I won't be at all upset if Brooks is delisted (though I think Gehrig's retirement's bought him 1 more year) I just don't see any point in trying to trade him... I also don't see the point in taking lots of picks just for the sake of it, there are one or two guys each year who get picked round 5 or later who make it - normally by rebuilding teams. I just don't see a lot to be excited about by getting rid of him other than stopping the arguments on Saintsational.TimeToShineFellas wrote:What would be the point of keeping him on the list for next year's delistings if his attitude and application doesn't change and he continues to stagnate in the magoos?BAM! (shhhh) wrote:but what is added by dumping even brooks given we're already likely taking at least 1 pick at the tail end of a draft without a strong tail? Save Brooks to be one of the 3 delistees next year.
I would rather use a late draft pick to develop a youngster than just hang onto Brooks for the sake of it.
![Wink ;)](./images/smilies/icon_wink.gif)
I actually think the most valuable thing we can do with the list spot is have it ready for a draftee from '08.