible. Peake had nothing to do with the Geelong trade as both players were going to be delisted because of salary cap pressure.4theluvoftheclub wrote:plugger66 wrote:claystreet wrote:Dont care either way about KS havent bagged him
was surprised to see him back at the club though
dont believe hes had much to do with the draft
Peake and Lyon have done the work IMHO
Peakr would have nothing to do with it. Two people only would do it and they are KS and RL. Well done both of them.
Sorry plugger 66 , but you're misinformed on this occassion, .
The 4 real players were Lyon, Peake (ex 2 IC recruiter at cats), Archie Fraser , and Tony Elshaug...Sheldon had very little role,
nice guy , but out of his depth
No you are wrong how many people have to prove your wrongplugger66 wrote:Sorry but you are wrong. The only real players in this draft were RL and KS. Happy for you to prove me wrong but that would be impossible. Peake had nothing to do with the Geelong trade as both players were going to be delisted because of salary cap pressure.4theluvoftheclub wrote:plugger66 wrote:claystreet wrote:Dont care either way about KS havent bagged him
was surprised to see him back at the club though
dont believe hes had much to do with the draft
Peake and Lyon have done the work IMHO
Peakr would have nothing to do with it. Two people only would do it and they are KS and RL. Well done both of them.
Sorry plugger 66 , but you're misinformed on this occassion, .
The 4 real players were Lyon, Peake (ex 2 IC recruiter at cats), Archie Fraser , and Tony Elshaug...Sheldon had very little role,
nice guy , but out of his depth
And the other guy said we were after Schneider before the papers even mentioned it. Yes you are right he has plenty of credibility.stinger wrote:where is your proof...i know who i would prefer to believe...and it ain't you.....plugger66 wrote:Sorry but you are wrong. The only real players in this draft were RL and KS. Happy for you to prove me wrong but that would be impossible. Peake had nothing to do with the Geelong trade as both players were going to be delisted because of salary cap pressure.4theluvoftheclub wrote:plugger66 wrote:claystreet wrote:Dont care either way about KS havent bagged him
was surprised to see him back at the club though
dont believe hes had much to do with the draft
Peake and Lyon have done the work IMHO
Peakr would have nothing to do with it. Two people only would do it and they are KS and RL. Well done both of them.
Sorry plugger 66 , but you're misinformed on this occassion, .
The 4 real players were Lyon, Peake (ex 2 IC recruiter at cats), Archie Fraser , and Tony Elshaug...Sheldon had very little role,
nice guy , but out of his depth
plugger66 wrote:Sorry but you are wrong. The only real players in this draft were RL and KS. Happy for you to prove me wrong but that would be impossible. Peake had nothing to do with the Geelong trade as both players were going to be delisted because of salary cap pressure.4theluvoftheclub wrote:plugger66 wrote:claystreet wrote:Dont care either way about KS havent bagged him
was surprised to see him back at the club though
dont believe hes had much to do with the draft
Peake and Lyon have done the work IMHO
Peakr would have nothing to do with it. Two people only would do it and they are KS and RL. Well done both of them.
Sorry plugger 66 , but you're misinformed on this occassion, .
The 4 real players were Lyon, Peake (ex 2 IC recruiter at cats), Archie Fraser , and Tony Elshaug...Sheldon had very little role,
nice guy , but out of his depth
You can have your opinion I have mine and we differ on this occassion. If you have inside info look forward to more next season.4theluvoftheclub wrote:plugger66 wrote:Sorry but you are wrong. The only real players in this draft were RL and KS. Happy for you to prove me wrong but that would be impossible. Peake had nothing to do with the Geelong trade as both players were going to be delisted because of salary cap pressure.4theluvoftheclub wrote:plugger66 wrote:claystreet wrote:Dont care either way about KS havent bagged him
was surprised to see him back at the club though
dont believe hes had much to do with the draft
Peake and Lyon have done the work IMHO
Peakr would have nothing to do with it. Two people only would do it and they are KS and RL. Well done both of them.
Sorry plugger 66 , but you're misinformed on this occassion, .
The 4 real players were Lyon, Peake (ex 2 IC recruiter at cats), Archie Fraser , and Tony Elshaug...Sheldon had very little role,
nice guy , but out of his depth
No 66, actually,I hapen to have some inside stuff, and at the last minute, the cats tried for a different deal with some trade pick swaps, and it was
our knowledge of their true position that Peake had, AND Peake's input into the Elshaug/Lyon phone calls ealier to do a 3-way play involving the pitch for Blake at a high price, and then getting King and Gardiner toi want to come to us, that brought it home, with Elshaug and Fraser playing hardball...
Kenny was not involved, just too nice a guy...needs a bit more bastard in him to be a decent trader/negotiator IMO
plugger66 wrote:You can have your opinion I have mine and we differ on this occassion. If you have inside info look forward to more next season.4theluvoftheclub wrote:plugger66 wrote:Sorry but you are wrong. The only real players in this draft were RL and KS. Happy for you to prove me wrong but that would be impossible. Peake had nothing to do with the Geelong trade as both players were going to be delisted because of salary cap pressure.4theluvoftheclub wrote:plugger66 wrote:claystreet wrote:Dont care either way about KS havent bagged him
was surprised to see him back at the club though
dont believe hes had much to do with the draft
Peake and Lyon have done the work IMHO
Peakr would have nothing to do with it. Two people only would do it and they are KS and RL. Well done both of them.
Sorry plugger 66 , but you're misinformed on this occassion, .
The 4 real players were Lyon, Peake (ex 2 IC recruiter at cats), Archie Fraser , and Tony Elshaug...Sheldon had very little role,
nice guy , but out of his depth
No 66, actually,I hapen to have some inside stuff, and at the last minute, the cats tried for a different deal with some trade pick swaps, and it was
our knowledge of their true position that Peake had, AND Peake's input into the Elshaug/Lyon phone calls ealier to do a 3-way play involving the pitch for Blake at a high price, and then getting King and Gardiner toi want to come to us, that brought it home, with Elshaug and Fraser playing hardball...
Kenny was not involved, just too nice a guy...needs a bit more bastard in him to be a decent trader/negotiator IMO
4theluvoftheclub wrote:[
No probs..agree to disagree..and I'll keep trying for the inside info..!!
stinger wrote:yes ...but arranged by peake not that little f-wit sheldon....who had no role in any of the trades....ross doesn't trust him....and neither should anyone else...i know him quite well....do you??????plugger66 wrote:I will say it slowly. Geelong did it as a favour to King and Gardiner so they would Have a place to play before the PSD.stinger wrote:plugger66 wrote:
Had nothing to do with Peake. They did it before the PSD so the players would know where they are playing.
say again????????????????????![]()
![]()
you don't read much do you...otherwise you would have seen the two articles which pretty much quote king as saying that it was the least the club could do for him.......