We can still take 3 kids...(edited/ subject to Rookies)

saintsRrising · Fri 12 Oct 2007 3:36pm

We have already lost 7 players.

Clarke
GTrain
Thommo
Hamill
Voss
Raymond
Sweeney

We have picked up 4 and and we so can still take 3 kids

Picks 9, 42 and 58

plugger66 · Post: # 474251Post **plugger66** » Fri 12 Oct 2007 3:37pm

saintsRrising wrote:We have already lost 7 players.

Clarke
GTrain
Thommo
Hamill
Voss
Raymond
Sweeney

We have picked up 4 and and we so can still take 3 kids

Picks 9, 42 and 58

Plus Brooks will go and maybe either Watts or Rix.

stinger · Post: # 474252Post **stinger** » Fri 12 Oct 2007 3:37pm

saintsRrising wrote:We have already lost 7 players.

Clarke
GTrain
Thommo
Hamill
Voss
Raymond
Sweeney

We have picked up 4 and and we so can still take 3 kids

Picks 9, 42 and 58

can actually take 4....we only have one vet left......

cowboy18 · Post: # 474253Post **cowboy18** » Fri 12 Oct 2007 3:38pm

How does it affect our rookie management? Do we need to elevate/delist more than 3 now?

Saints Premiers 2008 · Fri 12 Oct 2007 3:38pm

charlie gardiner spells the end for either brookes or watts

one will be kept - most probably watts

saintsRrising · Fri 12 Oct 2007 3:41pm

stinger wrote:

can actually take 4....we only have one vet left......

I am not sure but I think that in 2007 we did not elect to call them vets in order that we could maximise the number of our rookies......

So 4 if Harv=vet is listed as a vet...3 if just as a player...but I am not sure on the exact rules.

cwrcyn · Post: # 474261Post **cwrcyn** » Fri 12 Oct 2007 3:41pm

Not necessarily, considering the big question mark over Michael Gardiner.

One thing for sure is that our pick number 9 will be used on a midfielder

saintbrat · Post: # 474264Post **saintbrat** » Fri 12 Oct 2007 3:42pm

stinger wrote:
saintsRrising wrote:We have already lost 7 players.

Clarke
GTrain
Thommo
Hamill
Voss
Raymond
Sweeney

We have picked up 4 and and we so can still take 3 kids

Picks 9, 42 and 58
can actually take 4....we only have one vet left......

we have our two vets from 2007 still on the list- Harves and Max- thommo wasn't a vet- Not for lack of trying by the saints over the last two years.

plugger66 · Post: # 474267Post **plugger66** » Fri 12 Oct 2007 3:44pm

saintbrat wrote:
stinger wrote:
saintsRrising wrote:We have already lost 7 players.

Clarke
GTrain
Thommo
Hamill
Voss
Raymond
Sweeney

We have picked up 4 and and we so can still take 3 kids

Picks 9, 42 and 58
can actually take 4....we only have one vet left......
we have our two vets from 2007 still on the list- Harves and Max- thommo wasn't a vet- Not for lack of trying by the saints over the last two years.

We didnt use the vets list this year so we could get 6 rookies. The same next year.

saintsRrising · Fri 12 Oct 2007 3:44pm

cwrcyn wrote:Not necessarily, considering the big question mark over Michael Gardiner.

One thing for sure is that our pick number 9 will be used on a midfielder

Maybe maybe not....I think that they would like to...

But there are som good running rucks who would then be ready to play when King and possibly Gardiner retire.....

and maybea young FB...who again will need several years.

It will depend alot on who is left...but yes given the 4 we picked up another mid would be a priority.

stinger · Post: # 474272Post **stinger** » Fri 12 Oct 2007 3:45pm

saintsRrising wrote:
stinger wrote:

can actually take 4....we only have one vet left......
I am not sure but I think that in 2007 we did not elect to call them vets in order that we could maximise the number of our rookies......

So 4 if Harv=vet is listed as a vet...3 if just as a player...but I am not sure on the exact rules.

right we didn't...but we could call harvey a vet this year...and take one less rookie...then add one more to the general list.....which would need four additions to top it back up to 38....plus banger....39...5 rookies =44......

Spinner · Post: # 474273Post **Spinner** » Fri 12 Oct 2007 3:46pm

Attard and Jones were elevated....Hows does this effect things?

saintsRrising · Fri 12 Oct 2007 3:47pm

Yes OOPPS forget about elevating 2 rookies.....

So that means we need to delist 1 or 2 players.

plugger66 · Post: # 474278Post **plugger66** » Fri 12 Oct 2007 3:47pm

Spinner wrote:Attard and Jones were elevated....Hows does this effect things?

Attard isnt promoted and not sure on CJ.

saintsRrising · Fri 12 Oct 2007 3:50pm

It might also mean that Geary may be left as a rookie too.....

However Schneider may mean that CJ's future is more limited?????

saintbrat · Post: # 474310Post **saintbrat** » Fri 12 Oct 2007 3:58pm

to my searching we nothing published on Saints delistings-
and true our Vets are included inside the list but still regarded as vets and paid as such?

Saint Mik · Post: # 474323Post **Saint Mik** » Fri 12 Oct 2007 4:04pm

Is there a ten year deal with the vetrans list?

Kingy has had 13 years or so at the catery so can he go on the vets list even though he is only 28 he has 13 years service to his name.

I heard him say thats the least they could do after 13 years service when asked about what geelong had done for him to get him to the saints.

plugger66 · Post: # 474327Post **plugger66** » Fri 12 Oct 2007 4:04pm

Saint Mik wrote:Is there a ten year deal with the vetrans list?

Kingy has had 13 years or so at the catery so can he go on the vets list even though he is only 28 he has 13 years service to his name.

I heard him say thats the least they could do after 13 years service when asked about what geelong had done for him to get him to the saints.

Same club and 30 years of age.

ausfatcat · Post: # 474330Post **ausfatcat** » Fri 12 Oct 2007 4:05pm

saint milk

A player has to play for a club for ten years to be a vet, and can only be a vet at the club they have played 10 years for.

Also as to the title of this thread... WE HAVE TO USE 3picks in the draft.

Dan Warna · Post: # 474343Post **Dan Warna** » Fri 12 Oct 2007 4:09pm

I hope CJ is cut, if we have to cut someone.

Harvey is a double veteran due to 20 years service so whatever he is paid is DEDUCTED from out TPP

Saint Mik · Post: # 474365Post **Saint Mik** » Fri 12 Oct 2007 4:16pm

Thanks for that

Ghost Like · Post: # 474367Post **Ghost Like** » Fri 12 Oct 2007 4:18pm

So if we elevate two rookies, (Geary / Eddy for example)

We will still need to chop two, is this correct? Chop 3 if we wish to take part in the PSD (one pick)?

We can still take 3 kids...(edited/ subject to Rookies)

We can still take 3 kids...(edited/ subject to Rookies)

Re: We can still take 3 kids...

Re: We can still take 3 kids...

Re: We can still take 3 kids...

Re: We can still take 3 kids...

Re: We can still take 3 kids...

Re: We can still take 3 kids...